Optimisation of virtual monoenergetic reconstructions for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism using photon-counting detector computed tomography angiography.

Purpose: Computed tomography (CT) pulmonary angiography is considered the gold standard for pulmonary embolism (PE) diagnosis, relying on the discrimination between contrast and embolus. Photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) generates monoenergetic reconstructions through energy-resolved detection. Virtual monoenergetic images (VMI) at low keV can be used to improve pulmonary artery opacification. While studies have assessed VMI for PE diagnosis on dual-energy CT (DECT), there is a lack of literature on optimal settings for PCD-CT-PE reconstructions, warranting further investigation. Material and methods: Twenty-five sequential patients who underwent PCD-CT pulmonary angiography for suspicion of acute PE were retrospectively included in this study. Quantitative metrics including signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise (CNR) ratio were calculated for 4 VMI values (40, 60, 80, and 100 keV). Qualitative measures of diagnostic quality were obtained for proximal to distal pulmonary artery branches by 2 cardiothoracic radiologists using a 5-point modified Likert scale. Results: SNR and CNR were highest for the 40 keV VMI (49.3 ± 22.2 and 48.2 ± 22.1, respectively) and were inversely related to monoenergetic keV. Qualitatively, 40 and 60 keV both exhibited excellent diagnostic quality (mean main pulmonary artery: 5.0 ± 0 and 5.0 ± 0; subsegmental pulmonary arteries 4.9 ± 0.1 and 4.9 ± 0.1, respectively) while distal segments at high (80-100) keVs had worse quality. Conclusions: 40 keV was the best individual VMI for the detection of pulmonary embolism by quantitative metrics. Qualitatively, 40-60 keV reconstructions may be used without a significant decrease in subjective quality. VMIs at higher keV lead to reduced opacification of the distal pulmonary arteries, resulting in decreased image quality.

Enhancing diagnostic precision for acute chest syndrome in sickle cell disease: insights from dual-energy CT lung perfusion mapping.

PURPOSE: Acute chest syndrome (ACS) is secondary to occlusion of the pulmonary vasculature and a potentially life-threatening complication of sickle cell disease (SCD). Dual-energy CT (DECT) iodine perfusion map reconstructions can provide a method to visualize and quantify the extent of pulmonary microthrombi. METHODS: A total of 102 patients with sickle cell disease who underwent DECT CTPA with perfusion were retrospectively identified. The presence or absence of airspace opacities, segmental perfusion defects, and acute or chronic pulmonary emboli was noted. The number of segmental perfusion defects between patients with and without acute chest syndrome was compared. Sub-analyses were performed to investigate robustness. RESULTS: Of the 102 patients, 68 were clinically determined to not have ACS and 34 were determined to have ACS by clinical criteria. Of the patients with ACS, 82.4% were found to have perfusion defects with a median of 2 perfusion defects per patient. The presence of any or new perfusion defects was significantly associated with the diagnosis of ACS (P = 0.005 and < 0.001, respectively). Excluding patients with pulmonary embolism, 79% of patients with ACS had old or new perfusion defects, and the specificity for new perfusion defects was 87%, higher than consolidation/ground glass opacities (80%). CONCLUSION: DECT iodine map has the capability to depict microthrombi as perfusion defects. The presence of segmental perfusion defects on dual-energy CT maps was found to be associated with ACS with potential for improved specificity and reclassification.

Ultra-high-resolution photon-counting detector computed tomography of the lungs: Phantom and clinical assessment of radiation dose and image quality.

PURPOSE: Photon-counting-detector computed tomography (PCD-CT) offers enhanced noise reduction, spatial resolution, and image quality in comparison to energy-integrated-detectors CT (EID-CT). These hypothesized improvements were compared using PCD-CT ultra-high (UHR) and standard-resolution (SR) scan-modes. METHODS: Phantom scans were obtained with both EID-CT and PCD-CT (UHR, SR) on an adult body-phantom. Radiation dose was measured and noise levels were compared at a minimum achievable slice thickness of 0.5 mm for EID-CT, 0.2 mm for PCD-CT-UHR and 0.4 mm for PCD-CT-SR. Signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) were calculated for five tissue densities. Additionally, data from 25 patients who had PCD-CT of chest were reconstructed at 1 mm and 0.2 mm (UHR) slice-thickness and compared quantitatively (SNR) and qualitatively (noise, quality, sharpness, bone details). RESULTS: Phantom PCD-CT-UHR and PCD-CT-SR scans had similar measured radiation dose (16.0mGy vs 15.8 mGy). Phantom PCD-CT-SR (0.4 mm) had lower noise level in comparison to EID-CT (0.5 mm) (9.0HU vs 9.6HU). PCD-CT-UHR (0.2 mm) had slightly higher noise level (11.1HU). Phantom PCD-CT-SR (0.4 mm) had higher SNR in comparison to EID-CT (0.5 mm) while achieving higher resolution (Bone 115 vs 96, Acrylic 14 vs 14, Polyethylene 11 vs 10). SNR was slightly lower across all densities for PCD-CT UHR (0.2 mm). Interestingly, CNR was highest in the 0.2 mm PCD-CT group; PCD-CT CNR was 2.45 and 2.88 times the CNR for 0.5 mm EID-CT for acrylic and poly densities. Clinical comparison of SNR showed predictably higher SNR for 1 mm (30.3 ± 10.7 vs 14.2 ± 7, p = 0.02). Median subjective ratings were higher for 0.2 mm UHR vs 1 mm PCD-CT for nodule contour (4.6 ± 0.3 vs 3.6 ± 0.1, p = 0.02), bone detail (5 ± 0 vs 4 ± 0.1, p = 0.001), image quality (5 ± 0.1 vs 4.6 ± 0.4, p = 0.001), and sharpness (5 ± 0.1 vs 4 ± 0.2). CONCLUSION: Both UHR and SR PCD-CT result in similar radiation dose levels. PCD-CT can achieve higher resolution with lower noise level in comparison to EID-CT.

Left atrial calcification on chest CT: atrial ablation replaces rheumatic heart disease as the most identified etiology.

Purpose: Left atrial calcification (LAC), a primarily radiologic diagnosis, has been associated with rheumatic heart disease (RHD) and rheumatic fever (RF). However, left atrial calcification continues to be observed despite a significant decrease in the prevalence of rheumatic heart disease. The purpose of this study was to investigate other possible etiologies of left atrial calcification. Material and methods: This retrospective, observational single-center study included patients from 2017 to 2022 identified as having left atrial calcification as well as age- and sex-matched controls. The prevalence of rheumatic heart disease, atrial ablation, and mitral valve disease was compared, and odds ratios were calculated for each independent variable. Results: Sixty-two patients with left atrial calcifications were included and compared with 62 controls. 87.1% of patients in the left atrial calcifications cohort had a history of atrial fibrillation compared with 21% in the control cohort (p < 0.001). 16.1% of patients in the calcifications cohort presented a history of rheumatic fever compared with zero in the control cohort (p = 0.004). 66.1% of the left atrial calcifications cohort had a history of atrial ablation compared with 6.5% of the control group (p < 0.001). The odds ratio for left atrial calcification was 19.0 vs. 4.8 for rheumatic fever (comparative odds = 4.0 for atrial ablation vs. rheumatic fever). Multivariable log model found atrial ablation to explain 79.8% of left atrial calcifications identified. Conclusions: Our study found a 4-fold higher association between history of atrial ablation and left atrial calcification compared with rheumatic heart disease, suggesting a potential shift in etiology.

Non-contrast computed tomography findings for identification of chronically occluded coronary artery bypass grafts.

BACKGROUND: Detecting occlusions of coronary artery bypass grafts using non-contrast computed tomography (CT) series is understudied and underestimated. PURPOSE: To evaluate morphological findings for the diagnosis of chronic coronary artery bypass graft occlusion on non-contrast CT and investigate performance statistics for potential use cases. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventy-three patients with coronary artery bypass grafts who had CT angiography of the chest (non-contrast and arterial phases) were retrospectively included. Two readers applied pre-set morphologic findings to assess the patency of a bypass graft on non-contrast series. These findings included vessel shape (linear-band like), collapsed lumen and surgical graft marker without a visible vessel. Performance was tested using the simultaneously acquired arterial phase series as the ground truth. RESULTS: The per-patient diagnostic accuracy for occlusion was 0.890 (95% confidence interval = 0.795-0.951). Venous grafts overall had an 88% accuracy. None of the left internal mammary artery to left anterior descending artery arterial graft occlusions were detected. The negative likelihood ratio for an occluded graft that is truly patent was 0.121, demonstrating a true post-test probability of 97% for identifying a patent graft as truly patent given a prevalence of 20% occlusion at a median 8.4 years post-surgery. Neither years post-surgery, nor number of vessels was associated with a significant decrease in reader accuracy. CONCLUSION: Evaluation of coronary bypass grafts for chronic occlusion on non-contrast CT based off vessel morphology is feasible and accurate for venous grafts. Potential use cases include low-intermediate risk patients with chest pain or shortness of breath for whom non-contrast CT was ordered, or administration of iodine-based contrast is contraindicated.

Application of an artificial intelligence ensemble for detection of important secondary findings on lung ventilation and perfusion SPECT-CT.

RATIONALE: Single-photon-emission-computerized-tomography/computed-tomography(SPECT/CT) is commonly used for pulmonary disease. Scant work has been done to determine ability of AI for secondary findings using low-dose-CT(LDCT) attenuation correction series of SPECT/CT. METHODS: 120 patients with ventilation-perfusion-SPECT/CT from 9/1/21-5/1/22 were included in this retrospective study. AI-RAD companion(VA10A,Siemens-Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany), an ensemble of deep-convolutional-neural-networks was evaluated for the detection of pulmonary nodules, coronary artery calcium, aortic ectasia/aneurysm, and vertebral height loss. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity was measured for the outcomes. Inter-rater reliability were measured. Inter-rater reliability was measured using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) by comparing the number of nodules identified by the AI to radiologist. RESULTS: Overall per-nodule accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for detection of lung nodules were 0.678(95%CI 0.615-0.732), 0.956(95%CI 0.900-0.985), and 0.456(95%CI 0.376-0.543), respectively, with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between AI and radiologist of 0.78(95%CI 0.71-0.83). Overall per-patient accuracy for AI detection of coronary artery calcium, aortic ectasia/aneurysm, and vertebral height loss was 0.939(95%CI 0.878-0.975), 0.974(95%CI 0.925-0.995), and 0.857(95%CI 0.781-0.915), respectively. Sensitivity for coronary artery calcium, aortic ectasia/aneurysm, and vertebral height loss was 0.898(95%CI 0.778-0.966), 1 (95%CI 0.958-1), and 1 (95%CI 0.961-1), respectively. Specificity for coronary artery calcium, aortic ectasia/aneurysm, and vertebral height loss was 0.969(95% CI 0.893-0.996), 0.897 (95% CI 0.726-0.978), and 0.346 (95% CI 0.172-0.557), respectively. CONCLUSION: AI ensemble was accurate for coronary artery calcium and aortic ectasia/aneurysm, while sensitive for aortic ectasia/aneurysm, lung nodules and vertebral height loss on LDCT attenuation correction series of SPECT/CT.

Photon Counting Detector CT-Based Virtual Noniodine Reconstruction Algorithm for In Vitro and In Vivo Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring: Impact of Virtual Monoenergetic and Quantum Iterative Reconstructions.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of virtual monoenergetic imaging (VMI) and quantum iterative reconstruction (QIR) on the accuracy of coronary artery calcium scoring (CACS) using a virtual noniodine (VNI) reconstruction algorithm on a first-generation, clinical, photon counting detector computed tomography system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Coronary artery calcium scoring was evaluated in an anthropomorphic chest phantom simulating 3 different patient sizes by using 2 extension rings (small: 300 × 200 mm, medium: 350 × 250 mm, large: 400 × 300 mm) and in patients (n = 61; final analyses only in patients with coronary calcifications [n = 34; 65.4 ± 10.0 years; 73.5% male]), who underwent nonenhanced and contrast-enhanced, electrocardiogram-gated, cardiac computed tomography on a photon counting detector system. Phantom and patient data were reconstructed using a VNI reconstruction algorithm at different VMI (55-80 keV) and QIR (strength 1-4) levels (CACS VNI ). True noncontrast (TNC) scans at 70 keV and QIR "off" were used as reference for phantom and patient studies (CACS TNC ). RESULTS: In vitro and in vivo CACS VNI showed strong correlation ( r > 0.9, P < 0.001 for all) and excellent agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.9 for all) with CACS TNC at all investigated VMI and QIR levels. Phantom and patient CACS VNI significantly increased with decreasing keV levels (in vitro: from 475.2 ± 26.3 at 80 keV up to 652.5 ± 42.2 at 55 keV; in vivo: from 142.5 [7.4/737.7] at 80 keV up to 248.1 [31.2/1144] at 55 keV; P < 0.001 for all), resulting in an overestimation of CACS VNI at 55 keV compared with CACS TNC at 70 keV in some cases (in vitro: 625.8 ± 24.4; in vivo: 225.4 [35.1/959.7]). In vitro CACS increased with rising QIR at low keV. In vivo scores were significantly higher at QIR 1 compared with QIR 4 only at 60 and 80 keV (60 keV: 220.3 [29.6-1060] vs 219.5 [23.7/1048]; 80 keV: 152.0 [12.0/735.6] vs 142.5 [7.4/737.7]; P < 0.001). CACS VNI was closest to CACS TNC at 60 keV, QIR 2 (+0.1%) in the small; 55 keV, QIR 1 (±0%) in the medium; 55 keV, QIR 4 (-0.1%) in the large phantom; and at 60 keV, QIR 1 (-2.3%) in patients. CONCLUSIONS: Virtual monoenergetic imaging reconstructions have a significant impact on CACS VNI . The effects of different QIR levels are less consistent and seem to depend on several individual conditions, which should be further investigated.

COVID-19 Diagnosis on Chest Radiograph Using Artificial Intelligence.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has disrupted the world since 2019, causing significant morbidity and mortality in developed and developing countries alike. Although substantial resources have been diverted to developing diagnostic, preventative, and treatment measures, disparities in the availability and efficacy of these tools vary across countries. We seek to assess the ability of commercial artificial intelligence (AI) technology to diagnose COVID-19 by analyzing chest radiographs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Chest radiographs taken from symptomatic patients within two days of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests were assessed for COVID-19 infection by board-certified radiologists and commercially available AI software. Sixty patients with negative and 60 with positive COVID reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests were chosen. Results were compared against results of the PCR test for accuracy and statistically analyzed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves along with area under the curve (AUC) values. RESULTS: A total of 120 chest radiographs (60 positive and 60 negative RT-PCR tests) radiographs were analyzed. The AI software performed significantly better than chance (p = 0.001) and did not differ significantly from the radiologist ROC curve (p = 0.78). CONCLUSION: Commercially available AI software was not inferior compared with trained radiologists in accurately identifying COVID-19 cases by analyzing radiographs. While RT-PCR testing remains the standard, current advances in AI help correctly analyze chest radiographs to diagnose COVID-19 infection.

A Case Report of Brachiocephalic Vein Spasm Secondary to Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter.

Vascular spasm is well known and studied in the arterial system. There are only a few cases reported related to central venous spasms. We present the case of a 63-year-old male with an extensive medical history, including deep vein thrombosis (DVT), who underwent peripheral insertion of a central catheter in his left upper extremity with subsequent development of left upper extremity edema. The central catheter was removed before the patient underwent a contrast-enhanced computed tomography of the chest which revealed severe narrowing of the left brachiocephalic vein, consistent with venospasm in the clinical setting. Nitroglycerin might be useful to prevent vasospasm, or it might also be used for treatment. In our case, the catheter was removed, and no subsequent treatment was necessary.

Automated diagnosis and prognosis of COVID-19 pneumonia from initial ER chest X-rays using deep learning.

BACKGROUND: Airspace disease as seen on chest X-rays is an important point in triage for patients initially presenting to the emergency department with suspected COVID-19 infection. The purpose of this study is to evaluate a previously trained interpretable deep learning algorithm for the diagnosis and prognosis of COVID-19 pneumonia from chest X-rays obtained in the ED. METHODS: This retrospective study included 2456 (50% RT-PCR positive for COVID-19) adult patients who received both a chest X-ray and SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test from January 2020 to March of 2021 in the emergency department at a single U.S. INSTITUTION: A total of 2000 patients were included as an additional training cohort and 456 patients in the randomized internal holdout testing cohort for a previously trained Siemens AI-Radiology Companion deep learning convolutional neural network algorithm. Three cardiothoracic fellowship-trained radiologists systematically evaluated each chest X-ray and generated an airspace disease area-based severity score which was compared against the same score produced by artificial intelligence. The interobserver agreement, diagnostic accuracy, and predictive capability for inpatient outcomes were assessed. Principal statistical tests used in this study include both univariate and multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Overall ICC was 0.820 (95% CI 0.790-0.840). The diagnostic AUC for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR positivity was 0.890 (95% CI 0.861-0.920) for the neural network and 0.936 (95% CI 0.918-0.960) for radiologists. Airspace opacities score by AI alone predicted ICU admission (AUC = 0.870) and mortality (0.829) in all patients. Addition of age and BMI into a multivariate log model improved mortality prediction (AUC = 0.906). CONCLUSION: The deep learning algorithm provides an accurate and interpretable assessment of the disease burden in COVID-19 pneumonia on chest radiographs. The reported severity scores correlate with expert assessment and accurately predicts important clinical outcomes. The algorithm contributes additional prognostic information not currently incorporated into patient management.

Impact of Artificial Intelligence Assistance on Chest CT Interpretation Times: A Prospective Randomized Study.

BACKGROUND. Deep learning-based convolutional neural networks have enabled major advances in development of artificial intelligence (AI) software applications. Modern AI applications offer comprehensive multiorgan evaluation. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article was to evaluate the impact of an automated AI platform integrated into clinical workflow for chest CT interpretation on radiologists' interpretation times when evaluated in a real-world clinical setting. METHODS. In this prospective single-center study, a commercial AI software solution was integrated into clinical workflow for chest CT interpretation. The software provided automated analysis of cardiac, pulmonary, and musculoskeletal findings, including labeling, segmenting, and measuring normal structures as well as detecting, labeling, and measuring abnormalities. AI-annotated images and autogenerated summary results were stored in the PACS and available to interpreting radiologists. A total of 390 patients (204 women, 186 men; mean age, 62.8 ± 13.3 [SD] years) who underwent out-patient chest CT between January 19, 2021, and January 28, 2021, were included. Scans were randomized using 1:1 allocation between AI-assisted and non-AI-assisted arms and were clinically interpreted by one of three cardiothoracic radiologists (65 scans per arm per radiologist; total of 195 scans per arm) who recorded interpretation times using a stopwatch. Findings were categorized according to review of report impressions. Interpretation times were compared between arms. RESULTS. Mean interpretation times were significantly shorter in the AI-assisted than in the non-AI-assisted arm for all three readers (289 ± 89 vs 344 ± 129 seconds, p < .001; 449 ± 110 vs 649 ± 82 seconds, p < .001; 281 ± 114 vs 348 ± 93 seconds, p = .01) and for readers combined (328 ± 122 vs 421 ± 175 seconds, p < .001). For readers combined, the mean difference was 93 seconds (95% CI, 63-123 seconds), corresponding with a 22.1% reduction in the AI-assisted arm. Mean interpretation time was also shorter in the AI-assisted arm compared with the non-AI-assisted arm for contrast-enhanced scans (83 seconds), noncontrast scans (104 seconds), negative scans (84 seconds), positive scans without significant new findings (117 seconds), and positive scans with significant new findings (92 seconds). CONCLUSION. Cardiothoracic radiologists exhibited a 22.1% reduction in chest CT interpretations times when they had access to results from an automated AI support platform during real-world clinical practice. CLINICAL IMPACT. Integration of the AI support platform into clinical workflow improved radiologist efficiency.

An Interpretable Chest CT Deep Learning Algorithm for Quantification of COVID-19 Lung Disease and Prediction of Inpatient Morbidity and Mortality.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The burden of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) airspace opacities is time consuming and challenging to quantify on computed tomography. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of a deep convolutional neural network (dCNN) to predict inpatient outcomes associated with COVID-19 pneumonia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A previously trained dCNN was tested on an external validation cohort of 241 patients who presented to the emergency department and received a chest computed tomography scan, 93 with COVID-19 and 168 without. Airspace opacity scoring systems were defined by the extent of airspace opacity in each lobe, totaled across the entire lungs. Expert and dCNN scores were concurrently evaluated for interobserver agreement, while both dCNN identified airspace opacity scoring and raw opacity values were used in the prediction of COVID-19 diagnosis and inpatient outcomes. RESULTS: Interobserver agreement for airspace opacity scoring was 0.892 (95% CI 0.834-0.930). Probability of each outcome behaved as a logistic function of the opacity scoring (25% intensive care unit admission at score of 13/25, 25% intubation at 17/25, and 25% mortality at 20/25). Length of hospitalization, intensive care unit stay, and intubation were associated with larger airspace opacity score (p = 0.032, 0.039, 0.036, respectively). CONCLUSION: The tested dCNN was highly predictive of inpatient outcomes, performs at a near expert level, and provides added value for clinicians in terms of prognostication and disease severity.

Performance of an Artificial Intelligence-Based Platform Against Clinical Radiology Reports for the Evaluation of Noncontrast Chest CT.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Research on implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) in radiology workflows and its impact on reports remains scarce. In this study, we aim to assess if an AI platform would perform better than clinical radiology reports in evaluating noncontrast chest computed tomography (CT) scans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients who had undergone noncontrast chest CT were retrospectively identified. The radiology reports were reviewed in a binary fashion for reporting of pulmonary lesions, pulmonary emphysema, aortic dilatation, coronary artery calcifications (CAC), and vertebral compression fractures (VCF). CT scans were then processed using an AI platform. The reports' findings and the AI results were subsequently compared to a consensus read by two board-certificated radiologists as reference. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients (mean age: 64.2 ± 14.8 years; 57% males) were included in this study. Aortic segmentation and calcium quantification failed to be processed by AI in 2 and 3 cases, respectively. AI showed superior diagnostic performance in identifying aortic dilatation (AI: sensitivity: 96.3%, specificity: 81.4%, AUC: 0.89) vs (Reports: sensitivity: 25.9%, specificity: 100%, AUC: 0.63), p <0.001; and CAC (AI: sensitivity: 89.8%, specificity: 100, AUC: 0.95) vs (Reports: sensitivity: 75.4%, specificity: 94.9%, AUC: 0.85), p = 0.005. Reports had better performance than AI in identifying pulmonary lesions (Reports: sensitivity: 97.6%, specificity: 100%, AUC: 0.99) vs (AI: sensitivity: 92.8%, specificity: 82.4%, AUC: 0.88), p = 0.024; and VCF (Reports: sensitivity:100%, specificity: 100%, AUC: 1.0) vs (AI: sensitivity: 100%, specificity: 63.7%, AUC: 0.82), p <0.001. A comparable diagnostic performance was noted in identifying pulmonary emphysema on AI (sensitivity: 80.6%, specificity: 66.7%. AUC: 0.74) and reports (sensitivity: 74.2%, specificity: 97.1%, AUC: 0.86), p = 0.064. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that incorporating AI support platforms into radiology workflows can provide significant added value to clinical radiology reporting.

Normative Values of Pediatric Thoracic Aortic Diameters Indexed to Body Surface Area Using Computed Tomography.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to establish normative values for the thoracic aorta diameter in pediatric patients from birth to 18 years of age using computed tomography (CT) measurements and to create nomograms related to body surface area (BSA). METHODS: A total of 623 pediatric patients without cardiovascular disease (42.1% females; from 3 d to 18 y old) with high-quality, non-electrocardiogram-gated, contrast-enhanced CT imaging of the chest were retrospectively evaluated. Systematic measurements of the aortic diameter at predetermined levels were recorded, and demographic data including age, sex, ethnicity, and BSA were collected. Reference graphs plotting BSA over aortic diameter included the mean and Z -3 to Z +3, where Z represents SDs from the mean. RESULTS: The study population was divided into 2 groups (below 2 and greater than or equal to 2 y old). There were no significant differences in average aortic measurements between males and females. Both age groups exhibited significant positive correlations among all size-related metrics (all P <0.001) with BSA having the highest correlation. For both groups, the average orthogonal thoracic aortic diameters at each level of the thoracic aorta were used to create nomograms. CONCLUSION: This study establishes clinically applicable, BSA-specific reference values of the normal thoracic aorta for the pediatric population from CT imaging.

Accuracy of an Artificial Intelligence Deep Learning Algorithm Implementing a Recurrent Neural Network With Long Short-term Memory for the Automated Detection of Calcified Plaques From Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of a novel fully automated deep learning (DL) algorithm implementing a recurrent neural network (RNN) with long short-term memory (LSTM) for the detection of coronary artery calcium (CAC) from coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Under an IRB waiver and in HIPAA compliance, a total of 194 patients who had undergone CCTA were retrospectively included. Two observers independently evaluated the image quality and recorded the presence of CAC in the right (RCA), the combination of left main and left anterior descending (LM-LAD), and left circumflex (LCx) coronary arteries. Noncontrast CACS scans were allowed to be used in cases of uncertainty. Heart and coronary artery centerline detection and labeling were automatically performed. Presence of CAC was assessed by a RNN-LSTM. The algorithm's overall and per-vessel sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy were calculated. RESULTS: CAC was absent in 84 and present in 110 patients. As regards CCTA, the median subjective image quality, signal-to-noise ratio, and contrast-to-noise ratio were 3.0, 13.0, and 11.4. A total of 565 vessels were evaluated. On a per-vessel basis, the algorithm achieved a sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of 93.1% (confidence interval [CI], 84.3%-96.7%), 82.76% (CI, 74.6%-89.4%), and 86.7% (CI, 76.8%-87.9%), respectively, for the RCA, 93.1% (CI, 86.4%-97.7%), 95.5% (CI, 88.77%-98.75%), and 94.2% (CI. 90.2%-94.6%), respectively, for the LM-LAD, and 89.9% (CI, 80.2%-95.8%), 90.0% (CI, 83.2%-94.7%), and 89.9% (CI, 85.0%-94.1%), respectively, for the LCx. The overall sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy were 92.1% (CI, 92.1%-95.2%), 88.9% (CI. 84.9%-92.1%), and 90.3% (CI, 88.0%-90.0%), respectively. When accounting for image quality, the algorithm achieved a sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of 76.2%, 87.5%, and 82.2%, respectively, for poor-quality data sets and 93.3%, 89.2% and 90.9%, respectively, when data sets rated adequate or higher were combined. CONCLUSION: The proposed RNN-LSTM demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy for the detection of CAC from CCTA.

Validation of the Dominant Sequence Paradigm and Role of Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Imaging in PI-RADS Version 2.

Purpose To validate the dominant pulse sequence paradigm and limited role of dynamic contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2 for prostate multiparametric MR imaging by using data from a multireader study. Materials and Methods This HIPAA-compliant retrospective interpretation of prospectively acquired data was approved by the local ethics committee. Patients were treatment-naïve with endorectal coil 3-T multiparametric MR imaging. A total of 163 patients were evaluated, 110 with prostatectomy after multiparametric MR imaging and 53 with negative multiparametric MR imaging and systematic biopsy findings. Nine radiologists participated in this study and interpreted images in 58 patients, on average (range, 56-60 patients). Lesions were detected with PI-RADS version 2 and were compared with whole-mount prostatectomy findings. Probability of cancer detection for overall, T2-weighted, and diffusion-weighted (DW) imaging PI-RADS scores was calculated in the peripheral zone (PZ) and transition zone (TZ) by using generalized estimating equations. To determine dominant pulse sequence and benefit of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) imaging, odds ratios (ORs) were calculated as the ratio of odds of cancer of two consecutive scores by logistic regression. Results A total of 654 lesions (420 in the PZ) were detected. The probability of cancer detection for PI-RADS category 2, 3, 4, and 5 lesions was 15.7%, 33.1%, 70.5%, and 90.7%, respectively. DW imaging outperformed T2-weighted imaging in the PZ (OR, 3.49 vs 2.45; P = .008). T2-weighted imaging performed better but did not clearly outperform DW imaging in the TZ (OR, 4.79 vs 3.77; P = .494). Lesions classified as PI-RADS category 3 at DW MR imaging and as positive at DCE imaging in the PZ showed a higher probability of cancer detection than did DCE-negative PI-RADS category 3 lesions (67.8% vs 40.0%, P = .02). The addition of DCE imaging to DW imaging in the PZ was beneficial (OR, 2.0; P = .027), with an increase in the probability of cancer detection of 15.7%, 16.0%, and 9.2% for PI-RADS category 2, 3, and 4 lesions, respectively. Conclusion DW imaging outperforms T2-weighted imaging in the PZ; T2-weighted imaging did not show a significant difference when compared with DW imaging in the TZ by PI-RADS version 2 criteria. The addition of DCE imaging to DW imaging scores in the PZ yields meaningful improvements in probability of cancer detection. © RSNA, 2017 An earlier incorrect version of this article appeared online. This article was corrected on July 27, 2017. Online supplemental material is available for this article.