Physician experience improves ability to predict 6-month functional outcome of severe traumatic brain injury.

BACKGROUND: The functional prognosis of severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) during the acute phase is often poor and uncertain. We aimed to quantify the elements that shade the degree of uncertainty in prognostic determination of TBI and to better understand the role of clinical experience in prognostic quality. METHODS: This was an observational, prospective, multicenter study. The medical records of 16 patients with moderate or severe TBI in 2020 were randomly drawn from a previous study and submitted to two groups of physicians: senior and junior. The senior physician group had graduated from a critical care fellowship, and the junior physician group had at least 3 years of anesthesia and critical care residency. They were asked for each patient, based on the reading of clinical data and CT images of the first 24 h, to determine the probability of an unfavorable outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale < 4) at 6 months between 0 and 100, and their level of confidence. These estimations were compared with the actual evolution. RESULTS: Eighteen senior physicians and 18 junior physicians in 4 neuro-intensive care units were included in 2021. We observed that senior physicians performed better than junior physicians, with 73% (95% confidence interval (CI) 65-79) and 62% (95% CI 56-67) correct predictions, respectively, in the senior and junior groups (p = 0.006). The risk factors for incorrect prediction were junior group (OR 1.71, 95% CI 1.15-2.55), low confidence in the estimation (OR 1.76, 95% CI 1.18-2.63), and low level of agreement on prediction between senior physicians (OR 6.78, 95% CI 3.45-13.35). CONCLUSIONS: Determining functional prognosis in the acute phase of severe TBI involves uncertainty. This uncertainty should be modulated by the experience and confidence of the physician, and especially on the degree of agreement between physicians.

Long-term outcome following blunt cerebrovascular injuries: occurrence of ischemic complications, treatment, and outcome.

PURPOSE: Blunt cerebrovascular injuries (BCVI) are a rare but serious complication after trauma. Among patients with BCVI, neurological status is altered in 30% of cases and the prognosis seems to be associated with ischemic complications. The aim of this study was to assess the long-term outcome of BCVI-associated ischemic events. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study (2011-2017) included all patients admitted for severe trauma with identified BCVI in two level-1 trauma centers. Patients were considered to have a poor neurological outcome with a GOS-E between 2 and 5 and a good neurological outcome with GOS-E between 6 and 8. A multivariate logistic regression identified risk factors for poor neurological outcome at 1 year. RESULTS: Of the 6,294 patients admitted in both trauma centers between 2011 and 2017, 81 patients presenting BCVI were identified (incidence of 1.3%). The median age was 35 years (24-44) with a median Injury Severity Score of 28 (17-41). 29 patients (50%) had a good neurological prognosis, while 25 patients (43%) had a poor neurological prognosis at 1 year. Ischemic stroke occurred in 11 patients (13.6%) within a median time of 2 days (2-2.5). No ischemic stroke occurred in the first year after ICU discharge in both groups. In our study, good prognosis at 1 year was not associated with ischemic complications [3 (10) vs 3 (12) p = 1]. CONCLUSION: Ischemic complications after BCVI are rare, occur within the first week and do not seem to impact independently the 1-year neurological prognosis.

ISS is not an appropriate tool to estimate overtriage.

PURPOSE: The aim of this work is to study a cohort of patients of ISS < 15 admitted to a TC, and to determine the number of patients that ultimately benefited from the skills and resources specific of a level 1 trauma center. METHODS: Retrospective study from a prospective cohort of patients admitted to TC (Beaujon Hospital, APHP) for suspected severe trauma from January 2011 to December 2017. The main outcome criterion was the use of surgery or interventional radiology within the first 24 h after admission of patients with ISS < 15. The secondary outcomes were stratified into severe (mortality, resuscitation care, length of stay in intensive care units) and non-severe criteria (mild head injury, hospital discharge or transfer within 24 h). RESULTS: Of 3035 patients admitted during the study period, 1409 with an ISS < 15 were included, corresponding to a theoretical overtriage rate of 46.4%. Among these, 611 patients (43.4%) underwent emergency intervention within the first 24 h (586 surgical interventions, 19 direct transfers to the operating theater and 6 acts of interventional radiology), 238 (16.9%) of patients presented with severe and 531 (38%) with non-severe outcome criteria. CONCLUSION: This work demonstrates that in a cohort of patients classified as ISS < 15 admitted to a TC, a considerable amount of TC-specific resources are required, and patients present with severe outcome criteria despite being classified as overtriaged. These results suggest that triage of trauma patients should be based on resource use and clinical outcome rather than anatomic criteria.

Tracheostomy in COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome patients and follow-up: A parisian bicentric retrospective cohort.

BACKGROUND: Tracheostomy has been proposed as an option to help organize the healthcare system to face the unprecedented number of patients hospitalized for a COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in intensive care units (ICU). It is, however, considered a particularly high-risk procedure for contamination. This paper aims to provide our experience in performing tracheostomies on COVID-19 critically ill patients during the pandemic and its long-term local complications. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of patients tracheostomized for a COVID-19-related ARDS in two university hospitals in the Paris region between January 27th (date of first COVID-19 admission) and May 18th, 2020 (date of last tracheostomy performed). We focused on tracheostomy technique (percutaneous versus surgical), timing (early versus late) and late complications. RESULTS: Forty-eight tracheostomies were performed with an equal division between surgical and percutaneous techniques. There was no difference in patients' characteristics between surgical and percutaneous groups. Tracheostomy was performed after a median of 17 [12-22] days of mechanical ventilation (MV), with 10 patients in the "early" group (≤ day 10) and 38 patients in the "late" group (> day 10). Survivors required MV for a median of 32 [22-41] days and were ultimately decannulated with a median of 21 [15-34] days spent on cannula. Patients in the early group had shorter ICU and hospital stays (respectively 15 [12-19] versus 35 [25-47] days; p = 0.002, and 21 [16-28] versus 54 [35-72] days; p = 0.002) and spent less time on MV (respectively 17 [14-20] and 35 [27-43] days; p<0.001). Interestingly, patients in the percutaneous group had shorter hospital and rehabilitation center stays (respectively 44 [34-81] versus 92 [61-118] days; p = 0.012, and 24 [11-38] versus 45 [22-71] days; p = 0.045). Of the 30 (67%) patients examined by a head and neck surgeon, 17 (57%) had complications with unilateral laryngeal palsy (n = 5) being the most prevalent. CONCLUSIONS: Tracheostomy seems to be a safe procedure that could help ICU organization by delegating work to a separate team and favoring patient turnover by allowing faster transfer to step-down units. Following guidelines alone was found sufficient to prevent the risk of aerosolization and contamination of healthcare professionals.

Real-world use of idarucizumab for dabigatran reversal in three cases of serious bleeding.

Bleeding is a rare complication of direct oral anticoagulant potentially associated with high mortality rates. Biological monitoring is necessary for more than 24 h after idarucizumab antidote therapy in case of bleeding with dabigatran therapy.