Risk-adjusted proposal for >60 months follow up after surgical treatment of organ-confined renal cell carcinoma according to life expectancy.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the long-term oncological outcome of organ-confined (

Incidence of Cardiovascular Events after Nephrectomy - A Single Centre, Matched Pair Analysis between Donor and Tumour Nephrectomy in a Long Term Follow-Up.

INTRODUCTION: The study aimed to compare the incidence of cardiovascular events (CVEs) after donor nephrectomy (DN) and radical tumor nephrectomy (RN), according to an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), were evaluated over time. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Follow-up was collected for DN who underwent surgery from 1998 to 2007 for CVE and renal function. All DN were matched for age to patients treated by RN or adenoma enucleation (control group), who were eligible for DN. eGFR was estimated using the Cockgroft-Gould formula. Patients with preoperative comorbidities were excluded. RESULTS: Thirty DN (median age 48.9 years) were included with a median follow-up of 138.5 months (interquartile range 119-159). No significant differences in patients' characteristics were found preoperatively (p > 0.5). Four out of 30 DN developed a CVE (3 myocardial infarctions (MI), 1 stroke), 2 of 30 patients in the control group (both MI) and 8 of 30 RN patients (6 MI, 2 strokes, p > 0.05). Arterial hypertension developed in 14 DN (46.7%), in 12 (40%) after RN and in 15 controls. The CVE occurred after a median time of 68 months (5-231) and were related to a drop of ∼30% in the eGFR irrespective of the group. CONCLUSION: Decline of renal function after nephrectomy is the main risk factor for CVE. Close monitoring of renal function and new onset hypertension is warranted.

Differences in Overall and Cancer-specific Survival of Patients Presenting With Chromophobe Versus Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate prognostic parameters for the oncological outcome of patients treated for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (chRCC) in comparison with patients treated for clear cell RCC (ccRCC) using propensity score matching for survival analysis. METHODS: From 1969 to 2009, we identified 1010 from 3567 patients with RCC. Survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimate for histological subtypes including 109 chRCC and 901 ccRCC. Uni- and multivariate Cox regression was used to analyze prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for differences in patient characteristics among histological subgroups. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 61 months (range 0-289). chRCC showed longer OS (5 year, 90.1%; 10 year, 74.2%; 15 year, 61.4%) and CSS (94.2%, 89.7%, 89.7%) compared with ccRCC (OS 75.7%, 54.9%, 46.1% and CSS 84.7%, 75.4%, 72.2%; P = .002). Multivariate Cox regression revealed histology as a significant prognostic factor. Propensity score matching showed a difference in 72.4% (OS) and 87.2% (CSS) of matching attempts confirming the significant impact of histology. Univariate Cox regression showed nephron sparing surgery, no metastasis and no symptoms at presentation, age <65, eosinophilic features, low American Society of Anesthesiologists score, and Charlson Comorbidity Index to be beneficial for CSS. Only age at surgery, metastasis at presentation, and American Society of Anesthesiologists and Charlson Comorbidity Index scores were significant factors for OS in chRCC patients. CONCLUSION: ChRCC appears to have a favorable outcome compared with ccRCC. Even after adjustment for differences in characteristics known to have an influence on survival by propensity score matching, histology remains a significant prognostic factor.

Incidental vs symptomatic renal tumours: Survival outcomes.

PURPOSE: Currently there is an increase in the incidental diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Our aim was to assess the survival of patients with incidental and symptomatic renal tumours who had undergone nephrectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively assessed 604 patients who underwent renal surgery for RCC between 1983 and 2005. Patients were divided in two groups; group 1 had incidental and group 2 had symptomatic tumours. The median follow-up was 4 and 3.3 years for groups 1 and 2, respectively. All patients had surgery in the form of radical or partial nephrectomy. Sex, age, tumour size, type of surgery, pathological characteristics and patient survival in both groups were evaluated. The statistical analysis included the log-rank, Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression tests. RESULTS: There were 85 patients (14%) in group 1 (mean age 49.6 years) and 519 (86%) in group 2 (mean age 50 years). The mean (SEM, range) tumour size was 7.4 (0.4, 1.5-20) cm in group 1 and 9.7 (0.2, 2-38) cm in group 2 (P < 0.001). The most common stage was T1 (52%) and T2 (44%) in groups 1 and 2, respectively, with a predominance of G2 grade and the conventional type histology in both the groups. There was a significant difference in cancer-specific survival (CSS) between the groups (log-rank, P = 0.017). The 5- and 10-year CSS was 94% and 94% for group 1, and 82.5% and 79.5% for group 2. Cox regression analysis showed that in group 1, only the tumour mid-zonal location (P = 0.093), tumour stage pT (P < 0.001), grade 1 (P = 0.03), grade 2 (P = 0.01), grade 4 (P = 0.01) and the papillary histological type (P = 0.019) had significant effects on CSS. In group 2, only tumour size (P = 0.022) and stage pN (P = 0.003) had significant effects on CSS. The tumour recurrence rate was 18% and 29% for groups 1 and 2, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This large study supports the findings of other smaller studies published previously, confirming that at presentation incidental renal tumours are smaller and their diagnosis provides a better prognosis and longer CSS.