Achieving global surgical excellence: an evidence-based framework to guide surgical quality improvement programs in low and middle income countries.

Objectives: There is a lack of evidence-based guidelines for enhancing global surgical care delivery. We propose a set of recommendations to serve as a framework to guide surgical quality improvement and scale-up initiatives in low and middle income countries (LMICs). Methods: From January-December 2019, we reviewed the available literature and their application toward LMIC settings. The first initiative was the establishment of Best Practices Recommendations intended to summarize best-level evidence around quality improvement processes that have shown to decrease morbidity and mortality in LMICs. The GRADE level of evidence and strength of the recommendation were assigned in accordance with the WHO handbook for guidelines development. The second initiative was the scale-up of principles and practices by establishing international expert consensus on the optimal organization of surgical services in LMICs using a modified Delphi methodology. Results: Recommendations for three topic areas were established: reducing surgical site infections, improving quality of trauma systems, and interventions to reduce maternal and perinatal mortality. 27 studies were included in a quantitative synthesis and meta-analysis for interventions reducing surgical site infections, 27 studies for interventions improving the quality of trauma systems, and 14 studies for interventions reducing maternal and perinatal mortality. Using Delphi methodology, an international expert panel established consensus that district hospitals should place the highest priority on developing surgical services for low complexity, high volume conditions. At the national level, emergency and essential surgical care should be integrated within national Universal Health Coverage frameworks. Conclusions: This project fills a critical cap in the rapidly developing field of global surgery: gathering evidence-based, practical, and cost-effective solutions that will serve as a guide for the efficient planning and allocation of resources necessary to promote quality and safe essential surgical services in LMICs.

Have Factors Influencing Female Medical Students' Intention to Pursue a Career in Surgery Changed over the Last 10 Years? A Systematic Review.

In 2012, a systematic review reported on factors influencing female medical students, career intentions for surgery. This current review is a direct follow-up of that article with the aim of assessing whether factors affecting female medical student career choices have changed over the last decade. This review has identified access to research opportunities as a new factor that can be used to promote female medical student and trainee interest in surgery. Other factors have largely remained unchanged over the last 10 years, such as lack of access to leave, part-time work, and same-gender role models.

A systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing treatments for anal fissure.

BACKGROUND: There are multiple treatments for anal fissures. These range from medical treatment to surgical procedures, such as sphincterotomy. The aim of this study was to compare the relative clinical outcomes and effectiveness of interventional treatments for anal fissure. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials were identified by means of a PRISMA-compliant systematic review using the Medline, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases. Inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials comparing treatments for anal fissure. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed using BUGSnet package in R. Outcomes of interest were healing (6-8-, 10-16-, and >16-week follow-up), symptom recurrence, pain (measured on a visual analog scale), and fecal or flatus incontinence. PROPSERO Registration: CRD42021229615. RESULTS: Sixty-nine randomized controlled trials were included in the analysis. Lateral sphincterotomy remains the treatment with the highest odds of healing compared to botulinum toxin and medical therapy at all follow-up time points. There was no significant difference in healing between botulinum toxin and medical therapy at any time point. Advancement flap showed similar effectiveness compared to lateral sphincterotomy. Medical treatment and botulinum toxin had the highest pain scores at follow-up. Sphincterotomy had the highest odds of fecal and flatus incontinence. CONCLUSION: Lateral sphincterotomy had the highest rates of healing and should be considered as the definitive treatment after failed initial therapy with botulinum toxin or medical treatment. Botulinum toxin was equally effective compared to medical treatment. Advancement flap shows similar effectiveness compared to lateral sphincterotomy, but more studies are needed to evaluate its efficacy.

Detection of Anastomotic Leakage Following Elective Colonic Surgery: Results of the Prospective Biomarkers and Anastomotic Leakage (BALL) Study.

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leakage (AL) is an infrequent but life-threatening surgical complication following colorectal surgery. Early diagnosis remains clinically difficult but is a necessity to reduce associated morbidity and mortality. Clinical review and radiological modalities for the diagnosis of leakage remain non-specific and often only detect AL once it is well developed. Inflammatory biomarkers however have shown promise in early pre-clinical detection of leakage following colorectal surgery. METHODS: A multi-center, prospective observational study was conducted across four public hospitals in Auckland and Christchurch, New Zealand. Consecutive adults undergoing elective colectomy were initially recruited over a 3-y period. Perioperative blood samples were collected to measure interleukin (IL)-6, IL-1ß, tumor necrosis factor α, IL-10, C-reactive protein (CRP), leukocyte and neutrophil counts. Statistical analysis was performed to compare patients with an uncomplicated recovery with patients with AL. RESULTS: Sixteen patients developed AL (5.7%), diagnosed at a median post-operative (POD) day 7. CRP and IL-6 were consistently elevated in the early post-operative period in patients with AL, and had the best diagnostic accuracy on POD 3 (area under the curve 0.70; P = 0.02) and POD 1 (area under the curve 0.69; P = 0.02), respectively. IL-10, once adjusted for body mass index and surgical approach, was the sole biomarker significantly elevated in patients with AL on POD 4. CONCLUSIONS: Early post-operative elevations of CRP and IL-6 provide utility for early detection of AL after elective colectomy. Application of these inflammatory biomarkers and their combinations in daily practice warrants further investigation.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of topical sphincterotomy treatments for anal fissure.

BACKGROUND: Anal fissure is a common condition that can be treated medically or surgically. Chemical sphincterotomy is often used before surgical intervention. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of topical agents for chemical sphincterotomy on healing of anal fissures and side-effects. METHODS: A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) compliant systematic review was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, and CENTRAL databases. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials which compared topical sphincterotomy agents with topical placebo agents or each other. Studies that included surgical treatments were excluded. Overall evidence was synthesized according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) approach. RESULTS: Thirty-seven studies met the study selection criteria. Seventeen studies show that glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) was significantly more likely to heal anal fissure than placebo (relative risk (RR) = 1.96, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) = 1.35-2.84, I2 = 80%). Eleven studies showed a marginally significant difference between healing rates for diltiazem vs GTN, RR = 1.16, (1.01-1.33) I2 = 48%. There was no significant difference in healing between diltiazem and placebo, RR = 1.65, (0.64-4.23), I2 = 92%. GTN significantly reduced pain on the visual analog scale compared to the placebo group, MD-0.97 (-1.64 to -0.29) I2 = 92%. There was high certainty of evidence that GTN was significantly more likely to cause headache than placebo (RR = 2.73 (1.82-4.10) I2 = 58%) and diltiazem RR = 6.88 (2.19-21.63) I2 = 17%. CONCLUSION: There is low certainty evidence topical nitrates are an effective treatment for anal fissure healing and pain reduction compared to placebo. Despite widespread use of topical diltiazem, more evidence is required to establish the effectiveness of calcium channel blockers compared to placebo.