Environmental effects on behavioural development consequences for fitness of captive-reared fishes in the wild.

Why do captive-reared fishes generally have lower fitness in natural environments than wild conspecifics, even when the hatchery fishes are derived from wild parents from the local population? A thorough understanding of this question is the key to design artificial rearing environments that optimize post-release performance, as well as to recognize the limitations of what can be achieved by modifying hatchery rearing methods. Fishes are generally very plastic in their development and through gene-environment interactions, epigenetic and maternal effects their phenotypes will develop differently depending on their rearing environment. This suggests that there is scope for modifying conventional rearing environments to better prepare fishes for release into the wild. The complexity of the natural environment is impossible to mimic in full-scale rearing facilities. So, in reality, the challenge is to identify key modifications of the artificial rearing environment that are practically and economically feasible and that efficiently promote development towards a more wild-like phenotype. Do such key modifications really exist? Here, attempts to use physical enrichment and density reduction to improve the performance of hatchery fishes are discussed and evaluated. These manipulations show potential to increase the fitness of hatchery fishes released into natural environments, but the success is strongly dependent on adequately adapting methods to species and life stage-specific conditions.

Effects of rearing density and dietary fat content on burst-swim performance and oxygen transport capacity in juvenile Atlantic salmon Salmo salar.

The effects of hatchery rearing density (conventional or one third of conventional density) and feeding regime (high or reduced dietary fat levels) on burst-swim performance and oxygen transport capacity were studied in hatchery-reared Atlantic salmon Salmo salar, using wild fish as a reference group. There was no effect of rearing density or food regime on swimming performance in parr and smolts. The maximum swimming speed of wild parr was significantly higher than that of hatchery-reared conspecifics, while no such difference remained at the smolt stage. In smolts, relative ventricle mass was higher in wild S. salar compared with hatchery-reared fish. Moreover, wild S. salar had lower maximum oxygen consumption following a burst-swim challenge than hatchery fish. There were no effects of hatchery treatment on maximum oxygen consumption or relative ventricle mass. Haemoglobin and haematocrit levels, however, were lower in low-density fish than in fish reared at conventional density. Furthermore, dorsal-fin damage, an indicator of aggression, was similar in low-density reared and wild fish and lower than in S. salar reared at conventional density. Together, these results suggest that reduced rearing density is more important than reduced dietary fat levels in producing an S. salar smolt suitable for supplementary release.

Less is more: density influences the development of behavioural life skills in trout.

Theory suggests that habitat structure and population density profoundly influence the phenotypic development of animals. Here, we predicted that reduced rearing density and increased structural complexity promote food search ability, anti-predator response and the ability to forage on novel prey, all behavioural skills important for surviving in the wild. Brown trout were reared at three densities (conventional hatchery density, a fourth of conventional hatchery density and natural density) in tanks with or without structure. Treatment effects on behaviour were studied on trout fry and parr, whereupon 20 trout from each of the six treatment groups were released in an enclosed natural stream and recaptured after 36 days. Fry reared at natural density were faster to find prey in a maze. Moreover, parr reared at natural density were faster to eat novel prey, and showed more efficient anti-predator behaviour than fish reared at higher densities. Furthermore, parr reared at reduced densities were twice as likely to survive in the stream as trout reared at high density. In contrast, we found no clear treatment effects of structure. These novel results suggest that reduced rearing densities can facilitate the development of behavioural life skills in captive animals, thereby increasing their contribution to natural production.

Coping with divided attention: the advantage of familiarity.

The ability of an animal to perform a task successfully is limited by the amount of attention being simultaneously focused on other activities. One way in which individuals might reduce the cost of divided attention is by preferentially focusing on the most beneficial tasks. In territorial animals where aggression is lower among familiar individuals, the decision to associate preferentially with familiar conspecifics may therefore confer advantages by allowing attention to be switched from aggression to predator vigilance and feeding. Wild juvenile brown trout were used to test the prediction that familiar fishes respond more quickly than unfamiliar fishes to a simulated predator attack. Our results confirm this prediction by demonstrating that familiar trout respond 14% faster than unfamiliar individuals to a predator attack. The results also show that familiar fishes consume a greater number of food items, foraging at more than twice the rate of unfamiliar conspecifics. To the best of our knowledge, these results provide the first evidence that familiarity-biased association confers advantages through the immediate fitness benefits afforded by faster predator-evasion responses and the long-term benefits provided by increased feeding opportunities.

Experience and social environment influence the ability of young brown trout to forage on live novel prey.

Efficient feeding is crucial for the growth, survival and reproductive success of most animals. In artificial-rearing environments, however, animals are deprived of many stimuli normally experienced in the wild, which may alter feeding behaviour, and thus influence their survival and reproductive success upon release in nature. In a laboratory experiment, we investigated the effect of hatchery rearing on the ability of brown trout, Salmo trutta, to capture and consume a novel live prey item. Hatchery-reared and wild-caught trout, originating from the same river, were fed single black crickets, either in isolation or in visual and olfactory contact with another hatchery-reared or wild-caught fish. Total consumption, time to first bite and feeding efficiency were monitored. Wild-caught trout ate more, were quicker to attack, and consumed attacked prey more efficiently than hatchery-reared fish. Food consumption and efficiency increased in both wild and hatchery-reared trout during the experiment. We propose that the differences in feeding ability between wild-caught and hatchery-reared brown trout were mainly due to differences in previous experience of feeding on live prey. Wild-caught trout tended to eat more and sooner when in visual contact with another fish than when in isolation. This trend was not seen for the hatchery-reared fish, which may be due to environmental differences between the hatchery and the natural stream. The initial inability of hatchery-reared fish to forage on live prey may reduce their success when released in the wild, especially when in competition with resident wild fish. Copyright 2001 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

Growth hormone increases aggressive behavior in juvenile rainbow trout.

The aim of the present study was to clarify the role of growth hormone in social interactions in juvenile salmonids. Growth hormone increases the metabolic demands and feeding motivation in teleost fish. As a consequence, growth hormone may increase aggression levels and/or fighting ability. To test these hypotheses we observed agonistic behavior in pairs of juvenile rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) consisting of two control fish (C/C pairs), two growth hormone-treated fish (GH/GH pairs), or one growth hormone-treated and one control fish (C/GH pairs). The initiator and the winner of each act of aggression were registered. Aggression was lowest in the C/C pairs, intermediate in the C/GH pairs, and highest in the GH/GH pairs, with the difference between the C/C pairs and the GH/GH pairs being significant. This supports the hypothesis that GH increases aggression levels. However, in the C/GH pairs, the number of conflicts won by GH-treated and control fish did not differ significantly. Thus, because social status was not increased, GH did not appear to affect fighting ability. We suggest that growth hormone affects aggression indirectly by increasing the swimming activity, and/or by inducing defense of a larger territory, thereby increasing the encounter rate between opponents. Since increased aggression can incur energetic and mortality costs, there may be selection against high GH levels in natural populations.

Growth hormone increases predation exposure of rainbow trout.

The energetic state of an animal strongly influences decisions that balances feeding against predation risk. Growth hormone increases the metabolic demands, which should elevate the feeding motivation of an animal. This, in turn, may increase the willingness to risk exposure to predators during feeding. To test this hypothesis, we studied the effect of growth hormone on the behavioural response of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) to simulated attacks from a model heron. After attacks, growth hormone treated trout foraged closer to the water surface, resumed feeding earlier, and ate more food than did control trout. Such behaviour should increase the susceptibility to aerial predation. Thus, predation may select against high endogenous growth hormone secretion in wild fish. Furthermore, genetic manipulations to increase growth hormone levels, intended to improve growth performance in aquaculture, may result in individuals with substantially altered behavioural patterns. In light of the increasing potential for interactions between farmed and wild fish, growth hormone transgenic fish may pose a threat to wild fish populations.

Dominance, nutritional state, and growth hormone levels in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss).

This study addressed three questions concerning interactions between physiology and dominance in juvenile rainbow trout: (1) the validity of a model predicting a time-dependent effect of fasting on competitive ability (i.e., the ability to obtain contested food items) was tested in a series of dominance trials between fed and progressively more fasted trout, as was (2) the association between fasting and plasma growth hormone levels. (3) The relationship between plasma growth hormone levels and the competitive ability of individual trout was also studied. The main results were as follows: (1) The predictions of the time-dependent model were supported by the fasting-dominance experiment. After 3 days, fasted fish were dominant over fed fish, whereas after 6 and 9 days, the competitive ability of fed and fasted fish was similar. After 12 days, there was a tendency for fed fish to be dominant over their fasted competitors. (2) Sampling of plasma from fed and fasted trout, after 3, 6, 9, and 12 days, demonstrated that plasma growth hormone levels increases in food-deprived rainbow trout after more than 6 days of fasting, which is consistent with previous work. (3) No difference in plasma growth hormone levels was found between paired dominant and subordinate trout. Possible interactions between nutritional state, growth hormone levels, and dominance, and their implications are discussed.