Bilateral Exchange: Enteral Nutrition Clinical Decision Making in Pediatric Surgery Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Evidence-based medicine guides clinical decision-making; however, promoting enteral nutrition has historically followed a dogmatic approach in which patients graduate from clear liquids to full liquids to a regular diet after return of bowel function. Enhanced recovery after surgery has demonstrated that early enteral nutrition initiation is associated with shorter hospital stays. We aimed to understand postoperative pediatric nutrition practices in Kenya and the United States. METHODS: We completed a prospective observational study of pediatric surgery fellows during clinical rounds in a pediatric referral center in Kenya (S4A) and one in the United States (Riley). Fellow-patient interactions were observed from postoperative day one to discharge or postoperative day 30, whichever happened first. Patient demographic, operative information, and daily observations including nutritional status were collected via REDCap. RESULTS: We included 75 patients with 41 (54.7%) from Kenya; patients in Kenya were younger with 40% of patients in Kenya presenting as neonates. Median time to initiation and full enteral nutrition was shorter for the patients at Riley when compared to their counterparts at S4A. In the neonatal subgroup, patients at S4A initiated enteral nutrition sooner, but their hospital length of stays were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: Studying current nutrition practices may guide early enteral nutrition protocols. Implementing these protocols, particularly in a setting where enteral nutrition alternatives are minimal, may provide evidence of success and overrule dogmatic nutrition advancement. Studying implementation of these protocols in resource-constrained areas, where patient length of stay is often related to socioeconomic factors, may identify additional benefits to patients.

Demographics and medical school exposures to rural health influence future practice.

BACKGROUND: One-fifth of the US population lives in rural areas. A record number of rural hospitals have closed, creating increased burdens on regional centers and delays in care. This study aimed to assess medical student perceptions of rural surgery and health care, and to elucidate influential factors for future practice. METHODS: We administered a survey to medical schools throughout Indiana, Illinois, and Michigan. The survey was designed and evaluated by a survey content expert and piloted among a group of students. Student and faculty liaisons disseminated the survey between February and May 2021. Descriptive analysis of data was completed using Stata v.16.1 (StataCorp, LLC, College Station, TX). RESULTS: The respondents included 700 medical students; 59.5% were female, with an equal distribution across medical school classes. More than 98% of students believe we "lack" or "are in great need of" rural health care providers, as well as rural surgeons; however, more than half of the students did not agree that the rural workforce is declining. Only 15.7% of students reported an interest in "pursuing a future career in a rural setting." Students with exposure to rural health care, coming from a rural hometown, or having a dependent had a positive association with interest in pursuing rural practice. CONCLUSION: Although students are aware of the lack of rural surgeons and health care providers, there remains an educational deficit. Expanding exposure to rural health care and surgery while in medical school may increase the number of students interested in pursuing a career in a rural setting, potentially shrinking the rural workforce gap.

Uncovering the Overlap of Global and Domestic Rural Surgery for Medical Trainees.

INTRODUCTION: Medical trainees who participate in global rotations demonstrate improved cultural sensitivity, increased involvement in humanitarian efforts, and ability to adapt to limited resources. The global coronavirus pandemic halted global rotations for medical trainees. Domestic rural surgery (DRS) may offer a unique alternative. We aimed to understand medical students' perceptions of the similarities and differences between global surgery and DRS and how students' priorities impact career choices. METHODS: An electronic survey was administered at eleven medical training institutions in Indiana, Illinois, and Michigan in spring 2021. Mixed methods analysis was performed for students who reported an interest in global surgery. Quantitative analysis was completed using Stata 16.1. RESULTS: Of the 697 medical student respondents, 202 were interested in global surgery. Of those, only 18.3% were also interested in DRS. Students interested in DRS had more rural exposures. Rural exposures associated with DRS interest were pre-clinical courses (P = 0.002), clinical rotations (P = 0.045), and rural health interest groups (P < 0.001). Students interested in DRS and those unsure were less likely to prioritize careers involving teaching or research, program prestige, perceived career advancement, and well-equipped facilities. The students who were unsure were willing to utilize DRS exposures. CONCLUSIONS: Students interested in global surgery express a desire to practice in low-resource settings. Increased DRS exposures may help students to understand the overlap between global surgery and DRS when it comes to working with limited resources, achieving work-life balance and practice location.