Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur Radiol ; 27(12): 5146-5157, 2017 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28631080

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare cardiac left ventricular (LV) parameters in simultaneously acquired hybrid fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F] FDG) positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) in patients with residual tracer activity of upstream PET/CT. METHODS: Twenty-nine patients (23 men, age 58±17 years) underwent cardiac PET/MRI either directly after a non-cardiac PET/CT with homogenous cardiac [18F] FDG uptake (n=20) or for viability assessment (n=9). Gated cardiac [18F] FDG PET and cine MR sequences were acquired simultaneously and evaluated blinded to the cross-imaging results. Image quality (IQ), end-diastolic (LVEDV), end-systolic volume (LVESV), ejection fraction (LVEF) and myocardial mass (LVMM) were measured. Pearson correlation and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), regression and a Bland-Altman analysis were assessed. RESULTS: Except LVMM, volumetric and functional LV parameters demonstrated high correlations (LVESV: r=0.97, LVEDV: r=0.95, LVEF: r=0.91, LVMM: r=0.87, each p<0.05), but wide limits of agreement (LOA) for LVEDV (-25.3-82.5ml); LVESV (-33.1-72.7ml); LVEF (-18.9-14.8%) and LVMM (-78.2-43.2g). Intra- and interobserver reliability were very high (ICC≥0.95) for all parameters, except for MR-LVEF (ICC=0.87). PET-IQ (0-3) was high (mean: 2.2±0.9) with significant influence on LVMM calculations only. CONCLUSION: In simultaneously acquired cardiac PET/MRI data, LVEDV, LVESV and LVEF show good agreement. However, the agreement seems to be limited if cardiac PET/MRI follows PET/CT and only the residual activity is used. KEY POINTS: • [ 18 F] FDG PET-MRI is feasible with residual [ 18 F] FDG activity in patients with homogenous cardiac uptake. • Cardiac volumes and function assessed by PET/MRI show good agreement. • LVEDV and LVESV are underestimated; PET overestimates LVMM and LVEF. • Cardiac PET and MRI data correlate better when acquired simultaneously than sequentially. • PET and MRI should not assess LV parameters interchangeably.


Assuntos
Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico por imagem , Ventrículos do Coração/diagnóstico por imagem , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons combinada à Tomografia Computadorizada , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons/métodos , Volume Sistólico , Função Ventricular Esquerda/fisiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Fluordesoxiglucose F18 , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
2.
EJNMMI Res ; 6(1): 47, 2016 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27255510

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In PET/MRI, linear photon attenuation coefficients for attenuation correction (AC) cannot be directly derived, and cortical bone is, so far, usually not considered. This results in an underestimation of the average PET signal in PET/MRI. Recently introduced MR-AC methods predicting bone information from anatomic MRI or proton density-weighted zero-time imaging may solve this problem in the future. However, there is an ongoing debate if the current error is acceptable for clinical use and/or research. METHODS: We examined this feature for [(18)F] fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) brain PET in 13 patients with clinical signs of dementia or movement disorders who subsequently underwent PET/CT and PET/MRI on the same day. Multiple MR-AC approaches including a CT-derived AC were applied. RESULTS: The resulting PET data was compared to the CT-derived standard regarding the quantification error and its clinical impact. On a quantitative level, -11.9 to +2 % deviations from the CT-AC standard were found. These deviations, however, did not translate into a systematic diagnostic error. This, as overall patterns of hypometabolism (which are decisive for clinical diagnostics), remained largely unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a quantitative error by the omission of bone in MR-AC, clinical quality of brain [(18)F]FDG is not relevantly affected. Thus, brain [(18)F]FDG PET can already, even now with suboptimal MR-AC, be utilized for clinical routine purposes, even though the MR-AC warrants improvement.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA