Efficient measurement of multiple ventricular assist device patient-reported outcomes: Creation of a 20-item profile from the MCS A-QOL study.

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures of distinct concepts are often put together into patient profile assessments. When brief, profile assessments can decrease respondent burden and increase measure completion rates. In this report, we describe the creation of 5 self-reported 4-item short forms and the Mechanical Circulatory Support: Measures of Adjustment and Quality of Life (MCS A-QOL) 20-item profile to assess PROs specific to adjustment and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) among patients who undergo left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. METHODS: Using a cross-sectional sample of patients (n = 620) who underwent LVAD implantation at 12 U.S. sites or participated in the MyLVAD.com support group, we created 5 4-item short forms: Satisfaction with Treatment, ventricular assist device (VAD) Team Communication, Being Bothered by VAD Self-care and Limitations, Self-efficacy Regarding VAD self-care, and Stigma, which we combined into a 20-item profile. Analyses included intercorrelations among measures, Cronbach's alpha (i.e., internal consistency reliability)/score-level-specific reliability, and construct validity. RESULTS: The 620 patients were mean age = 57 years, 78% male, 70% White, and 56% on destination therapy LVADs. Intercorrelations among the 5 4-item measures were low to moderate (≤0.50), indicating they are associated yet largely distinct, and correlations with calibrated measures and 6-item short forms were ≥0.76, indicating their ability to reflect full-item bank scores. Internal consistency reliability for the 5 4-item short forms ranged from acceptable (≥0.70) to good (≥0.80). Construct validity was demonstrated for these measures. CONCLUSIONS: Our 5 4-item short forms are reliable and valid and may be used individually or together as a 20-item profile to assess adjustment and HRQOL in patients who undergo LVAD implantation.

New Dizziness Impact Measures of Positional, Functional, and Emotional Status Were Supported for Reliability, Validity, and Efficiency.

Objective: To calibrate the 25 items from the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) patient-reported outcome measure (PROM), using item response theory (IRT), into 1 or more item banks, and assess reliability, validity, and administration efficiency of scores derived from computerized adaptive test (CAT) or short form (SF) administration modes. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Outpatient rehabilitation clinics. Participants: Patients (N=28,815; women=69%; mean age [SD]=60 [18]) included in a large national dataset and assessed for dizziness-related conditions who responded to all DHI items at intake. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: IRT model assumptions of unidimensionality, local item independence, item fit, and presence of differential item functioning (DIF) were evaluated. Generated scores were assessed for reliability, validity, and administration efficiency. Results: Patients were treated in 976 clinics from 49 US states for either vestibular-, brain injury-, or neck-related impairments. Three unidimensional item banks were calibrated, creating 3 distinct PROMs for Dizziness Functional Status (DFS, 13 items), Dizziness Positional Status (DPS, 4 items), and Dizziness Emotional Status (DES, 6 items). Two items did not fit into any domain. A DFS-CAT and a DFS 7-item SF were developed. Except for 2 items by age groups and 1 item by main impairment, no items were flagged for DIF; DIF impact was negligible. Median reliability estimates were 0.91, 0.72, and 0.79 for the DFS, DPS, and DES, respectively. Scores discriminated between patient groups in clinically logical ways and had a large effect size (>0.8), with acceptable floor and ceiling effects (<15%), except for a floor effect for DPS (20.4%). DFS-CAT scores were generated using a median of 8 items; they correlated highly with full-bank scores (r=0.99). Conclusion: The 3 dizziness impact PROMs demonstrated moderate to high reliability, were valid, and highly responsive to change; thus, they are suitable for research and routine clinical administration.

Novel measures to assess ventricular assist device patient-reported outcomes: Findings from the MCS A-QOL study.

BACKGROUND: Generic and heart failure-specific measures do not capture unique aspects of living with a ventricular assist device (VAD). Using state-of-the-science psychometric measurement methods, we developed a measurement system to assess post-ventricular assist device adjustment and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). METHODS: Patients were recruited from 10/26/16-2/29/20 from 12 U.S. VAD programs. We created a dataset of participants (n = 620) enrolled before left (L)VAD implantation, with data at 3- or 6- months post-implantation (group1 [n = 154]), and participants enrolled after LVAD implantation, with data at one timepoint (group 2 [n = 466]). We constructed 5 item banks: 3 modified from existing measures and 2 new measures. Analyses included item response theory (IRT) modeling, differential item functioning tests for systematic measurement bias, and indicators of reliability and validity. RESULTS: Of 620 participants, 56% (n = 345) were implanted as destination therapy, 51% (n = 316) were <12 months post-implantation, mean age = 57.3 years, 78% (n = 485) male, 70% (n = 433) White, 58% (n = 353) married/partnered, and 58% (n = 357) with >high school education. We developed 5 new VAD item banks/measures: 6-item VAD Team Communication; 12-item Self-efficacy Regarding VAD Self-care; 11-item Being Bothered by VAD Self-care and Limitations; 7-item Satisfaction with Treatment; and 11-item Stigma. Cronbach's alpha reliability ranged from good (≥0.80) to excellent (≥0.90) for item banks/measures. All measures, except VAD Team Communication, demonstrated at least moderate correlations (≥0.30) with construct validity indicators. CONCLUSIONS: These measures meet IRT modeling assumptions and requirements; scores demonstrate reliability and validity. Use of these measures may assist VAD clinicians to inform patients about VADs as a treatment option and guide post-VAD interventions.

Psychometric Properties of the Spinal Cord Injury-Quality of Life (SCI-QOL) Resilience Short Form in a Sample With Spinal Cord Injury.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the psychometric properties (eg, data distribution characteristics, convergent or discriminant validity, internal consistency reliability) of the Spinal Cord Injury-Quality of Life measurement system (SCI-QOL) Resilience 8-item short form (SF) in comparison to the criterion standard resilience measure, Connor Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) in a sample of individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). DESIGN: Descriptive statistics were calculated to examine variable data distribution characteristics. Correlation analyses were conducted for convergent and discriminant validity. Reliability statistics were calculated for resilience and other validity measures. SETTING: General community. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals with SCI (N=202; 51.5% male, 48% female). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System measures (depression, anxiety, ability to participate in social roles and activities, pain intensity, fatigue, sleep disturbance), SCI-QOL short forms (SF) (resilience, positive affect and well-being, mobility), CD-RISC, National Institutes of Health Toolbox for Assessment of Neurological and Behavioral Function - perceived stress (NIH Toolbox-perceived stress), and the Satisfaction with Life Scale were administered. RESULTS: The mean and SD for the SCI-QOL Resilience SF (mean=48.60; SD=8.20) approximated the normative mean (mean=50, SD=10). The SCI-QOL Resilience SF scores were essentially normally distributed though somewhat kurtotic, with skew=-0.17 and excess kurtosis=1.4; internal consistency reliability was good (Cronbach's alpha=0.89). Convergent validity was supported by significant moderate correlations in expected directions between the SCI-QOL Resilience SF and measures of CD-RISC resilience, depressive symptoms, anxiety, social participation, positive affect and well-being, stress, and satisfaction with life. Discriminant validity was supported by small non-significant correlations between the SCI-QOL Resilience SF and age, sex, injury level, time since injury, pain intensity, mobility, sleep disturbance, and fatigue. CONCLUSION: The SCI-QOL Resilience SF demonstrated good convergent and discriminant validity. Our study showed that the SCI-QOL Resilience SF is a psychometrically valid tool that can reliably estimate levels of resilience in the SCI population.

Cytogenetics and molecular genetics of myelodysplastic neoplasms.

According to the 2022 World Health Organization (WHO) Classification (5th edition), the term myelodysplastic neoplasms (abbreviated MDS) has been introduced to replace myelodysplastic syndromes. MDS are a group of clonal hematopoietic stem cell diseases characterized by cytopenia(s), dysplasia in one or more of lineages, ineffective hematopoiesis, and an increased risk of progression to bone marrow failure or to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Current NCCN guidelines and recent review articles have provided in depth discussion on the clinical diagnosis and management of MDS. This review will focus on discussion of the WHO and International Consensus Classification (ICC) updates on the role of cytogenetics and molecular genetics in the diagnosis and risk stratification of MDS.

Psychometric properties of the mock interview rating scale for autistic transition-age youth.

Background: Employment is a major contributor to quality of life. However, autistic people are often unemployed and underemployed. One potential barrier to employment is the job interview. However, the availability of psychometrically-evaluated assessments of job interviewing skills is limited for autism services providers and researchers. Objective: We analyzed the psychometric properties of the Mock Interview Rating Scale that was adapted for research with autistic transition-age youth (A-MIRS; a comprehensive assessment of video-recorded job interview role-play scenarios using anchor-based ratings for 14 scripted job scenarios). Methods: Eighty-five transition-age youth with autism completed one of two randomized controlled trials to test the effectiveness of two interventions focused on job interview skills. All participants completed a single job interview role-play at pre-test that was scored by raters using the A-MIRS. We analyzed the structure of the A-MIRS using classical test theory, which involved conducting both exploratory and confirmatory factor analyzes, Rasch model analysis and calibration techniques. We then assessed internal consistency, inter-rater reliability, and test-retest reliability. Pearson correlations were used to assess the A-MIRS' construct, convergent, divergent, criterion, and predictive validities by comparing it to demographic, clinical, cognitive, work history measures, and employment outcomes. Results: Results revealed an 11-item unidimensional construct with strong internal consistency, inter-rater reliability, and test-retest reliability. Construct [pragmatic social skills (r = 0.61, p < 0.001), self-reported interview skills (r = 0.34, p = 0.001)], divergent [e.g., age (r = -0.13, p = 0.26), race (r = 0.02, p = 0.87)], and predictive validities [competitive employment (r = 0.31, p = 0.03)] received initial support via study correlations, while convergent [e.g., intrinsic motivation (r = 0.32, p = 0.007), job interview anxiety (r = -0.19, p = 0.08)] and criterion [e.g., prior employment (r = 0.22, p = 0.046), current employment (r = 0.21, p = 0.054)] validities were limited. Conclusion: The psychometric properties of the 11-item A-MIRS ranged from strong-to-acceptable, indicating it may have utility as a reliable and valid method for assessing the job interview skills of autistic transition-age youth.

Lower Quadrant Edema Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Is Reliable, Valid, and Efficient for Patients With Lymphatic and Venous Disorders.

OBJECTIVE: The main aims of this study were: (1) to create a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) item bank for measuring the impact of lower quadrant edema (LQE) on physical function using item response theory and (2) to assess reliability, validity, and administration efficiency of LQE PROM scores based on computerized adaptive test (CAT) and the reliability of a 10-item short form (SF). METHODS: This retrospective study included data from patients treated in outpatient rehabilitation clinics for lower quadrant edema who responded to all 30 candidate items at intake. Item response theory model assumptions of unidimensionality, local item independence, item fit, and presence of differential item functioning (DIF) were evaluated. LQE-CAT-generated scores were assessed for reliability, validity, and administration efficiency. LQE-SF-generated scores were assessed for reliability. RESULTS: The total cohort included 4894 patients (mean [SD] age = 65 [14] years; range = 14-89 years). A set of 20 items was selected for the item bank based on support for its unidimensionality and fit to the item response theory model, with reliability estimates greater than 0.92 for CAT and SF administration modes. No items demonstrated DIF with respect to tested variables. After controlling for scores at intake, scores discriminated among multiple patient groups in clinically logical ways with better outcomes observed for patients who were younger with less chronic symptoms and fewer comorbidities. Scores were responsive to change but the effect size was small (0.4). There were negligible floor and ceiling effects. CAT administration of the item bank required an average of 6.1 items (median = 5). Scores correlated highly with full-bank scores (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.98). CONCLUSION: Scores on the LQE PROM were reliable, valid, and efficient for assessing perceived physical function of patients with lower quadrant edema. The LQE, CAT, and SF are suitable for research and routine clinical care. Reasons for the small effect size for change scores should be studied. IMPACT: The newly developed LQE PROM was reliable and valid and offered efficient administration modes for assessing perceived physical function of patients with LQE, both for research and routine clinical care in busy outpatient rehabilitation settings. As an item response theory-based measure, the LQE PROM allows administration of condition-specific functional questions with low response burden for patients. The 10-item LQE-SF offers a feasible alternative administration mode when CAT administration is not available. This study supports a transition to PROMs that are based on modern measurement approaches to achieve the combined benefits of high accuracy and efficiency.

The Stroke Upper and Lower Extremity Physical Function Measures Were Supported for Score Reliability, Validity, and Administration Efficiency for Patients Poststroke.

OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to (1) evaluate the suitability of newly developed items for calibration into 2 item banks for stroke upper extremity (SUE) and stroke lower extremity (SLE) physical function (PF) patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and to (2) assess score reliability and validity and PROM administration efficiency based on computerized adaptive testing (CAT). METHODS: A retrospective longitudinal study involving patients poststroke who were treated in outpatient rehabilitation clinics and responded to 28 and 25 region-specific candidate items addressing tasks related to upper or lower extremity PF, respectively, was conducted. Item response theory (IRT) model assumptions of unidimensionality, local independence, item fit, and presence of differential item functioning were evaluated. CAT-generated scores were assessed for reliability, validity, and administration efficiency, and 10-item short forms were assessed for reliability. RESULTS: Cohorts consisted of 2017 patients with stroke involving the upper extremity and 2107 patients with stroke involving the lower extremity (mean age [SD]: SUE = 62 [14] and SLE = 63 [14]; range = 14-89). Two solutions (SUE: 28-item; SLE: 24-item) supported unidimensionality and fit to the IRT model, with reliability estimates >0.93 for all administration modes. No items demonstrated differential item functioning. Scores discriminated among multiple patient groups in clinically logical ways, with better outcomes observed for patients who were younger, were male, had less chronicity, and had fewer comorbidities. The SUE and SLE, respectively, had 1 and 0.3% floor effects and 4.3 and 1.1% ceiling effects. Change score effect sizes were 0.5 (SUE) and 0.6 (SLE). Simulated CAT scores required an average of 6 (SUE) and 5.6 (SLE) items (median = 5). CONCLUSION: The stroke upper extremity and stroke lower extremity PROM scores were reliable, valid, and efficient and had moderate change effect sizes for assessing PF as perceived by patients poststroke with upper and lower extremity impairments. Scores had negligible floor and acceptable ceiling effects. Based on these results, the stroke PROMs are suitable for research and routine clinical practice. IMPACT: As IRT-based measures, these PROMs support clinical practice guideline recommendations for the use of outcome measures in neurologic physical therapy and the administration of condition-specific functional questions with low response burden for patients. The 10-item short forms offer a feasible alternative administration mode when CAT administration is not available.

Reliability, Validity, and Efficiency of an Item Response Theory-Based Balance Confidence Patient-Reported Outcome Measure.

OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to calibrate the original 16 items from the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale to create an item response theory (IRT)-based item bank and scoring metric of balance confidence (BC) and to assess psychometric properties of a computerized adaptive test (BC-CAT) and 6-item short-form (BC-SF) administration modes. METHODS: This retrospective study included data from patients who were treated in outpatient rehabilitation clinics and assessed for balance impairments by responding to the full ABC Scale at intake. IRT model assumptions of unidimensionality, local item independence, item fit, and presence of differential item functioning (DIF) were evaluated. BC-CAT-generated scores were assessed for reliability, validity, and administration efficiency, and the newly developed BC-SF was assessed for reliability. RESULTS: Total cohort included 20,354 patients (mean age [SD] = 66 [16] years; range = 14-89). All 16 items were retained in the final item bank based on support for unidimensionality and fit to the IRT model. No items demonstrated DIF. Reliability estimates were 0.95, 0.96, and 0.98 for the BC-SF, BC-CAT, and the full item bank, respectively. Scores discriminated among patient groups in clinically logical ways. After controlling for scores at intake, better outcomes were achieved for patients who were younger, had more acute symptoms, exercised more, and had fewer comorbidities. Scores were responsive to change with a moderate effect size, with negligible floor and ceiling effects. CAT scores were generated using an average of 4.7 items (median = 4) and correlated highly with full-bank scores (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.99). CONCLUSION: The IRT-based BC patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) was reliable, valid, moderately responsive to change, and efficient, with excellent score coverage. The measure is suitable for research and routine clinical administration using the BC-CAT or BC-SF administration modes. The full ABC Scale can be administered for increased clinical content when appropriate. IMPACT: The newly developed BC-PROM was reliable and valid for assessing perceived BC. In addition, the BC-PROM has efficient administration modes with low patient response burden, which enhances feasibility and promotes use during routine clinical practice in busy rehabilitation settings. This study supports a transition to PROMs that are based on modern measurement approaches to achieve the combined benefits of high accuracy and efficiency.

Psychometric properties of the mock interview rating scale for schizophrenia and other serious mental illnesses.

Background: Over the past 10 years, job interview training has emerged as an area of study among adults with schizophrenia and other serious mental illnesses who face significant challenges when navigating job interviews. The field of mental health services research has limited access to assessments of job interview skills with rigorously evaluated psychometric properties. Objective: We sought to evaluate the initial psychometric properties of a measure assessing job interview skills via role-play performance. Methods: As part of a randomized controlled trial, 90 adults with schizophrenia or other serious mental illnesses completed a job interview role-play assessment with eight items (and scored using anchors) called the mock interview rating scale (MIRS). A classical test theory analysis was conducted including confirmatory factor analyses, Rasch model analysis and calibration, and differential item functioning; along with inter-rater, internal consistency, and test-retest reliabilities. Pearson correlations were used to evaluate construct, convergent, divergent, criterion, and predictive validity by correlating the MIRS with demographic, clinical, cognitive, work history measures, and employment outcomes. Results: Our analyses resulted in the removal of a single item (sounding honest) and yielded a unidimensional total score measurement with support for its inter-rater reliability, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability. There was initial support for the construct, convergent, criterion, and predictive validities of the MIRS, as it correlated with measures of social competence, neurocognition, valuing job interview training, and employment outcomes. Meanwhile, the lack of correlations with race, physical health, and substance abuse lent support for divergent validity. Conclusion: This study presents initial evidence that the seven-item version of the MIRS has acceptable psychometric properties supporting its use to assess job interview skills reliably and validly among adults with schizophrenia and other serious mental illnesses. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03049813.

Item Banks for Measuring the Effect of Blood Pressure Dysregulation on Health-Related Quality of Life in Persons With Spinal Cord Injury.

OBJECTIVE: To report on the development and calibration of the new Blood Pressure Dysregulation Measurement System (BPD-MS) item banks that assess the effect of BPD on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and the daily activities of Veterans and non-Veterans with spinal cord injury (SCI). DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey study. SETTING: Two Veteran Affairs medical centers and a SCI model system site. PARTICIPANTS: 454 respondents with SCI (n=262 American Veterans and n=192 non-Veterans; N=454). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The BPD-MS item banks. RESULTS: BPD item pools were developed and refined using literature reviews, qualitative data from focus groups, and cognitive debriefing of persons with SCI and professional caregivers. The item banks then underwent expert review, reading level assessment, and translatability review prior to field testing. The items pools consisted of 180 unique questions (items). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, item response theory modeling, and differential item function investigations resulted in item banks that included a total of 150 items: 75 describing the effect of autonomic dysreflexia on HRQOL, 55 describing the effect of low blood pressure (LBP) on HRQOL, and 20 describing the effect of LBP on daily activities. In addition, 10-item short forms were constructed based on item response theory-derived item information values and the clinical relevance of item content. CONCLUSIONS: The new BPD-MS item banks and corresponding 10-item short forms were developed using established rigorous measurement development standards, which represents the first BPD-specific patient-reported outcomes measurement system unique for use in the SCI population.

Development of a New Measure of Housing Security: The REDD-CAT Housing Security Measure.

BACKGROUND: Housing security is a key social determinant of behavior related to health outcomes. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to develop a new patient-reported outcome measure that evaluates aspects of housing security for use in the Re-Engineered Discharge for Diabetes-Computer Adaptive Test (REDD-CAT) measurement system. DESIGN: Qualitative data, literature reviews, and cross-sectional survey study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 225 people with T2DM provided responses to the items in this item pool. MAIN MEASURES: A new item pool that evaluates important aspects of housing security was developed using stakeholder data from focus groups of persons with T2DM. KEY RESULTS: For the Housing Affordability scale, factor analysis (both exploratory and confirmatory) supported the retention of six items. Of these items, none exhibited sparse cells or problems with monotonicity; no items were deleted due to low item-adjusted total score correlations. For the six affordability items, a constrained graded response model indicated no items exhibited misfit; thus, all were retained. No items indicated differential item functioning (examined for age, sex, education, race, and socioeconomic status). Thus, the final Affordability item bank comprised six items. A Housing Safety index (three items) and a Home Features index (eight items) were also developed. Reliability (i.e., internal consistency and test-retest reliability) and validity (i.e., convergent, discriminant, and known-groups) of the new measures were also supported. CONCLUSIONS: The REDD-CAT Housing Security Measure provides a reliable and valid assessment of housing affordability, safety, and home features in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Future work is needed to establish the clinical utility of this measure in other clinical populations.

A New Instrument for Assessing Work-Related Body Mechanics and Strain in the General Population.

Clinical pain is often linked to poor body mechanics, with individuals sometimes presenting multiple painful disorders. Such disorders may be influenced by behaviors that affect the general resiliency and health of the musculoskeletal system. We aimed to develop a self-reported scale using the Malmö Diet and Cancer Study questions on work-related body mechanical exposures. An expert panel identified 41 variables having content validity for musculoskeletal problems. Exploratory factor analysis was conducted on a random selection of 50% of the cohort (n = 6,789 adults); the remaining was reserved for confirmatory factor analyses (CFA), item response theory (IRT) item calibration, and differential item functioning investigations. Supported by standard measure development methods and fit criteria, the final unidimensional item bank contains 13 items. Overall CFA statistics (root mean square error of approximation = .09; comparative fit index = .96; Tucker-Lewis index = .96; standardized root mean residuals = .05) indicated excellent single-factor model fit and appropriateness of IRT modeling and calibration. Expert review and item information values (score-precision) guided selection of an 8-item short form with acceptable score-level reliabilities (≥.70) for T-scores = 39-80+. This measure provides reliable assessment of body mechanics strain in adults and can be useful when evaluating different contributions to musculoskeletal problems affecting pain-treatment success in future clinical research. PERSPECTIVE: This article presents the development and psychometric properties of a new measure, "Work-related Body Mechanics and Strain Scale (WR-BMSS)." The scale has 13-items or alternatively an 8-item short form. This measure could potentially help clinicians who seek to assess how musculoskeletal problems may contribute to patient pain and disability.

Development and calibration data for the Illness Burden item bank: a new computer adaptive test for persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to develop a new measure, the Re-Engineered Discharge for Diabetes Computer Adaptive Test (REDD-CAT) Illness Burden item bank, to evaluate the impact that a chronic condition has on independent living, the ability to work (including working at home), social activities, and relationships. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were used to inform the development of an item pool (47 items) that captured patients' beliefs about how a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes interferes with different aspects of their lives. The Illness Burden item bank was developed and tested in 225 people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. RESULTS: No items had sparse response option cells or problems with monotonicity; two items were deleted due to low item-rest correlations. Factor analyses supported the retention of 29 items. With those 29 remaining items, a constrained (common slope) graded response model fit assessment indicated that two items had misfit; they were excluded. No items displayed differential item functioning by age, sex, education, or socio-economic status. The final item bank is comprised of 27 items. Preliminary data supported the reliability (internal consistency and test-retest reliability) and validity (convergent, discriminant, and known-groups) of the new bank. CONCLUSION: The Illness Burden item bank can be administered as a computer adaptive test or a 6-item short form. This new measure captures patients' perceptions of the impact that having type 2 diabetes has on their daily lives; it can be used in conjunction with the REDD-CAT measurement system to evaluate important social determinants of health in persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Development and calibration data for the Medication Adherence Item Bank: a new computer adaptive test for persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

PURPOSE: To develop a new computer adaptive test that evaluates important aspects of medication adherence for persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: Two hundred and twenty-five people with type 2 diabetes mellitus completed 41 items related to medication adherence. RESULTS: Exploratory analysis supported the essential unidimensionality of the initial item pool. Five items were deleted due to low item-adjusted total score correlations (resulting in 36 items). Confirmatory factor analysis supported the retention of 27 items. A graded response model identified no items for exclusion, based on misfit. No items were flagged for meaningful differential item functioning (DIF). The final item bank is comprised of 27 items; an associated 6-item short form was constructed that balanced both psychometric factors (e.g., item information values) and clinical input. Initial analysis of the simulated CAT and static short form supported both the reliability (i.e., internal consistency and test-retest reliability) and validity (i.e., convergent, discriminant, and known groups) of both administration formats. CONCLUSIONS: The new medication adherence item bank provides a reliable and valid assessment of the ability to take medications accurately among people with T2DM; it will be available in early 2023 through healthmeasures.net.

Initial Evidence for Reliable and Valid Use of Scores on the 8-Item Econ-QOL Short Form to Measure Economic Quality of Life in Caregivers of Persons With Traumatic Brain Injury.

OBJECTIVE: To provide reliability and validity data to support the clinical utility of Economic Quality of Life Measure (Econ-QOL) scores in caregivers of civilians and service members/veterans with traumatic brain injury (TBI). DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey study. SETTING: Three academic medical centers and a Veterans Affairs treatment facility. PARTICIPANTS: 376 caregivers of civilians (n=213) and service members/veterans (n=163) with TBI (N=376). INTERVENTIONS: N/A. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Econ-QOL and several patient-reported outcome measures (Traumatic Brain Injury Caregiver Quality of Life Caregiver-Specific Anxiety and Caregiver Strain, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System sleep-related impairment, Neurological Quality of Life Measurement System positive affect and well-being) and measures of financial status (self-reported income). RESULTS: Internal consistency reliability of the Econ-QOL Short Form scores were excellent (all Cronbach's alphas ≥.92). There were no floor or ceiling effects for scores. There was evidence of convergent and discriminant validity, with the Econ-QOL scores having the strongest relationships with self-reported income (convergent validity evidence) and weak relationships with the other measures (discriminant validity evidence). Individuals with scores that were "below or possibly below" the poverty line (according to 2016 federal government poverty level thresholds) reported worse economic quality of life relative to those individuals who were definitely above the poverty line, supporting known-groups validity. CONCLUSIONS: This article establishes the clinical utility of scores on the Econ-QOL Short Form in caregivers of persons with TBI and provides evidence that it is valid and appropriate to use such scores not only in a variety of different disability populations (eg, spinal cord injury, stroke) but also in caregivers.

Development and calibration data for the Healthcare Access Item Bank: a new computer adaptive test for persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to develop a new measure to evaluate the ability to receive medical services when needed among persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: The Healthcare Access measure was developed using data from 225 persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus who completed an item pool comprised of 54 questions pertaining to their experience accessing healthcare services. RESULTS: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses supported the retention of 45 items. In addition, a constrained graded response model (GRM), as well as analyses that examined item misfit and differential item functioning (investigated for age, sex, education, race, and socioeconomic status), supported the retention of 44 items in the final item bank. Expert review and GRM item calibration products were used to inform the selection of a 6-item static short form and to program the Healthcare Access computer adaptive test (CAT). Preliminary data supported the reliability (i.e., internal consistency and test-retest reliability) and validity (i.e., convergent, discriminant, and known-groups) of the new measure. CONCLUSIONS: The new Healthcare Access item bank can be used to examine the experiences that persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus have with healthcare access, to better target treatment improvements and mitigate disparities; it will be available as a part of the Neuro-Qol measurement system through healthmeasures.net and the PROMIS Application Programmable Interface (API) in early 2023.

The development and initial validation of the PROMIS®+HF-27 and PROMIS+HF-10 profiles.

AIMS: Heart failure (HF) is a common and morbid condition impacting multiple health domains. We previously reported the development of the PROMIS®-Plus-HF (PROMIS+HF) profile measure, including universal and HF-specific items. To facilitate use, we developed shorter, PROMIS+HF profiles intended for research and clinical use. METHODS AND RESULTS: Candidate items were selected based on psychometric properties and symptom range coverage. HF clinicians (n = 43) rated item importance and clinical actionability. Based on these results, we developed the PROMIS+HF-27 and PROMIS+HF-10 profiles with summary scores (0-100) for overall, physical, mental, and social health. In a cross-sectional sample (n = 600), we measured internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha and Spearman-Brown), test-retest reliability (intraclass coefficient; n = 100), known-groups validity via New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, and convergent validity with Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) scores. In a longitudinal sample (n = 75), we evaluated responsiveness of baseline/follow-up scores by calculating mean differences and Cohen's d and comparing with paired t-tests. Internal consistency was good to excellent (α 0.82-0.94) for all PROMIS+HF-27 scores and acceptable to good (α/Spearman-Brown 0.60-0.85) for PROMIS+HF-10 scores. Test-retest intraclass coefficients were acceptable to excellent (0.75-0.97). Both profiles demonstrated known-groups validity for the overall and physical health summary scores based on NYHA class, and convergent validity for nearly all scores compared with KCCQ scores. In the longitudinal sample, we demonstrated responsiveness for PROMIS+HF-27 and PROMIS+HF-10 overall and physical summary scores. For the PROMIS+HF overall summary scores, a group-based increase of 7.6-8.3 points represented a small to medium change (Cohen's d = 0.40-0.42). For the PROMIS+HF physical summary scores, a group-based increase of 5.0-5.9 points represented a small to medium change (Cohen's d = 0.29-0.35). CONCLUSIONS: The PROMIS+HF-27 and PROMIS+HF-10 profiles demonstrated good psychometric characteristics with evidence of responsiveness for overall and physical health. These new measures can facilitate patient-centred research and clinical care, such as improving care quality through symptom monitoring, facilitating shared decision-making, evaluating quality of care, assessing new interventions, and monitoring during the initiation and titration of guideline-directed medical therapy.

Measuring PROMIS® Emotional Distress in Early Childhood.

OBJECTIVE: Create and validate developmentally sensitive parent-report measures of emotional distress for children ages 1-5 years that conceptually align with the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) pediatric measures. METHODS: Initial items were generated based on expert and parent input regarding core components of emotional distress in early childhood and review of theoretical and empirical work in this domain. Items were psychometrically tested using data from two waves of panel surveys. Item response theory (IRT) was applied to develop item calibration parameters (Wave 1), and scores were centered on a general U.S. population sample (Wave 2). Final PROMIS early childhood (EC) instruments were compared with existing measures of related constructs to establish construct validity. RESULTS: Experts and parents confirmed the content validity of the existing PROMIS Pediatric emotional distress domains (i.e., anger, anxiety, and depressive symptoms) as developmentally salient for young children. Existing items were adapted and expanded for early childhood by employing best practices from developmental measurement science. Item banks as well as 4- and 8-item short forms, free from differential item functioning across sex and age, were constructed for the three domains based on rigorous IRT analyses. Correlations with subscales from previously validated measures provided further evidence of construct validity. CONCLUSIONS: The PROMIS EC Anger/Irritability, Anxiety, and Depressive Symptoms measures demonstrated good reliability and initial evidence of validity for use in early childhood. This is an important contribution to advancing brief, efficient measurement of emotional distress in young children, closing a developmental gap in PROMIS pediatric emotional distress assessment.

Psychometric Considerations in Developing PROMIS® Measures for Early Childhood.

OBJECTIVE: The early expression of lifespan health and disease states can often be detected in early childhood. Currently, the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) includes over 300 measures of health for individuals ages 5 years and older. We extended PROMIS to early childhood by creating developmentally appropriate, lifespan coherent parent-report measures for 1-5-year-olds. This paper describes the psychometric approaches used for these efforts. METHODS: 2 waves of data from parents of children ages 1-5 were collected via 2 internet panel companies. Wave 1 data (n = 1,400) were used to evaluate item pool unidimensionality, model fit, and initial item parameters. Combined data from wave 1 and wave 2 (reference sample; n = 1,057) were used to estimate final item parameters. Using item response theory methods, we developed and tested 12 item pools: Global Health, Physical Activity, Sleep Disturbance, Sleep-related Impairment, Anger/Irritability, Anxiety, Depressive Symptoms, Positive Affect, Self-Regulation, Engagement, Family Relationships, and Peer Relationships. RESULTS: Wave 1 analyses supported the unidimensionality of Physical Activity, Positive Affect, Anger/Irritability, Anxiety, Depressive Symptoms, and Global Health. Family Relationships and Peer Relationships were combined to form "Social Relationships"; Sleep Disturbance and Sleep-related Impairment were combined to form "Sleep Problems." Self-Regulation was divided into "Flexibility" and "Frustration Tolerance"; Engagement was divided into "Curiosity" and "Persistence." Short forms were developed for item banks with more than 10 items; and. CONCLUSIONS: Using rigorous mixed-methods, we successfully extended PROMIS to early childhood (1-5-year-olds). Measures are now publicly available in English and Spanish (www.healthmeasures.net).