Prevalence of sleep apnea in unselected patients with atrial fibrillation by a home-monitoring device: The DAN-APNO study.

Background: Sleep apnea (SA), a modifiable risk factor in - atrial fibrillation (AF), is associated with worse outcomes in AF. We aimed to assess the prevalence and severity of SA in patients with AF, and, subsequently, to assess the positive predictive value (PPV) of moderate to severe SA by a home-monitoring device in comparison to cardio-respiratory monitoring (CRM) in consecutive patients with AF. Methods: This cross-sectional study recruited unselected patients with AF without known SA from an out-patient clinic at Department of Cardiology, Herlev-Gentofte University Hospital. Participants underwent four consecutive nights of sleep-recording with the home-monitoring device NightOwl™ (NO). Moderate SA was defined as an Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) of 15-29 and severe SA as ≥ 30 AHI. Participants with moderate to severe SA was offered CRM for validation of the diagnosis. Results: We included 126 patients with AF with a median age of 68 (interquartile range: 60-75) years, 42 (33 %) women, 70 (56 %) hypertension, 61 (48 %) hyperlipidemia and 49 (39 %) heart failure. NO detected severe SA in 36 (29 %) of patients with AF, moderate SA in 35 (28 %), mild SA in 45 (36 %) and no SA in 10 (8 %). Of 71 patients with moderate to severe SA by NO, 38 patients underwent CRM and the PPV of NO was 0.82 (31/38) to diagnose moderate SA and 0.92 (22/24) to diagnose severe SA by CRM. Conclusion: Moderate to severe SA by NO was highly prevalent in patients with AF without known SA. A home-monitoring device such as NO could be an easy and feasible SA screening tool in patients with AF.

The Validity of a New Procedure-Based Definition of Cancer Status in Patients with Breast-, Lung- and Colorectal Cancer in the Danish National Patient Registry.

Background/Aim: The Danish National Patient Registry (DNPR) provides unique epidemiological insight, but often lacks granular data. We propose a procedure-based definition of cancer status in patients with breast-, lung- and colorectal cancer, which can be applied to administrative health databases. New definitions of cancer status are needed as mortality and morbidity are closely linked to cancer status, yet most studies only use duration since cancer diagnosis as a severity marker. The aim of the study was to validate a new pragmatic definition. Methods: Medical journals of 600 patients, with breast-, lung- and colorectal cancer from the Department of Oncology at Herlev-Gentofte Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. We defined active cancer as a cancer diagnosis, not followed by a potentially curative procedure within 6 months of the diagnosis. The remaining patients were characterized as having non-active cancer. This dichotomization was then compared to a cancer status assessment based on treatment received and paraclinical test such as their first post-procedural control scan. Based on this comparison, we calculated the positive predictive value (PPV) of our definitions of active and non-active cancer. Results: The calculated PPVs for active breast-, lung- and colorectal cancer were 87% (CI 95%: 0.74-0.99), 91% (CI 95%: 0.87-0.96) and 82% (CI 95%: 0.73-0.91). The PPVs for non-active breast-, lung- and colorectal cancer were 95% (CI 95%: 0.92-0.99), 91% (CI 95%: 0.82-0.99) and 73% (CI 95%: 0.66-0.81), respectively. Conclusion: We found an overall high PPV for both active and non-active cancer across all three types of cancer.

Adverse Events Associated With Coprescription of Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitors and Oral Organic Nitrates in Male Patients With Ischemic Heart Disease : A Case-Crossover Study.

BACKGROUND: Concomitant use of oral organic nitrates (nitrates) and phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors is contraindicated. OBJECTIVE: To measure temporal trends in the coprescription of nitrates and PDE5 inhibitors and to measure the association between cardiovascular outcomes and the coprescription of nitrates with PDE5 inhibitors. DESIGN: Case-crossover design. SETTING: Nationwide study of Danish patients from 2000 to 2018. PATIENTS: Male patients with International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) codes for ischemic heart disease (IHD), including those who had a continuing prescription for nitrates and a new, filled prescription for PDE5 inhibitors. MEASUREMENTS: Two composite outcomes were measured: 1) cardiac arrest, shock, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, or acute coronary arteriography and 2) syncope, angina pectoris, or drug-related adverse event. RESULTS: From 2000 to 2018, 249 541 male patients with IHD were identified. Of these, 42 073 patients had continuing prescriptions for nitrates. During this period, the prescription rate for PDE5 inhibitors in patients with IHD who were taking nitrates increased from an average of 0.9 prescriptions (95% CI, 0.5 to 1.2 prescriptions) per 100 persons per year in 2000 to 19.5 prescriptions (CI, 18.0 to 21.1 prescriptions) in 2018. No statistically significant association was found between the coprescription of nitrates with PDE5 inhibitors and the risk for either composite outcome (odds ratio [OR], 0.58 [CI, 0.28 to 1.13] for the first outcome and OR, 0.73 [CI, 0.40 to 1.32] for the second outcome). LIMITATION: An assumption was made that concurrently filled prescriptions for nitrates and PDE5 inhibitors equaled concomitant use. CONCLUSION: From 2000 to 2018, the use of PDE5 inhibitors increased 20-fold among Danish patients with IHD who were taking nitrates. A statistically significant association between concomitant use of these medications and cardiovascular adverse events could not be identified. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Ib Mogens Kristiansens Almene Fond and Helsefonden.

Protocol for detecting unrecognized sleep apnea in patients with atrial fibrillation by a home-monitoring device: the DAN-APNO study.

BACKGROUND: Determining the presence of modifiable risk factors for atrial fibrillation (AF), such as sleep apnea is of clinical importance due to the potential impact targeting these risk factors can have on the progression and burden of AF. Using new digital-based technology is a promising solution to the underreporting of sleep apnea highlighted by academical societies in recent years. The aim of this study is to report the prevalence and severity of sleep apnea in patients with AF and, secondarily, assess the accuracy and feasibility of a new home-screening device for sleep apnea (NightOwl™ by Ectosense). METHODS: DAN-APNO is a cross-sectional study at the Department of Cardiology, Herlev-Gentofte Hospital recruiting patients with AF referred to anticoagulation initiation aged 18 to 90 years without known sleep apnea. At least 150 patients will be recruited and undergo medical history, clinical evaluation, several sleep-apnea questionnaires, and a sleep-recording evaluation for four nights with sleep apnea home-monitoring device NightOwl™. Additionally, the first 20 participants and participants with moderate-severe sleep apnea by screening are referred to cardio-respiratory monitoring (CRM). This clinical evaluation allows the comparison of standard evaluation method and the NightOwl™. Clinical measures include Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI), Oxygen Desaturation Index (ODI), pulse rate, as well as questionaries about sleep apnea assessment and the clinical feasibility of the NightOwl™ device. Main outcomes comprise analysis of the prevalence and severity of sleep apnea, and clinical and demographic predictors of moderate and severe sleep apnea. In addition, correlation analyses for accuracy measures between CRM and NightOwl™ will be conducted along with patient ease-of-use and satisfaction questionnaires. DISCUSSION: This study is limited by selection bias; only patients with atrial fibrillation from anticoagulation clinic is asked to participate, which could limit the generalizability of our results. However, this study aims to test whether a miniaturized simple home-monitoring device for detecting sleep apnea in patients with AF potentially can evaluate sleep apnea more conveniently and easier. Trial Registration The study is registered the 18-02-2021 at clinicaltrials.gov with registration number: NCT04760002.

Bleeding Risk Following Systemic Fluconazole or Topical Azoles in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation on Apixaban, Rivaroxaban, or Dabigatran.

BACKGROUND: Bleeding safety in relation to use of systemic fluconazole and topical azoles among patients with atrial fibrillation treated with apixaban, rivaroxaban, or dabigatran is insufficiently explored, despite clinical relevance and several reports suggesting associations. METHODS: Using nationwide Danish registers, we identified patients with atrial fibrillation initiated on apixaban, rivaroxaban, or dabigatran from 2012-2018. We investigated associations between bleeding incidents and systemic fluconazole or topical azole treatment using a case-crossover design with 30-day exposure windows and reported odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: We included 32,340 (36%), 32,409 (36%), and 24,940 (28%) patients initiated on apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran, respectively. Patients on apixaban were older (median age: 77 years; interquartile range [IQR] 70-84) compared with rivaroxaban users (median age: 75 years; IQR 68-82) and patients on dabigatran (median age: 73 years; IQR 66-80). Apixaban users had a significantly increased risk of bleeding following exposure to systemic fluconazole: odds ratio (OR) 3.5; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.4-10.6. No increased risk was found among rivaroxaban and dabigatran users: ORs of 0.9 (95% CI, 0.2-3.0) and 1.7 (95% CI, 0.5-5.6), respectively. As to bleeding risk pertaining to topical azole exposure among apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran users, no association was found, with corresponding ORs of 0.8 (95% CI, 0.5-1.3); 1.3 (95% CI, 0.9-2.1); and 1.2 (95% CI 0.8-1.8), respectively. CONCLUSION: In patients with atrial fibrillation on either apixaban, rivaroxaban, or dabigatran, an association between an elevated bleeding risk and use of systemic fluconazole was found among patients on apixaban. We found no increased risk of bleeding following co-exposure to topical azoles.

Gastrointestinal bleeding risk following concomitant treatment with oral glucocorticoids in patients on non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants.

OBJECTIVE: Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) risk in relation to concomitant treatment with non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOAC) and oral glucocorticoids is insufficiently explored. We aimed to investigate the short-term risk following coexposure. METHODS: This is a register-based, nationwide Danish study including patients with atrial fibrillation on NOACs during 2012-2018. Patients were defined as exposed to oral glucocorticoids if they claimed a prescription within 60 days prior to GIB. We investigated the associations between GIB and oral glucocorticoid exposure, reporting HRs via a nested case-control design and absolute risk via a cohort design. Matching terms were age, sex, calendar year, follow-up time and NOAC agent. RESULTS: 98 376 patients on NOACs (median age: 75 years (IQR: 68-82), 44% female) were included, and 16% redeemed at least one oral glucocorticoid prescription within 3 years. HRs of GIB were increased comparing exposed with non-exposed patients (<20 mg daily dose, HR 1.54 (95% CI 1.29 to 1.84); ≥20 mg daily dose, HR 2.19 (95% CI 1.81 to 2.65)). 60-day standardised absolute risk of GIB following first claimed oral glucocorticoid prescription increased compared with non-exposed: 60-day absolute risk: 0.71% (95% CI 0.58% to 0.85%) vs 0.38% (95% CI 0.32% to 0.43%). The relative risk was elevated as well: risk ratio of 1.89 (95% CI 1.43 to 2.36). CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant treatment with NOACs and oral glucocorticoids was associated with a short-term rate and risk increase of GIB compared with patients only on NOACs. This could have implications for clinical management, necessitating closer monitoring or other risk mitigation strategies during episodes of cotreatment with oral glucocorticoids.