Role and benefits of infectious diseases specialists in the COVID-19 pandemic: Multilevel analysis of care provision in German hospitals using data from the Lean European Open Survey on SARS-CoV-2 infected patients (LEOSS) cohort.

PURPOSE: This study investigates the care provision and the role of infectious disease (ID) specialists during the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. METHODS: A survey was conducted at German study sites participating in the Lean European Open Survey on SARS-CoV-2 infected patients (LEOSS). Hospitals certified by the German Society of Infectious diseases (DGI) were identified as ID centers. We compared care provision and the involvement of ID specialists between ID and non-ID hospitals. Then we applied a multivariable regression model to analyse how clinical ID care influenced the mortality of COVID-19 patients in the LEOSS cohort. RESULTS: Of the 40 participating hospitals in the study, 35% (14/40) were identified as ID centers. Among those, clinical ID care structures were more commonly established, and ID specialists were always involved in pandemic management and the care of COVID-19 patients. Overall, 68% (27/40) of the hospitals involved ID specialists in the crisis management team, 78% (31/40) in normal inpatient care, and 80% (28/35) in intensive care. Multivariable analysis revealed that COVID-19 patients in ID centers had a lower mortality risk compared to those in non-ID centers (odds ratio: 0.61 (95% CI 0.40-0.93), p = 0.021). CONCLUSION: ID specialists played a crucial role in pandemic management and inpatient care.

Infective endocarditis and spondylodiscitis-impact of sequence of surgical therapy on survival and recurrence rate.

OBJECTIVES: To date, there are no standardized treatment algorithms or recommendations for patients with infective endocarditis (IE) and concomitant spondylodiscitis (SD). Therefore, our aim was to analyse whether the sequence of surgical treatment of IE and SD has an impact on postoperative outcome and to identify risk factors for survival and postoperative recurrence. METHODS: Patients with IE underwent surgery in 4 German university hospitals between 1994 and 2022. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to identify possible predictors of 30-day/1-year mortality and recurrence of IE and/or SD. RESULTS: From the total IE cohort (n = 3991), 150 patients (4.4%) had concomitant SD. Primary surgery for IE was performed in 76.6%, and primary surgery for SD in 23.3%. The median age was 70.0 (64.0-75.6) years and patients were mostly male (79.5%). The most common pathogens detected were enterococci and Staphylococcus aureus followed by streptococci, and coagulase-negative Staphylococci. If SD was operated on first, 30-day mortality was significantly higher than if IE was operated on 1st (25.7% vs 11.4%; P = 0.037) and we observed a tendency for a higher 1-year mortality. If IE was treated 1st, we observed a higher recurrence rate within 1 year (12.2% vs 0%; P = 0.023). Multivariable analysis showed that primary surgery for SD was an independent predictor of 30-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Primary surgical treatment for SD was an independent risk factor for 30-day mortality. When IE was treated surgically 1st, the recurrence rate of IE and/or SD was higher.

An investigation into the quality of life improvements after vertebral osteomyelitis depending on the status of pathogen detection.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare clinical characteristics and quality of life (QoL) after vertebral osteomyelitis (VO) based on the status of pathogen detection in microbiological sampling. METHODS: We conducted a post hoc data analysis from a prospective single-center study in a tertiary referral hospital, including VO patients from 2008 to 2020. Data were collected preoperatively (T0) and 1-year post surgery (T1). The primary outcome was QoL, assessed with the Oswestry Disability Index and Core Outcome Measures Index. RESULTS: Data from 133 patients with surgically treated thoracic or lumbar VO were evaluated. The pathogen was detected from cultured intraoperative samples in 100 (75.2%) patients (group 1). Culture remained negative in 33 (24.8%) patients (group 2). Quality of life did not differ significantly between the groups at T1. We observed higher preoperative C-reactive protein values and higher rates of spinal empyema at T0 in group 1. CONCLUSION: Quality of life improved significantly for all patients at T1, but scores remained comparable to those reported by patients with chronic back pain. Quality of life was not affected by pathogen detection. However, attempts to detect pathogens are still indicated due to the concomitant findings, including bacteremia and epidural abscesses, along with the advantages of targeted antibiotic therapy. The most critical step for detection may be avoiding pre-sampling antibiotic administration. Cite this article as: Beyer F, Wenk B, Jung N, Bredow J, Eysel P, Yagdiran A. An investigation into quality of life improvements after vertebral osteomyelitis depending on the status of pathogen detection. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc., 2024; 10.5152/j.aott.2024.23073 [Epub Ahead of Print].

Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) in Germany: insights and clinical outcomes from the K-APAT cohort study.

PURPOSE: Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) offers several key advantages, including enhanced patient quality of life, reduced healthcare costs, and a potential reduction of nosocomial infections. It is acknowledged for its safety and effectiveness. This study provides the first systematic clinical data for Germany, where OPAT has not yet been widely adopted. The aim is to establish a foundational reference point for further research and integration of OPAT into the German healthcare system. METHODS: This prospective observational study descriptively analyses data obtained from a cohort of patients receiving OPAT. Both in- and outpatients from all medical specialties could be recruited. Patients administered the anti-infective medications themselves at home using elastomeric pumps. RESULTS: 77 patients received OPAT, with a median duration of 15 days and saving 1782 inpatient days. The most frequently treated entities were orthopaedic infections (n = 20, 26%), S. aureus bloodstream infection (n = 16, 21%) and infectious endocarditis (n = 11, 14%). The most frequently applied drugs were flucloxacillin (n = 18, 23%), penicillin G (n = 13, 17%) and ceftriaxone (n = 10; 13%). Only 5% of patients (n = 4) reported to have missed more than one outpatient dose (max. 3 per patient). Only one catheter-related adverse event required medical intervention, and there were no catheter-related infections. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrates that OPAT can be safely conducted in Germany. In preparation for its broader implementation, crucial next steps include creating medical guidelines, fostering interdisciplinary and inter-sectoral communication, as well as creating financial and structural regulations that facilitate and encourage the adoption of OPAT. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04002453.

Efficacy and safety of an early oral switch in low-risk Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection (SABATO): an international, open-label, parallel-group, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection is treated with at least 14 days of intravenous antimicrobials. We assessed the efficacy and safety of an early switch to oral therapy in patients at low risk for complications related to S aureus bloodstream infection. METHODS: In this international, open-label, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial done in 31 tertiary care hospitals in Germany, France, the Netherlands, and Spain, adult patients with low-risk S aureus bloodstream infection were randomly assigned after 5-7 days of intravenous antimicrobial therapy to oral antimicrobial therapy or to continue intravenous standard therapy. Randomisation was done via a central web-based system, using permuted blocks of varying length, and stratified by study centre. The main exclusion criteria were signs and symptoms of complicated S aureus bloodstream infection, non-removable foreign devices, and severe comorbidity. The composite primary endpoint was the occurrence of any complication related to S aureus bloodstream infection (relapsing S aureus bloodstream infection, deep-seated infection, and mortality attributable to infection) within 90 days, assessed in the intention-to-treat population by clinical assessors who were masked to treatment assignment. Adverse events were assessed in all participants who received at least one dose of study medication (safety population). Due to slow recruitment, the scientific advisory committee decided on Jan 15, 2018, to stop the trial after 215 participants were randomly assigned (planned sample size was 430 participants) and to convert the planned interim analysis into the final analysis. The decision was taken without knowledge of outcome data, at a time when 126 participants were enrolled. The new sample size accommodated a non-inferiority margin of 10%; to claim non-inferiority, the upper bound of the 95% CI for the treatment difference (stratified by centre) had to be below 10 percentage points. The trial is closed to recruitment and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01792804), the German Clinical trials register (DRKS00004741), and EudraCT (2013-000577-77). FINDINGS: Of 5063 patients with S aureus bloodstream infection assessed for eligibility, 213 were randomly assigned to switch to oral therapy (n=108) or to continue intravenous therapy (n=105). Mean age was 63·5 (SD 17·2) years and 148 (69%) participants were male and 65 (31%) were female. In the oral switch group, 14 (13%) participants met the primary endpoint versus 13 (12%) in the intravenous group, with a treatment difference of 0·7 percentage points (95% CI -7·8 to 9·1; p=0·013). In the oral switch group, 36 (34%) of 107 participants in the safety population had at least one serious adverse event compared with 27 (26%) of 103 participants in the intravenous group (p=0·29). INTERPRETATION: Oral switch antimicrobial therapy was non-inferior to intravenous standard therapy in participants with low-risk S aureus bloodstream infection. However, it is necessary to carefully assess patients for signs and symptoms of complicated S aureus bloodstream infection at the time of presentation and thereafter before considering early oral switch therapy. FUNDING: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. TRANSLATIONS: For the German, Spanish, French and Dutch translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Flucloxacillin and cefazolin for treatment of Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection.

PURPOSE: Antistaphylococcal penicillins and cefazolin have been used as first line therapy in Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection. While efficacy of both regimens seems to be similar, the compounds may differ with regard to tolerability. This study aims to describe the clinical use of cefazolin and flucloxacillin, focussing on discontinuation or change of anti-infective agent due to adverse events. METHODS: This observational prospective study was conducted at two German tertiary care centres with an internal recommendation of flucloxacillin for MSSA-BSI in one, and of cefazolin in the other centre. Adverse events were registered weekly under treatment and at a 90-day follow-up. Descriptive analysis was complemented by a propensity score analysis comparing adverse events (stratified rank-based test applied to the sum of Common Terminology Criteria for adverse events ratings per patient). RESULTS: Of 71 patients included, therapy was initiated with flucloxacillin in 56 (79%), and with cefazolin in 15 (21%). The propensity score analysis indicates a statistically significant difference concerning the severity of adverse events between the treatment groups in favour of cefazolin (p = 0.019). Adverse events led to discontinuation of flucloxacillin in 7 individuals (13% of all patients receiving flucloxacillin). Clinical outcome was not different among treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Using cefazolin rather than flucloxacillin as a first line agent for treatment of MSSA-BSI is supported by these clinical data.

Surgery for Vertebral Osteomyelitis Lowers 1-Year Mortality and Failure Rates Compared with Nonsurgical Treatment: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine differences between patients who underwent surgical treatment and those who underwent nonsurgical treatment of vertebral osteomyelitis (VO) and to identify potential factors influencing treatment failure (death and/or recurrence within 1 year). METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of clinical data prospectively collected from patients treated for VO between 2008 and 2020. The decision between surgical and nonsurgical treatment was made for each patient based on defined criteria. A 1:1 propensity score matching was performed to exclude confounders between the 2 treatments. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to identify potential risk factors for death and/or recurrence within the first year after VO diagnosis. RESULTS: Forty-two patients (11.8%) were treated nonsurgically and 313 patients (88.2%) underwent surgery. A higher percentage of the surgically treated patients than the nonsurgically treated patients had an American Society of Anesthesiologists score of >2 (69.0% versus 47.5%; p = 0.007), and the thoracic spine was affected more often in the surgical group (30.4% versus 11.9%; p = 0.013). Endocarditis was detected significantly more often in the nonsurgically treated patients (14.3% versus 4.2%; p = 0.018). The recurrence rate was 3 times higher in the nonsurgically treated patients (16.7% versus 5.4%; p = 0.017), but this difference was no longer detectable after propensity matching. After matching, the nonsurgically treated patients showed an almost 7-fold higher 1-year mortality rate (25.0% versus 3.7%; p = 0.018) and an almost 3-fold higher rate of treatment failure (42.9% versus 14.8%; p = 0.022). Multivariable analysis revealed nonsurgical treatment and bacteremia to be independent risk factors for treatment failure. CONCLUSIONS: In our matched cohort of patients with VO, surgical intervention resulted in a significantly lower rate of treatment failure (death and/or recurrence within 1 year) compared with nonsurgical intervention. Furthermore, nonsurgical treatment was an independent risk factor for treatment failure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.