A phase II study of ME2136 (Asenapine Maleate) plus standard antiemetic therapy for patients, including diabetic patients, receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy.

Olanzapine combined with the neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist, palonosetron and dexamethasone is the standard treatment for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) due to highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC). However, the use of olanzapine poses challenges in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) due to the potential risk of hyperglycemia. ME2136, antipsychotic similar to olanzapine, is associated with a lower risk of hyperglycemia. This study investigated the antiemetic efficacy and safety of ME2136 for HEC. This single-arm phase 2 study examined the safety and efficacy of ME2136 5 mg for 4 days in combination with triplet-combination antiemetic therapy. Two cohorts were established for the safety assessment: DM and non-DM. Eligible patients had malignant tumors and were receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy for the first time. The primary endpoint was the complete response (CR) rate, defined as the percentage of patients without vomiting and not requiring rescue medications in the delayed phase (24-120 h). Between December 2020 and January 2022, 40 patients were enrolled, with 20 in each cohort. All patients were included in the safety analysis and 35 in the efficacy analysis. The CR rate in the delayed phase was 71.4% [60% CI 63.1-78.6%] for all patients, 66.7% in the DM cohort, and 76.5% in the non-DM cohort. No treatment-related adverse events ≥ grade 3, including hyperglycemia, were reported. ME2136, when combined with standard triplet-combination antiemetic therapy, is expected to exert similar antiemetic effects to the standard treatment for CINV due to HEC. Currently, ME2136-02 trial is underway to examine the safety and efficacy of triplet-combination antiemetic therapy and a 5-day treatment with ME2136. This study was registered with the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT2041200071) on 10 December 2020. Clinical trial registration: This study was registered with the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT2041200071) on 10 December 2020.

Two Japanese families with familial pancreatic cancer with suspected pathogenic variants of CDKN2A: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Germline mutations in CDKN2A result in Familial Atypical Multiple Mole Melanoma Syndrome (FAMMM) (OMIM #155,601), which is associated with an increased risk of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and melanoma. FAMMM has been reported globally, but it is quite rare in Japan. We report two families with familial pancreatic cancer with suspected pathogenic variants of CDKN2A that were incidentally identified through comprehensive genomic profiling. CASE PRESENTATION: The first case is a 74-year-old woman with a diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma with multiple liver metastases. She had family histories of pancreatic cancer, but no personal or family history of malignant melanoma. Whole exon sequencing detected a germline CDKN2A variant evaluated as likely pathogenic. The results were disclosed to her daughters after she died, and the same CDKN2A variant was detected in one of the daughter. The daughter was referred to a nearby hospital for her clinical management. The second case is a 65-year-old man with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. He had family histories of pancreatic cancer, but no personal or family history of malignant melanoma. He underwent a comprehensive genomic profiling test using pancreatic cancer tissue, and detected a presumed germline pathogenic variant of CDKN2A. Germline testing confirmed the same CDKN2A variant. Genetic analysis of his relatives produced negative results. Other blood relatives are scheduled for genetic analysis in the future. We report two families with familial pancreatic cancer with suspected pathogenic variants of CDKN2A that were incidentally identified through comprehensive genomic profiling. CONCLUSIONS: In current Japanese precision medicine, comprehensive genetic analysis can reveal rare genetic syndromes and offer us the opportunity to provide health management for patients and their relatives. However, gene-specific issues are raised in terms of the evaluation of a variant's pathogenicity and the extent of surveillance of the at-risk organs due to a lack of genetic and clinical data concerning CDKN2A variant carriers in Japan.

Proposal for Classifying the Emetogenicity of Oral Anticancer Agents with a Focus on PARP Inhibitors: A Prospective, Observational, Multicenter Study (JASCC-CINV 2002).

Background: Olaparib and niraparib (poly adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose polymerase [PARP] inhibitors) have significant antitumor action in patients with ovarian cancer. However, the incidence of nausea and vomiting among patients on these drugs in clinical trials is rather high. There are no guidelines on antiemetic treatment for nausea caused by oral anticancer agents. This study aimed to investigate the incidence of nausea and vomiting caused by PARP inhibitors and the actual situation of antiemetic therapy in patients with gynecologic cancer. Methods: Patients with gynecologic cancer who were scheduled to receive PARP inhibitors were enrolled. Data on PARP inhibitor-induced nausea and vomiting were collected from patient diaries for 21 days. The primary endpoint was the incidence of vomiting during the 21 days after starting olaparib and niraparib. Results: Overall, between January 2020 and March 2023, 134 patients were enrolled. Of the 129 patients who were evaluated, 28 (21.7%) received prophylactic antiemetics for 21 days, and 101 (78.3%) did not. The overall incidence of PARP inhibitor-induced vomiting was 16.3%. The incidence of vomiting in the group that did not receive antiemetic prophylaxis was 13.9%. On dividing the group that did not receive antiemetic prophylaxis into the olaparib and niraparib subgroups, the incidence of vomiting was found to be 18.6% for the olaparib group and 10.3% for the niraparib group. Conclusion: The incidence of emesis without antiemetic prophylaxis among patients on olaparib and niraparib ranged from 10% to 30%. Therefore, olaparib and niraparib can be classified in the low emetogenic risk and prophylactic antiemetic therapy at the time of treatment initiation may be unnecessary.

A Japanese Family Meeting the Clinical Diagnostic Criteria for MEN1 with a MEN1 Variant of Uncertain Significance.

Multiple gastroenteric, pancreatic, and pituitary neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) were diagnosed in a 74-year-old man with a history of primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT). Germline testing demonstrated a variant of MEN1 (c.1694T>A, p.L565Q), whose pathogenicity was classified as a variant of uncertain significance (VUS) according to the ACMG/AMP guidelines. The same germline variant was detected in the patient's son and daughter, who also showed PHPT or hypercalcemia and met the clinical diagnostic criteria for multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1). During surveillance of the son, multiple pancreatic tumors suggestive of NENs were detected. The pathogenicity of the current MEN1 variant was re-evaluated as likely pathogenic, based on additional family data.

A Japanese case of ovarian mucinous adenocarcinoma with germline double variants of MSH2 and BRCA2.

Germline double heterozygosity (GDH) is rarely reported in cases of inherited cancer syndromes, and GDH of a mismatch repair gene and BRCA has never been reported in Japan. Nonetheless, the current report demonstrates a case of ovarian mucinous adenocarcinoma with initiated Lynch syndrome (LS)-related surveillance because of a known germline MSH2 variant. Six and a half years after oophorectomy, multiple tumors developed in the patient's lungs, bones, and lymph nodes, and histology results confirmed mucinous adenocarcinoma. Systemic chemotherapy including an anti-PD-L1 antibody was effective for >1 year, but brain metastases developed. Pathology of the brain tumors showed mucinous adenocarcinoma without expression of MSH2 and MSH6, while multi-gene panel testing demonstrated not only high microsatellite instability and a high tumor mutation burden, but also germline BRCA2 variants. Further, germline testing in relatives confirmed both variants were from the paternal line, from which many LS-related cancers develop, but not BRCA-related cancer.

Discordance of microsatellite instability and mismatch repair immunochemistry occurs depending on the cancer type.

Microsatellite instability (MSI) and deficiency of mismatch repair (dMMR) are key markers for predicting the response of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and screening for Lynch syndrome (LS). This study examined the incidences of and factors associated with the concordance of MSI and MMR in human cancers. A total of 518 formalin-fixed cancer tissues were analyzed for MSI and MMR immunohistochemistry (IHC). MSI was analyzed by a PCR-based method using Promega markers. Concordance with MMR expression and factors associated with concordance were analyzed. In 2 colorectal cancer samples, MMR IHC failed due to inadequate staining conditions. In the remaining 516 cancers, a high level of MSI (MSI-H) was identified in 113 cases, and dMMR was identified in 112. The concordance of MSI and MMR IHC was 98.3%. Only 9 cases (4 pancreatobiliary, 3 colorectal, and 2 endometrial cancers) were discordant. Of the 113 MSI-H cases, 4 (3.5%) were proficient MMR (pMMR); of the 403 microsatellite stability (MSS) cases, 5 (1.2%) were dMMR. The independent factors associated with MSI-H/dMMR included meeting Amsterdam II criteria, assay purpose, and sampling method. Multivariate analysis revealed that cancer type (gastrointestinal cancers or others) was associated with concordance of MSI and MMR IHC. Three LS cases with pancreatic or endometrial cancer demonstrated MSS and dMMR, and one biliary cancer showed MSI-H and pMMR. Discordance between MSI and MMR IHC occasionally occurs in pancreaticobiliary and endometrial cancers. When suspected, both MSI and MMR IHC should be done to judge the ICI indication and screen for LS.

A Japanese case of familial malignant melanoma with germline CDK4 variant incidentally diagnosed by cancer genome profiling.

Familial malignant melanoma (FMM) is a hereditary tumor that is quite rare in Japan; to date, the germline CDK4 variant has scarcely been reported around the world. Thus, we report on a woman with FMM who developed salivary gland cancer, for which a germline pathogenic variant of CDK4 was incidentally identified through comprehensive genomic profiling. She had a history of multiple atypical nevi and a facial melanoma since her 30 s and multiple family histories of melanoma; however, none of her relatives were aware of its heredity. Genetic counseling and skin surveillance were performed. Precision medicine for cancer can discover this rare genetic syndrome and provides us with the opportunity to manage the health of patients and their relatives.

Genetic medicine in companion diagnostics of germline BRCA testing of Japanese pancreatic cancer patients.

In 2021, Japan's national health insurance made germline BRCA (g.BRCA) testing available to unresectable pancreatic cancer (PC) patients as a companion diagnostic (CD) of the PARP inhibitor. This study investigated the incidence of the g.BRCA variant (g.BRCAv.) and the status of the genetic medicine associated with its testing. A total of 110 PC patients underwent the testing, five of whom (4.5%) had a deleterious g.BRCA2v. (all truncations) but no g.BRCA1v. The turnaround time (TAT) to the doctors was 13 days, and to the patients, 17 days. A higher incidence of a BRCA-related family history and a shorter TAT were seen in the g.BRCAv. patients, but they were insignificant (p = 0.085 and p = 0.059, respectively). Genetic counseling was not performed for three g.BRCA2v. patients because two of them had no accessible relatives and one died of the cancer before the genetic report was completed. Two families underwent generic counseling and testing based on the patient's genetic data. g.BRCAv. is recognized in a small fraction of PC cases, and the following genetic counseling is done more for the relatives than for the patients. TAT was constant and did not affect much on the genetic counseling, but the earlier testing is expected for patients with a deadly cancer.

Present status of germline findings in precision medicine for Japanese cancer patients: issues in the current system.

OBJECTIVE: Since 2019, precision cancer medicine has been covered by national insurance in Japan; however, to date, germline findings have not been fully reported. The aim of this study was to evaluate the current status and raise a problem of germline finding analysis and disclosure in Japanese precision cancer medicine. METHODS: Germline findings of 52 genes were examined in 296 cases with advanced cancer by a case series study. RESULTS: Six (2.0%) cases were examined by the Oncoguide™ NCC Oncopanel with germline testing, but no germline findings were reported. The remaining 290 (98.0%) cases were analyzed by FoundationOne® CDx (tumor-only testing), which recognized 404 pathogenic variants; those of BRCA1/2 were recognized in 16 (5.5%) tumors. Our institutional algorithm suggested 39 candidate germline findings in 34 cases, while the public algorithm listed at least 91 candidate germline findings. Four germline findings had been previously identified (BRCA1: 3 and ATM: 1). Nine of 30 cases with candidate germline findings excluding these known germline findings refused or deferred germline testing. Only 4 of 16 cases that received counseling underwent germline testing, and those 4 revealed 3 germline findings (BRCA2, CDK4 and RAD51C); in total, 8 (2.7%) germline findings were revealed. Reasons for refusing genetic counseling and/or germline testing included extra hospital visits, added expense for germline testing due to limited national insurance coverage, poor patient physical condition and no known family members associated with the possible germline finding. CONCLUSIONS: In current Japanese precision cancer medicine, only a small fraction of the patients undergoes germline testing and demonstrated germline finding. The current results suggested a need for earlier indications for precision cancer medicine, broader insurance coverage and more efficient germline finding prediction algorithms, to increase the number of germline testings and to improve the following managements.

Changes in HPV16/18 Prevalence among Unvaccinated Women with Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia in Japan: Assessment of Herd Effects following the HPV Vaccination Program.

Since the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination program for Japanese girls aged 12-16 years began in 2010, vaccination uptake has been low in women born before 1993 but high (approximately 70%) in those born during 1994-1999. We previously compared the prevalence of vaccine types HPV16 and HPV18 in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1-3 (CIN1-3) or adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) between vaccinated and unvaccinated cohorts and found direct protection effects among vaccinated women in Japan. In this study, we focused on changes in HPV16/18 prevalence among "unvaccinated" cohorts with CIN/AIS. We analyzed HPV16/18 prevalence among 5051 unvaccinated women aged <40 years, newly diagnosed with CIN/AIS during 2012-2021 for time trends. Declining trends in HPV16/18 prevalence over 9 years were observed in CIN1 (36.0-10.0%, Ptrend = 0.03) and CIN2-3/AIS (62.5-36.4%, Ptrend = 0.07) among women aged <25 years. HPV16/18 prevalence in CIN1 and CIN2-3/AIS diagnosed at age 20-24 years was lower in 1994-1999 birth cohorts compared with 1988-1993 birth cohorts (4.5% vs. 25.7% for CIN1 and 40.0% vs. 58.1% for CIN2-3/AIS, both p = 0.04). Significant reduction in HPV16/18 prevalence among young unvaccinated women with CIN1 and CIN2-3/AIS suggests herd effects of HPV vaccination in Japan.

Microsatellite instability is biased in Amsterdam II-defined Lynch-related cancer cases with family history but is rare in other cancers: a summary of 1000 analyses.

BACKGROUND: Microsatellite instability (MSI) is a key marker for predicting the response of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and for screening Lynch syndrome (LS). AIM: This study aimed to see the characteristics of cancers with high level of MSI (MSI-H) in genetic medicine and precision medicine. METHODS: This study analyzed the incidence of MSI-H in 1000 cancers and compared according to several clinical and demographic factors. RESULTS: The incidence of MSI-H was highest in endometrial cancers (26.7%, 20/75), followed by small intestine (20%, 3/15) and colorectal cancers (CRCs)(13.7%, 64/466); the sum of these three cancers (15.6%) was significantly higher than that of other types (2.5%)(P < 0.0001). MSI-H was associated with LS-related cancers (P < 0.0001), younger age (P = 0.009), and family history, but not with smoking, drinking, or serum hepatitis virus markers. In CRC cases, MSI-H was significantly associated with a family history of LS-related cancer (P < 0.0001), Amsterdam II criteria [odds ratio (OR): 5.96], right side CRCs (OR: 4.89), and multiplicity (OR: 3.31). However, MSI-H was very rare in pancreatic (0.6%, 1/162) and biliary cancers (1.6%, 1/64) and was null in 25 familial pancreatic cancers. MSI-H was more recognized in cancers analyzed for genetic counseling (33.3%) than in those for ICI companion diagnostics (3.1%)(P < 0.0001). Even in CRCs, MSI-H was limited to 3.3% when analyzed for drug use. CONCLUSIONS: MSI-H was predominantly recognized in LS-related cancer cases with specific family histories and younger age. MSI-H was limited to a small proportion in precision medicine especially for non-LS-related cancer cases.

Role of Tumor Mutation Burden Analysis in Detecting Lynch Syndrome in Precision Medicine: Analysis of 2,501 Japanese Cancer Patients.

BACKGROUND: Tumor mutation burden (TMB) is the total exonic mutation count per megabase of tumor DNA. Recent advances in precision medicine occasionally detect Lynch syndrome (LS) by germline sequencing for mismatch-repair (g.MMR) genes but not using TMB. The current study analyzes the utility of TMB in detecting LS. METHODS: Whole-exome sequencing (ion-semiconductor sequencing) was performed for somatic and germline DNA from 2,501 various cancer patients to detect TMB and g.MMR sequencing. MMR IHC was conducted when high TMB (≥10) was detected in LS-related cancers with an additional condition of wild-type BRAF in colorectal cancers. Target sequencing and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) were further performed for g.MMR genes in MMR-deficient cancers (TMB-based g.MMR target sequencing). We compared universal sequencing and TMB-based target sequencing in their sensitivity for detecting LS. RESULTS: LS was detected in 16 (0.6%) of the 2,501 patients: 1.1% (9/826) of colorectal cancer patients, 16.2% (6/37) of endometrial cancer patients, and 14.3% (1/7) of small intestine cancer patients. TMB-based g.MMR target sequencing (81.3%) showed superior sensitivity for detecting LS than universal g.MMR sequencing (56.3%; P = 0.127) but missed 3 LS patients (1 with a low-TMB cancer, 1 with a BRAF-mutant colorectal cancer, and 1 with an MMR-proficient cancer). Ion-semiconductor sequencing could detect single-nucleotide substitutions but not large deletions. POL-mutated cancers showed extremely high TMBs (48.4-749.2). CONCLUSIONS: g.MMR target sequencing, combined with TMB, somatic BRAF mutation, and MMR IHC is an effective strategy for detecting LS. IMPACT: TMB can be a biomarker for detecting LS in precision medicine.

Disclosure of secondary findings in exome sequencing of 2480 Japanese cancer patients.

High-throughput sequencing has greatly contributed to precision medicine. However, challenges remain in reporting secondary findings (SFs) of germline pathogenic variants and managing the affected patients. The aim of this study was to examine the incidence of SFs in Japanese cancer patients using whole exome sequencing (WES) and to understand patient preferences regarding SF disclosure. WES was conducted for 2480 cancer patients. Genomic data were screened and classified for variants of 59 genes listed by the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics SF v2.0 and for an additional 13 hereditary cancer-related genes. Majority of the participants (68.9%; 1709/2480) opted for disclosure of their SFs. Thirty-two pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants, including BRCA1 (7 patients), BRCA2 (4), CHEK2 (4), PTEN (3), MLH1 (3), SDHB (2), MSH6 (1), NF1 (1), EXT2 (1), NF1 (1), NTRK1 (1), MYH7 (3), MYL2 (1), TNNT2 (1), LDLR (2), FBN1 (1), and KCNH2 (1) were recognized in 36 patients (1.5%). Twenty-eight (77.8%) patients underwent genetic counseling and received their SF results. Eighteen (64.3%) patients underwent clinical management for SFs. Genetic validation tests were administered significantly more frequently to patients with than without a SF-related personal history (P = 0.025). This was a first attempt at a large-scale systematic exome analysis in Japan; nevertheless, many cancer patients opted for disclosure of SFs and accepted or considered clinical management.

Efficacy and safety of 5 mg olanzapine combined with aprepitant, granisetron and dexamethasone to prevent carboplatin-induced nausea and vomiting in patients with gynecologic cancer: A multi-institution phase II study.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of prophylactic administration of 5 mg olanzapine (OLZ) combined with neurokinin 1 receptor antagonist (NK1RA), 5-hydroxytryptamine type-3 receptor antagonist (5-HT3RA), and dexamethasone (DEX) to prevent nausea and vomiting in carboplatin (CBDCA) combination therapy for patients with gynecological cancer. METHODS: We conducted a single-arm, multi-institution, phase II study. Gynecological cancer patients scheduled to receive AUC ≥4 mg/mL/min CBDCA were enrolled. All patients received 5 mg OLZ (once daily after supper on days 1-4) combined with NK1RA, 5-HT3RA, and DEX. The primary end point was complete response (CR; no emesis and rescue therapy) during overall phase (120 h after the start of carboplatin administration). RESULTS: Between May 2018 and June 2019, 60 patients were enrolled from 3 institutions in Japan. A total of 57 patients who met the criteria were included in the efficacy and safety analysis. The CR rate for the overall phase was 78.9%. Acute (0-24 h) and delayed phases (24-120 h) were 96.5% and 80.7%, respectively. Somnolence was observed in 73.7% patients. However, somnolence of grade 2 or higher was observed in only 3.5% of cases. There were no grade 3 or 4 toxicities associated with OLZ. CONCLUSIONS: Preventive use of OLZ combined with standard triplet therapy had promising activity with manageable safety, suggesting that this combination could be an effective standard treatment option for patients with AUC ≥4 mg/mL/min CBDCA combination therapy.

Changes in the Clinicopathological Demographics of Vulvar Cancer in Japan: Increasing Oldest-Old, Stage Shifting, and Decreasing Cohort-Level Survival †.

BACKGROUND: To examine trends in the clinicopathological characteristics of vulvar cancer in Japan. METHODS: This is a nationwide retrospective study examining consecutive women with vulvar cancer between 2001 and 2010 in Japan (n = 1061). Temporal trends in demographics, tumor characteristics, and survival were assessed by cohort-level analysis. The National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result Program was used for external validation (n = 10,154). RESULTS: The number of oldest-old women aged ≥80 years significantly increased (from 18.0% in 2001 to 30.6% in 2010; 70.5% relative increase) in the study period. A stage shift was observed, with stage I disease decreasing from 43.0% to 34.0% (21.0% relative decrease), and tumors with distant metastases increasing from 23.2% to 35.6% (53.3% relative increase, p < 0.05). The number of women who underwent surgical treatment decreased from 84.0% to 69.7% (17.0% relative decrease), whereas utilization of radiotherapy increased from 34.4% to 43.2% (25.7% relative increase) over time (p < 0.05). In the cohort-level analysis, the five-year survival rates significantly decreased from 2001 to 2010 (p < 0.05), specifically, 66.9% to 51.0% for progression-free survival (23.7% relative decrease), 79.5% to 67.9% for cause-specific survival (14.6% relative decrease), and 74.9% to 62.3% for overall survival (16.9% relative decrease). In the patient-level analysis, oldest-old women were less likely to undergo surgical treatment and were independently associated with decreased survival (p < 0.05). In the US cohort, the number of oldest-old women (25.2% to 27.8%) and the five-year cause-specific survival rate (81.8% to 79.9%) remained unchanged during the study period (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Demographics and outcomes of vulvar cancer in Japan significantly changed during the study period. An increasing oldest-old population and a stage shift to more metastatic disease resulted in a cohort-level decrease in survival rates.

Metachronous ovarian endometrioid carcinomas in a patient with a PTEN variant: case report of incidentally detected Cowden syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Somatic PTEN mutation occurs in a proportion of ovarian endometrioid carcinomas. However, these cancers have seldom been reported in diseases associated with germline PTEN variants, such as Cowden syndrome (CS). CASE PRESENTATION: The present case was a 39-year-old woman with a left ovarian carcinoma who demonstrated a germline splice variant of PTEN (c.1026 + 1G > T) following genome-wide whole exome sequencing of her germline DNA. Histology of her resected tumor revealed endometrioid carcinoma of the same type as a right ovarian cancer resected eight years previously. These tumors showed null immunostaining for PTEN. She was genetically diagnosed with CS. Despite her clinical examinations had demonstrated several characteristic findings of CS, including mammary fibroma, esophageal and skin papilloma, colonic hamartoma, uterine myoma, and lipoma, the clinicians could not approach this diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Ovarian endometrioid carcinoma is generally thought to develop from endometrial tissue menstruated from the uterus and implanted on the ovary. To date, ovarian cancers have not been listed as CS-related cancers; however, ovarian endometrioid cancer can have a potential association with CS in endometriosis cases.

The issues regarding postoperative adjuvant therapy and prognostic risk factors for patients with stage I-II cervical cancer: A review.

The treatment for most patients with early-stage cervical cancer involves radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection, and indications for postoperative adjuvant therapy have been determined by evaluating the prognostic risk factors for recurrence in each case. The aim of this review is to raise and discuss the various issues that have not yet been resolved regarding the prognostic risk factors and postoperative adjuvant therapy. Several clinicopathological factors, such as tumor size, lymphovascular space involvement, deep stromal invasion, parametrial involvement and lymph node metastasis, have been identified to have prognostic significance in early-stage cervical cancer. However, this remains controversial because there is suggested to be substantial heterogeneity among patients after radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy and it would be difficult to define the risk groups clearly. This indicates the need to develop more convenient and accurate criteria to define risk groups. According to the currently available evidence, patients in the high-risk group should receive adjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with cisplatin (CDDP) and fluolouracil. However, CCRT with CDDP administered weekly (CCRT-P) has instead been applied in a clinical context worldwide. Whether CCRT-P has a survival benefit compared with radiotherapy (RT) alone is unknown because no randomized phase III trials have been performed for patients in the high-risk group after radical surgery. Patients with high-risk factors have a high incidence of distant metastasis, for whom systemic chemotherapy might be a key to improving overall survival. The pivotal study that investigated the role of RT alone for patients with intermediate-risk factors after hysterectomy is the GOG092 trial. This trial showed a 47% reduction in the risk of recurrence after RT compared with no further treatment (NFT). However, the improvement in overall survival with RT did not reach statistical significance, while patients allocated to the RT group did experience an increase in severe toxicities compared with the NFT group. This could be why many physicians are reluctant to treat patients with this approach, although guidelines recommend RT for patients with intermediate-risk factors. With regard to toxicities, postoperative RT would be problematic because the organs in the pelvis targeted by RT have already been damaged by radical surgery. To reduce the toxicities, intensity-modulated radiotherapy would best be used worldwide. Further improvement in adjuvant therapy will come from enhanced definition of prognostic risk factors, better patient selection, and refinements in both local and systematic therapies.

Adjuvant chemotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy for high-risk cervical cancer after radical hysterectomy and systematic lymphadenectomy.

BACKGROUND: The aims of this study were to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of chemotherapy (CT) compared with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) after radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy in high-risk patients with early-stage cervical cancer and to evaluate whether the radicality of the lymphadenectomy would affect the outcome and toxicity of postoperative adjuvant therapy. METHODS: The cases of all patients (n = 393) with FIGO IB1-IIB cervical cancer who were treated by radical surgery at Shizuoka Cancer Center between January 2002 and December 2013 were reviewed. Of these, 111 patients met the inclusion criteria for this retrospective study: (1) high risk for occurrence due to pathologically confirmed parametrial invasion and/or pelvic lymph node metastasis; (2) postoperative treatment with adjuvant CT or CCRT. The clinical data of these patients were reviewed. RESULTS: Of the 111 patients, 37 and 74 patients underwent CT and CCRT, respectively. The 4-year progression-free survival rate [PFS; 71.7 (CT) vs. 68.3 % (CCRT)] and overall survival rate [76.0 (CT) vs. 82.7 % (CCRT)] did not differ significantly between the two groups. The CT group contained significantly more patients with severe neutropenia than the CCRT group (66.7 vs. 23.0 %, respectively; p < 0.001), and the CCRT group contained significantly more patients with diarrhea than the CT group (10.8 vs. 0 %, respectively; p = 0.04). The patients who had ≥40 lymph nodes dissected (≥40 group) had higher PFS than the patients who had <40 lymph nodes dissected (<40 group) (73.2 vs. 64.2 %, respectively), although the difference was not significant. In the CT group, there was no significant association between the number of dissected lymph nodes and severe toxicities. However, in the CCRT group, significantly more vomiting (p = 0.046) and edema (p = 0.046) occurred in the ≥40 group than in the <40 group. CONCLUSIONS: Chemotherapy after surgery for high-risk patients had similar efficacy and a different toxicity profile compared with CCRT, and a more radical surgical procedure would improve the survival outcome. However, CCRT was associated with worse toxicity than CT. We advocate a prospective randomized study to compare CT with CCRT for patients with high-risk factors for recurrence.

Efficacy and safety of olanzapine combined with aprepitant, palonosetron, and dexamethasone for preventing nausea and vomiting induced by cisplatin-based chemotherapy in gynecological cancer: KCOG-G1301 phase II trial.

PURPOSE: Olanzapine is effective in chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). In patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC), its efficacy was reported as rescue therapy for breakthrough emesis refractory to triplet therapy (palonosetron, aprepitant, and dexamethasone). However, its preventive effects with triplet therapy for CINV are unknown. This study aimed to investigate efficacy and safety of preventive use of olanzapine with triplet therapy for CINV of HEC. METHODS: This study is a prospective multicenter study conducted by Kansai Clinical Oncology Group. Forty chemo-naïve gynecological cancer patients receiving HEC with cisplatin (≥50 mg/m(2)) were enrolled. Oral olanzapine (5 mg) was administered with triplet therapy a day prior to cisplatin administration and on days 1-5. The primary endpoint was complete response (no vomiting and no rescue) rate for the overall phase (0-120 h post-chemotherapy). Secondary endpoints were complete response rate for acute phase (0-24 h post-chemotherapy) and delayed phase (24-120 h post-chemotherapy) and complete control (no vomiting, no rescue, and no significant nausea) rate and total control (no vomiting, no rescue, and no nausea) rate for each phase. These endpoints were evaluated during the first cycle of chemotherapy. RESULTS: Complete response rates for acute, delayed, and overall phases were 97.5, 95.0, and 92.5 %, respectively. Complete control rates were 92.5, 87.5, and 82.5 %, respectively. Total control rates were 87.5, 67.5, and 67.5 %, respectively. There were no grade 3 or 4 adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Preventive use of olanzapine combined with triplet therapy gives better results than those from previously reported studies of triplet therapy.

Efficacy of Olanzapine Combined Therapy for Patients Receiving Highly Emetogenic Chemotherapy Resistant to Standard Antiemetic Therapy.

OBJECTIVE: Olanzapine is proved to be effective for chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). But its efficacy in combination with standard antiemetic therapy is unknown. The purpose of this study is to prove the preventive effect of olanzapine for the prevention of CINV caused by highly emetogenic chemotherapy when used with standard antiemetic therapy. METHOD: Gynecologic cancer patients receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy who had grade 2 or 3 nausea in overall phase (0-120 h after chemotherapy) despite standard therapy were assigned to this study. From the next cycles to cycles in which patients developed grade 2 or 3 nausea, they received olanzapine with standard therapy. 5 mg oral olanzapine was administered for 7 days from the day before chemotherapy. The effectiveness of preventive administration of olanzapine was evaluated retrospectively. The primary endpoint was nausea control rate (grade 0 or 1) with olanzapine. RESULTS: Fifty patients were evaluable. The nausea control rate with olanzapine was improved from 58% to 98% in acute phase (0-24 h after chemotherapy) and 2% to 94% in delayed phase (24-120 h after chemotherapy). In overall phase, the nausea control rate improved from 0% to 92%, and it was statistically significant (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Preventive use of olanzapine combined with standard antiemetic therapy showed improvement in control of refractory nausea.