Extragenital Sexually Transmitted Infection Testing Among Louisiana Parish Health Units, 2016-2019.

BACKGROUND: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends that men who have sex with men (MSM) get tested annually for urethral and rectal chlamydia (CT) and gonorrhea (NG), and pharyngeal NG. There are no national recommendations to screen women and heterosexual men at extragenital sites. We assessed extragenital CT/NG screening among men and women at Louisiana's Parish Health Units (PHU). METHODS: The Louisiana STD/HIV/Hepatitis Program piloted extragenital screening at 4 PHUs in February 2016 and expanded to 11 PHUs in 2017. Sexual histories were used to identify gender of sex partners and exposed sites. Because of billing restrictions, up to 2 anatomical sites were tested for CT/NG. RESULTS: From February 2016 to June 2019, 70,895 urogenital and extragenital specimens (56,086 urogenital, 13,797 pharyngeal, and 1,012 rectal) were collected from 56,086 patients. Pharyngeal CT positivity was 160 of 7,868 (2.0%) among women, 54 of 4,838 (1.1%) among men who have sex with women (MSW) and 33 of 1,091 (3.0%) among MSM. Rectal CT positivity was 51 of 439 (11.6%) among women and 95 of 573 (16.6%) among MSM. Pharyngeal NG positivity was 299 of 7,868 (3.8%) among women, 222 of 4,838 (4.6%) among MSW, and 97 of 1,091 (8.9%) among MSM. Rectal NG positivity was 20 of 439 (4.6%) among women and 134 of 573 (23.4%) among MSM.Urogenital-only screening would have missed: among women, 173 of 3,923 (4.4%) CT and 227 of 1,480 (15.3%) NG infections; among MSW, 26 of 2,667 (1%) CT and 149 of 1,709 (8.7%) NG infections; and among MSM, 116 of 336 (34.5%) CT and 127 of 413 (42.1%) NG infections. CONCLUSIONS: Many CT/NG infections would have been missed with urogenital-only screening. Men who have sex with men had much higher extragenital infection rates than women and MSW.

Electronic Messaging for Gonorrhea and Chlamydia Test Result Notification, Improving Treatment and Patient Satisfaction.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 20% of chlamydia (CT) and gonorrhea (GC) cases in Louisiana are diagnosed at Parish Health Units. Patient notification of CT and GC test results involves nurses' phone calls and letters to positive patients, which is time-consuming and inefficient. METHODS: In December 2018, electronic results notification was implemented in Caddo Parish Health Unit using Chexout software to notify enrolled patients via text or email when test results are ready to view in a patient portal. We compared the timeliness of GC/CT results notification and treatment pre-Chexout (December 2017 to November 2018) and post-Chexout (December 2018 to November 2019) implementation. A random sample of patients was interviewed to assess acceptability. RESULTS: During December 2018 to November 2019, 5432 patients were tested for CT/GC, 3924 (72%) enrolled in Chexout, and notifications were sent to 3884 (99%). Among CT-positives, 472 of 568 (83%) viewed results in the portal compared with 2451 of 3356 (73%) CT-negatives. Among GC-positives, 300 of 353 (85%) viewed results compared with 2657 of 3571 (74%) GC-negatives. Treatment success for CT improved from 493 of 670 (74%) to 506 of 568 (89%), and for GC, from 332 of 409 (81%) to 325 of 353 (92%). Mean time to treatment decreased for CT (13.4-10.7 days) and GC (11.3-9.2 days). Enrolled patients found Chexout notification satisfactory in 168 of 169 (99%) and easy to use in 130 of 141 (92%). Reasons for declining electronic notification included lack of personal cell phone for 55 of 86 (64%) and confidentiality concerns for 42 of 86 (49%). CONCLUSIONS: Electronic messaging decreased time to notification and increased treatment success. Nurses spent less time notifying patients leaving more time for patient care.

Preventing Congenital Syphilis-Opportunities Identified by Congenital Syphilis Case Review Boards.

BACKGROUND: Louisiana has had the highest rates of congenital syphilis (CS) in the nation since 2012. Congenital syphilis case review boards were established statewide in 2016 to study CS cases and identify interventions. METHODS: We summarized the findings of CS review boards, assessed which cases were preventable by prenatal care providers, reviewed recommended interventions, and assessed subsequent improvement in provider practices. RESULTS: All 79 CS cases reported from January 2016 to July 2017 were reviewed by boards during August 2016 to August 2017. Twenty-six (33%) cases that could have been prevented by prenatal care providers had: lack of rescreening at 28 to 32 weeks (n = 15), lack of any screening (n = 5), treatment delay (n = 4), or incorrect interpretation of test results (n = 2). Twenty-one (27%) cases were possibly preventable by providers including: mother did not return for follow-up and treatment (n = 19), late third trimester reactive test with premature delivery (n = 1), or incomplete treatment and lack of follow-up by health department staff (n = 1). Thirty-two (40%) cases that were unlikely to be prevented by providers had: nonreactive test at 28-32 weeks then reactive test <30 days before delivery (n = 10), no prenatal care (n = 9), mother adequately treated, case by infant criteria (n = 8), first/second trimester nonreactive, reactive at preterm delivery (n = 4), or mother adequately treated, reinfected before delivery (n = 1). Providers were advised to adhere to CDC recommended syphilis screening and treatment protocols and rapidly report pregnant women with syphilis. Many providers changed their procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Congenital syphilis case review boards identified practices with inadequate screening, treatment, or reporting. Sharing these findings with providers changed practices and may prevent future cases.