Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am Surg ; 89(11): 4668-4674, 2023 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36120831

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patients with rib fractures have variable clinical courses and it is difficult to predict which patients will do poorly. Ideally this prediction would happen at the time of admission to facilitate effective triage. One scoring system devised to this end, is the Battle score. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of the Battle score as triage tool, and to re-tool it for performance in an inpatient trauma setting. METHODS: A multivariate logistic regression model was trained on patients admitted to a level one trauma center with at least one rib fracture. A composite outcome was used to classify those who had poor outcomes. Eighteen candidate predictors were analyzed in univariate analysis, then the most promising fed into the logistic model until a triage score was built and internally validated by bootstrapping. RESULTS: Of the 838 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 145 (17.3%) patients had a defined poor outcome. The relevant predictors included in the final scoring system were number of ribs fractured, chest tube, pulmonary contusions, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and Glasgow coma score. Age was not found to be predictive. This score was found to have higher fidelity in predicting poor outcomes than the original Battle score (AUROC .858 vs .649.). DISCUSSION: An easy to calculate clinical scoring system was created to triage patients with rib fractures at the time of admission. Age may be of less importance than previously thought, while injury burden and history of lung disease may play a larger role.


Assuntos
Pneumopatias , Fraturas das Costelas , Traumatismos Torácicos , Humanos , Fraturas das Costelas/complicações , Fraturas das Costelas/terapia , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Costelas , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
Cancer Manag Res ; 10: 653-661, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29670399

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To investigate the association of age and sex on survival in non-metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients and to identify groups at high risk for poor outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 5,047 non-metastatic CRC patients from 2008 to 2013. Data regarding age at diagnosis; gender; tumor site; tumor stage; differentiation; lymphatic, neural or vascular invasion; and survival outcomes were collected. Patients were stratified into 10-year age groups (≤35, 36-45, 46-55, 56-65, 66-75, >75) and then further analyzed in three age groups (≤35, 36-75, >75). Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using univariate and multivariate Cox regression models. RESULTS: Of the 5,047 eligible patients, 41.3% were female. The tumor stages were balanced between the genders. In the female patients, the tumor stages were similarly distributed among the different age groups, while younger male patients were diagnosed with more advanced disease (P<0.001 for trend). When stratified into three age groups, young females experienced significantly poorer survival than young males (DFS: hazard ratio [HR]=1.85 [1.04-3.30], OS: HR=2.65 [1.11-6.34]). After adjusting for tumor stage, site, differentiated grade and lymphatic or vascular invasion status, females ≤35 and >75 had shorter DFS than patients between 36 and 75 years old (HR=1.57 [1.03-2.38] and HR=1.51 [1.11-2.05, respectively]), while there was no difference in DFS between females ≤35 and those >75. For male patients, older age was associated with poorer OS after the same adjustment. CONCLUSION: Young female CRC patients (≤35 years old) had the poorest DFS and quite poor OS compared to the other age groups. This emphasizes the need for health care providers to have a heightened awareness and to conduct further research when caring for young female CRC patients.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA