Comparative effect of Tai Chi and aerobic exercise on cognitive function in advanced lung cancer survivors with perceived cognitive impairment: a three-arm randomized controlled trial with mediation analysis.

PURPOSE: Cancer-related cognitive impairment is prevalent in metastatic lung cancer survivors. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of aerobic exercise and Tai Chi on perceived cognitive function and the mediating role of psychoneurological symptoms with perceived cognitive impairment. METHODS: In a subgroup of a parent randomized clinical trial, participants who reported cognitive impairment underwent a 16-week aerobic exercise (n = 49), Tai Chi (n = 48), and control (n = 54) groups. Measures included perceived cognitive function and psychoneurological symptoms (sleep disturbance, fatigue, anxiety, and depression) assessed at baseline (T0), 16-week (T1), and 1 year (T2). RESULTS: Participants in Tai Chi showed significant improvements compared to aerobic exercise and control groups in perceived cognitive function at T1 (AE: between-group difference, 6.52; P < 0.001; CG: 8.34; P < 0.001) and T2 (AE: between-group difference, 3.55; P = 0.05; CG: 5.94; P < 0.001). Sleep disturbance, fatigue, anxiety, and depression at month 12 explained 24%, 31%, 32%, and 24% of the effect of the intervention on cognitive function at month 12, respectively. Only anxiety at month 4 explained 23% of the intervention effect at month 12. CONCLUSIONS: Tai Chi demonstrated beneficial effects on cognitive function in advanced lung cancer survivors with perceived cognitive impairment. Improvement in cognitive function was mediated by reducing sleep disturbance, fatigue, anxiety, and depression, highlighting the importance of addressing these symptoms in future interventions to improve cognitive function, with anxiety playing a significant role at an earlier stage. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Tai Chi is a potentially safe complementary therapeutic option for managing cognitive impairment in this vulnerable population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04119778; retrospectively registered on 8 October 2019.

Tai Chi and Aerobic Exercise on Cancer-Related Dyspnea in Advanced Lung Cancer Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

CONTEXT: Dyspnea, a prevalent and debilitating symptom in patients with advanced lung cancer, negatively affects symptom burden and prognosis. Physical activity has emerged as a promising non-pharmacological intervention for managing dyspnea. OBJECTIVES: This study compared the effectiveness of two widely-recognized physical activity modalities, namely Tai Chi (TC) and aerobic exercise (AE) for treating dyspnea in patients with advanced lung cancer. METHODS: Patients with advanced lung cancer (n=226) were randomized into TC, AE, or control groups. There was no baseline dyspnea requirement for patients. The AE group received two 60-minute supervised sessions and home-based exercises per month, the TC group received 60-minute sessions twice weekly, and the control group received exercise guidelines for 16 weeks. The primary outcome (sleep quality) of the study has been previously reported. In this secondary analysis, we focused on dyspnea outcomes, including overall and lung cancer-specific dyspnea. Assessments were conducted at baseline (T0), 16 weeks (T1), and one year (T2). RESULTS: Compared to the control group, TC significantly improved overall dyspnea at T1 (between-group difference, -8.69; P=0.03) and T2 (between-group difference, -11.45; P=0.01), but not AE. Both AE (between-group difference, -11.04; P=0.01) and TC (between-group difference, -14.19; P<0.001) significantly alleviated lung cancer-specific dyspnea at T2 compared with the control group. CONCLUSION: Both TC and AE alleviate dyspnea severity in patients with advanced lung cancer, and continuous exercise can yield substantial improvements. Due to its multi-component nature, Tai Chi has a greater effect on dyspnea.

Effectiveness of Aerobic Exercise and Tai Chi Interventions on Sleep Quality in Patients With Advanced Lung Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Sleep disturbances prevalent among patients with advanced lung cancer can aggravate physical and psychological symptoms, contributing to decreased quality of life and survival. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of 2 physical activities of different modalities and intensities, namely aerobic exercise (AE) and tai chi (TC), on subjective sleep quality, physical and psychological outcomes, and survival in patients with advanced lung cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: This assessor-blinded, randomized clinical trial was conducted in 3 public hospitals in Hong Kong between December 19, 2018, and September 7, 2022. A total of 226 patients with advanced lung cancer were recruited and randomized 1:1:1 to AE, TC, or the control group. Interventions: For 16 weeks, the AE group received two 60-minute supervised group exercise sessions and home-based exercises per month, and the TC group received 60-minute group sessions twice weekly. The control group received physical activity guidelines. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was subjective sleep quality. Secondary outcomes included objective sleep measures, anxiety, depression, fatigue, quality of life, physical function, circadian rhythm, and 1-year survival. Assessments were conducted at baseline, 16 weeks (T1), and 1 year (T2). Results: The 226 participants had a mean (SD) age of 61.41 (8.73) years, and 122 (54.0%) were female. Compared with the control group, participants in the AE and TC groups showed statistically significant improvements in subjective sleep quality from baseline to T1 (AE: between-group difference, -2.72; 95% CI, -3.97 to -1.46; P < .001; TC: between-group difference, -4.21; 95% CI, -5.48 to -2.94; P < .001) and T2 (AE: between-group difference, -1.75; 95% CI, -3.24 to -0.26; P = .02; TC: between-group difference, -3.95; 95% CI, -5.41 to -2.49; P < .001), psychological distress, physical function, step count, and circadian rhythm. The TC group had a statistically significant greater improvement in sleep than the AE group at T1 (between-group difference, -1.49; 95% CI, -2.77 to -0.22; P = .02) and T2 (between-group difference, -2.20; 95% CI, -3.57 to -0.83; P < .001). Participants in the TC group showed statistically significant improvement in survival compared with the control group. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, AE and TC improved sleep, psychological distress, physical function, and circadian rhythm, with TC demonstrating greater benefits on sleep and survival. Both exercises, but particularly TC, can be incorporated into lung cancer survivorship care. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04119778.

Relationship of subjective and objective sleep measures with physical performance in advanced-stage lung cancer patients.

Advanced lung cancer patients suffer from deteriorated physical function, which negatively impacts physical and psychological health. As little is known about sleep and physical function in this population, this study aimed to examine the association between subjective and objective sleep parameters and physical function among them. 164 advanced lung cancer patients were included. Objective sleep was measured by actigraphy (measured on non-dominant wrist for 72 h), and subjective sleep quality was assessed by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Performance-based physical function was measured by Timed Up and Go Test (TUGT), 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), Sit-to-Stand Test, and One-leg Standing Test. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses were employed to examine the association between sleep and physical function. Total sleep time (TST) was significantly associated with the 6MWT (ß = 0.259; 95% CI 0.120, 0.398; P < 0.001), TUGT (ß = - 0.012; 95% CI = - 0.017, - 0.008; P < 0.001) and Sit-to-Stand Test (ß = 0.027; 95% CI = 0.018, 0.035; P < 0.001) after adjustment for multiple covariates. PSQI global score was only significantly associated with TUGT (ß = 0.140; 95% CI = 0.000, 0.280; P = 0.050) after adjustment for multiple covariates. Shorter sleep duration significantly predicted poorer physical performance in advanced lung cancer patients, and more attention is required for those with less than 4.3 h of sleep on average.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03482323. Registered 29 March 2018, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03482323 ; ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04119778. Registered 8 October 2019, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04119778 .

Utilization of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy in oligometastatic & oligoprogressive skeletal metastases: Results and pattern of failure.

AIM: To evaluate the outcome and toxicities of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for skeletal metastasis in a tertiary cancer center. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of 22 patients treated with SABR for skeletal metastases for oligometastases (OM) or oligoprogression (OP) since October 2012. There are a total of 27 treatments with 20 spinal and seven non-spinal metastases. Treatment outcome including local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), pain control, treatment-related toxicity and failure pattern are described. Patients are assessed by interval computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography-CT, magnetic resonance imaging or bone scintigraphy by physicians' discretion. Toxicities are graded by common toxicities criteria version 4.03. RESULT: The median age of the patients is 64 years. Primary sites include lung (50%), breast (32%), nasopharynx (9%), prostate (4.5%) and colon (4.5%). Twelve patients with OM and 10 with OP are included. Dose to most spinal and non-spinal metastases is 35 and 50 Gy, respectively, in five fractions. With a median follow up of 15.6 months, there are three local failures (1-year LC 91.2%). The median PFS and OS are 10.1 and 37.3 months, while PFS of OP and OM group is 6.6 and 10.6 months, respectively. Two-third of symptomatic patients have at least 1-year complete pain control. There are two vertebral fractures and one grade 3 esophagitis. CONCLUSION: Our series shows excellent LC of SABR to skeletal metastases with limited toxicities in OM and OP diseases. However, its benefit of survival warrants further studies.

Endoscopic resection with adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A critical review.

Radical esophagectomy with extended lymph node dissection is considered the standard of care in treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of esophagus with deep mucosal invasion (pT1a m3) or submucosal involvement (pT1b). However, despite the increasing use of minimally invasive approaches, it remains a major surgery associated with significant morbidities and even mortality risk. Endoscopic resection (ER) results in excellent local control in early superficial mucosal (pT1a) disease yet there is substantial risk of lymph node metastases in T1b disease. Therefore, ER followed by combined with chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) would potentially improve the outcome in pT1a m3 or pT1b disease and would be an attractive conservative alternative to esophagectomy. Retrospective series published so far have shown promising results for this combined treatment. Herein the current literature of the indications, treatment outcome and toxicities of this treatment strategy are discussed and critically reviewed.