Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Technol Cancer Res Treat ; 23: 15330338241229367, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38297814

RESUMO

Objective: To investigate the dosimetric effects of using individualized silicone rubber (SR) bolus on the target area and organs at risk (OARs) during postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT), as well as evaluate skin acute radiation dermatitis (ARD). Methods: A retrospective study was performed on 30 patients with breast cancer. Each patient was prepared with an individualized SR bolus of 3 mm thickness. Fan-beam computed tomography (FBCT) was performed at the first and second fractions, and then once a week for a total of 5 times. Dosimetric metrics such as homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CI), skin dose (SD), and OARs including the heart, lungs, and spinal cord were compared between the original plan and the FBCTs. The acute side effects were recorded. Results: In targets' dosimetric metrics, there were no significant differences in Dmean and V105% between planning computed tomography (CT) and actual treatments (P > .05), while the differences in D95%, V95%, HI, and CI were statistically significant (P < .05). In OARs, there were no significant differences between the Dmean, V5, and V20 of the affected lung, V5 of the heart and Dmax of the spinal cord (P > .05) except the V30 of affected lung, which was slightly lower than the planning CT (P < .05). In SD, both Dmax and Dmean in actual treatments were increased than plan A, and the difference was statistically significant (P < .05), while the skin-V20 and skin-V30 has no difference. Among the 30 patients, only one patient had no skin ARD, and 5 patients developed ARD of grade 2, while the remaining 24 patients were grade 1. Conclusion: The OR bolus showed good anastomoses and high interfraction reproducibility with the chest wall, and did not cause deformation during irradiation. It ensured accurate dose delivery of the target and OARs during the treatment, which may increase SD by over 101%. In this study, no cases of grade 3 skin ARD were observed. However, the potential of using OR bolus to reduce grade 1 and 2 skin ARD warrants further investigation with a larger sample size.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Dermatite , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada , Humanos , Feminino , Neoplasias da Mama/radioterapia , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Elastômeros de Silicone , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador/métodos , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Estudos Retrospectivos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Mastectomia/efeitos adversos , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada/efeitos adversos , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada/métodos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Dermatite/cirurgia , Órgãos em Risco/efeitos da radiação
2.
BMC Med Imaging ; 22(1): 123, 2022 07 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35810273

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Accurate contouring of the clinical target volume (CTV) is a key element of radiotherapy in cervical cancer. We validated a novel deep learning (DL)-based auto-segmentation algorithm for CTVs in cervical cancer called the three-channel adaptive auto-segmentation network (TCAS). METHODS: A total of 107 cases were collected and contoured by senior radiation oncologists (ROs). Each case consisted of the following: (1) contrast-enhanced CT scan for positioning, (2) the related CTV, (3) multiple plain CT scans during treatment and (4) the related CTV. After registration between (1) and (3) for the same patient, the aligned image and CTV were generated. Method 1 is rigid registration, method 2 is deformable registration, and the aligned CTV is seen as the result. Method 3 is rigid registration and TCAS, method 4 is deformable registration and TCAS, and the result is generated by a DL-based method. RESULTS: From the 107 cases, 15 pairs were selected as the test set. The dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of method 1 was 0.8155 ± 0.0368; the DSC of method 2 was 0.8277 ± 0.0315; the DSCs of method 3 and 4 were 0.8914 ± 0.0294 and 0.8921 ± 0.0231, respectively. The mean surface distance and Hausdorff distance of methods 3 and 4 were markedly better than those of method 1 and 2. CONCLUSIONS: The TCAS achieved comparable accuracy to the manual delineation performed by senior ROs and was significantly better than direct registration.


Assuntos
Aprendizado Profundo , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero , Algoritmos , Feminino , Humanos , Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador/métodos , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador/métodos , Espécies Reativas de Oxigênio , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/radioterapia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA