Lip Wedge Resection with Orbicularis Oris Plication for Facial Paralysis: A Novel Technique.

Introduction: Oral incompetence (OI) following facial nerve injury or sacrifice remains a frustrating problem for patients and clinicians alike. Dynamic procedures for facial paralysis often do not fully address OI and static surgeries are frequently needed. Current static options frequently involved multiple facial incisions. Methods: We describe a novel technique to address OI due to lower division facial nerve paralysis and report outcomes in an initial series of patients. Results: OI symptoms improved in 94% of patients following a single-stage surgery. Revision was required in one patient with subsequent resolution of symptoms. Major complications (19%) included persistent OI, wound dehiscence, and bothersome lip "bulk". Conclusion: Lip wedge resection with orbicular oris plication resolves OI in facial paralysis patients with the added benefit of only a single incision on the face.

Introduction : L'incompétence orale après une blessure ou un sacrifice des nerfs faciaux demeure un problème frustrant, tant pour les patients que pour les cliniciens. En cas de paralysie faciale, il n'est pas rare que les interventions dynamiques ne corrigent pas toute l'incompétence orale, et des interventions statiques sont souvent nécessaires. Les options statiques actuelles exigent souvent de multiples incisions faciales. Méthodologie : Les chercheurs décrivent une nouvelle technique pour corriger une incompétence orale en raison d'une paralysie de la partie inférieure des nerfs faciaux et rendent compte des résultats auprès d'une série initiale de patients. Résultats : Les symptômes d'incompétence orale ont diminué chez 94 % des patients après une chirurgie en un temps. Un patient a dû subir une révision, puis les symptômes se sont résorbés. Les complications majeures (19 %) incluaient une incompétence orale persistante, la déhiscence de la plaie et un « volume ¼ dérangeant de la lèvre. Conclusion : La résection en coin par plicature de l'orbiculaire des lèvres résout l'incompétence orale en cas de paralysie faciale et a l'avantage supplémentaire de nécessiter une seule incision sur le visage.

The Cost of Guideline Adherence: A Multicenter Analysis of the Financial Implications of Adopting the US Multi-Society Task Force Polypectomy Guidelines.

GOAL: The goal of this study was to determine the financial impact of adopting the US Multi-Society Task Force (USMSTF) polypectomy guidelines on physician reimbursement and disposable equipment costs for gastroenterologists in the academic medical center and community practice settings. BACKGROUND: In 2020, USMSTF guidelines on polypectomy were introduced with a strong recommendation for cold snare rather than cold forceps technique for removing diminutive and small polyps. Polypectomy with snare technique reimburses physicians at a higher rate compared with cold forceps and also requires different disposable equipment. The financial implications of adopting these guidelines is unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients that underwent screening colonoscopy where polypectomy was performed at an academic medical center (Loma Linda University Medical Center) and community practice medical center (Ascension Providence Hospital) between July 2018 and July 2019 were identified. The polypectomy technique performed during each procedure was determined (forceps alone, snare alone, forceps plus snare) along with the number and size of polyps as well as disposable equipment. Actual and projected provider reimbursement and disposable equipment costs were determined based on applying the new polypectomy guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 1167 patients underwent colonoscopy with polypectomy. Adhering to new guidelines would increase estimated physician reimbursement by 5.6% and 12.5% at academic and community practice sites, respectively. The mean increase in physician reimbursement per procedure was significantly higher at community practice compared with the academic setting ($29.50 vs. $14.13, P <0.00001). The mean increase in disposable equipment cost per procedure was significantly higher at the community practice setting ($6.11 vs. $1.97, P <0.00001). CONCLUSION: Adopting new polypectomy guidelines will increase physician reimbursement and equipment costs when colonoscopy with polypectomy is performed.

The Effect of Breast Implants on Mammogram Outcomes.

Breast cancer detection in women with implants has been questioned. We sought to evaluate the impact of breast implants on mammographic outcomes. A retrospective review of women undergoing mammography between March 1 and October 30, 2013 was performed. Demographic characteristics and mammogram results were compared between women with and without breast implants. Overall, 4.8 per cent of 1863 women identified during the study period had breast implants. Median age was 59 years (26-93). Women with implants were younger (53.9 vs 59.2 years, P < 0.0001), had lower body mass index (25.4 vs 28.9, P < 0.0001), and were more likely to have dense breast tissue (72.1% vs 56.4%, P = 0.004) than those without. There were no statistically significant differences with regards to Breast Imaging Recording and Data System 0 score (13.3% with implants vs 21.4% without), call back exam (18.9% with vs 24.1% without), time to resolution of abnormal imaging (58.6 days with vs 43.3 without), or cancer detection rate (0% with implants vs 1.0% without). Because implants did not significantly affect mammogram results, women with implants should be reassured that mammography remains useful in detecting cancer. However, future research is required to determine whether lower call back rates and longer time to resolution of imaging findings contribute to delays in diagnosis in patients with implants.