A phase III study comparing secondary long-term prophylaxis versus on-demand treatment with vWF/FVIII concentrates in severe inherited von Willebrand disease.

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of prospective clinical trials specifically designed to evaluate the benefits of prophylaxis with vWF/FVIII concentrates in patients with inherited von Willebrand disease (vWD). The aim of the study was to compare efficacy of secondary long-term prophylaxis (PRO) with vWF/FVIII in the prevention of bleeding episodes in severe vWD patients to standard of care (on-demand treatment; ODT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this 12-month, phase III, open-label study (PRO.WILL), vWD patients (aged ≥6 years) were randomised to PRO (n=9; 5 completed) or ODT (n=10; 7 completed) treatment with Fanhdi®/Alphanate® (Grifols) according to current licensing status for use in vWD. We assessed the proportion of patients who did not present any spontaneous bleeding episode, adverse events (AEs) or thrombotic events. RESULTS: All patients on ODT had vWD type 2 or 3 vs 70% of patients on PRO. All ODT patients experienced bleeds vs 60% on PRO. PRO patients showed fewer bleeds (n=32 vs n=172 [112 in the same patient, mostly mucosal]; p<0.0001) and lower risk of bleeding (relative attributable risk estimate: -0.667; 95% CI: -2.374, -0.107; p<0.001). Most frequent bleeds in ODT and PRO groups were, respectively, epistaxis (n=52 vs n=15) and gastrointestinal (n=13 [9 in the same patient] vs n=1). While most bleeds lasted one day under ODT (31/32), only epistaxis did so in PRO group (14/15). No AEs due to study medication were observed. DISCUSSION: Despite the small sample size and the heterogeneity of the study population, patients on vWF/FVIII prophylaxis showed a reduction in bleeding risk and rate compared to on-demand treatment.

Risk Factors for the Progression from Low to High Titres in 260 Children with Severe Haemophilia A and Newly Developed Inhibitors.

In children with severe haemophilia A, inhibitors to factor VIII (FVIII) usually develop during the first 50 treatment exposure days and are classified as low or high titre depending on the peak inhibitor titre being greater or less than 5 Bethesda units/mL (BU/mL). Classification of the inhibitor may change with time, as some low-titre inhibitors progress to high titre following re-exposure to FVIII concentrate. The aim of this study was to investigate potential risk factors for such a progression in children with severe haemophilia A and newly diagnosed inhibitors. This study was a follow-up study of the PedNet Registry and included 260 children with severe haemophilia A and inhibitors born between 1990 and 2009 and recruited consecutively from 31 haemophilia centres. Clinical and laboratory data were collected from the date of each child's first positive inhibitor test for at least 3 years. At the time of first positive inhibitor test, 49% (n = 127) had low-titre inhibitors, with 50% of them progressing to high titre and only 25% maintaining low titres. The FVIII gene (F8) mutation type was known in 247 patients (95%), and included 202 (82%) null mutations. The progression to high-titre inhibitors was associated with null F8 mutations (odds ratio [OR]: 2.6; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.0­6.5), family history of inhibitors (OR: 7.2; 95% CI: 1.8­28.4) and the use of high-dose immune tolerance induction, defined as ≥100 IU FVIII concentrate/kg/d (OR: 3.9; 95% CI: 1.5­10.0). These results suggest that high-dose immune tolerance induction should be avoided as the initial strategy in patients who develop low-titre FVIII inhibitors.