Exoscopic Microsurgery: A Change of Paradigm in Brain Tumor Surgery? Comparison with Standard Operative Microscope.

BACKGROUND: The exoscope is a high-definition telescope recently introduced in neurosurgery. In the past few years, several reports have described the advantages and disadvantages of such technology. No studies have compared results of surgery with standard microscope and exoscope in patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). METHODS: Our retrospective study encompassed 177 patients operated on for GBM (WHO 2021) between February 2017 and August 2022. A total of 144 patients were operated on with a microscope only and the others with a 3D4K exoscope only. All clinical and radiological data were collected. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) have been estimated in the two groups and compared by the Cox model adjusting for potential confounders (e.g., sex, age, Karnofsky performance status, gross total resection, MGMT methylated promoter, and operator's experience). RESULTS: IDH was mutated in 9 (5.2%) patients and MGMT was methylated in 76 (44.4%). Overall, 122 patients received a gross total resection, 14 patients received a subtotal resection, and 41 patients received a partial resection. During follow-up, 139 (73.5%) patients experienced tumor recurrence and 18.7% of them received a second surgery. After truncation to 12 months, the median PFS for patients operated on with the microscope was 8.82 months, while for patients operated on with the exoscope it was >12 months. Instead, the OS was comparable in the two groups. The multivariable Cox model showed that the use of microscope compared to the exoscope was associated with lower progression-free survival (hazard ratio = 3.55, 95%CI = 1.66-7.56, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The exoscope has proven efficacy in terms of surgical resection, which was not different to that of the microscope. Furthermore, patients operated on with the exoscope had a longer PFS. A comparable OS was observed between microscope and exoscope, but further prospective studies with longer follow-up are needed.

Perilesional resection technique of glioblastoma: intraoperative ultrasound and histological findings of the resection borders in a single center experience.

INTRODUCTION: The surgical goal in glioblastoma treatment is the maximal safe resection of the tumor. Currently the lack of consensus on surgical technique opens different approaches. This study describes the "perilesional technique" and its outcomes in terms of the extent of resection, progression free survival and overall survival. METHODS: Patients included (n = 40) received a diagnosis of glioblastoma and underwent surgery using the perilesional dissection technique at "San Gerardo Hospital"between 2018 and 2021. The tumor core was progressively isolated using a circumferential movement, healthy brain margins were protected with Cottonoid patties in a "shingles on the roof" fashion, then the tumorwas removed en bloc. Intraoperative ultrasound (iOUS) was used and at least 1 bioptic sample of "healthy" margin of the resection was collected and analyzed. The extent of resection was quantified. Extent of surgical resection (EOR) and progression free survival (PFS)were safety endpoints of the procedure. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients (85%) received a gross total resection(GTR) while 3 (7.5%) patients received a sub-total resection (STR), and 3 (7.5%) a partial resection (PR). The mean post-operative residual volume was 1.44 cm3 (range 0-15.9 cm3).During surgery, a total of 76 margins were collected: 51 (67.1%) were tumor free, 25 (32.9%) were infiltrated. The median PFS was 13.4 months, 15.3 in the GTR group and 9.6 months in the STR-PR group. CONCLUSIONS: Perilesional resection is an efficient technique which aims to bring the surgeon to a safe environment, carefully reaching the "healthy" brain before removing the tumoren bloc. This technique can achieve excellent tumor margins, extent of resection, and preservation of apatient's functions.

Association between treatment-related lymphopenia and survival in glioblastoma patients following postoperative chemoradiotherapy.

PURPOSE: Our study investigated the association between treatment-related lymphopenia and overall survival (OS) in a series of glioblastoma (GBM) patients. We also explored clinical and dosimetric predictors of lymphocytes depletion. METHODS: Between 2015 and 2019, 64 patients were treated at the same institution with postoperative chemoradiotherapy. Peripheral lymphocyte count (PLC) data and dose-volume histogram parameters were collected. Radiotherapy (RT) schedule consisted in standard total dose of 60 Gy in 30 daily fractions, with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ). Posttreatment acute absolute lymphopenia (nadir AAL) was calculated as a PLC lower than 1.0â€¯× 103/mm3. Acute relative lymphopenia (ARL) was expressed by the nadir-PLC/baseline-PLC ratio < 0.5. Nadir-PLC was the lowest PLC registered between the end of RT and the first month of follow-up. Survival rates were estimated with Kaplan-Meier curves. Clinical and dosimetric variables related to AAL/ARL and OS were identified by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: A total of 57 patients were eligible and included in the analyses. The median PLC was significantly decreased following chemoradiotherapy (2180/mm3 vs 900/mm3). Median OS was 16 months (range 5-55 months), with no significant difference between patients who developed nadir AAL and those who did not (16 months vs 16.5 months; p = 0.304). When considering ARL vs non-ARL, median OS was 14 months vs 26 months (p = 0.013), respectively. In multivariate Cox regression only age, sex, extent of surgery, access to adjuvant chemotherapy and brain D98% were independently associated with OS. CONCLUSION: Although iatrogenic immunosuppression could be associated with inferior clinical outcomes, our data show that treatment-related lymphopenia does not adversely affect GBM survival. Prospective studies are required to confirm these findings.