A case of successful surgical treatment of left ventricular thrombus associated with acute myocardial infarction by Impella combined with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation approach.

The mortality rate in patients with heart failure complicated by cardiogenic shock following acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains high, prompting research on mechanical circulatory support. Improved mortality rates have been reported with the early introduction of EcMELLA (Impella combined with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, ECMO). However, clear indications for this treatment have not been established, given the associated risks and limitations related to access routes. Left ventricular thrombosis is traditionally considered a contraindication for Impella use. A 74-year-old man without specific medical history or coronary risk factors was diagnosed with Forrester IV heart failure due to cardiogenic shock complicated by AMI and left ventricular thrombosis. The patient underwent emergency coronary artery bypass surgery, intracardiac thrombus removal, and Dor surgery. Following cardiopulmonary bypass, ongoing heart failure was observed, necessitating the implementation of EcMELLA for circulatory support. Preoperative computed tomography showed that the bilateral subclavian arteries were too narrow (< 7 mm) and anatomically unsuitable for traditional access methods. Thus, we introduced a single-access EcMELLA 5.5, through which the Impella was introduced and veno-arterial-ECMO blood was delivered from a single artificial vessel anastomosed to the brachiocephalic artery. The patient was weaned off veno-arterial-ECMO and extubated on postoperative day 3. By postoperative day 14, improved cardiac function allowed for Impella removal. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 31 with improved ambulation; thereafter, the patient returned to work. Thus, the single-access EcMELLA5.5 treatment strategy combined with Dor procedure was effective in left ventricular thrombosis in patients with heart failure with cardiogenic shock complicated by AMI.

Case series: successful salvage from refractory cardiogenic shock caused by COVID-19-associated myocardial injury with temporary ventricular assist devices.

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is predominantly known to cause respiratory injury; however, the present case series highlights four instances in which the infection resulted in significant cardiac complications. Among such cases, some represent severe cardiogenic shock, which necessitates the immediate introduction of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) for salvage. Case summary: This case series involved patients with COVID-19-associated myocardial injury leading to fulminant cardiogenic shock. These patients required immediate implementation of peripheral MCS, followed by an instant upgrade to a central MCS system due to anatomical limitations and severe biventricular dysfunction. Central MCS provided effective ventricular unloading, resulting in a significant and prompt improvement in ventricular function. The treatment timeline showed rapid deterioration followed by remarkable recovery within 2 weeks of MCS initiation, demonstrating the effectiveness of aggressive and tailored MCS strategies in managing severe COVID-19-related cardiac complications. Discussion: This study provides significant insights into the cardiovascular implications of COVID-19, particularly in the context of severe myocardial injury that leads to cardiogenic shock. The report underscores the importance of early recognition and intervention in such cases, focusing on the use of MCS as a life-saving modality. The findings also revealed unique pathological features of COVID-19-associated myocardial injury, including macrophage-predominant infiltration and microthrombosis, which are distinct from the features of conventional myocarditis. These findings highlight the need for further research on the pathophysiology of COVID-19-related cardiac injuries and the development of targeted therapeutic strategies.

Predictors of late outcomes after concomitant tricuspid valve repair with left-sided valve surgery.

BACKGROUND: Concomitant tricuspid valve (TV) repair is a safe and effective procedure to protect against late moderate or greater tricuspid regurgitation (TR) after left-sided valve surgery, but studies regarding its late outcomes and recurrent TR are limited. This study aimed to reveal the late outcomes and explore the predictors of mortality and recurrent TR among patients who underwent concomitant TV repair with left-sided valve surgery. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study included 645 patients (mean age, 69.7 years; 44% male) who underwent concomitant TV repair with left-sided valve surgery (mitral valve surgery in 594 cases, aortic valve surgery in 172 cases) from 2006-2020. Preoperative TR was grade 4, 3, and less than 2 in 85, 235, and 325 patients, respectively. The median follow-up period was 4.6 (IQR 1.7-7.8) years. The in-hospital or 30-day mortality was 1.7% (n = 11). Regarding long-term outcomes after TV repair, 90.3% and 80.8% achieved 5- and 10-year survival, respectively, while 96.1% and 88.8% achieved 5- and 10-year freedom from recurrent TR, respectively. The following were independent predictors of overall mortality on multivariate analysis in patients with preoperative TR grade ≥ 3: prior pacemaker implantation, preoperative renal dysfunction, diabetes mellitus and NYHA class ≥ 3. Also, suture annuloplasty and ring type of ring annuloplasty were not independent risk factors for recurrent TR, classified as grade ≥ 3. CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant TV repair with left-sided valve surgery had acceptable outcomes in terms of survival and TR durability. In patients with preoperative TR grade ≥ 3, preoperative patient status had negative impacts on prognosis.

Successful Implantation of Rapid Deployment Aortic Valve after TAVR Explantation.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become widely used in recent years, However, there is also an increasing need for removal of TAVR valves due to prosthetic valve dysfunction (PVD) and the development of infective endocarditis. Surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) for these patients is risky due to the original patient background and anatomic conditions. Intuity rapid deployment aortic valve (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA) replacement would be useful for such high risk patients to prevent longer cardiac arrest time and obtain good hemodynamic results. However, there are few reports which present Intuity valve replacement after TAVR explantation. Herein, We report two cases in which we have achieved good hemodynamics with shorter cardiac arrest times by using a rapid deployment valve after TAVR explantation. CASE PRESENTATION: We present 2 cases of successful implantation of the Intuity rapid deployment valve after TAVR explantation. The 84- and 88-year-old female patients had previously received TAVR for severe aortic stenosis with SAPIEN XT (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA) and developed PVD during follow-up. The TAVR valve was removed carefully, then an Intuity valve was implanted with cardiac arrest times of 69 and 41 min. Both patients had good echocardiographic results with effective orifice area of 2.0 cm2 and 1.2 cm2 and mean trans-aortic plessure gradient of 9 mmHg and 15 mmHg respectively without aortic regurgitation. They were discharged without major complications. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical AVR using a rapid deployment valve is a useful alternative to sutured AVR after TAVR valve explantation. It allows for shorter cardiac arrest times and better postoperative hemodynamics without major complication.

Management of aortic valve insufficiency in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device: a republication of the review published in Japanese Journal of Artificial Organs.

Since 2011, implantable ventricular assist devices have been a standard treatment for severe heart failure alongside heart transplantation in Japan. However, the limited availability of donors has led to a prolonged wait for transplants, now averaging 1719 days, intensifying the issue of aortic insufficiency in patients with continuous flow ventricular assist devices. These devices limit the opening of the aortic valve, leading to sustained closure and increased shear stress, which accelerates valve degradation. Risk factors for aortic insufficiency include having a smaller body surface area, being of advanced age, and the presence of mild aortic insufficiency prior to device implantation. In patients presenting with mild or moderate aortic regurgitation at the time of ventricular assist device implantation, interventions such as aortic valve repair or bioprosthetic valve replacement are performed with the aim of halting its progression. The choice of surgical procedure should be tailored to each patient's individual condition. The management of de novo aortic insufficiency in patients with continuous flow ventricular assist devices remains challenging, with no clear consensus on when to intervene. Interventions for significant aortic insufficiency typically consider the patient's symptoms and aortic insufficiency severity. De novo aortic insufficiency progression in continuous flow ventricular assist devices patients necessitates careful monitoring and intervention based on individual patient assessments and valve condition. This review was created based on a translation of the Japanese review written in the Japanese Journal of Artificial Organs in 2023 (Vol. 52, No. 1, pp. 77-80), with some modifications.

The outcomes of a standardized protocol for extracorporeal mechanical circulatory support selection-left ventricular challenge protocol.

There are no criteria for surgical mechanical circulatory system (MCS) selection for acute heart failure. Since 2021, we have utilized cardiopulmonary bypass system to assess patients' heart and lung condition to inform surgical MCS selection. we aimed to retrospectively analyze the outcomes of treatments administered using our protocol. We analyzed the data of 19 patients who underwent surgical MCS implantation. We compared patients' characteristics across the biventricular-assist device (BiVAD), central Y-Y extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), central ECMO, and left VAD (LVAD) systems. Patients' diagnoses included fulminant myocarditis (47.4%), dilated cardiomyopathy (21.1%), acute myocardial infarction (15.8%), infarction from aortic dissection (5.3%), doxorubicin-related cardiomyopathy (5.3%), and tachycardia-induced myocarditis (5.3%). Eight patients (42.1%) underwent LVAD implantation, 1 (5.2%) underwent central ECMO, 4 (21.1%) underwent BiVAD implantation, and 6 (31.6%) underwent central Y-Y ECMO. 48 h after surgery, both the pulmonary arterial and right atrial pressures were effectively controlled, with median values being 19.0 mmHg and 9.0 mmHg, respectively. No patients transitioned from LVAD to BiVAD in the delayed period. Cerebrovascular events occurred in 21.1%. Successful weaning was achieved in 11 patients (57.9%), and 5 patients (26.3%) were converted to durable LVAD. Two-year cumulative survival was 84.2%. Our protocol showed good results for device selection in patients with heart failure, and device selection according to this protocol enabled good control of the pulmonary and systemic circulations.

Safety and efficacy of aortic valvuloplasty for de novo aortic insufficiency in patients with a left-ventricular assist device.

OBJECTIVES: Progression of aortic insufficiency during left-ventricular assist device (LVAD) support is a crucial topic. One treatment option is aortic valvuloplasty (AVP); however, there is controversy regarding its safety and efficacy. We investigated the safety and efficacy of AVP using the coaptation stitch method (Park's stitch) performed for de novo aortic insufficiency. METHODS: Between 2013 and 2020, 175 consecutive patients underwent LVAD implantation, of which 7 patients [men, 2 (28.6%); median age, 55 years] underwent late-stage AVP. Two patients underwent AVP within 2 weeks, and the remaining six patients underwent AVP 3, 19, 24, 28, 42, and 49 months, respectively, after LVAD implantation. RESULTS: Preoperatively, the degree of aortic insufficiency was moderate in 6 (85.7%) patients and severe in 1 (14.3%) patient. AVP was technically successful in 6 (85.7%) patients, while one case of failed plasty was subsequently treated with bioprosthetic valve replacement. A 1-year post-AVP right heart catheterization study revealed a median pulmonary artery wedge pressure of 10.0 mmHg. No deaths or heart failure admissions occurred during the follow-up (median, 38.0 months). There was no aortic insufficiency in 2 (28.6%) patients; however, trivial AI was observed in 3 (42.8%) patients, and mild AI was observed in 1 (14.3%) patient 2 years postoperatively. However, at the 3-year follow-up, two patients developed an increase in AI grade from trivial to mild. CONCLUSIONS: AVP using Park's stitch was safe. It is critical to carefully observe the aortic valve during AVP surgery to ensure that AVP is appropriate.

Single-vessel access venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and Impella technique for acute cardiogenic shock complicated by lung congestion.

The combination of the Impella and peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (Ecmella) is a promising treatment for critically ill patients. We report a single-access Ecmella approach using the brachiocephalic artery. A 65-year-old woman with acute myocardial infarction involving the left main coronary artery underwent intra-aortic balloon pump and peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) placement. Given the progression of pulmonary congestion and lower limb ischaemia, and an axillary artery diameter of 4.9 mm, we decided to perform a single Ecmella approach. A Y-shaped 9-mm Dacron woven graft was anastomosed to the brachiocephalic artery through a reverse T-shaped partial sternotomy. The Impella 5.5 and arterial cannula of VA-ECMO were introduced through each graft. Six days after, VA-ECMO was removed. Sixty-two days after the surgery, the patient received durable left ventricle assist device implantation. In conclusion, haemodynamic support using a single-access Ecmella through brachiocephalic artery allows for managing patients with narrow peripheral arteries.

Impact of complete revascularization in coronary artery bypass grafting for ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Objective: In patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy, coronary artery bypass grafting ensures better survival than medical therapy. However, the long-term clinical impact of complete revascularization remains unclear. This observational study aimed to evaluate the effects of complete revascularization on long-term survival and left ventricular functional recovery in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed outcomes of 498 patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy who underwent complete (n = 386) or incomplete (n = 112) myocardial revascularization between 1993 and 2015. The baseline characteristics were adjusted using inverse probability of treatment weighting to reduce the impact of treatment bias and potential confounding. The mean follow-up duration was 77.2 ± 42.8 months in survivors. Results: The overall 5-year survival rate (complete revascularization, 72.5% vs incomplete revascularization, 57.9%, P = .03) and freedom from all-cause death and/or readmission due to heart failure (54.5% vs 40.1%, P = .007) were significantly greater in patients with complete revascularization than those with incomplete revascularization. After adjustments using inverse probability of treatment weighting, the complete revascularization group demonstrated a lower risk of all-cause death (hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% confidence interval, 0.43-0.86; P = .005) and composite adverse events (hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.44-0.79; P < .001) and a greater improvement in the left ventricular ejection fraction 1-year postoperatively (absolute change: 11.0 ± 11.9% vs 8.3 ± 11.4%, interaction effect P = .05) than the incomplete revascularization group. Conclusions: In patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting, complete revascularization was associated with better long-term outcomes and greater left ventricular functional recovery and should be encouraged whenever possible.

Outcomes and residual gap analysis after the modified cryomaze procedure performed via right minithoracotomy versus sternotomy.

Objectives: Developments in both technique and technology have enabled surgeons to perform the maze procedure via right minithoracotomy (RMT) to treat atrial fibrillation (AF). This study aimed to clarify the outcomes of the modified cryomaze procedure via the RMT approach compared with the sternotomy approach. Methods: The study cohort comprised 803 consecutive patients who underwent a modified cryomaze procedure (130 via RMT and 673 via sternotomy) for paroxysmal AF and persistent AF from January 2001 to March 2022. The Gray test was applied to compare the incidence of recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias. Additionally, residual electrical gaps were investigated in the patients who underwent additional catheter ablation for recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias. Results: The respective 1-, 2-, and 3-year cumulative incidences of recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias were 13.1%, 19.5%, and 23.1% in the RMT group, and 9.3%, 10.9%, and 12.8% in the sternotomy group (Gray test P = .036). All 31 patients with recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias underwent additional catheter ablation, comprising 14 (10.8%) in the RMT group and 17 (2.5%) in the sternotomy group. There was a significant intergroup difference in the site of residual electrical gaps; the RMT group more frequently had residual gaps in the tricuspid annulus than the sternotomy group (6.2% vs 0.4%; P < .001). Conclusions: In the modified cryomaze procedure via the RMT approach, ablation failure is more likely to occur at the tricuspid annulus, where the surgical field of view is relatively poor compared with the sternotomy approach. Therefore, surgical ablation should be performed with caution when the RMT approach is used.

Successful echocardiography-guided medical management of severe early post-implant right ventricular failure in a patient with left ventricular assist device support: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Post-implant right heart failure (RHF) has been recognized as a crucial prognostic factor in patients receiving left ventricular assist devices (LVADs), and its management has long attracted attention from cardiologists and surgeons. CASE PRESENTATION: This report described an 18-year-old female with acutely deteriorating heart failure due to dilated cardiomyopathy who underwent paracorporeal pulsatile-flow LVAD and developed early post-implant RHF. At postoperative day (POD) six, she was almost asymptomatic at rest on 2.5 mg/kg/min of dobutamine; however, the echocardiogram, performed as part of the daily postoperative care, revealed a severely enlarged right ventricle with a decompressed left ventricle, implying the development of post-implant RHF. Bolus infusion of saline and reduction of pump flow (6.0 L/min to 3.0 L/min) led to normalization of both ventricular shapes in 30 s, suggesting that RHF could be managed without surgical interventions. Milrinone was started on POD six, followed by sildenafil administration on POD seven. Fluid balance was strictly adjusted under the close observation of daily echocardiograms. Milrinone and dobutamine were discontinued on PODs 18 and 21, respectively. The patient was listed for a heart transplant on POD 40. Despite reduced right ventricular function (right ventricular stroke work index of 182.34 mmHg*ml/m- 2, body surface area 1.5 m2), she was successfully converted to implantable LVAD on POD 44 with no recurrence of post-implant RHF thereafter for four years. CONCLUSIONS: In post-implant RHF management, early detection, together with proper and prompt medical management, is crucial to avoiding any surgical intervention. Close observation of daily echocardiograms might be helpful in detecting subclinical RHF and is useful for post-implant medical management.

Efficacy of catheter cleaning methods using intravenous indwelling catheter, 10% silver nitrate solution and a monofilament nylon thread for deeply progressed superficial driveline infections: case series.

Driveline infection (DLI) is treated by local irrigation via driveline exit site (DLES) and surgical debridement is considered in patients with deep DLI. We describe three cases of deeply progressed superficial DLI that were considered to require surgical debridement but could be treated with a unique catheter cleaning method using intravenous indwelling catheter, a cotton swab with 10% silver nitrate solution and a monofilament nylon thread. Case 1 was a 60-y-old man with ischemic cardiomyopathy with left ventricular assist device implantation 2 y before. Daily bedside debridement with 10% silver nitrate solution was performed via the DLES. Case 2 was a 43-y-old man with ischemic cardiomyopathy who had recurrent DLI with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, and case 3 was a 49-y-old woman with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, who also showed improvement in their DLI with Pseudomonas aeruginosa. These cleaning methods may be useful for the deeply progressed superficial DLI.

Prognostic impact of lung computed tomography density in cardiogenic shock patients with veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary complications often occur in patients receiving veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO). However, the prognostic impact of lung damage has not been fully elucidated. METHODS: This single-center retrospective observational study targeted patients with cardiogenic shock who received VA ECMO between 2012 and 2021. This study included 65 patients who underwent chest computed tomography (CT) on VA ECMO, followed by escalation to central mechanical circulatory support (MCS) with left ventricular venting. The average density of lung CT images was measured using region-of-interest methods, and the primary endpoint was 180-day all-cause death after escalation to the central MCS. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients (34%) developed 180-day all-cause death. According to the Cox regression analysis, age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.14; p = 0.001), ischemic etiology (HR, 5.53; 95% CI, 2.09-14.62; p < 0.001), duration of VA ECMO support (HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.00-1.40; p = 0.045), and lung CT density (≥ -481 Hounsfield unit [HU]) (HR, 6.33; 95% CI, 2.26-17.72; p < 0.001) were independently associated with all-cause death. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis determined that lung CT density ≥ -481 HU is an optimal cutoff value for predicting all-cause death (area under the curve [AUC], 0.72). The 180-day overall survival rate for patients with high lung CT density (≥ -481 HU) was significantly lower than that for those with low lung CT density (< -481 HU) (44.4% vs. 81.6%, respectively, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Higher lung CT density could be a useful predictor of death in patients with VA ECMO requiring central MCS escalation.

Short- and Midterm outcomes of modified robotic tricuspid annuloplasty for secondary tricuspid regurgitation.

BACKGROUND: Despite the growing popularity of robotically assisted mitral repair, robotically assisted tricuspid repair has not been widely adopted. We assessed the safety and feasibility of robotic tricuspid annuloplasty with continuous sutures for tricuspid regurgitation (TR). METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied consecutive 68 patients (median age, 74 years) with secondary TR who underwent tricuspid annuloplasty using continuous sutures with (n = 61) and without mitral valve repair (n = 7) from 2018 to 2021. Robotic tricuspid annuloplasty consists of continuous sutures with flexible prosthetic band to the tricuspid annulus using two V-Loc barbed sutures (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN). Concomitant maze procedure was performed in 45 (66%) patients. Robotic tricuspid annuloplasty with continuous sutures was successfully performed. There was no in-hospital or 30-day mortality; 65 patients (96%) did not experience major surgery-related complications. Preoperatively, the TR grade was mild in 20 (29%) patients and mildly higher in 48 (71%). Postoperatively, the TR severity significantly improved, with TR grade mildly higher in 9% at hospital discharge and 7% at 1-year follow-up (p < 0.001). The 1-year and 2-year freedom rates from heart failure were 98% and 95%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic tricuspid annuloplasty with continuous sutures is safe and feasible alone or concomitant with mitral valve repair. It offered sustained improvement in TR severity and might prevent heart failure readmission.

What Is the Optimal Mitral Valve Repair for Isolated Posterior Leaflet Prolapse to Achieve Long-Term Durability?

Background This study assessed risk factors for mitral regurgitation (MR) recurrence or functional mitral stenosis during long-term follow-up in patients undergoing mitral valve repair for isolated posterior mitral leaflet prolapse. Methods and Results We assessed a consecutive series of 511 patients who underwent primary mitral valve repair for isolated posterior leaflet prolapse between 2001 and 2021. Annuloplasty using a partial band was selected in 86.3%. The leaflet resection technique was used in 83.0%, whereas the chordal replacement without resection was used in 14.5%. Risk factors were analyzed for MR recurrence ≥grade 2 or functional mitral stenosis with mean transmitral pressure gradient ≥5 mm Hg using a multivariable Fine-Gray regression model. The 1-, 5-, and 10-year cumulative incidence of MR ≥grade 2 was 7.8%, 22.7%, and 30.1%, respectively, whereas that of mean transmitral pressure gradient ≥5 mm Hg was 8.1%, 20.6%, and 29.3%, respectively. Risk factors for MR ≥grade 2 included chordal replacement without resection (hazard ratio [HR], 2.50, P<0.001) and larger prosthesis size (HR, 1.13, P=0.023), whereas factors for functional mitral stenosis were use of a full ring (partial band versus full ring, HR, 0.53, P=0.013), smaller prosthesis size (HR, 0.74, P<0.001), and larger body surface area (HR, 3.03, P=0.045). Both MR ≥grade 2 and mean transmitral pressure gradient ≥5 mm Hg at 1 year post surgery were significantly associated with the long-term incidence of reoperation. Conclusions Leaflet resection with a large partial band may be an optimal strategy for isolated posterior mitral valve prolapse.

Ventricular arrhythmias following coronary artery bypass grafting for ischemic cardiomyopathy: When to insert an implanted cardioverter defibrillator?

Objectives: The study objectives were to determine the incidence, predictors, and clinical impact of ventricular arrhythmias after coronary artery bypass grafting and to evaluate the impact of implantable cardioverter defibrillators on the survival of patients with ventricular arrhythmias. Methods: We enrolled 498 patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction of 40% or less who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting between 1993 and 2015. Clinical follow-up was completed in 94.0% of patients, with a median follow-up of 58.4 months. Results: Overall, 212 patients (43%) died, mainly of heart failure (n = 54, 10.8%) or sudden cardiac death (n = 40, 8.0%). The sudden cardiac death rate was highest during the first 6 months, with a monthly rate of 0.37%. Overall, 99 patients (20%) developed postoperative ventricular arrhythmias, and implantable cardioverter defibrillator was implanted in 55 patients. Previous ventricular arrhythmias (hazard ratio, 3.22; 95% confidence interval, 1.98-5.24; P < .001), left ventricular end-systolic dimension (hazard ratio, 1.07; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.10; P < .001), and myocardial infarction in the left anterior descending artery territory (hazard ratio, 1.73; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-2.73; P = .02) were independent predictors of postoperative ventricular arrhythmias. Notably, the 5-year survival of patients with ventricular arrhythmias who received an implantable cardioverter defibrillator was significantly higher than that of patients with ventricular arrhythmias who did not receive it (76.1% vs 22.7%, P < .001) and was comparable to that of patients without ventricular arrhythmias (76.1% vs 73.6%, P = .98). Conclusions: Sudden cardiac death affects a significant proportion of patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting, most frequently within 6 months postoperatively. To prevent sudden cardiac death, earlier implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation should be indicated for high-risk patients with scars in the left anterior descending artery territory and excessive left ventricular remodeling.

Does the residual aorta dilate after replacement of the bicuspid aortic valve and ascending aorta?

Background: Although a bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is known to be associated with progressive ascending aortic dilatation, the fate of the residual aorta after aortic valve and ascending aorta surgery is unknown. We reviewed surgical outcomes and explored serial changes in the size of the sinus of Valsalva (SOV) and distal ascending aorta (DAAo) in 89 patients with a BAV undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR) and graft replacement (GR) of the ascending aorta. Methods: We retrospectively examined patients who underwent AVR and GR of the ascending aorta for BAV-and related disease and thoracic aortic dilatation at our institution between January 2009 and December 2018. Patients who underwent AVR alone or required intervention for the aortic root and aortic arch and patients with connective tissue diseases were excluded. Aortic diameters were examined using computed tomography (CT). Late CT more than 1 year after surgery was performed in 69 patients (78%) with a mean follow-up of 4.9±2.8 years. Results: The surgical indication for aortic valve etiology was stenosis in 61 patients (69%), regurgitation in 10 (11%), and mixed in 18 (20%). Preoperative maximum short diameters of the ascending aorta, SOV, and DAAo were 47.3±4.7, 36.0±5.2, and 37.2±3.6 mm, respectively. The diameter of the SOV increased non-significantly by 0.08±0.45 mm per year [95% confidence interval (CI): -0.12 to 0.11, P=0.150], while that of the DAAo increased significantly by 0.11±0.40 mm per year (95% CI: 0.02-0.21, P=0.005). One patient required reoperation 6 years postoperatively due to a pseudo-aneurysm at the proximal anastomotic site. No patient required reoperation due to progressive dilatation of the residual aorta. According to the Kaplan-Meier analysis, the long-term survival rates were 98.9%, 98.9%, and 92.7% at 1, 5, and 10 years postoperatively, respectively. Conclusions: Rapid dilatation of the residual aorta rarely occurred in patients with a BAV who underwent AVR and GR of the ascending aorta in the mid-term follow-up. For selected patients with a surgical indication for ascending aortic dilatation, simple AVR and GR of the ascending aorta may be sufficient surgical options.