Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes in patients with primary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis treated with emapalumab.

ABSTRACT: Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a rare, life-threatening, hyperinflammatory syndrome. Emapalumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody that neutralizes the proinflammatory cytokine interferon gamma, is approved in the United States to treat primary HLH (pHLH) in patients with refractory, recurrent, or progressive disease, or intolerance with conventional HLH treatments. REAL-HLH, a retrospective study, conducted across 33 US hospitals, evaluated real-world treatment patterns and outcomes in patients treated with ≥1 dose of emapalumab between 20 November 2018 and 31 October 2021. In total, 46 patients met the pHLH classification criteria. Median age at diagnosis was 1.0 year (range, 0.3-21.0). Emapalumab was initiated for treating refractory (19/46), recurrent (14/46), or progressive (7/46) pHLH. At initiation, 15 of 46 patients were in the intensive care unit, and 35 of 46 had received prior HLH-related therapies. Emapalumab treatment resulted in normalization of key laboratory parameters, including chemokine ligand 9 (24/33, 72.7%), ferritin (20/45, 44.4%), fibrinogen (37/38, 97.4%), platelets (39/46, 84.8%), and absolute neutrophil count (40/45, 88.9%). Forty-two (91.3%) patients were considered eligible for transplant. Pretransplant survival was 38 of 42 (90.5%). Thirty-one (73.8%) transplant-eligible patients proceeded to transplant, and 23 of 31 (74.2%) of those who received transplant were alive at the end of the follow-up period. Twelve-month survival probability from emapalumab initiation for the entire cohort (N = 46) was 73.1%. There were no discontinuations because of adverse events. In conclusion, results from the REAL-HLH study, which describes treatment patterns, effectiveness, and outcomes in patients with pHLH treated with emapalumab in real-world settings, are consistent with the emapalumab pivotal phase 2/3 pHLH trial.

Exposure-safety relationship for patients with primary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis treated with emapalumab.

Primary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (pHLH) is an immune-mediated, hyperinflammatory disorder. Interferon-γ (IFNγ) plays a key role in the pathophysiology of pHLH. Emapalumab, a fully human, anti-IFNγ monoclonal antibody neutralizes both free and receptor-bound IFNγ. However, inhibiting IFNγ-mediated signaling could result in immune dysfunction and immunosuppression. This exploratory exposure-safety analysis investigated the relationship between emapalumab and the incidence of adverse events in patients with pHLH. Increased exposure to emapalumab was not associated with an increased predicted risk of severe adverse events, infection, or infusion-related reactions. Emapalumab was associated with a favorable and manageable safety profile across all assessed doses and treatment durations.

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis: A disorder of T cell activation, immune regulation, and distinctive immunopathology.

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a disorder that has been recognized since the middle of the last century. In recent decades, increasing understanding of the genetic roots and pathophysiology of HLH has led to improved diagnosis and treatment of this once universally fatal disorder. HLH is best conceptualized as a maladaptive state of excessive T cell activation driving life-threatening myeloid cell activation, largely via interferon-gamma (IFN-γ). In familial forms of HLH (F-HLH), inherited defects of lymphocyte cytotoxic biology underlie excessive T cell activation, demonstrating the importance of the perforin/granzyme pathway as a negative feedback loop limiting acute T cell activation in response to environmental factors. HLH occurring in other contexts and without apparent inherited genetic predisposition remains poorly understood, though it may share some downstream aspects of pathophysiology including excessive IFN-γ action and activation of innate immune effectors. Iatrogenic forms of HLH occurring after immune-activating therapies for cancer are providing new insights into the potential toxicities of inadequately controlled T cell activation. Diagnosing HLH increasingly relies on context-specific measures of T cell activation, IFN-γ activity, and inflammation. Treatment of HLH largely relies on cytotoxic chemotherapy, though targeted therapies against T cells, IFN-γ, and other cytokines are increasingly utilized.

Inpatient recognition and management of HLH.

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is one of the life-threatening emergencies that a hematologist may be called upon to diagnose and manage. It is a hyperinflammatory process that develops in patients with genetic abnormalities, hematologic malignancies, chronic inflammatory states, or infections. The main clinical challenges are recognizing HLH, determining whether the immune response is aberrant or appropriate, and deciding upon therapy. Patients may present with fever, central nervous system symptoms, cytopenias, or elevated liver enzymes. Recognizing HLH is challenging because its features overlap with numerous systemic disorders, thus requiring a high level of suspicion and timely investigations to confirm the diagnosis and detect the underlying trigger. Once HLH is diagnosed, careful consideration of immunosuppressive therapy's potential benefit versus harm is necessary. Such therapy can sometimes be tailored to the underlying trigger. In the acute setting, the competing pressures of completing a thorough diagnostic process (including evaluation for the presence of lymphoma and infection) and the need for expedited treatment must be balanced. During the management of an HLH patient, continuous vigilance for the presence of as-yet unrecognized disease triggers, monitoring response, and identifying emerging complications is critical. This review will discuss the recognition and management of HLH in the inpatient setting.

Early response markers predict survival after etoposide-based therapy of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis.

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a life-threatening hyperinflammatory syndrome that is most commonly treated with etoposide and dexamethasone. This standard of care therapy has improved survival, but ∼15% of patients still die in the first months after diagnosis, and poor responses prompting salvage therapy are frequent. Thus, identifying patients at risk promptly is likely to improve outcomes. We conducted a multi-institutional, retrospective study of pediatric and young adults treated per HLH-94 or HLH-2004 from 2010 to 2019 to identify patients at risk for early mortality. Biweekly data during the first 100 days of treatment were analyzed using receiver operating curves to define optimal prognostic indicators and their thresholds. The primary end point was survival to bone marrow transplant (BMT) or ∼1 year if no BMT was pursued. Eighty-nine patients met the study inclusion criteria. Pre-BMT mortality was 13% (n = 12), and overall mortality was 27% (n = 24). Laboratory markers measured on day 7 of therapy more efficiently predicted outcomes than did either pretreatment or later assessments. The most potent day 7 unfavorable marker was improvement in soluble CD25 (sCD25) of less than 25% from pretherapy levels. Absolute sCD25 level, platelet count, absolute lymphocyte count, and blood urea nitrogen were also discriminatory markers (area under the curve ≥ 0.7). The presence of ≥3 of these unfavorable markers was strongly associated with pre-BMT mortality (accuracy, 0.93). Thus, serial monitoring of sCD25 and assessment of other early (day 7) response markers optimally predicts prognosis with etoposide-based therapy and may indicate the need for earlier use of alternative, response-adapted therapeutic strategies for HLH.

The 2022 EULAR/ACR points to consider at the early stages of diagnosis and management of suspected haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis/macrophage activation syndrome (HLH/MAS).

OBJECTIVE: Haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) and macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) are life-threatening systemic hyperinflammatory syndromes that can develop in most inflammatory contexts. They can progress rapidly, and early identification and management are critical for preventing organ failure and mortality. This effort aimed to develop evidence-based and consensus-based points to consider to assist clinicians in optimising decision-making in the early stages of diagnosis, treatment and monitoring of HLH/MAS. METHODS: A multinational, multidisciplinary task force of physician experts, including adult and paediatric rheumatologists, haematologist/oncologists, immunologists, infectious disease specialists, intensivists, allied healthcare professionals and patients/parents, formulated relevant research questions and conducted a systematic literature review (SLR). Delphi methodology, informed by SLR results and questionnaires of experts, was used to generate statements aimed at assisting early decision-making and optimising the initial care of patients with HLH/MAS. RESULTS: The task force developed 6 overarching statements and 24 specific points to consider relevant to early recognition of HLH/MAS, diagnostic approaches, initial management and monitoring of HLH/MAS. Major themes included the simultaneous need for prompt syndrome recognition, systematic evaluation of underlying contributors, early intervention targeting both hyperinflammation and likely contributors, careful monitoring for progression/complications and expert multidisciplinary assistance. CONCLUSION: These 2022 EULAR/American College of Rheumatology points to consider provide up-to-date guidance, based on the best available published data and expert opinion. They are meant to help guide the initial evaluation, management and monitoring of patients with HLH/MAS in order to halt disease progression and prevent life-threatening immunopathology.

The 2022 EULAR/ACR Points to Consider at the Early Stages of Diagnosis and Management of Suspected Haemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis/Macrophage Activation Syndrome (HLH/MAS).

OBJECTIVE: Haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) and macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) are life-threatening systemic hyperinflammatory syndromes that can develop in most inflammatory contexts. They can progress rapidly, and early identification and management are critical for preventing organ failure and mortality. This effort aimed to develop evidence-based and consensus-based points to consider to assist clinicians in optimising decision-making in the early stages of diagnosis, treatment and monitoring of HLH/MAS. METHODS: A multinational, multidisciplinary task force of physician experts, including adult and paediatric rheumatologists, haematologist/oncologists, immunologists, infectious disease specialists, intensivists, allied healthcare professionals and patients/parents, formulated relevant research questions and conducted a systematic literature review (SLR). Delphi methodology, informed by SLR results and questionnaires of experts, was used to generate statements aimed at assisting early decision-making and optimising the initial care of patients with HLH/MAS. RESULTS: The task force developed 6 overarching statements and 24 specific points to consider relevant to early recognition of HLH/MAS, diagnostic approaches, initial management and monitoring of HLH/MAS. Major themes included the simultaneous need for prompt syndrome recognition, systematic evaluation of underlying contributors, early intervention targeting both hyperinflammation and likely contributors, careful monitoring for progression/complications and expert multidisciplinary assistance. CONCLUSION: These 2022 EULAR/American College of Rheumatology points to consider provide up-to-date guidance, based on the best available published data and expert opinion. They are meant to help guide the initial evaluation, management and monitoring of patients with HLH/MAS in order to halt disease progression and prevent life-threatening immunopathology.

Loss of STAT2 may be dangerous in a world filled with viruses.

Type I IFNs, a family of cytokines that signal through a single receptor and signaling mechanism, were originally named for their ability to interfere with viral replication. While type II IFN (IFN-γ) largely protects against intracellular bacteria and protozoa, type I IFNs largely protect from viral infections. Inborn errors of immunity in humans have demonstrated this point and its clinical relevance with increasing clarity. In this issue of the JCI, Bucciol, Moens, et al. report the largest series of patients to date with deficiency of STAT2, an important protein for type I IFN signaling. Individuals with STAT2 loss demonstrated a clinical phenotype of viral susceptibility and inflammatory complications, many of which remain poorly understood. These findings further illustrate the very specific and critical role that type I IFNs play in host defense against viruses.

Alemtuzumab and CXCL9 levels predict likelihood of sustained engraftment after reduced-intensity conditioning HCT.

Overall survival after reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) using alemtuzumab, fludarabine, and melphalan is associated with high rates of mixed chimerism (MC) and secondary graft failure (GF). We hypothesized that peritransplantation alemtuzumab levels or specific patterns of inflammation would predict these risks. We assessed samples from the Bone Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network 1204 (NCT01998633) to study the impact of alemtuzumab levels and cytokine patterns on MC and impending or established secondary GF (defined as donor chimerism <5% after initial engraftment and/or requirement of cellular intervention). Thirty-three patients with hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (n = 25) and other IEIs (n = 8) who underwent HCTs with T-cell-replete grafts were included. Patients with day 0 alemtuzumab levels ≤0.32 µg/mL had a markedly lower incidence of MC, 14.3%, vs 90.9% in patients with levels >0.32 µg/mL (P = .008). Impending or established secondary GF was only observed in patients with day 0 alemtuzumab levels >0.32 µg/mL (P = .08). Unexpectedly, patients with impending or established secondary GF had lower CXCL9 levels. The cumulative incidence of impending or established secondary GF in patients with a day 14+ CXCL9 level ≤2394 pg/mL (day 14+ median) was 73.6% vs 0% in patients with a level >2394 pg/mL (P = .002). CXCL9 levels inversely correlated with alemtuzumab levels. These data suggest a model in which higher levels of alemtuzumab at day 0 deplete donor T cells, inhibit the graft-versus-marrow reaction (thereby suppressing CXCL9 levels), and adversely affect sustained engraftment in the nonmyeloablative HCT setting. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01998633.

Quercetin ameliorates XIAP deficiency-associated hyperinflammation.

XIAP (X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis) deficiency is a rare inborn error of immunity. XIAP deficiency causes hyperinflammatory disease manifestations due to dysregulated TNF (tumor necrosis factor)-receptor signaling and NLRP3 (NOD- [nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain], LRR- [leucine-rich repeat] and pyrin domain-containing protein 3) inflammasome function. Safe and effective long-term treatments are needed and are especially important to help prevent the need for high-risk allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Here we evaluated inflammasome inhibitors as potential therapeutics with a focus on the natural flavonoid antioxidant quercetin. Bone marrow (BM)-derived macrophages were derived from XIAP-deficient or wild-type (WT) mice. Human monocytes were obtained from control or XIAP-deficient patients. Cells were stimulated with TLR (Toll-like receptor) agonists or TNF-α ± inhibitors or quercetin. For in vivo lipopolysaccharide (LPS) challenge experiments, XIAP-deficient or WT mice were fed mouse chow ± supplemental quercetin (50 mg/kg per day exposure) for 7 days followed by a challenge with 10 ng/kg LPS. IL-1ß (interleukin-1ß) and IL-18 were measured by ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay). In murine studies, quercetin prevented IL-1ß secretion from XIAP knockout cells following TLR agonists or TNF-α stimulation (P < .05) and strongly reduced constitutive production of IL-18 by both WT and XIAP-deficient cells (P < .05). At 4 hours after in vivo LPS challenge, blood levels of IL-1ß and IL-18 were significantly decreased in mice that had received quercetin-supplemented chow (P < .05). In experiments using human cells, quercetin greatly reduced IL-1ß secretion by monocytes following TNF-α stimulation (P < .05). Our data suggest that quercetin may be an effective natural therapeutic for the prevention of XIAP deficiency-associated hyperinflammation. Clinical trials, including careful pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies to ensure that effective levels of quercetin can be obtained, are warranted.

Malignancy-associated haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis.

Haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is an inflammatory syndrome that can occur with cancer (malignancy-associated HLH) or with immune-activating therapies for cancer. Patients with lymphoma appear to be at particularly high risk for malignancy-associated HLH. The familial form of HLH is characterised by uncontrolled activation of macrophages and cytotoxic T cells, which can be identified by genetics or specific immune markers. However, the pathophysiology of malignancy-associated HLH is not well understood, and distinguishing pathological immune activation from the laboratory and clinical abnormalities seen in cancer and cancer treatment is challenging. Emerging diagnostic tools, such as serum cytokine or chemokine concentrations, flow cytometry, and other functional measures, are discussed. Mortality remains high with current approaches. Targeted therapy, including blockade of specific cytokines such as IL-1, IL-6, and IFNγ, and inhibition of the JAK-STAT pathways might improve outcomes for some patients. Finally, we discuss a framework for thinking of malignancy-associated HLH within a larger umbrella concept of cytokine storm syndrome.

A Case of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Complicated by Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis: Identifying the Aberrant Immune Response.

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a life-threatening hyperinflammatory syndrome that may complicate hematologic malignancies. HLH and malignancies have common clinical features, and HLH diagnostic criteria (HLH-2004/Hscore) were not validated in this specific population. We describe a case of a 72-year-old patient with a history of chronic lymphocytic leukemia stable for over 10 years who presented with fever and cytopenia. After excluding infectious etiologies and the progression of her disease, HLH was diagnosed. The patient was treated with etoposide, dexamethasone, intravenous immunoglobulin, and rituximab. Despite initial clinical improvement, the patient deteriorated and developed pulmonary aspergillosis and CNS involvement that reflected uncontrolled HLH. The patient died 45 days after her presentation. An unusual feature of this case was that HLH was not triggered by infection, disease transformation, or treatment. This case emphasizes the challenges of differentiating the development of overwhelming HLH from other complications associated with hematologic malignancy.

Reduced-Intensity/Reduced-Toxicity Conditioning Approaches Are Tolerated in XIAP Deficiency but Patients Fare Poorly with Acute GVHD.

X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis (XIAP) deficiency is an inherited primary immunodeficiency characterized by chronic inflammasome overactivity and associated with hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) with fully myeloablative conditioning may be curative but has been associated with poor outcomes. Reports of reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) and reduced-toxicity conditioning (RTC) regimens suggest these approaches are well tolerated, but outcomes are not well established. Retrospective data were collected from an international cohort of 40 patients with XIAP deficiency who underwent HCT with RIC or RTC. Thirty-three (83%) patients had a history of HLH, and thirteen (33%) patients had IBD. Median age at HCT was 6.5 years. Grafts were from HLA-matched (n = 30, 75%) and HLA-mismatched (n = 10, 25%) donors. There were no cases of primary graft failure. Two (5%) patients experienced secondary graft failure, and three (8%) patients ultimately received a second HCT. Nine (23%) patients developed grade II-IV acute GVHD, and 3 (8%) developed extensive chronic GVHD. The estimated 2-year overall and event-free survival rates were 74% (CI 55-86%) and 64% (CI 46-77%), respectively. Recipient and donor HLA mismatch and grade II-IV acute GVHD were negatively associated with survival on multivariate analysis with hazard ratios of 5.8 (CI 1.5-23.3, p = 0.01) and 8.2 (CI 2.1-32.7, p < 0.01), respectively. These data suggest that XIAP patients tolerate RIC and RTC with survival rates similar to HCT of other genetic HLH disorders. Every effort should be made to prevent acute GVHD in XIAP-deficient patients who undergo allogeneic HCT.

Consensus-Based Guidelines for the Recognition, Diagnosis, and Management of Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis in Critically Ill Children and Adults.

OBJECTIVE: Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis is a hyperinflammatory syndrome that often requires critical care support and remains difficult to diagnose. These guidelines are meant to aid in the early recognition, diagnosis, supportive care, and treatment of patients with hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis in ICUs. DATA SOURCES: The literature searches were performed with PubMed (MEDLINE). STUDY SELECTION: Keywords and medical subject headings terms for literature search included "macrophage activation syndrome," hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis," and "hemophagocytic syndrome." DATA EXTRACTION: The Histiocyte Society developed these consensus recommendations on the basis of published reports and expert opinions with level of evidence provided for each recommendation. They were endorsed by the Society of Critical Care Medicine. DATA SYNTHESIS: Testing for hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis should be initiated promptly in all patients admitted to ICUs with an unexplained or disproportionate inflammatory response, especially those with rapid clinical deterioration. Meeting five or more of eight hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis 2004 diagnostic criteria serves as a valuable diagnostic tool for hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. Early aggressive critical care interventions are often required to manage the multisystem organ failure associated with hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. Thorough investigation of the underlying triggers of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, including infections, malignancies, and autoimmune/autoinflammatory diseases, is essential. Early steroid treatment is indicated for patients with familial hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis and is often valuable in patients with acquired hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (i.e., secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis) without previous therapy, including macrophage activation syndrome (hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis secondary to autoimmune/autoinflammatory disease) without persistent or relapsing disease. Steroid treatment should not be delayed, particularly if organ dysfunction is present. In patients with macrophage activation syndrome, whose disease does not sufficiently respond, interleukin-1 inhibition and/or cyclosporine A is recommended. In familial hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis and severe, persistent, or relapsing secondary macrophage activation syndrome, the addition of prompt individualized, age-adjusted etoposide treatment is recommended. CONCLUSIONS: Further studies are needed to determine optimal treatment for patients with hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis in ICUs, including the use of novel and adjunct therapies.

High risk of relapsed disease in patients with NK/T-cell chronic active Epstein-Barr virus disease outside of Asia.

Chronic active Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) disease (CAEBV) is characterized by high levels of EBV predominantly in T and/or natural killer cells with lymphoproliferation, organ failure due to infiltration of tissues with virus-infected cells, hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, and/or lymphoma. The disease is more common in Asia than in the United States and Europe. Although allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is considered the only curative therapy for CAEBV, its efficacy and the best treatment modality to reduce disease severity prior to HSCT is unknown. Here, we retrospectively assessed an international cohort of 57 patients outside of Asia. Treatment of the disease varied widely, although most patients ultimately proceeded to HSCT. Though patients undergoing HSCT had better survival than those who did not (55% vs 25%, P < .01), there was still a high rate of death in both groups. Mortality was largely not affected by age, ethnicity, cell-type involvement, or disease complications, but development of lymphoma showed a trend with increased mortality (56% vs 35%, P = .1). The overwhelming majority (75%) of patients who died after HSCT succumbed to relapsed disease. CAEBV remains challenging to treat when advanced disease is present. Outcomes would likely improve with better disease control strategies, earlier referral for HSCT, and close follow-up after HSCT including aggressive management of rising EBV DNA levels in the blood.

An improved index for diagnosis and mortality prediction in malignancy-associated hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis.

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a life-threatening inflammatory syndrome that may complicate hematologic malignancies (HMs). The appropriateness of current criteria for diagnosing HLH in the context of HMs is unknown because they were developed for children with familial HLH (HLH-2004) or derived from adult patient cohorts in which HMs were underrepresented (HScore). Moreover, many features of these criteria may directly reflect the underlying HM rather than an abnormal inflammatory state. To improve and potentially simplify HLH diagnosis in patients with HMs, we studied an international cohort of 225 adult patients with various HMs both with and without HLH and for whom HLH-2004 criteria were available. Classification and regression tree and receiver-operating curve analyses were used to identify the most useful diagnostic and prognostic parameters and to optimize laboratory cutoff values. Combined elevation of soluble CD25 (>3900 U/mL) and ferritin (>1000 ng/mL) best identified HLH-2004-defining features (sensitivity, 84%; specificity, 81%). Moreover, this combination, which we term the optimized HLH inflammatory (OHI) index, was highly predictive of mortality (hazard ratio, 4.3; 95% confidence interval, 3.0-6.2) across diverse HMs. Furthermore, the OHI index identified a large group of patients with high mortality risk who were not defined as having HLH according to HLH-2004/HScore. Finally, the OHI index shows diagnostic and prognostic value when used for routine surveillance of patients with newly diagnosed HMs as well as those with clinically suspected HLH. Thus, we conclude that the OHI index identifies patients with HM and an inflammatory state associated with a high mortality risk and warrants further prospective validation.

Emapalumab in primary haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis and the pathogenic role of interferon gamma: A pharmacometric model-based approach.

AIM: Primary haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a rare, life-threatening, hyperinflammatory syndrome generally occurring in early childhood. The monoclonal antibody emapalumab binds and neutralises interferon γ (IFNγ). This study aimed to determine an emapalumab dosing regimen when traditional dose-finding approaches are not applicable, using pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analyses to further clarify HLH pathogenesis and confirm IFNγ neutralisation as the relevant therapeutic target in pHLH. METHODS: Initial emapalumab dosing (1 mg/kg) for pHLH patients participating in a pivotal multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 2/3 study was based on anticipated IFNγ levels and allometrically scaled pharmacokinetic parameters estimated in healthy volunteers. Emapalumab dosing was adjusted based on estimated IFNγ-mediated clearance and HLH clinical and laboratory criteria. Frequent dosing and emapalumab dose adaptation were used to account for highly variable IFNγ levels and potential target-mediated drug disposition. RESULTS: High inter- and intra-individual variability in IFNγ production (assessed by total IFNγ levels, range: 102 -106  pg/mL) was observed in pHLH patients. Administering emapalumab reduced IFNγ activity, resulting in significant improvements in clinical and laboratory parameters and a reduced risk of adverse events, mainly related to pHLH. Modelled outcomes supported dose titration starting from 1 mg/kg, with possible increases to 3, 6 or 10 mg/kg based on re-evaluation of parameters of disease activity every 3 days. CONCLUSIONS: The variable and unanticipated extremely high IFNγ concentrations in patients with pHLH are reflected in parameters of disease activity. Improved outcomes can be achieved by neutralising IFNγ using frequent emapalumab dosing and dose adaptation guided by clinical and laboratory observations.

A prospective pilot study of a novel alemtuzumab target concentration intervention strategy.

Alemtuzumab is used as part of reduced-intensity and reduced-toxicity transplant conditioning regimens for nonmalignant diseases. Prior studies identified an ideal target concentration range of 0.15-0.6 mcg/mL at day 0. However, only 24% of patients fall within this window using standard intermediate dosing. We performed a pilot study of a novel target concentration intervention strategy to target day 0 alemtuzumab concentrations to 0.15-0.6 mcg/mL. Twelve patients received model-informed alemtuzumab dosing of 0.5-0.6 mcg/kg divided over days -14 to -12. Alemtuzumab concentrations were measured, and pharmacokinetic (PK) modeling was performed on day -5 to predict day 0 concentrations. If the day 0 alemtuzumab concentration was predicted to fall below 0.15 mcg/mL, simulations were performed to identify the individual "top-up" dose needed to achieve the target day 0 concentration window. Six (50%) patients achieved day 0 alemtuzumab concentrations between 0.15 and 0.6 mcg/mL (4 received a top-up dose). Five patients had day 0 concentrations above the target window (no top-up doses). One patient had a day 0 concentration below the target range in the presence of anti-alemtuzumab antibodies. A concentration intervention strategy approach to alemtuzumab treatment can successfully target a greater proportion of patients into the ideal therapeutic window. Additional dose-reduction studies are needed to further optimize the initial dosing and achieve target attainment in all patients.