Oncologic outcomes and patient-reported quality of life in patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma treated with definitive transoral robotic surgery versus definitive chemoradiation.

OBJECTIVE: It has been postulated that treatment outcomes are similar between transoral robotic surgery (TORS) and definitive chemoradiation (CRT) for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OPSCC). We compared oncologic and quality of life (QOL) outcomes between definitive CRT and definitive TORS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An observational comparison study was performed on 92 patients treated with TORS±adjuvant therapy and 46 patients treated with definitive CRT between July 2005 and January 2016. The Kaplan Meier method was used for survival analyses, and the Mann-Whitney test was used to compare QOL scores between groups. RESULTS: All patients had T0-T2 and N0-N2 disease, although CRT patients had higher clinical staging (p<0.001). HPV+ disease was present in 79% (n=73) of TORS patients and 91% (n=19) of tested CRT patients. Median follow-up was 22.1months (range: 0.33-83.4). There were no significant differences in locoregional control or overall survival between CRT and TORS groups. Definitive TORS resulted in better saliva-related QOL than definitive CRT at 1, 6, 12, and 24months (p<0.001, p=0.025, p=0.017, p=0.011). Among TORS patients, adjuvant therapy was associated with worse QOL in the saliva domain at 6, 12, and 24months (p<0.001, p<0.001, p=0.007), and taste domain at 6 and 12months (p=0.067, p=0.008). CONCLUSION: Definitive CRT and definitive TORS offer similar rates of locoregional control, overall survival, and disease-free survival in patients with early stage OPSCC. TORS resulted in significantly better short and long-term saliva-related QOL, whereas adjuvant therapy was associated with worse saliva and taste-related QOL compared to TORS alone.

Concurrent chemotherapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for anal carcinoma--clinical outcomes in a large National Cancer Institute-designated integrated cancer centre network.

AIMS: To report the clinical outcomes of patients with anal carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and concurrent chemotherapy in a large integrated academic-community cancer centre network. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-eight patients were treated with IMRT for anal carcinoma at 13 community cancer centres. IMRT planning for all centres was carried out at one central location. Sixty-five patients (83%) were T1-T2, 64% were N0, 9% were M1; five patients were HIV positive. All but one patient received concurrent chemotherapy. The median dose to the pelvis including inguinal nodes was 45 Gy. The primary site and involved nodes were boosted to a median dose of 55.8 Gy. All acute and late toxicities were scored according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3.0. RESULTS: The median follow-up for the entire cohort was 16 months (range 0-72 months). Acute grade ≥3 toxicity included 27.7% gastrointestinal and 29.0% dermatological. Acute grade 4 haematological toxicity occurred in 12.9% of patients. Sixty-four (88.9%) patients experienced a complete response. The 2 year colostomy-free survival, overall survival, freedom from local failure and freedom from distant failure rates were 81.2, 86.9, 83.6 and 81.8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Early results seem to confirm that IMRT used concurrently with chemotherapy for treatment of anal carcinoma is effective and well tolerated. This complex treatment can be safely and effectively carried out in a large integrated healthcare network.