The use of a pre-hospital questionnaire expedited the acute management of patients with ischemic stroke in a comprehensive stroke center.

BACKGROUND: Delays in intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) treatment for acute ischemic stroke decrease the benefit of treatment. Difficulties determining a patient's clinical eligibility for IVT is a frequent cause of treatment delays. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the effectiveness of the "PROVIDENCE" datasheet, a pre- hospital assessment of contraindications for IVT use applied by emergency medical services personnel. METHODS: We performed a single-center cohort study comparing IVT decision and treatment times between patients with PROVIDENCE datasheets and those without. Patients were eligible if they were over 18 years old and presented to our comprehensive stroke center from the field with stroke-like symptoms with onset within 4.5 hours. RESULTS: We identified 465 records and included 166 records in our final analysis (54 in the study group and 112 in the control group). A subgroup of 85 patients received IVT (30 in the study group patients and 55 in the control group). The PROVIDENCE datasheet was associated with a faster median time by five minutes from the patient's initial presentation at the emergency department to the final decision regarding IVT eligibility (p = 0.032) and a faster time between the first encounter with a neurology provider and the decision regarding IVT administration by six minutes (p = 0.002) for the entire sample. In the subgroup that received IVT, the PROVIDENCE datasheet decreased the median decision time by seven minutes (p = 0.044) There was no significant difference in door-to-needle times between groups. CONCLUSION: Using the PROVIDENCE datasheet, first responders can quickly identify potential contraindications for IVT treatment in patients with stroke-like symptoms. This tool expedited decision-making and led to faster IVT administration process at a comprehensive stroke center.

Extended calorie restriction suppresses overall and specific food cravings: a systematic review and a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Multiple studies have concluded that calorie restriction for at least 12 weeks is associated with reduced food cravings, while others have shown that calorie restriction may increase food cravings. We addressed this ambiguity in a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: We searched for studies conducted on subjects with obesity, implemented calorie restriction for at least 12 weeks and measured food cravings pre-intervention and post-intervention. Our final eight studies mostly used the Food Craving Inventory. Other comparable methods were converted to a similar scale. We used the duration ≥12 weeks, but closest to 16 weeks for studies with multiple follow-ups and performed DerSimonian-Laird random-effects meta-analyses using the 'metafor' package in r software. RESULTS: Despite heterogeneity across studies, we observed reductions in pooled effects for overall food cravings (-0.246 [-0.490, -0.001]) as well as cravings for sweet (-0.410 [-0.626, -0.194]), high-fat (-0.190 [-0.343, -0.037]), starchy (-0.288 [-0.517, -0.058]) and fast food (-0.340 [-0.633, -0.048]) in the meta-analysis. Baseline body weight, type of intervention, duration, sample size and percentage of female subjects explained the heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: Calorie restriction is associated with reduced food cravings supporting a de-conditioning model of craving reductions. Our findings should ease the minds of clinicians concerned about increased cravings in patients undergoing calorie restriction interventions.

Physical activity and obesity: what we know and what we need to know.

Creating a negative energy balance by decreasing caloric consumption and increasing physical activity is a common strategy used to treat obesity. A large number of review and original research papers have considered the role of physical activity in weight loss and maintenance. However, their conclusions are at times conflicting. In this review, we have critically evaluated the findings of systematic reviews and meta-analyses and supplemented their conclusions with recently published, high-quality clinical trials. We have eliminated studies that were methodologically flawed in an attempt to reduce the ambiguity in the literature. We further sought, through selective review of these publications, to isolate the effects of various types of exercise, independent of dietary interventions, to further clarify their independent contributions. Thus, our review describes (i) combined calorie restriction with physical activity interventions, (ii) physical activity interventions without calorie restriction and (iii) the role of physical activity on maintenance of weight loss. Through this critical examination of the literature, we have provided conclusions to address certain ambiguities regarding the role of physical activity in obesity treatment that will inform clinical practice. We have also identified several long-standing gaps in knowledge that will inform future research.