Comparing the effects of pulsed and radiofrequency catheter ablation on quality of life, anxiety, and depression of patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia: a single-center, randomized, single-blind, standard-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) may lead to decreased quality of life (QOL) and increased anxiety and depression in patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT), possibly due to the lack of selectivity of the ablation tissue and the long ablation time. In recent years, pulsed field ablation (PFA) has been used for the first time in China to treat PSVT patients because of its ability to ablate abnormal tissue sites in a precise and transient manner. This study was conducted to compare the effects of PFA and RFCA on QOL and psychological symptoms of PSVT patients. METHODS: We have designed a single-center, randomized, single-blind, standard-controlled trial. A total of 50 participants who met the eligibility criteria would be randomly allocated into the PFA group or RFCA group in a 1:1 ratio. All participants were assessed using the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at pre-procedure (T0), post-procedure (T1), and 3 months post-procedure (T2). The SPSS 21.0 software was used to analyze the data through Wilcoxon and Fisher's exact tests and repeated measures ANOVA. RESULTS: Twenty-five in the PFA group and 24 in the RFCA group completed the trial. SF-36: (1) Between-group comparison: At T1, PFA group had significantly higher SF-36 scores on physiological function (PF) and general health (GH) than RFCA group, with a treatment difference of 5.61 points and 18.51 points(P < 0.05). (2) Within-group comparison: We found that in the PFA and RFCA groups, T2 showed significant improvement in the remaining 6 subscales of the SF-36 scale compared to T1 and T0 (P < 0.05), except for body pain (BP) and social function (SF) scores. HADS: (1) Between-group comparison: no significant difference (P > 0.05). (2) Within-group comparison: The HADS scores of the PFA and RFCA groups were statistically significant at T2 compared to T0 and T1 (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our study provided new and meaningful evidence that PFA was effective in significantly improving QOL and decreasing anxiety and depression in PFA patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2200060272.

Do atrophic gastritis and intestinal metaplasia reverse after Helicobacter pylori eradication?

BACKGROUND: It's still controversial whether Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication can reverse atrophic gastritis (AG) and intestinal metaplasia (IM). Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to estimate the effect of H. pylori eradication on AG and IM. METHODS: We searched the PubMed, Web of Science and EMBASE datasets through April 2023 for epidemiological studies, which provided mean glandular atrophy (GA) or IM score before and after H. pylori eradication, or provided ORs, RRs or HRs and 95% CIs for the association of AG or IM with H. pylori eradication. Weighted mean difference (WMD) and pooled ORs and 95%CIs were used to estimate the effect of H. pylori eradication on AG and IM. RESULTS: Twenty articles with a total of 5242 participants were included in this meta-analysis. H. pylori eradication significantly decreased GA score in the antrum (WMD -0.36; 95% CI: -0.52, -0.19, p < 0.01), GA score in the corpus (WMD -0.35; 95% CI: -0.52, -0.19, p < 0.01), IM score in the antrum (WMD -0.16; 95% CI: -0.26, -0.07, p < 0.01) and IM score in the corpus (WMD -0.20; 95% CI: -0.37, -0.04, p = 0.01). H. pylori eradication significantly improved AG (pooled OR 2.96; 95% CI: 1.70, 5.14, p < 0.01) and IM (pooled OR 2.41; 95% CI: 1.24, 4.70, p < 0.01). The association remained significant in the subgroup analyses by study design, sites of lesions, regions and follow-up time. Although Publication bias was observed for AG, the association remained significant after trim-and-fill adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: H. pylori eradication could significantly improve AG and IM at early stage.

Gastric Cancer Screening Methods: A Comparative Study of the Chinese New Gastric Cancer Screening Score and Kyoto Classification of Gastritis.

Objective: To evaluate the Chinese new gastric cancer screening score (i.e., Li's score) and Kyoto Classification of Gastritis for screening gastric cancer. Methods: A total of 702 patients were scored using the two scoring methods. Gastric atrophy, intestinal metaplasia, and gastric cancer (including early gastric cancer) were compared between the two scoring methods. The area under the ROC curve, sensitivity, and specificity of the two scoring methods were evaluated. Results: Both of the two scoring methods found that gastric atrophy, intestinal metaplasia, and gastric cancer (including early gastric cancer) were all significantly higher in the medium-risk and high-risk group patients than those in the low-risk group patients. According to the Kyoto Classification of Gastritis, patients in the high-risk group had more gastric atrophy, intestinal metaplasia, and gastric cancer than those in the medium-risk group patients. Gastric atrophy, intestinal metaplasia, and gastric cancer in the low-risk and medium-risk group patients evaluated by the Li score were all significantly higher than those in patients with corresponding risk level evaluated by Kyoto Classification of Gastritis, respectively. The area under the ROC curve of the Li score was 0.702, and the sensitivity and specificity were 57.6% and 85.3%, respectively. The area under the ROC curve of the Kyoto Classification of Gastritis was 0.826, and the sensitivity and specificity were 75.4% and 83.6%, respectively. Conclusion: Both Li's score and Kyoto Classification of Gastritis showed good screening value for gastric cancer, but Kyoto Classification of Gastritis was more sensitive than the Li score.

Low circadian clock genes expression in cancers: A meta-analysis of its association with clinicopathological features and prognosis.

BACKGROUND: Per1, Per2, Per3, Cry1, Cry2, Bmal1, Npas2 and CLOCK genes are the eight core circadian clock genes. Low expression of these circadian clock genes plays an important role in the progression of cancers. However, its clinicopathological and prognostic value in patients with cancers remains controversial and inconclusive. We performed a meta-analysis of studies assessing the clinicopathological and prognostic significance of low expression of these genes in cancers. METHODS: Relevant studies were searched from the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, EBSCO, Ovid, PubMed, Science Direct, Wiley Online Library database, CNKI and Wan Fang database. The meta-analysis was performed by using STATA version 12 software. A random-effect model was employed to evaluate all pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and odd ratios (ORs). RESULTS: A total of 36 studies comprising 7476 cases met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis suggested that low expression of Per1 was associated with poor differentiation (Per1: OR=2.30, 95%CI: 1.36∼3.87, P=0.002) and deeper invasion depth (Per1: OR=2.12, 95%CI: 1.62∼2.77, Ρ<0.001); low Per2 expression was correlated with poor differentiation (Per2: OR=2.41, 95%CI: 1.53∼3.79, Ρ<0.001), worse TNM stage (Per2:OR=3.47, 95%CI: 1.88∼6.42, P<0.001) and further metastasis (Per2:OR=2.35, 95%CI: 1.35∼4.11, Ρ=0.003). Furthermore, the results revealed that low expressions of Per1 and Per2 were also correlated with poor overall survival of cancers (Per1: HR=1.35, 95%CI: 1.06∼1.72, P=0.014; Per2: HR=1.43, 95%CI: 1.10∼1.85, P=0.007). Subgroup analysis indicated that low Per1 and Per2 expressions were especially associated with poor prognosis of gastrointestinal caners (Per1: HR=1.33, 95%CI: 1.14∼1.55, Ρ<0.001, Ι2=4.2%; Per2: HR=1.62, 95%CI: 1.25∼2.18, P<0.001, I2=0.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggested that low Per1, Per2 and Npas2 expression played a distinct and crucial role in progression of cancers. Low expressions of Per1 and Per2 could serve as unfavorable indicators for cancers prognosis, especially for gastrointestinal cancers.