Evaluation of TAK-264, an Antibody-Drug Conjugate in Pancreatic Cancer Cell Lines and Patient-Derived Xenograft Models.

BACKGROUND: Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are an emerging technology consisting of an antibody, linker, and toxic agent, which have the potential to offer a targeted therapeutic approach. A novel target recently explored for the treatment of pancreatic cancer is guanylyl cyclase C (GCC). The objective of this study was to determine the anti-tumorigenic activity of TAK-264, an investigational ADC consisting of an antibody targeting GCC linked to a monomethyl auristatin E payload via a peptide linker. METHODS: The antiproliferative effects of TAK-264 assessed in a panel of eleven pancreatic cancer cell lines. Additionally, ten unique pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cancer patient-derived xenograft models were treated with TAK-264 and the efficacy was determined. Baseline levels of GCC were analyzed on PDX models and cell lines. Immunoblotting was performed to evaluate the effects of TAK-264 on downstream effectors. RESULTS: GCC protein expression was analyzed by immunoblotting in both normal and tumor tissue; marked increase in GCC expression was observed in tumor tissue. The in vitro experiments demonstrated a range of responses to TAK-264. Eight of the ten PDAC PDX models treated with TAK-264 demonstrated a statistically significant tumor growth inhibition. Immunoblotting demonstrated an increase in phosphorylated-HistoneH3 in both responsive and less responsive cell lines and PDAC PDX models treated with TAK-264. There was no correlation between baseline levels of GCC and response in either PDX or cell line models. CONCLUSION: TAK-264 has shown suppression activity in pancreatic cancer cell lines and in pancreatic PDX models. These findings support further investigation of ADC targeting GCC.

TAK-264 (MLN0264) in Previously Treated Asian Patients with Advanced Gastrointestinal Carcinoma Expressing Guanylyl Cyclase C: Results from an Open-Label, Non-randomized Phase 1 Study.

PURPOSE: This phase 1 dose-escalation portion of the study evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and antitumor activity of TAK-264 in Asian patients with advanced gastrointestinal (GI) carcinoma or metastatic or recurrent gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma expressing guanylyl cyclase C (GCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adult patients with advanced GI malignancies expressing GCC (H-score ≥ 10) received TAK-264 on day 1 of 3-week cycles as 30-minute intravenous infusions for up to 1 year or until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary objectives were to evaluate the safety profile including dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) during cycle 1, determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and characterize the PK profile of TAK-264. RESULTS: Twelve patients were enrolled and treated with 1.2 mg/kg (n=3), 1.5 mg/kg (n=3), or 1.8 mg/kg TAK-264 (n=6). Median number of treatment cycles received was two (range, 1 to 10). None of the patients experienced a DLT and the MTD was not determined. Ten patients (83%) experienced adverse events (AEs). The most common were neutropenia, anorexia, and nausea (each reported by four patients). Five patients (42%) experienced grade ≥ 3 AEs consisting of tumor hemorrhage and hypertension, ascites, adrenal insufficiency, neutropenia and asthenia. Serum exposure to TAK-264 increased proportionally with the dose and the median half-life was approximately 5.5-6.6 days. No patients experienced an objective response. CONCLUSION: TAK-264 demonstrated a manageable safety profile with limited antitumor activity consistent with studies conducted in Western patients with advanced GI malignancies. TAK-264 exposure increased proportionally with the dose.

Consistent expression of guanylyl cyclase-C in primary and metastatic gastrointestinal cancers.

BACKGROUND: The transmembrane receptor guanylate cyclase-C (GCC) has been found to be expressed in colorectal cancers. However, limited data are available on GCC protein expression in non-colorectal gastrointestinal tumors and few studies have reported whether GCC protein expression was consistently preserved in synchronous primary and metastatic cancer tissues. METHODS: GCC protein status was assessed by immunohistochemistry in tumor specimens from individuals (n = 627) with gastrointestinal tumors, including esophageal (n = 130), gastric (n = 276), pancreatic (n = 136), and colorectal (n = 85) primary and metastatic tumors. Tissue specimens consisted of tissue microarrays containing esophageal, gastric, pancreatic tumors, and whole-slide tissue sections from colorectal cancer patients with matching primary and metastatic tumors. RESULT: Among the evaluated esophageal, gastric, and pancreatic tumors, the frequency of GCC positivity at the protein level ranged from 59% to 68%. GCC was consistently expressed in primary and matched/synchronous metastatic lesions of colorectal cancer tissues derived from the same patients. CONCLUSION: This observational study demonstrated the protein expression of GCC across various gastrointestinal malignancies. In all cancer histotypes, GCC protein localization was observed predominantly in the cytoplasm compared to the membrane region of tumor cells. Consistent immunohistochemistry detection of GCC protein expression in primary colorectal cancers and in their matched liver metastases suggests that the expression of GCC is maintained throughout the process of tumor progression and formation of metastatic disease.

A phase II study of antibody-drug conjugate, TAK-264 (MLN0264) in previously treated patients with advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma expressing guanylyl cyclase C.

Background This phase II open-label, multicenter study evaluated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of TAK-264 in previously treated patients with advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma expressing guanylyl cyclase C (GCC). Methods Patients with advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma expressing GCC (H-score ≥ 10) received TAK-264 1.8 mg/kg on day 1 of a 21-day cycle as a 30-min intravenous infusion for up to 1 year or until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary objective was overall response rate (ORR [complete response + partial response (PR)]). Secondary objectives included evaluations of the safety and pharmacokinetic profile of TAK-264 (NCT02202785). Results 43 patients were enrolled and treated with 1.8 mg/kg TAK-264: 11, 15, and 17 patients with low, intermediate, and high GCC expression, respectively. Median number of treatment cycles received was two (range 1-10). The ORR was 3%, including one patient with intermediate GCC expression who achieved a PR. All patients experienced ≥1 adverse events (AE). The majority of patients experienced grade 1/2 AEs affecting the gastrointestinal tract. Fifteen (35%) patients experienced ≥grade 3 drug-related AEs; five (12%) patients had a serious AE. The most common (≥10% of patients) all-grade drug-related AEs were nausea (33%), fatigue (28%), neutropenia (23%), decreased appetite (23%), vomiting (16%), asthenia (16%), and alopecia (14%). Conclusions TAK-264 demonstrated a manageable safety profile; however, the low efficacy of TAK-264 observed in this study did not support further clinical investigation.

Phase II study of the antibody-drug conjugate TAK-264 (MLN0264) in patients with metastatic or recurrent adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction expressing guanylyl cyclase C.

Background The first-in-class antibody-drug conjugate TAK-264 (formerly MLN0264) consists of an antibody targeting guanylyl cyclase C (GCC) conjugated to monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) via a peptide linker. This phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of TAK-264 in patients with adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction expressing GCC, who had progressed on ≥1 line of prior therapy. Methods This study used a two-stage design, with an interim analysis conducted after stage I to determine whether to continue to stage II or discontinue on the grounds of futility. Adult patients with gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma expressing low, intermediate, or high GCC levels received TAK-264 1.8 mg/kg as a 30-min intravenous infusion once every 21 days, for up to 1 year. The primary endpoint was objective response rate. Radiographic assessments of tumor burden were performed every 2 cycles (6 weeks). Results A total of 38 patients participated in the study. Patients received a median of 2 (range 1-14) cycles; 8 (21%) received at least 6 cycles. The most common adverse events were nausea (53%), fatigue (32%), and decreased appetite (29%). Grade ≥3 events including anemia, diarrhea, and neutropenia were seen in 14 (37%) patients. Systemic exposure to TAK-264 was maintained throughout each treatment cycle. Two patients (6%) with intermediate GCC expression had objective responses. Conclusions TAK-264 demonstrated a manageable safety profile in this patient population. The stage I interim analysis did not support continuation to stage II of the study.

Antibody-drug conjugate directed against the guanylyl cyclase antigen for the treatment of gastrointestinal malignancies.

Antibody-directed cancer chemotherapy in the form of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) may improve the therapeutic index with the potential to enhance efficacy and decrease systemic toxicity. ADCs consist of three key components including an antibody that specifically binds to the target, a toxic agent and a linker which releases the toxic agent inside tumor cells. A novel ADC, MLN0264 (TAK-264) was recently investigated in patients with gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies. TAK-264 is an anti- guanylyl cyclase C (GCC) antibody conjugated via a protease-cleavable linker to the potent anti-microtubule agent monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) (linker and toxin licensed from Seattle Genetics). Following binding to GCC, the ADC is internalized and transported to lysosomes where MMAE is released to bind to tubulin, leading to cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. This GCC targeting ADC has been evaluated in clinical studies in patients with advanced gastrointestinal malignancies. The early findings from Phase 1 study have shown preliminary activity signals in gastric, gastroesophageal, and pancreatic cancer. Results from two phase II studies in pancreatic and gastoesophageal adenocarcinoma showed only limited activity. Antibody-drug-conjugates offer a promising therapeutic modality aimed at providing target-directed cancer chemotherapy. Herein we discuss the GCC target and gastrointestinal malignancies where GCC based targeted therapies could further evolve and offer a significant clinical benefit.

Phase I Study of the Investigational Anti-Guanylyl Cyclase Antibody-Drug Conjugate TAK-264 (MLN0264) in Adult Patients with Advanced Gastrointestinal Malignancies.

PURPOSE: To assess the safety, tolerability, and preliminary antitumor activity of the investigational anti-guanylyl cyclase C (GCC) antibody-drug conjugate TAK-264 (formerly MLN0264) in adult patients with advanced gastrointestinal malignancies. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Adult patients with GCC-expressing gastrointestinal malignancies (H-score ≥ 10) were eligible for inclusion. TAK-264 was administered as a 30-minute intravenous infusion once every 3 weeks for up to 17 cycles. Dose escalation proceeded using a Bayesian continual reassessment method. At the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), 25 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer were enrolled in a prespecified dose expansion cohort. RESULTS: Forty-one patients were enrolled, including 35 (85%) with metastatic colorectal cancer. During dose escalation (0.3-2.4 mg/kg), four of 19 patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities of grade 4 neutropenia; the MTD was determined as 1.8 mg/kg. Patients received a median of two cycles of TAK-264 (range, 1-12); nine received ≥four cycles. Common drug-related adverse events (AEs) included nausea and decreased appetite (each 41%), fatigue (32%), diarrhea, anemia, alopecia, and neutropenia (each 27%); grade ≥3 AEs included neutropenia (22%), hypokalemia, and febrile neutropenia (each 7%). Peripheral neuropathy was reported in four (10%) patients. Pharmacokinetic data showed approximately dose proportional systemic exposure and a mean plasma half-life of around 4 days, supporting the dosing schedule. Overall, 39 patients were response-evaluable; three experienced durable stable disease; and one with gastric adenocarcinoma had a partial response. GCC expression did not appear to correlate with treatment duration. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that TAK-264 has a manageable safety profile, with preliminary evidence of potential antitumor activity in specific gastrointestinal malignancies. Further investigation is underway. Clin Cancer Res; 22(20); 5049-57. ©2016 AACR.

Phase 1 study of ixazomib, an investigational proteasome inhibitor, in advanced non-hematologic malignancies.

PURPOSE: Ixazomib is an investigational proteasome inhibitor with demonstrated antitumor activity in xenograft models of multiple myeloma (MM), lymphoma, and solid tumors. This open-label, phase 1 study investigated intravenous (IV) ixazomib, in adult patients with advanced non-hematologic malignancies. METHODS: Patients received IV ixazomib twice-weekly for up to twelve 21-day cycles. The 0.125 mg/m(2) starting dose was doubled (one patient/dose) until 1.0 mg/m(2) based on dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) in cycle 1. This was followed by 3 + 3 dose-escalation and expansion at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Primary objectives included safety and MTD assessment. Secondary objectives included assessment of pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and disease response. RESULTS: Ixazomib was escalated from 0.125 to 2.34 mg/m(2) to determine the MTD (n = 23); patients were then enrolled to MTD expansion (n = 73) and pharmacodynamic (n = 20) cohorts. Five patients experienced DLTs (1.0 and 1.76 mg/m(2): grade 3 pruritic rash; 2.34 mg/m(2): grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia, and grade 3 acute renal failure); thus, the MTD was 1.76 mg/m(2). Drug-related grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) included thrombocytopenia (23 %), skin and subcutaneous (SC) tissue disorders (16 %), and fatigue (9 %). Among 92 evaluable patients, one (head and neck cancer) had a partial response and 30 had stable disease. Ixazomib terminal half-life was 3.8-7.2 days; plasma exposures increased dose-proportionally and drug was distributed to tumors. Inhibition of whole-blood 20S proteasome activity and upregulation of ATF-3 in tumor biopsies demonstrated target engagement. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with solid tumors, ixazomib was associated with a manageable safety profile, limited antitumor activity, and evidence of downstream proteasome inhibition effects.

SHP-1 expression accounts for resistance to imatinib treatment in Philadelphia chromosome-positive cells derived from patients with chronic myeloid leukemia.

We prove that the SH2-containing tyrosine phosphatase 1 (SHP-1) plays a prominent role as resistance determinant of imatinib (IMA) treatment response in chronic myelogenous leukemia cell lines (sensitive/KCL22-S and resistant/KCL22-R). Indeed, SHP-1 expression is significantly lower in resistant than in sensitive cell line, in which coimmunoprecipitation analysis shows the interaction between SHP-1 and a second tyrosine phosphatase SHP-2, a positive regulator of RAS/MAPK pathway. In KCL22-R SHP-1 ectopic expression restores both SHP-1/SHP-2 interaction and IMA responsiveness; it also decreases SHP-2 activity after IMA treatment. Consistently, SHP-2 knocking-down in KCL22-R reduces either STAT3 activation or cell viability after IMA exposure. Therefore, our data suggest that SHP-1 plays an important role in BCR-ABL-independent IMA resistance modulating the activation signals that SHP-2 receives from both BCR/ABL and membrane receptor tyrosine kinases. The role of SHP-1 as a determinant of IMA sensitivity has been further confirmed in 60 consecutive untreated patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia, whose SHP-1 mRNA levels were significantly lower in case of IMA treatment failure (P < .0001). In conclusion, we suggest that SHP-1 could be a new biologic indicator at baseline of IMA sensitivity in patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia.

c-MYC oncoprotein dictates transcriptional profiles of ATP-binding cassette transporter genes in chronic myelogenous leukemia CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cells.

Resistance to chemotherapeutic agents remains one of the major impediments to a successful treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Misregulation of the activity of a specific group of ATP-binding cassette transporters (ABC) is responsible for reducing the intracellular concentration of drugs in leukemic cells. Moreover, a consistent body of evidence also suggests that ABC transporters play a role in cancer progression beyond the efflux of cytotoxic drugs. Despite a large number of studies that investigated the function of the ABC transporters, little is known about the transcriptional regulation of the ABC genes. Here, we present data showing that the oncoprotein c-MYC is a direct transcriptional regulator of a large set of ABC transporters in CML. Furthermore, molecular analysis carried out in CD34+ hematopoietic cell precursors of 21 CML patients reveals that the overexpression of ABC transporters driven by c-MYC is a peculiar characteristic of the CD34+ population in CML and was not found either in the population of mononuclear cells from which they had been purified nor in CD34+ cells isolated from healthy donors. Finally, we describe how the methylation state of CpG islands may regulate the access of c-MYC to ABCG2 gene promoter, a well-studied gene associated with multidrug resistance in CML, hence, affecting its expression. Taken together, our findings support a model in which c-MYC-driven transcriptional events, combined with epigenetic mechanisms, direct and regulate the expression of ABC genes with possible implications in tumor malignancy and drug efflux in CML.

Phase II study of neoadjuvant imatinib in glioblastoma: evaluation of clinical and molecular effects of the treatment.

PURPOSE: Phase I-II studies indicate that imatinib is active in glioblastoma multiforme. To better understand the molecular and clinical effects of imatinib in glioblastoma multiforme, we conducted a neoadjuvant study of imatinib with pretreatment and posttreatment biopsies. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients underwent a computerized tomography-guided biopsy of their brain tumors. If diagnosed with glioblastoma multiforme, they were immediately treated with 7 days of imatinib 400 mg orally twice daily followed by either definitive surgery or re-biopsy. Pretreatment and posttreatment tissue specimens were tested by immunohistochemistry for Ki67 and microvessel destiny, and posttreatment specimens were analyzed for the presence of intact imatinib in tissue. Furthermore, pretreatment and posttreatment pairs were analyzed by Western blotting for activation of platelet-derived growth factor receptor, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), phosphoinositide 3-kinase/AKT, and mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathways. Pharmacokinetic studies were also done. RESULTS: Twenty patients were enrolled. Median survival was 6.2 months. Intact imatinib was detected in the posttreatment tissue specimens using mass spectrometry. There was no evidence of a drug effect on proliferation, as evidenced by a change in Ki67 expression. Biochemical evidence of response, as shown by decreased activation of AKT and mitogen-activated protein kinase or increased p27 level, was detected in 4 of 11 patients with evaluable, matched pre- and post-imatinib biopsies. Two patients showed high-level EGFR activation and homozygous EGFR mutations, whereas one patient had high-level platelet-derived growth factor receptor-B activation. CONCLUSIONS: Intact imatinib was detected in glioblastoma multiforme tissue. However, the histologic and immunoblotting evaluations suggest that glioblastoma multiforme proliferation and survival mechanisms are not substantially reduced by imatinib therapy in most patients.

Bone sialoprotein is predictive of bone metastases in resectable non-small-cell lung cancer: a retrospective case-control study.

PURPOSE: Bone metastases (BM) in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) may be detected at diagnosis or during the course of the disease, and are associated with a worse prognosis. Currently, there are no predictive or diagnostic markers to identify high-risk patients for metastatic bone dissemination. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty patients with resected NSCLC who subsequently developed BM were matched for clinicopathologic parameters to 30 control patients with resected NSCLC without any metastases and 26 patients with resected NSCLC and non-BM lesions. Primary tumors were investigated by immunohistochemistry for 10 markers involved in bone resorption or development of metastases. Differences among groups were estimated by chi2 test, whereas the prognostic impact of clinicopathologic parameters and marker expression was evaluated by univariate (Wilcoxon and Mantel-Cox tests) and multivariate (Cox proportional hazards regression model) analyses. RESULTS: The presence of bone sialoprotein (BSP) was strongly associated with bone dissemination (P < .001) and, independently, with worse outcome (P = .02, Mantel-Cox test), as defined by overall survival. To evaluate BSP protein expression in nonselected NSCLC, a series of 120 consecutive resected lung carcinomas was added to the study, and BSP prevalence reached 40%. No other markers showed a statistically significant difference among the three groups or demonstrated a prognostic impact, in terms of both overall survival and time interval to metastases. CONCLUSION: BSP protein expression in the primary resected NSCLC is strongly associated with BM progression and could be useful in identifying high-risk patients who could benefit from novel modalities of surveillance and preventive treatment.

Epigenetic transitions: towards therapeutic targets.

Therapeutic approaches aimed at developing epigenetically-effective drugs are under intense investigation. Several classes of enzymes regulating histone acetylation and DNA methylation, which are required for epigenetic transitions, offer attractive targets for therapeutic interventions. Imbalances in histone acetylation and DNA methylation may play a significant role in the development of cancer and leukaemia and may provide a mechanistic rationale for targeting epigenetic modifications. Clinical trials designed to evaluate inhibitors of DNA methylation and histone deacetylase inhibitors are showing encouraging results in cancer patients. A growing quantity of data from preclinical research supports the notion that epigenetically-effective drugs could also find an application in other therapeutic areas. A number of emerging biomarkers may prove useful for monitoring drug effects and defining molecular signatures of response, toxicity and effective dose.

Chemoprevention of lung cancer: new directions.

The refractoriness of advanced lung cancer to current treatment modalities requires new approaches to reduce the public health burden associated with this disease. One strategy that is currently being tested is chemoprevention, which aims to prevent the development of cancer in populations that are at high risk for cancer due to a variety of genetic or environmental factors. The key to the success of this approach, however, requires the identification of appropriately targeted efficacious, non-toxic agents as well as the methodologies to efficiently test them. Given the lack of success of previous phase III definitive lung cancer chemoprevention trials, there is a need for smaller scale phase II trials with molecular, imaging, or histologic endpoints to demonstrate preliminary safety and efficacy. The identification of molecular pathways critical to lung carcinogenesis offers the opportunity to develop targeted therapies for prevention. Means of optimizing the risk/benefit ratio associated with treatment include regional drug delivery that minimizes systemic toxicities and combination therapies. Identification of the most appropriate cohorts, such as former smokers without ongoing DNA damage due to carcinogen exposure, may uncover benefits that are hidden in a mixed population. Equally important is the identification of appropriate study endpoints that are predictive of patient outcomes such as cancer incidence. Further understanding of lung cancer biology will be critical to the success of future clinical trials.

Epigenetic changes: potential therapeutic targets.

Recent advances in human genome research have resulted in novel approaches for the identification of epigenetic modifications associated with cancer. Modulators of DNA methylation and chromatin structure have a dramatic effect on gene expression, cellular proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis. Molecular pathways regulating epigenetic events that occur during tumorigenesis have been exploited as new targets for therapeutic intervention. Clinical studies exploring the effectiveness of therapeutic agents targeting DNA methylation and acetylation of histones have yielded promising results. Molecular profiles of epigenetic alterations in cancer cells could allow better stratification of patients who may show responsiveness to specific treatments.