Developing an understanding of networks with a focus on LMIC health systems: How and why clinical and programmatic networks form and function to be able to change practices: A realist review.

Networks are an increasingly employed approach to improve quality of care, service delivery, and health systems performance, particularly in low-and-middle income country (LMIC) health systems. The literature shows that networks can improve the provision and quality of services and health system functioning but there is limited evidence explaining how and why networks are established and work to achieve their reported results. We undertook a realist review to explore this. The objective of this realist review was to develop a programme theory outlining the underlying mechanisms and interactions of contexts that explain how and why a network's set-up and function enable high-quality care and services and improved clinical outcomes in LMIC health systems. We followed Pawson's five steps for realist reviews. The search strategy was based on a previously published scoping review with additional searches. Literature was selected based on its relevance to the programme theory and rigour. Context-mechanism-outcome configurations were developed from the extracted data to refine the initial programme theory with causal explanations. Theories on social movements and organisations supported the identification of mechanism and brought additional explanatory power to the programme theory. The programme theory explains how networks are initiated, formed, and function in a way that sets them up for network leadership and committed, engaged, and motivated network members to emerge and to change practices, which may lead to improved quality of care, service delivery, and clinical outcomes through the following phases: identify a problem, developing a collective vision, taking action to solve the problem, forming purposeful relationships, linkages, and partnerships, building a network identity and culture, and the creation of a psychological safe space. This deeper understanding of networks formation and functioning can lead to a more considered planning and implementation of networks, thereby improving health system functioning and performance.

Understanding networks in low-and middle-income countries' health systems: A scoping review.

Networks are an often-employed approach to improve problems of poor service delivery and quality of care in sub-optimally functioning health systems. There are many types of health system networks reported in the literature and despite differences, there are identifiable common characteristics, uses, purposes, and stakeholders. This scoping review systematically searched the literature on networks in health systems to map the different types of networks to develop an understanding of what they are, when and what they are used for, and the purposes they intend to achieve. Peer-reviewed literature was systematically searched from six databases (Medline (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid), Global Health (Ovid), the Cochrane Library, Web of Science Core Collection, Global Index Medicus's Africa Index Medicus) and grey literature was purposively searched. Data from the selected literature on network definitions, characteristics, stakeholders, uses, and purposes were charted. Drawing on existing frameworks and refining with the selected literature, a five-component framework (form and structure, governance and leadership, mode of functioning, resources, and communication), broadly characterizing a network, is proposed. The framework and mapping of uses, purposes, and stakeholders is a first step towards further understanding what networks are, when and what they are used for, and the purposes they intend to achieve in health systems.

Networks of Care in Rural Madagascar for Achieving Universal Health Coverage in Ifanadiana District.

Health care is most effective when a patient's basic primary care needs are met as close to home as possible, with advanced care accessible when needed. In Ifanadiana District, Madagascar, a collaboration between the Ministry of Public Health (MoPH) and PIVOT, a non-governmental organization (NGO), fosters Networks of Care (NOC) to support high-quality, patient-centered care. The district's health system has three levels of care: community, health center, district hospital; a regional hospital is available for tertiary care services. We explore the MoPH/PIVOT collaboration through a case study which focuses on noteworthy elements of the collaboration across the four NOC domains: (I) agreement and enabling environment, (II) operational standards, (III) quality, efficiency, and responsibility, (IV) learning and adaptation. Under Domain I, we describe formal agreements between the MoPH and PIVOT and the process for engaging communities in creating effective NOC. Domain II discusses patient referral across levels of the health system and improvements to facility readiness and service availability. Under Domain III the collaboration prioritizes communication and supervision to support clinical quality, and social support for patients. Domain IV focuses on evaluation, research, and the use of data to modify programs to better meet community needs. The case study, organized by the domains of the NOC framework, demonstrates that a collaboration between the MoPH and an NGO can create effective NOC in a remote district with limited accessibility and advance the country's agenda to achieve universal health coverage.

Applying a Client-centered Approach to Maternal and Neonatal Networks of Care: Case Studies from Urban and Rural Nigeria.

In Nigeria, two maternal and neonatal health Networks of Care (NOC) focus on extending the reach and quality of routine and emergency maternal and neonatal health services tailored to the different contexts. This paper uses the four domains of the NOC framework-Agreements and Enabling Environment, Operational Standards, Quality, Efficiency and Responsibility, and Learning and Adaptation-to describe the NOC, highlighting how each developed to address specific local needs. In Northern Nigeria, the NOC were established in collaboration among Clinton Health Access Initiative and the government to reduce maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. Health centers and communities in the network were supported to be better prepared to provide maternal and neonatal care, while birth attendants at all levels were empowered and equipped to stabilize and treat complications. The approach brought services closer to the community and facilitated rapid referrals. The NOC in Lagos State extended the reach of routine and emergency maternal and neonatal health services through organically developed linkages among registered traditional birth attendant clinics, private and public sector facilities, the Primary Healthcare Board, and the Traditional Medicine Board. Traditional birth attendants are registered, trained, and monitored by Apex Community Health Officers, whose responsibilities include collection and review of data and ensuring linkages to postpartum services, such as family planning and immunizations. While differing in their approaches, both NOC provide locally appropriate, pragmatic approaches to supporting women birthing in the community and encouraging institutional delivery to ensure that women and their babies have access to timely, appropriate, and safe services.

Averting Maternal Death and Disability in an Urban Network of Care in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: A Descriptive Case Study.

The non-governmental organization Comprehensive Community Based Rehabilitation in Tanzania (CCBRT) developed a multi-facility maternal and neonatal Network of Care (NOC) among 22 government hospitals and catchment facilities operating across Dar es Salaam. While facility delivery rates were above 90% in the Dar es Salaam region, the quality of services was substandard, leading to an excess of preventable maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. In partnership with the Dar es Salaam regional health authorities CCBRT developed a plan to improve the quality of service delivery at childbirth by through a system strengthening approach, capacitating lower-level facilities to provide routine care during pregnancy and uncomplicated deliveries, as well as improving care at secondary level referral hospitals and developing an inter-connected strengthened referral system. The Regional-CCBRT partnership implemented interventions across the continuum of care that included clinical training in basic and comprehensive emergency obstetric care, investments in infrastructure, and a rigorous maternal and perinatal death audit and follow-up program. Routine data generated were reflected upon at quarterly quality improvement meetings to follow up on problems identified. The government has initiated the replication of the model. This descriptive case study uses the four domains of the Networks of Care framework to document the wide-ranging efforts made to build and maintain the CCBRT Network of Care in order to solve for specific challenges in maternal and neonatal health service delivery in the urban context of the Dar es Salaam region.

The Logarithmic Spiral of Networks of Care for Expectant Families in Rural Nepal: A Descriptive Case Study.

This case study utilizes the four domains of effective Networks of Care (NOC) as a lens to describe the suite of interventions of a biosocial approach to maternal and neonatal health services in rural Nepal: The Network of Safety model, created by the non-governmental organization One Heart Worldwide (OHW) in collaboration with the government health system in Nepal. This approach provides essential guidance in the areas of health financing, governance, sustainability, reflection of user preference, and scalability. OHW addresses the reproductive health needs of women living in remote areas of Nepal in collaboration with local-level health and government workers by emphasizing clinical skill development and mentorship in management and leadership. With Nepal's shift to Federalism, the OHW approach proved flexible and able to deepen its support to leaders in new local-level government structures. The results on the ground were remarkable: using analytic skills gained from their OHW partnership, municipality leaders and health workers demonstrated effective communication and proactive responses to challenges, while maintaining fidelity to the Network of Safety model. The six-year commitment made by OHW to partner municipalities promoted active learning and adaptation and is a clear contributor to the scalability of the OHW Network of Safety. Observing the Network of Safety work through the domains of NOC highlights the interdisciplinary effort required to successfully transform Maternal and Neonatal Health (MNH) services in rural Nepal.

Developing a Common Understanding of Networks of Care through a Scoping Study.

The phrase "Networks of Care" seems familiar but remains poorly defined. A health system that exemplifies effective Networks of Care (NOC) purposefully and effectively interconnects service delivery touch points within a catchment area to fill critical service gaps and create continuity in patient care. To more fully elaborate the concept of Networks of Care, we conducted a multi-method scoping study that included a literature review, stakeholder interviews, and descriptive case studies from five low- and middle-income countries. Our extended definition of a Network of Care features four overlapping and interdependent domains of activity at multiple levels of health systems, characterized by: 1) Agreement and Enabling Environment, 2) Operational Standards, 3) Quality, Efficiency and Responsibility, and 4) Learning and Adaptation. There are a series of key interrelated themes within each domain. Creating a common understanding of what characterizes and fosters an effective Network of Care can drive the evolution and strengthening of national health programs, especially those incorporating universal health coverage and promoting comprehensive care and integrated services. An understanding of the Networks of Care model can help guide efforts to move health service delivery toward goals that can benefit a diversity of stakeholders, including a variety of health system actors, such as health care workers, users of health systems, and the wider community at large. It can also contribute to improving poor health outcomes and reducing waste originating from fragmented services and lack of access.