Administration of an adeno-associated viral vector expressing interferon-ß in patients with inflammatory hand arthritis, results of a phase I/II study.

OBJECTIVE: Inflammatory hand arthritis (IHA) results in impaired function. Local gene therapy with ART-I02, a recombinant adeno-associated virus (AAV) serotype 5 vector expressing interferon (IFN)-ß, under the transcriptional control of nuclear factor κ-B responsive promoter, was preclinically shown to have favorable effects. This study aimed to investigate the safety and tolerability of local gene therapy with ART-I02 in patients with IHA. METHODS: In this first-in-human, dose-escalating, cohort study, 12 IHA patients were to receive a single intra-articular (IA) injection of ART-I02 ranging 0.3 × 1012-1.2 × 1013 genome copies in an affected hand joint. Adverse events (AEs), routine safety laboratory and the clinical course of disease were periodically evaluated. Baseline- and follow-up contrast enhanced magnetic resonance images (MRIs), shedding of viral vectors in bodily fluids, and AAV5 and IFN-ß immune responses were evaluated. A data review committee provided safety recommendations. RESULTS: Four patients were enrolled. Long-lasting local AEs were observed in 3 patients upon IA injection of ART-I02. The AEs were moderate in severity and could be treated conservative. Given the duration of the AEs and their possible or probable relation to ART-I02, no additional patients were enrolled. No systemic treatment emergent AEs were observed. The MRIs reflected the AEs by (peri)arthritis. No T-cell response against AAV5 or IFN-ß, nor IFN-ß antibodies could be detected. Neutralizing antibody titers against AAV5 raised post-dose. CONCLUSION: Single IA doses of 0.6 × 1012 or 1.2 × 1012 ART-I02 vector genomes were administered without systemic side effects or serious AEs. However, local tolerability was insufficient for continuation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02727764.

The simplified oral flucloxacillin absorption test: an accurate method to identify patients with inadequate oral flucloxacillin absorption.

BACKGROUND: The preferred treatment for severe methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus infections is flucloxacillin, a small-spectrum antibiotic administered intravenously (IV) and orally. However, clinicians switch to the less preferred broad-spectrum antibiotics because of the variable absorption after oral administration of flucloxacillin. A classical oral absorption test (OAT) requires overnight fasting and interruption of IV therapy, and is laborious. In the current study, we investigated whether a simplified OAT can be utilized in a clinical setting to guide antibiotic treatment in patients with severe S. aureus infections. For this, OAT IV therapy is continued and oral dosing is performed after a one-hour fast and implemented after a small study. METHODS: In 196 patients receiving IV flucloxacillin by continuous infusion, a classical OAT (test A) or simplified version of the OAT (test B) was performed. In both tests, 1 g oral flucloxacillin was given and serum samples were taken prior to intake and at one and two hours after administration. Flucloxacillin concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. Adequate absorption was defined as an increase of flucloxacillin concentration of at least 10 mg/l after one or two hours compared to baseline. RESULTS: In a sample of 196 patients (85 F/111 M), test A was performed in 28 patients, and test B in 168 patients. Age, gender, and baseline values of creatinine and albumin were similar in both groups. The maximal increase of flucloxacillin absorption was highly variable between patients. In 26 (13%) of the 196 patients, the flucloxacillin increase did not reach the value of 10 mg/l. The median (interquartile range, IQR) maximal increase of flucloxacillin absorption was 22.0 (15-31.25) mg/l for test A and 21.5 (13-32.25) mg/l for test B. There was no significant difference in maximal increase of flucloxacillin absorption between test A and B (p = 0.74), nor between males and females (p = 0.95). Age, creatinine, and albumin were not correlated with flucloxacillin levels. CONCLUSIONS: The simplified version of the OAT is useful to identify patients with adequate oral flucloxacillin absorption, and to ensure the effective continuation of an oral small-spectrum treatment.

[Fosfomycin, an old antibiotic with new possibilities]. / Fosfomycine, een oud antibioticum met nieuwe mogelijkheden.

- Fosfomycin is a broad-spectrum antibiotic agent used orally for uncomplicated cystitis. The intravenous form of administration has recently been authorised in the Netherlands.- Thanks to its broad spectrum and extensive tissue penetration, fosfomycin offers possibilities for the treatment of infections in different organs.- Infections with multidrug-resistant bacteria pose a significant threat to public health. Many of these multidrug-resistant bacteria are sensitive to fosfomycin, which means fosfomycin may be an option for the treatment of infections with multidrug-resistant bacteria. - There is a lack of knowledge about the pharmacological properties of fosfomycin to establish a good dosing schedule. Knowledge is also lacking about the safety of fosfomycin and the extent of its tolerability in the treatment of different infections. - More research is needed before fosfomycin can be used in the battle against multidrug-resistant bacteria.

Enhanced tolerability of the 5-hydroxytryptophane challenge test combined with granisetron.

A recently developed oral serotonergic challenge test consisting of 5-Hydroxytryptophane (5-HTP, 200 mg) combined with carbidopa (CBD, 100 mg + 50 mg) exhibited dose-related neuroendocrine responsiveness and predictable pharmacokinetics. However, its applicability is limited by nausea and vomiting. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, four-way crossover trial was performed in 12 healthy male volunteers. The 5-HTP/CBD-challenge was combined with two oral anti-emetics (granisetron, 2 mg or domperidone, 10 mg) to investigate its reliability when side-effects are suppressed. The neuroendocrine response (serum cortisol and prolactin), the side-effect profile [Visual Analogue Scale Nausea (VAS)] and vomiting subjects per treatment were the main outcome measures. Compared to 5-HTP/CBD/placebo, 5-HTP/CBD/ granisetron had no impact on cortisol [% change with 95% confidence interval: -7.1% (18.9; 6.5)] or prolactin levels [-9.6% (-25.1; 9.1)]; 5-HTP/CBD/domperidone increased cortisol [+13.0% (-4.2; 33.4)], and increased prolactin extensively [+336.8% (245.7; 451.9)]. Compared to placebo, VAS Nausea increased non-significantly with granisetron [+7.6 mm (-1.3; 16.5)], as opposed to domperidone [+16.2 mm (7.2; 25.2)] and 5-HTP/CBD/placebo [+14.7 mm (5.5; 23.8)]. No subjects vomited with granisetron, compared to two subjects treated with 5-HTP/CBD/placebo and five subjects with domperidone. Compared with 5-HTP/CBD/placebo, granisetron addition decreased C(max) of 5-HTP statistically significantly different (from 1483 to 1272 ng/ml) without influencing AUC(0- infinity). Addition of granisetron to the combined 5-HTP/CBD challenge suppresses nausea and vomiting without influencing the neuroendocrine response or pharmacokinetics, enhancing its clinical applicability in future psychiatric research and drug development.

Gallbladder volume as a biomarker for the motilin effect in healthy volunteers and patients with functional dyspepsia.

AIM: To investigate a motilin effect on gallbladder volume in healthy volunteers and patients with functional dyspepsia. METHODS: Forty-three healthy volunteers and 10 patients with functional dyspepsia received motilin (4 pmol.min/kg) or placebo in four separate double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, cross-over studies. The gallbladder volume was measured by ultrasonography. Analysis of variance of the combined data of these studies was performed to investigate a motilin effect on gallbladder volume and potential differences between patients and healthy volunteers. RESULTS: The baseline gallbladder volume was similar for placebo and motilin treatment, as well as for patients and healthy volunteers. Motilin, compared with placebo, significantly decreased the gallbladder volume in healthy volunteers (P = 0.003) and patients (P < 0.0001). A linear concentration-response relationship was observed. The decrease in gallbladder volume by motilin was greater in patients (P = 0.03). The motilin effect was consistent between studies. CONCLUSION: The interdigestive gallbladder volume is a non-invasive end-point for motilin activity, displaying a consistent response across studies, a clear response to motilin and a clear concentration-response relationship. However, it is less suitable as a biomarker for future pharmacological studies on motilin agonists or antagonists as the effect is probably indirect, and a relatively large study population of 27 subjects is required to demonstrate a 15% decrease in gallbladder volume. Further investigation is required to confirm altered gallbladder motility as a feature of functional dyspepsia.

The effect of motilin on the rectum in healthy volunteers.

AIMS: The role of motilin in the regulation of upper gastrointestinal (GI) motility is well defined. However, little is known about the effects on the distal GI tract. To investigate the effect of exogenous motilin on rectal function, barostat measurements in the rectum were performed and lower abdominal symptoms were scored. METHODS: Eight fasted, healthy volunteers were infused intravenously with synthetic motilin or placebo over 90 min in a double-blind, randomized, cross-over design. Rectum volume was measured with a barostat device during constant pressure and during isobaric distensions. Lower abdominal symptoms were scored by visual analogue scales. Plasma motilin concentrations were measured by radioimmunoassay. RESULTS: Baseline rectum volumes were similar between treatments: 185 +/- 62 mL (motilin) and 136 +/- 41 mL (placebo). During the constant pressure procedure, motilin increased rectum volume [area under the effect curve (AUEC)] by 6%[95% confidence interval (CI) -3, 16] of baseline, compared with placebo. During isobaric distensions motilin increased rectum volume (AUEC) by 43 mL (95% CI 0.4, 85; P < 0.05) and compliance by 10 mL mmHg-1 (95% CI 0.3, 20; P < 0.05) relative to placebo. Motilin did not induce changes in the sensation of rectal feelings. CONCLUSION: Exogenous motilin increased rectal compliance in healthy volunteers, without affecting rectal sensations.

Exogenous motilin affects postprandial proximal gastric motor function and visceral sensation.

Our aim was to investigate the effect of motilin on postprandial proximal gastric motor and sensory function in healthy volunteers. Ten fasted, healthy volunteers were infused intravenously with synthetic motilin or placebo over 90 min. A liquid meal (200 ml) was ingested within 2 min at the start of the infusion. Proximal gastric volume was measured with a barostat device. Abdominal symptoms were scored by visual analog scales. Plasma motilin concentrations were measured using RIA. Endogenous motilin levels were not affected by meal ingestion. After meal intake, gastric relaxation was similar for motilin and placebo. After postprandial relaxation, motilin resulted in a faster return of gastric volume to baseline (P = 0.007). Motilin significantly increased postprandial feelings of nausea (P = 0.03) and tended to increase abdominal pain and abdominal tension. In conclusion, after normal postprandial gastric relaxation, motilin accelerated the return of gastric volume to baseline. In addition, motilin increased postprandial feelings of nausea.

Dose-related effects of motilin on proximal gastrointestinal motility.

AIM: To assess non-invasively the dose-response relations for the effects of exogenous motilin on antrum contraction frequency, gall-bladder volume and gastric myoelectrical activity. METHODS: In a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, five-way crossover study, 10 fasted healthy volunteers were infused intravenously with synthetic human motilin (0.5, 1, 2 and 4 pmol x min/kg) or placebo for 60 min. Gall-bladder volume and antrum contractions were assessed by ultrasonography and gastric myoelectrical activity by electrogastrography. Motilin concentrations were measured using a radioimmunoassay. RESULTS: Baseline plasma motilin levels (60 pmol/L) were similar for all treatments. Motilin levels increased upon the start of infusion and rapidly returned to baseline after cessation of the infusion. At motilin doses of 2 and 4 pmol.min/kg, the antrum contraction frequency was significantly augmented, with maximum differences of two contractions per 2-min interval compared to placebo, while no changes in gastric myoelectrical activity were observed. Changes in gall-bladder volume were not significantly different for any of the motilin doses compared to placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Motilin increased antrum contraction frequency, whereas no effect on gastric myoelectrical activity was observed. Antrum contraction frequency appears to be a useful biomarker for motilin efficacy, and motilin doses of 2 and 4 pmol x min/kg were equally effective.