Predictability and durability of mitral valve repair in patients with severe degenerative mitral regurgitation in medium sized centres.

INTRODUCTION: Mitral valve repair (MVr) is now the treatment of choice to correct severe degenerative mitral regurgitation (MR). Repair rates vary greatly from centre to centre, and the concept of heart valve centres of excellence has been established. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to see whether large international centre repair rates, and outcomes, are transferrable to medium-sized centres with an interest in mitral repair. METHODS: Between 2011 and 2018, a total of 346 patients underwent mitral valve surgery by a single surgeon. Of these, 238 consecutive patients had repairs, or attempted repairs for degenerative MR, and are included in this study. RESULTS: The study sample consisted of 71% male patients and had a mean age of 64.4 ± 12.3 years; 66% of the study population had concomitant procedures. The overall repair rate in this cohort is 99%. Mean follow up was 3.7 ± 1.9 years. At 5 years, the freedom from MR ≥ 3+ was 95.9 ± 1.9% and at 7 years 91.1 ± 3.8%. Freedom from reoperation at 5 years was 92.9 ± 3.7%, while the 5 years actuarial survival was 89.1 ± 3.7%. On a multivariate analysis, predischarge echo grade was associated with higher risk of future reoperation (odds ratio (OR) = 21.82, p = 0.05). Only age (OR = 1.3, p = 0.03) was predictive of long-term survival. CONCLUSIONS: In specialised medium-sized heart centres, where the surgical team have undergone specialist mitral training, favourable short- and long-term outcomes are achievable with mitral repair rates similar to those from large international centres of excellence. In these heart centres, early surgery should be considered for all patients with severe degenerative MR.

An awareness and prevalence study of Irish cold-water athletes and external auditory canal exostoses.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the awareness, otological symptoms and prevalence of external auditory canal exostoses in Irish cold-water athletes. METHOD: An online and in person cross-sectional survey was undertaken with Irish cold-water athletes to explore athletes' awareness, known prevalence of external auditory canal exostoses and attitudes towards preventive measures. RESULTS: Of the 926 participants surveyed, 67.5 per cent were aware of external auditory canal exostoses. Triathletes reported the lowest awareness (39.9 per cent) among water athletes. A total of 9.7 per cent (n = 90) had previously been diagnosed with external auditory canal exostoses and 46.7 per cent (n = 42) were non-surfers. Ear symptoms were reported in 76 per cent of athletes. Otoscopic examinations showed that 23.7 per cent had external auditory canal exostoses, 3.6 per cent of whom were aware of their diagnosis. CONCLUSION: The majority of Irish surfing athletes are aware of external auditory canal exostoses. There is less awareness with regard to Ireland's newly emerging sports such as open water swimming and triathlons. Over 90 per cent of athletes surveyed had no idea they had external auditory canal exostoses, which highlights the need to increase public awareness.

Association between thyroid nodule size and malignancy rate.

INTRODUCTION: The diagnostic performance of ultrasound-fine needle aspiration to identify thyroid nodules harbouring malignancy remains variable. The aim of this study was to determine thyroid nodule size and cytological classification as predictors of malignancy risk. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis at an academic hospital involving 499 consecutive patients who underwent thyroid surgery between 2004 and 2015. RESULTS: A total of 503 thyroid nodules (499 patients, 84% female; mean age 50.8 years, standard deviation, SD, 15.4 years) were analysed. Of these, 19.5% were malignant. The mean (± SD) nodule size was 3.28 ± 1.63 cm and 3.27 ± 1.54 cm for benign and malignant nodules, respectively. The odds of malignancy for thyroid nodules less than 3.0 cm was similar to those for nodules of 3.0 cm or greater (0.26 compared with 0.29; p=0.77). Overall, the sensitivity and specificity of fine-needle aspiration in this cohort were 71.4% and 100%, respectively. The overall false negative rate was 5.4%. When the cut-off of 3.0 cm was used, the false negative rate in thyroid nodules less than 3.0 cm was 0% compared with 7.0% in nodules of 3.0 cm or greater. Thus, class (p<0.01) but not nodule size (p=0.49), was associated with higher malignancy risk. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that thyroid nodule size did not accurately predict the risk of thyroid malignancy irrespective of fine-needle aspiration cytology. Routine diagnostic thyroid lobectomy solely owing to thyroid nodule size of 3.0 cm or greater is currently not justified.

The utility of the radionuclide probe in parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism.

INTRODUCTION Parathyroidectomy is the definitive treatment for primary hyperparathyroidism but the intraoperative identification of adenomas is challenging. The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of a radionuclide probe (RNP) in addition to intraoperative parathyroid hormone ( IOPTH) measurement as an intraoperative diagnostic adjunct in patients undergoing parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism. METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study of patients treated between 2004 and 2015 in a university affiliated teaching hospital. Patients were grouped into those with RNP use (RNP+) and those without (RNP-). The primary outcome measure was rate of operative failure, which included false positives. The diagnostic sensitivity and positive predictive value of both RNP and IOPTH were also evaluated. RESULTS A total of 298 patients were included in the study, 127 (42.6%) being in the RNP+ group and 171 (57.4%) in the RNP- group. The false positive rate for the RNP+ patients was 1.6% compared with 9.4% for RNP- patients (p=0.006, hazard ratio [HR]: 6.45). The rates of operative failure were 6.3% and 11.7% respectively (p=0.159, HR: 1.97). RNP use had a sensitivity of 92.0% and a positive predictive value of 98.3% compared with 78.6% and 95.2% respectively for IOPTH monitoring. CONCLUSIONS RNP use is associated with fewer false positives and reduced operative failure than IOPTH measurement. It also has a higher sensitivity and positive predictive value. RNP use is recommended in centres that have the required facilities.

BRAFV600E mutation as a predictor of thyroid malignancy in indeterminate nodules: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Thyroid nodules are usually diagnosed using fine-needle aspiration (FNA). The sensitivity limitations of FNA result in 10-30% of nodules being classified as "indeterminate". The BRAFV600E mutation is associated with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). We conducted a systemic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic utility of the BRAFV600E mutation in indeterminate nodules. METHOD: PUBMED and EMBASE were searched for studies testing for the BRAFV600E involving indeterminate nodules (Thy3a, Thy3f, Thy4) and containing information on final surgical histopathology. Thirty two studies involving 3150 indeterminate nodules were included in the analysis. RESULTS: The overall sensitivity and specificity for BRAFV600E for the diagnosis of thyroid malignancy was 0.40 (95% CI: 0.32-0.48) and 1.00 (95% CI: 0.98-1.00) respectively. The diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 205.4 (95% CI: 40.1-1052). With a Fagan plot, the post-test probability of thyroid cancer, given a negative mutation was 6%, but this rose to 92% with a positive result. On subgroup analysis, for Thy3a nodules, the pooled sensitivity and specificity for thyroid malignancy was 0.21 (95% CI: 0.13-0.34) and 1.00 (95% CI: 0.98-1.00). For Thy3f nodules, the pooled sensitivity and specificity was 0.09 (95% CI: 0.03-0.20) and 1.00 (95% CI: 0.05-1.00) respectively. For Thy4 nodules, the corresponding sensitivity and specificity was 0.58 (95% CI: 0.5-0.64) and 0.99 (95% CI: 0.95-1.00) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a high specificity for thyroid cancer, BRAFV600E mutation has a low overall sensitivity and therefore has a limited diagnostic value as a single screening test.