Outcomes of endovascular treatment of renal arterial stenosis in transplanted kidneys

ABSTRACT Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and outcomes of endovascular treatment of TRAS with PTA. Materials and Methods We searched our prospectively collected database looking at cases of TRAS between January 2005-December 2011. CCT was the gold-standart for diagnosis of TRAS. Parameters analysed comprised technical aspects, arterial blood pressure variation, and renal function. A minimum follow-up of 24 months was considered. Results Of the 2221 renal transplants performed in the selected period, 22 (0.9%) patients were identified with TRAS. Fourteen (63.6%) were male and mean age was 377±14.8years (12-69). Kidney graft was from deceased donnors in 20 (80%) cases. On doppler evaluation, mean blood flow speed after transplantation, at TRAS diagnosis and after TAP was 210.6±99.5, 417±122.7 and 182.5±81.6mL/sec, respectively (p<0.001). For SBP and DBP, there was a significant difference between between pre-intervention and all post-treatment time points (p<0.001). After 1 month of the procedure, there was stabilization of the Cr level with a significant difference between mean Cr levels along time (p<0.001). After a mean follow-up of 16±4.2 (3-24) months, overall success rate was 100%. Conclusions Endovascular treatment with PTA/stenting is a safe and effective option for managing TRAS, ensuring the functionality of the graft and normalization of blood pressure and renal function.

Outcomes of endovascular treatment of renal arterial stenosis in transplanted kidneys.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and outcomes of endovascular treatment of TRAS with PTA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched our prospectively collected database looking at cases of TRAS between January 2005-December 2011. CCT was the gold-standart for diagnosis of TRAS. Parameters analysed comprised technical aspects, arterial blood pressure variation, and renal function. A minimum follow-up of 24 months was considered. RESULTS: Of the 2221 renal transplants performed in the selected period, 22 (0.9%) patients were identifi ed with TRAS. Fourteen (63.6%) were male and mean age was 377±14.8years (12-69). Kidney graft was from deceased donnors in 20 (80%) cases. On doppler evaluation, mean blood fl ow speed after transplantation, at TRAS diagnosis and after TAP was 210.6±99.5, 417±122.7 and 182.5±81.6mL/sec, respectively (p<0.001). For SBP and DBP, there was a signifi cant difference between between preintervention and all post-treatment time points (p<0.001). After 1 month of the procedure, there was stabilization of the Cr level with a signifi cant difference between mean Cr levels along time (p<0.001). After a mean follow-up of 16±4.2 (3-24) months, overall success rate was 100%. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular treatment with PTA/stenting is a safe and effective option for managing TRAS, ensuring the functionality of the graft and normalization of blood pressure and renal function.

Revascularization of living-donor kidney transplant with multiple arteries: long-term outcomes using the inferior epigastric artery.

OBJECTIVE: To study the safety and long-term outcomes of use of the inferior epigastric artery (IEA) for revascularization of small accessory kidney arteries (3 mm or less). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data of 602 living-donor kidney transplants were reviewed. Age was 37.4 ± 15 years (range, 3-78 years). Multiple arteries were present in 98 kidneys (16.3%); of these, 83 (84.7%) had 2 and arteries and 15 (15.3%) had 3 arteries. In 21 kidneys (21.4%) with multiple arteries (group I [GI]), the IEA was used for reconstruction. Four (14.3%) had 3 arteries, and 17 (85.7%) had 2 arteries. In 77 patients (group II [GII]), the inferior accessory renal artery was reconstructed with a side-to-side or an end-to-side anastomosis to the main renal artery. Follow-up was 43.8 ± 38.1 months (range, 1-124 months). The Fisher exact test and the 2-tailed t test were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Delayed graft function occurred in 1 GI patient (4.8%) and in 5 GII patients (6.5%; P >.05). One partial renal infarction occurred in each group (4.8% vs 1.3%; P >.05). There was 1 urinary fistula in GI and 3 urinary fistulas and 1 ureteral stenosis in GII (P >.05). One graft (4.8%) lost function in GI and 5 (6.5%) in GII (P >.05). Eleven patients (53.4%) were hypertensive in GI and 53 (68.8%) in GII (P >.05). CONCLUSION: The use of the IEA for revascularization of a living-donor kidney transplant with multiple arteries is safe and effective, yielding similar long-term outcomes compared with the standard technique. Use of the IEA avoids the risks of manipulation of the main renal artery.

Current outcome of prioritized patients for kidney transplantation.

PURPOSE: To analyze the outcome of deceased donor recipients given priority in allocation due to lack of access for dialysis and compare this data to the one obtained from non-prioritized deceased donor kidney transplant recipients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: we reviewed electronic charts of 31 patients submitted to kidney transplantation that were given priority in transplantation program due to lack of access for dialysis from January 2005 to December 2008. Immunological and surgical complications rates, and grafts and patients survival rates were analyzed. These data were compared to those obtained from 100 regular patients who underwent kidney transplantation without allocation priority during the same period. RESULTS: Overall surgical complication rate was 25.8 % and 27 % in the patients with priority in allocation and in the non-prioritized patients, respectively. There was no statistical significant difference for surgical complications (p = 1.0), immunological complications (p = 0.21) and graft survival (p = 0.19) rates between the groups. However, patient survival rate was statistically significant worse in prioritized patients (p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: patients given priority in allocation owing to lack of access for dialysis have higher mortality rate when compared to those non-prioritized.

Current outcome of prioritized patients for kidney transplantation

PURPOSE: To analyze the outcome of deceased donor recipients given priority in allocation due to lack of access for dialysis and compare this data to the one obtained from non-prioritized deceased donor kidney transplant recipients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: we reviewed electronic charts of 31 patients submitted to kidney transplantation that were given priority in transplantation program due to lack of access for dialysis from January 2005 to December 2008. Immunological and surgical complications rates, and grafts and patients survival rates were analyzed. These data were compared to those obtained from 100 regular patients who underwent kidney transplantation without allocation priority during the same period. RESULTS: Overall surgical complication rate was 25.8% and 27% in the patients with priority in allocation and in the non-prioritized patients, respectively. There was no statistical significant difference for surgical complications (p = 1.0), immunological complications (p = 0.21) and graft survival (p = 0.19) rates between the groups. However, patient survival rate was statistically significant worse in prioritized patients (p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: patients given priority in allocation owing to lack of access for dialysis have higher mortality rate when compared to those non-prioritized.

Caliceal-cutaneous fistula after kidney transplantation.

Urinary fistula is a one of the most common complications after kidney transplantation. Conservative treatment with stent and Foley catheter drainage may be tried, however in some cases more invasive approach is needed. Caliceal fistula is a rare condition and the diagnosis may be missed. Here we present an interesting case of caliceal-cutaneous fistula diagnosed by computed tomography after living kidney transplantation. After failure of conservative management, the patient was successfully treated with partial nephrectomy.

Histologic inflammatory changes on the prostatic gland due to immunosuppression for kidney transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of type IV prostatitis in patients with kidney transplantation receiving an immunosuppression regimen and to compare it with that of a nonimmunosuppressed control group. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 216 electronic charts of patients who had undergone surgical treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia from August 2000 to January 2006. Of the 216 patients, 183 did not receive immunosuppressive therapy and were included in the control group (group 1). The other 33 patients had undergone kidney transplantation and were included in the study group (group 2). The patient data were accessed for age at surgery, International Prostate Symptom Score, prostate volume, preoperative serum prostate-specific antigen level, history of acute urinary retention, and surgical approach (open vs transurethral resection of prostate). Histologic findings from the surgical specimens were also recorded. RESULTS: The mean age at surgery, mean serum prostate-specific antigen level, mean prostate volume, and mean International Prostate Symptom Score were not significantly different between both groups. However, histologic evidence of chronic prostatitis was obtained in 145 surgical specimens (78%) from group 1 and in just 3 specimens from group 2 (9%; P < .001). Moreover, nonimmunosuppressed patients had a 38.2 times greater risk of presenting with prostatitis than did the immunosuppressed patients. CONCLUSION: Immunosuppression therapy in kidney transplantation has a protective factor in the prostatitis incidence.

C4d staining in post-reperfusion renal biopsy is not useful for the early detection of antibody-mediated rejection when CDC crossmatching is negative.

BACKGROUND: Sensitized patients (pts) may develop acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) due to preformed donor-specific antibodies, undetected by pre-transplant complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) crossmatch (XM). We hypothesized that C4d staining in 1-h post-reperfusion biopsies (1-h Bx) could detect early complement activation in the renal allograft due to preformed donor-specific antibodies. METHODS: To test this hypothesis, renal transplants (n = 229) performed between June 2005 and December 2007 were entered into a prospective study of 1-h Bx and stained for C4d by immunofluorescence. Transplants were performed against a negative T-cell CDC-XM with the exception of three cases with a positive B-cell XM. RESULTS: All 229 1-h Bx stained negative for C4d. Fourteen pts (6%) developed AMR. None of the 14 protocol 1-h Bx stained positive for C4d in peritubular capillaries (PTC). However, all indication biopsies-that diagnosed AMR-performed at a median of 8 days after transplantation stained for C4d in PTC. CONCLUSIONS: These data show that C4d staining in 1-h Bx is, in general, not useful for the early detection of AMR when CDC-XM is negative.

Transurethral injection therapy with carbon-coated beads (Durasphere®) for treatment of recurrent pyelonephritis in kidney transplant patients with vesico-ureteral reflux to the allograft.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Recurrent transplant pyelonephritis (RTP) secondary to vesico-ureteral reflux (VUR) to the transplant kidney (KTx) remains a significant cause of infectious complications with impact on patient and graft outcomes. Our objective was to verify the safety and efficacy of transurethral injection of Durasphere(®) to relieve RTP secondary to VUR after renal transplantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between June 2004 and July 2008, eight patients with RTP (defined as two or more episodes of pyelonephritis after transplantation) and VUR to the KTx were treated with subureteral injections of Durasphere(®). The mean age at surgery was 38.8 ± 13.8 yr (23-65). The patients were followed regularly every six months. The mean interval between the KTx and the treatment was 76 ± 74.1 (10-238 months). The mean follow-up was 22.3 ± 16.1 months (8-57 months). RESULTS: Six patients (75%) were free of pyelonephritis during a mean period of follow-up of 23.2 ± 17.1 months (8-57 months). Two of them had no VUR and four cases presented with G II VUR (pre-operative G IV three cases and one case G III). In one case, symptomatic recurrent cystitis made a second treatment necessary. This patient remained free of infections for three yr after the first treatment and for 18 months after the second treatment. Of the remaining two patients, one had six episodes of RTP before treatment in a period of three yr and only two episodes after treatment in two yr of follow-up. The last case had a new episode of pyelonephritis five months after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Transurethral injection therapy with Durasphere(®) is a safe and effective minimally invasive treatment option for KTx patients with recurrent RTP. A second treatment seems to be necessary in some cases.

Comparação entre a nefrectomia laparoscópica e a nefrectomia subcostal como acessos cirúrgicos para nefrectomia do doador / Comparison between laparoscopic and subcostal mini-incision for live donor nephrectomy

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the results of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy with open donor nephrectomy. Methods: A non-randomized prospective analysis was conducted of living donor kidney transplantations (118 open donor nephrectomies; 57 laparoscopic donor nephrectomies) between January 2005 and December 2007 in the Kidney Transplantation Unit of Hospital das Clínicas of Faculdade de Medicina of the Universidade de São Paulo. Results: Mean donor operative time, mean donor hospital stay, mean postoperative creatinine values, and rates of complications and graft survival were similar for both groups. A significant statistical difference in warm ischemia time was observed between the open donor nephrectomy and laparoscopic donor nephrectomy groups (p < 0.001). There was only one conversion in the laparoscopic donor nephrectomy group. Conclusions: Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy is a safe procedure for a donor nephrectomy, comparable to an open procedure with similar results despite a longer warm ischemia time.

Objetivos: O objetivo deste estudo foi comparar a nefrectomia radical laparoscópica e a nefrectomia subcostal do doador. Métodos: Foi realizado um estudo prospectivo e não randomizado dos pacientes submetidos entre Janeiro 2005 e Dezembro 2007 a nefrectomia para doação renal na Unidade de Transplante Renal do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (118 casos de nefrectomia subcostal do doador; 57 casos de nefrectomia radical laparoscópica). Resultados: Tempo cirúrgico, tempo de internação hospitalar do doador, creatinina sérica pós-transplante e taxas de complicação e da sobrevida do rim transplantado foram similares para ambos os grupos. Foi encontrada uma diferença estatisticamente significante no tempo de isquemia quente (p < 0,001). Houve somente uma conversão no grupo submetido a nefrectomia laparoscópica. Conclusões: A nefrectomia laparoscópica do doador é procedimento seguro para doação renal e com resultados similares à nefrectomia subcostal, apesar de maior tempo de isquemia quente.

Subcostal mini incision: a good option for donor nephrectomy.

OBJECTIVES: We describe the results of over one hundred nephrectomies performed using a subcostal mini incision. INTRODUCTION: A major effort has been undertaken to encourage living donor renal transplantation. New techniques that use minimally invasive approaches to perform donor nephrectomy have been progressively accepted. Among these new procedures is the mini-incision approach. METHODS: We prospectively analyzed one hundred and seventeen consecutive donors that were subjected to subcostal mini-incision nephrectomy at a single center. Surgical time, warm and cold ischemia time, intraoperative complications, time until hospital discharge, presence of infection, bleeding, the need for a second operation, and death were analyzed. Eventual loss of donor renal function was indicated by increases in serum creatinine and proteinuria. RESULTS: The mean time of surgery was 180.5 +/- 26.2 minutes. The mean warm ischemia time was 93 +/-8.3 seconds, while the mean cold ischemia time was 85.9 (+/-23.5) minutes. We had one case with an intraoperative complication, and only two patients required another operation. An intra-abdominal abscess occurred in one patient (0.85%), proteinuria occurred in one patient (0.85%), and a transitory increase of creatinine levels occurred in two patients (1.7%). DISCUSSION: Reducing the length of the abdominal incision did not influence surgical time or result in an increase in intraoperative complications relative to our historical data or literature reports. Organ preparation was accomplished successfully with a brief warm ischemia time. Additionally, the mean hospital stay was short, and few surgical complications occurred. CONCLUSION: The use of a subcostal mini incision is both safe and similar to conventional techniques previously described in the literature.

Comparison between laparoscopic and subcostal mini-incision for live donor nephrectomy.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the results of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy with open donor nephrectomy. METHODS: A non-randomized prospective analysis was conducted of living donor kidney transplantations (118 open donor nephrectomies; 57 laparoscopic donor nephrectomies) between January 2005 and December 2007 in the Kidney Transplantation Unit of Hospital das Clínicas of Faculdade de Medicina of the Universidade de São Paulo. RESULTS: Mean donor operative time, mean donor hospital stay, mean postoperative creatinine values, and rates of complications and graft survival were similar for both groups. A significant statistical difference in warm ischemia time was observed between the open donor nephrectomy and laparoscopic donor nephrectomy groups (p < 0.001). There was only one conversion in the laparoscopic donor nephrectomy group. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy is a safe procedure for a donor nephrectomy, comparable to an open procedure with similar results despite a longer warm ischemia time.

Subcostal mini incision: a good option for donor nephrectomy

OBJECTIVES: We describe the results of over one hundred nephrectomies performed using a subcostal mini incision. INTRODUCTION: A major effort has been undertaken to encourage living donor renal transplantation. New techniques that use minimally invasive approaches to perform donor nephrectomy have been progressively accepted. Among these new procedures is the mini-incision approach. METHODS: We prospectively analyzed one hundred and seventeen consecutive donors that were subjected to subcostal mini-incision nephrectomy at a single center. Surgical time, warm and cold ischemia time, intraoperative complications, time until hospital discharge, presence of infection, bleeding, the need for a second operation, and death were analyzed. Eventual loss of donor renal function was indicated by increases in serum creatinine and proteinuria. RESULTS: The mean time of surgery was 180.5 ± 26.2 minutes. The mean warm ischemia time was 93 ±8.3 seconds, while the mean cold ischemia time was 85.9 (±23.5) minutes. We had one case with an intraoperative complication, and only two patients required another operation. An intra-abdominal abscess occurred in one patient (0.85 percent), proteinuria occurred in one patient (0.85 percent), and a transitory increase of creatinine levels occurred in two patients (1.7 percent). DISCUSSION: Reducing the length of the abdominal incision did not influence surgical time or result in an increase in intraoperative complications relative to our historical data or literature reports. Organ preparation was accomplished successfully with a brief warm ischemia time. Additionally, the mean hospital stay was short, and few surgical complications occurred. CONCLUSION: The use of a subcostal mini incision is both safe and similar to conventional techniques previously described in the literature.

Contribuições à técnica cirúrgica em transplante renal: Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo / Contributions to the surgical tecniques of kidney transplantation: Clinic Hospital of São Paulo University School of Medicine

Não é infreqüente ouvir que, em transplante renal, inovações de impacto no âmbito cirúrgico já não são mais prováveis. No entanto, soluções de alto impacto econômico ainda surgem com freqüência e muitas delas têm surgido no Brasil, contribuindo significativamente para a mudança de conduta cirúrgica em transplante renal a nível mundial. A técnica cirúrgica do transplante renal propriamente dita está bem estabelecida há anos, sendo muito parecida entre os diversos serviços de transplante. Já no que se refere ao tratamento cirúrgico das complicações do transplante e dos pacientes com doenças associadas à insuficiência renal crônica dialítica (IRCD), observamos considerável controvérsia e variação nas condutas. Este estudo pretende oferecer um panorama sobre as técnicas cirúrgicas utilizadas no transplante renal, as complicações decorrentes deste procedimento e os resultados obtidos pelo Serviço de Transplante Renal do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo...

Is not rare to hear that, on kidney transplantation, improvements on surgical aspects are not probable anymore. Although, solutions with high economical impact arises frequently and, many of them, in Brazil, contributing, significantly, for changes on surgical conduct on kidney transplantation worldwide. The surgical techniques for kidney transplantation are well established and do not change between the groups of transplants. Although, the surgical treatment of complicated outcomes and of patients with diseases related to chronic renal failure is still controversial. This study aims to offer a general overview about the surgical techniques of kidney transplantation, complications inherent to this procedure and the results obtained by the Kidney Transplantation Team of Clinic Hospital of São Paulo University Medical School.

Radical retropubic prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer in renal transplant patients.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility of radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) in renal transplant recipients with clinically localized prostate cancer. METHODS: A prospective protocol was established between August 2004 and November 2007. In that period, 8 patients diagnosed with localized prostate cancer were submitted to RRP, and their clinicopathologic data were reviewed. RESULTS: The mean age (+/- standard deviation) at surgery was 59.6 +/- 6.7 years (range, 49-67 years). All patients had T1C tumors, except for 1 with a T2A tumor. The mean preoperative prostate-specific antigen value was 4.5 +/- 1.8 ng/mL (range, 1.6-7.0 ng/mL). The mean interval between renal transplantation and RRP was 89.9 +/- 65.1 months (range, 40-209 months). The procedure was well tolerated without major complications, and all patients were discharged on the fifth postoperative day. There was no impairment to bladder descent caused by the presence of the allograft or the ureteroneocystostomy. Urethrovesical anastomosis was easily performed in all cases in the standard manner. Blood transfusion was needed in 2 patients (1 received 2 U and another 5 U of blood). The mean operative duration was 183 +/- 29.7 minutes (range, 150-240 minutes), the mean estimated blood loss was 656 +/- 576 mL (range, 100-2000 mL), and no deterioration of graft function was observed. All patients were followed, and the mean follow-up was 10.5 months (range, 2-30 months). Prostate-specific antigen was undetectable in all cases during this time frame. CONCLUSIONS: Radical retropubic prostatectomy in renal transplant patients is safe, effective, and can be easily performed in the same manner as described by Walsh, regardless of the presence of the allograft. The only necessary technical modification is the avoidance of ipsilateral lymphadenectomy to prevent damage to the transplanted organ.

Comparison of renal transplantation outcomes in children with and without bladder dysfunction. A customized approach equals the difference.

PURPOSE: We examined the development of urological abnormalities in a group of pediatric renal transplant recipients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed 211 patients younger than 19 years who underwent 226 renal transplants. Three groups of patients were studied-136 children with end stage renal disease due to a nonurological cause (group 1), 56 children with a urological disorder but with an adequate bladder (group 2a) and 19 children with lower urinary tract dysfunction and/or inadequate bladder drainage (group 2b). A total of 15 children in group 2b underwent bladder augmentation (ureterocystoplasty in 6, enterocystoplasty in 9), 2 underwent continent urinary diversion, 1 underwent autoaugmentation and 1 underwent a Mitrofanoff procedure at the bladder for easier drainage. Kidney transplantation was performed in the classic manner by extraperitoneal access, and whenever possible the ureter was reimplanted using an antireflux procedure. RESULTS: At a mean followup of 75 months 13 children had died, 59 grafts were lost and 15 children had received a second transplant. Two patients in group 2a required a complementary urological procedure to preserve renal function (1 enterocystoplasty, 1 vesicostomy). A total of 12 major surgical complications occurred in 226 kidney transplants (5.3%), with a similar incidence in all groups. The overall graft survival at 5 years was 75%, 74% and 84%, respectively, in groups 1, 2a and 2b. CONCLUSIONS: With individualized treatment children with severely inferior lower urinary tract function may undergo renal transplantation with a safe and adequate outcome.

Endoscopic treatment of vesical and urethral perforations after tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) procedure for female stress urinary incontinence.

UNLABELLED: Stress urinary incontinence is a problem that is prevalent in women, and its treatment with minimally invasive techniques using synthetic materials has increased recently, although the procedure has also brought increased occurrence of specific complications such as vesical and urethral perforations. We describe 11 cases of endoscopic correction of vesical and urethral perforations due to the use of synthetic material for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. MATERIALS AND METHOD: Eleven patients were treated for complications after undergoing the TVT(R) (tension-free vaginal tape) procedure; 6 of them had the polypropylene tape inside the bladder, and 5 had erosion of the urethra. Endoscopic resection of the polypropylene tapes was performed on all patients. RESULTS: A 6-month follow-up with cystoscopic control showed that the procedures were successful with complete relief of the symptoms except for 1 patient who persisted with the polypropylene tape in the bladder. This patient underwent a new endoscopic resection, and the cystoscopic control exam was normal 3 months later. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic resection of intravesical and intraurethral synthetic tapes can be considered a good alternative for the treatment of complications resulting from the TVT procedure.

Endoscopic treatment of vesical and urethral perforations after tension-free vaginal tape (TVT®) procedure for female stress urinary incontinence / x

A incontinência urinária de esforço é um problema prevalente em mulheres. As opções para seu tratamento vêm aumentando nos últimos tempos, havendo um direcionamento para as técnicas minimamente invasivas, com auxílio de material sintético. Com a utilização desses procedimentos, surgiram complicações incomuns, como perfuração vesical e uretral. As complicações estudadas foram devido à utilização de material sintético no tratamento de incontinência urinária de esforço e o tratamento endoscópico empregado. MATERIAL E MÉTODO: Onze pacientes foram tratadas com complicações decorrentes do tension-free vaginal tape, seis com faixa de polipropileno dentro da bexiga e cinco com erosão para uretra. Foi realizada ressecção endoscópica em todas as pacientes. RESULTADOS: Uma paciente persistiu com a faixa de polipropileno e foi submetida à nova ressecção endoscópica e cistoscopia controle após três meses era normal. CONCLUSÃO: Realização de ressecção endoscópica de faixas sintéticas intravesicais e intra-uretrais deve ser considerada uma boa alternativa no tratamento dessas complicações.

Renal cell carcinoma presenting as a cervical mass.

The authors report a case of a 60-year-old woman presenting with a renal cell carcinoma in which the first sign leading to its diagnosis was a cervical metastasis, an uncommon site of distant disease in renal neoplasms. The patient had an 18-month history of a progressively enlarging cervical mass at the anterior aspect of the neck. After laboratory and radiological evaluation, the cervical mass was excised, and the microscopic and immunohistochemical patterns suggested the possibility of a metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Computerized tomography of the abdomen showed a solid, 4 cm left renal mass. A radical left nephrectomy was performed, and the histology confirmed the suspected diagnosis. The patient received immunotherapy, and in a follow-up period of 9 months, there was no evidence of recurrent disease. It seems that head and neck metastasis of renal cell carcinoma should preferentially be treated with surgical excision because of the associated morbidity and quality-of-life issues.

Renal cell carcinoma presenting as a cervical mass

The authors report a case of a 60-year-old woman presenting with a renal cell carcinoma in which the first sign leading to its diagnosis was a cervical metastasis, an uncommon site of distant disease in renal neoplasms. The patient had an 18-month history of a progressively enlarging cervical mass at the anterior aspect of the neck. After laboratory and radiological evaluation, the cervical mass was excised, and the microscopic and immunohistochemical patterns suggested the possibility of a metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Computerized tomography of the abdomen showed a solid, 4 cm left renal mass. A radical left nephrectomy was performed, and the histology confirmed the suspected diagnosis. The patient received immunotherapy, and in a follow-up period of 9 months, there was no evidence of recurrent disease. It seems that head and neck metastasis of renal cell carcinoma should preferentially be treated with surgical excision because of the associated morbidity and quality-of-life issues.