Teaching clinical reasoning: principles from the literature to help improve instruction from the classroom to the bedside.

Clinical reasoning has been characterized as being an essential aspect of being a physician. Despite this, clinical reasoning has a variety of definitions and medical error, which is often attributed to clinical reasoning, has been reported to be a leading cause of death in the United States and abroad. Further, instructors struggle with teaching this essential ability which often does not play a significant role in the curriculum. In this article, we begin with defining clinical reasoning and then discuss four principles from the literature as well as a variety of techniques for teaching these principles to help ground an instructors' understanding in clinical reasoning. We also tackle contemporary challenges in teaching clinical reasoning such as the integration of artificial intelligence and strategies to help with transitions in instruction (e.g., from the classroom to the clinic or from medical school to residency/registrar training) and suggest next steps for research and innovation in clinical reasoning.

Exploring Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities Needed for Army Pharmacist Readiness Using the Nominal Group Technique.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to conduct a general educational needs assessment to identify deficiencies in current Army pharmacy education while projecting future educational requirements based on changes in pharmacy practice and evolving demands of military medicine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve pharmacists participated in a facilitated discussion using the nominal group technique. Data were analyzed using quantitative and qualitative methods to establish consensus. Member checking was used to verify and validate the findings. RESULTS: Participants generated 190 knowledge, skill, and ability (KSA) statements over 3 sessions. Twenty-one statements achieved consensus. Four consensus statements were skills, 7 were knowledge, and 10 were abilities. KSAs were categorized into pharmaceutical care, military, logistics, or legal domain based on a thematic analysis. CONCLUSIONS: With modernized, relevant KSAs, the Army can measure and train a ready pharmacy force. Individual Critical Tasks augmented with KSAs are one potential approach we recommend as a strategy to improve Army pharmacist health profession education.

Exploring sleep duration and clinical reasoning process in resident physicians: a thematic analysis.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Connecting resident physician work hours and sleep deprivation to adverse outcomes has been difficult. Our study explores clinical reasoning rather than outcomes. Diagnostic errors are a leading cause of medical error and may result from deficits in clinical reasoning. We used simulated cases to explore relationships between sleep duration and diagnostic reasoning. METHODS: Residents were recruited for a 2-month study (inpatient/outpatient). Each participant's sleep was tracked (sleep diary/actigraphy). At the end of each month, residents watched two brief simulated clinical encounters and performed "think alouds" of their clinical reasoning. In each session, one video was straightforward, and the other video contained distracting contextual factors. Sessions were recorded, transcribed, and interpreted. We conducted a thematic analysis using a constant comparative approach. Themes were compared based on sleep duration and contextual factors. RESULTS: Residents (n=17) slept more during outpatient compared to inpatient months (450.5±7.13 v 425.6±10.78, p=0.02). We found the following diagnostic reasoning themes: uncertainty, disorganized knowledge, error, semantic incompetence, emotional content, and organized knowledge. Themes reflecting suboptimal clinical reasoning (disorganized knowledge, error, semantic incompetence, uncertainty) were observed more in cases with contextual factors (distractors). "Think alouds" from cases with contextual factors following sleep restriction had a greater number of themes concerning for problematic diagnostic reasoning. CONCLUSIONS: Residents obtained significantly more sleep during outpatient compared to inpatient months. Several negative clinical reasoning themes emerged with less sleep combined with cases containing contextual distractors. Our findings reinforce the importance of adequate sleep and supervision in house officers, particularly in cases with distracting elements.

Reflecting on LTCOS Scholarship and Implications for Educational Practice.

The Long Term Career Outcome Study is a central program of research in the Center for Health Professions Education at the Uniformed Services University. The overarching goal of Long Term Career Outcome Study is to perform evidence-based evaluations before, during, and after medical school, and as such, it represents a form of educational epidemiology. In this essay, we highlighted the findings of the investigations published in this special issue. These investigations span from "before" medical school matriculation to "during" medical school and "after" learners go on to graduate training and practice. Furthermore, we discuss how this scholarship might shed light on improving the educational practices at the Uniformed Services University and potentially elsewhere. We hope that this work demonstrates how research can enhance medical education processes and connect research, policy, and practice.

Blinding of Admissions Committee to MCAT Scores: Is There a Difference in Subsequent Medical School Performance Between Cohorts?

BACKGROUND: The Medical College Admission Test (MCAT) is designed to inform members of the admissions committee about applicants' academic readiness for medical school. Although previous work has shown that MCAT scores have some predictive validity evidence for a variety of medical student outcomes, there is also a concern that the MCAT is overly emphasized by admissions committees, which may, for example, affect matriculant diversity. The purpose of this study was to understand whether deemphasizing the MCAT by blinding committee members to applicants' specific scores has resulted in matriculants with different pre-clerkship and clerkship performance. METHOD: The Admissions Committee from the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (USU) created a policy to blind admissions committee members to MCAT scores. The MCAT-blinded policy was implemented for classes of 2022 to 2024. This MCAT-blinded cohort's performance was compared with a previous cohort, classes of 2018 to 2020. Two analyses of covariance were performed to test for differences in the pre-clerkship and clerkship module scores. Undergraduate grade point average (uGPA) and MCAT percentile for matriculants were included as covariates. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in either pre-clerkship or clerkship performance between the MCAT-revealed and MCAT-blinded cohorts. CONCLUSION: This study found similar medical school performance between the MCAT-blinded and MCAT-revealed cohorts. The research team plans to continuously follow these two cohorts to understand their performance further down their education path, including step 1 and step 2 examinations.

Career Accomplishments of Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences Medical Graduates: Classes 1980-2017.

BACKGROUND: The current study reports career accomplishments of Uniformed Services University (USU) graduates in four areas: (1) positions held over the course of their entire career, (2) military awards, decorations, and rank, (3) first residency completed, and (4) academic achievements. METHOD: Utilizing the responses to the alumni survey sent to USU graduates in the Class 1980 to 2017, we extracted relevant data and reported descriptive statistics. RESULTS: 1,848 out of 4,469 responded to the survey (41%). 86% (n = 1,574) of respondents indicated having served as a full-time clinician (seeing patients at least 70% of the time during a typical week), while many of them serve in leadership such as educational, operational, or command leadership roles. 87% (n = 1,579) of respondents are ranked from O-4 to O-6, and 64% (n = 1,169) of the respondents received a military award or medal. Family medicine, internal medicine, and pediatrics were the most chosen medical specialties, which is similar to the national patterns reported by AAMC. 45% (n = 781) held an academic appointment. CONCLUSION: USU graduates continue to make significant contributions to military medicine. USU graduates' medical specialty preferences are similar to the past, which calls for further investigation to identify driving factors on such preference.

Teaching Students How to Think: A Longitudinal Qualitative Study of Preclerkship Clinical Reasoning Instruction.

INTRODUCTION: An objective of undergraduate medical education is to teach students how to think like physicians through a process called clinical reasoning. Currently, clerkship directors often feel that students enter their clinical years with a marginal comprehension of clinical reasoning concepts; instruction in this area could be improved. Although there have been previous educational studies assessing curricular interventions to improve the instruction of clinical reasoning, it is not yet known what happens at an individual level between an instructor and a small group of students in the teaching of clinical reasoning. This research will identify how clinical reasoning is being taught in a longitudinal clinical reasoning course. METHODS: The Introduction to Clinical Reasoning course is a 15-month-long case-based course held in the preclinical curriculum of the USU. Individual sessions involve small-group learning with approximately seven students per group. Throughout the academic year of 2018-2019, 10 of these sessions were videotaped and transcribed. All participants provided informed consent. A thematic analysis was performed using a constant comparative approach. Transcripts were analyzed until thematic sufficiency was reached. RESULTS: Over 300 pages of text were analyzed; new themes ceased to be identified after the eighth session. Topics included obstetrics, general pediatric issues, jaundice, and chest pain; these sessions were taught either by attendings, fellows, or fourth-year medical students with attending supervision. The thematic analysis revealed themes associated with clinical reasoning processes, themes associated with knowledge organization, and a theme associated with clinical reasoning in the military. The clinical reasoning process themes included problem list construction and refinement, differential diagnosis, naming and defending a leading diagnosis, and clinical reasoning heuristics. The knowledge organization themes included illness script development and refinement and semantic competence. The final theme was military relevant care. CONCLUSIONS: In individual teaching sessions, preceptors emphasized problem lists, differential diagnoses, and leading diagnoses in a course designed to strengthen diagnostic reasoning in preclerkship medical students. The use of illness scripts was more often implicitly used rather than explicitly stated, and students used these sessions to use and apply new vocabularies related to a clinical presentation. Instruction in clinical reasoning could be improved by encouraging faculty to provide further context to their thinking, by encouraging the comparing and contrasting of illness scripts, and by using a shared vocabulary for clinical reasoning. Limitations of this study include that it was done in the context of a clinical reasoning course and that it was done at a military medical school, which may limit generalizability. Future studies could determine if faculty development could improve the frequency of references to the clinical reasoning processes that could improve student readiness for clerkship.

The Retention of USUHS Military Physicians: An Exploratory Study.

BACKGROUND: Previously, researchers investigated the career accomplishments of USU medical graduates using the data from a USU alumni survey. To better understand if such accomplishments are related to military retention, the current study investigates the relationship between accomplishments (such as military career milestones and academic achievement) and military retention. METHODS: Utilizing the responses to the alumni survey sent to USU graduates in the Classes of 1980 to 2017, the researchers investigated the relationship between a series of survey items (e.g., military rank, medical specialties, and operation experiences) and military retention. RESULTS: Among the respondents who had a deployment history in support of an operational mission, 206 (67.1%) stayed longer than their initial active duty service or planned on staying longer than their current active duty service commitment. Fellowship directors (n = 65, 72.3%) showed a higher retention rate than other positions. The PHS alumni had the highest retention rate (n = 39, 69%) of the military branches, whereas physicians in medical specialties with higher demand (e.g., otolaryngology and psychiatry) showed less promising retention. CONCLUSIONS: By conducting future research on underlying reasons as to why full-time clinicians, junior physicians, and physicians in medical specialties with higher demand showed less promising retention, stakeholders will be able to identify what needs to be addressed to retain highly skilled physicians in the military.