Immediate hypersensitivity reactions to iodinated contrast media despite drug prophylaxis-a comparative retrospective cohort study of breakthrough reactions in Bern (Switzerland) and Seoul (South Korea).

Background: Although several studies deal with breakthrough reactions (BTRs) in patients with contrast media (CM) hypersensitivity reactions, the phenomenon is still unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to analyse in depth patients with BTR in two countries. Methods: We retrospectively analysed the electronic medical records of in- and outpatients (random sample enrolment) from two academic hospitals of tertiary care (Seoul/South Korea, with a special monitoring system exclusively for CM hypersensitivity, and Bern/Switzerland, manually operated) with respect to basic epidemiological data, number of BTRs per patient, and severity grades of severity in follow-up analyses. The study period lasted from 2013 (2000 Bern) to 2017. Results: We identified 445 BTR-patients (91.5% from Seoul) with 691 BTRs (94.5% from Seoul). Most reactions were mild, 11% moderate and 3.9% severe. In Seoul, we found patients with up to 10 BTRs, and in Bern, there were only patients with one BTR. Fatal reactions or deaths did not occur. In most cases, the severity of the BTRs and of the index reactions were identical (80.8%). Mild index reactions remained constant in 90.6%. In contrast, in moderate index reactions the severity decreased/remained identically in 86.8% and increased in 13.2%. In severe index reactions, 55.6% of BTR reactions were severe again, in 44.4% the severity decreased. In 158 BTRs (22.9%) the culprit iodinated contrast medium (ICM) of the index reaction induced the BTR. In the other 482 BTRs (69.8%) the culprit ICM was changed to another non-culprit ICM. Conclusions: To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest study on patients with BTRs, and the first study showing BTRs in two centers in two countries of two continents. The main differences between the two centers result from the different hospital size, the number of patients, and the different documentation [manual (Bern) vs. electronical screening (Seoul)]. BTRs are no contraindications for further ICM-application. We recommend performing an allergy skin test as basis for the decision-making process of the next contrast-enhanced image-guided examination.

Development and Feasibility Evaluation of Smart Cancer Care 2.0 Based on Patient-Reported Outcomes for Post-Discharge Management of Patients with Cancer.

Purpose: A "Smart Cancer Care" platform that integrates patient-reported outcomes (PROs) with management has been established in Korea. This study focused on improving health behaviors and connecting patients to welfare services by introducing and assessing the feasibility of "Smart Cancer Care 2.0," an enhanced version designed for monitoring complications post-cancer treatment. Materials and Methods: Smart Cancer Care 2.0 was developed by conducting a literature review and consulting with expert panels to identify symptoms or variables requiring monitoring and management guidelines based on the treatment type. Qualitative and quantitative surveys were conducted to assess the feasibility of the app and web system based on the experiences of patients with cancer and healthcare workers. Results: A total of 81 symptoms or variables (chemotherapy-, surgery-, radiotherapy-, rehabilitation-, and health management-related) were selected for management in Smart Cancer Care 2.0. PROs for these symptoms were basically categorized into three severity grades: (1) preventive management, (2) self-treatment, and (3) consultation with a healthcare worker or visit to a healthcare institution. The overall mean scores in the feasibility evaluation by patients and healthcare workers were 3.83 and 3.90 points, respectively, indicating high usefulness. Conclusion: Smart Cancer Care 2.0 leverages the existing ICT-based platform, Smart Cancer Care, and further includes health behaviors and welfare services. Smart Cancer Care 2.0 may play a crucial role in establishing a comprehensive post-discharge management system for patients with cancer as it provides suitable interventions based on patients' responses and allows the regularly collected PROs to be easily viewed for streamlined care.

MetaLAB-HOI: Template standardization of health outcomes enable massive and accurate detection of adverse drug reactions from electronic health records.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to advance the MetaLAB algorithm and verify its performance with multicenter data to effectively detect major adverse drug reactions (ADRs), including drug-induced liver injury. METHODS: Based on MetaLAB, we created an optimal scenario for detecting ADRs by considering demographic and clinical records. MetaLAB-HOI was developed to identify ADR signals using common model-based multicenter electronic health record (EHR) data from the clinical health outcomes of interest (HOI) template and design for drug-exposed and nonexposed groups. In this study, we calculated the odds ratio of 101 drugs for HOI in Konyang University Hospital, Seoul National University Hospital, Chungbuk National University Hospital, and Seoul National University Bundang Hospital. RESULTS: The overlapping drugs in four medical centers are amlodipine, aspirin, bisoprolol, carvedilol, clopidogrel, clozapine, digoxin, diltiazem, methotrexate, and rosuvastatin. We developed MetaLAB-HOI, an algorithm that can detect ADRs more efficiently using EHR. We compared the detection results of four medical centers, with drug-induced liver injuries as representative ADRs. CONCLUSIONS: MetaLAB-HOI's strength lies in fully utilizing the patient's clinical information, such as prescription, procedure, and laboratory results, to detect ADR signals. Considering changes in the patient's condition over time, we created an algorithm based on a scenario that accounted for each drug exposure and onset period supervised by specialists for HOI. We determined that when a template capable of detecting ADR based on clinical evidence is developed and manualized, it can be applied in medical centers for new drugs with insufficient data.

Adverse Drug Events Associated With Remdesivir in Real-World Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19, Including Vulnerable Populations: A Retrospective Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: Remdesivir is a US Food and Drug Administration-approved drug for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Clinical trials were conducted under strictly controlled situations for a selected population, and their reported adverse events may not fully represent conditions in real-world patients. We aimed to estimate the incidence of adverse drug events (ADEs) associated with remdesivir in hospitalized patients with COVID-19, including vulnerable subpopulations, such as those with impaired renal or hepatic function and pregnant women. METHODS: This retrospective observational study included hospitalized patients with confirmed COVID-19 treated with remdesivir between January and December 2021 at ten hospitals. ADEs and severe ADEs (Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events grade ≥ 3) were operationally defined and analyzed through laboratory investigations. The incidence of ADEs was compared with that of each matched control in subpopulations with renal or hepatic impairment and pregnant women. RESULTS: Among 2,140 patients, 1,416 (66.2%) and 295 (13.8%) experienced at least one ADE and severe ADE, respectively. The most frequent ADE was 'hepatic injury' (42.9%), followed by anemia (27.6%). The most common severe ADEs were 'hypokalemia' (5.3%), 'hepatic injury' (2.9%), and 'anemia' (3.6%). There was no significant difference in the incidence of ADEs in patients relative to their respective matched-control groups, including those with renal impairment (80.0% vs. control 71.8%, P = 0.063), hepatic impairment (70.4% vs. control 75.0%, P = 0.623) and pregnant women (78.6% vs. control 63.7%, P = 0.067). However, severe ADE incidence was significantly higher in patients with renal impairment (40.8% vs. 16.0%, P < 0.001). The most common severe ADEs in those were 'anemia' (15.3%), 'hypokalemia' (10.5%), and 'thrombocytopenia' (8.9%). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of severe ADEs in patients with hepatic impairment or in pregnancy (P = 0.230; P = 0.085). CONCLUSION: A significant proportion of patients with COVID-19 treated with remdesivir experienced ADEs and severe ADEs. Given the high incidence of severe ADEs, caution is required in patients with renal impairment. Further studies are needed to investigate ADEs in pregnant women and patients with hepatic impairment.

Comparison of Cefazolin/Metronidazole to Ampicillin/Sulbactam as Preoperative Antibiotics in Colorectal Surgery: A Retrospective, Single-Center Cohort Study.

AIM: The use of prophylactic antibiotics prior to colorectal surgery reduces surgical site infections. Cefazolin and metronidazole are used as a standard regimen. Ampicillin/sulbactam may be an alternative, but current data are limited. We compared the efficacy of ampicillin/sulbactam with cefazolin and metronidazole as prophylactic antibiotics. METHODS: Patients who underwent colorectal surgery at Inha University Hospital between 2010 and 2020 were treated prophylactically with cefazolin and metronidazole or ampicillin/sulbactam, and observed for 30 days following surgery. The primary outcome was surgical site infections. The secondary outcomes were deep/organ infections and the need for drainage. RESULTS: SSIs occurred in 2.6% (17/646) of the ampicillin/sulbactam group, whose rate was not inferior to the occurrence in the group receiving cefazolin and metronidazole (3.8%, 21/556). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to the cefazolin and metronidazole combination, ampicillin/sulbactam is not inferior as a preoperative prophylactic antibiotic regimen for colorectal surgery.

Investigation of hepatic adverse events due to quetiapine by using the common data model.

PURPOSE: Quetiapine is a drug used to treat schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depressive disorder. However, it can cause mild or severe hepatic adverse events and rarely fatal liver damage. This study was aimed at investigating hepatic toxicity caused by quetiapine use by analyzing the information captured from hospital electronic health records by using the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership common data model (CDM). METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study involving a nested case-control method. A CDM based on an electronic health record database from five hospitals between January 2009 and May 2020 was used. We analyzed the status of quetiapine use, adverse events, and hepatic impairment. RESULTS: The numbers of patients with non-serious and severe hepatic adverse reactions were 2566 (5.05%) and 835 (1.64%) out of 50 766 patients, respectively. After adjusting for covariates, the odds ratio of hepatic adverse events was 2.35 (95% CI: 2.03-2.72), and the odds ratio of severe hepatic adverse events was 1.76 (95% CI: 1.16-2.66). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that quetiapine should be cautiously used, and hepatic function should be monitored in patients using quetiapine because it can cause mild or severe hepatic adverse events, complications, and in rare cases, fatal liver damage.

Development and Application of an Active Pharmacovigilance Framework Based on Electronic Healthcare Records from Multiple Centers in Korea.

INTRODUCTION: With the availability of retrospective pharmacovigilance data, the common data model (CDM) has been identified as an efficient approach towards anonymized multicenter analysis; however, the establishment of a suitable model for individual medical systems and applications supporting their analysis is a challenge. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to construct a specialized Korean CDM (K-CDM) for pharmacovigilance systems based on a clinical scenario to detect adverse drug reactions (ADRs). METHODS: De-identified patient records (n = 5,402,129) from 13 institutions were converted to the K-CDM. From 2005 to 2017, 37,698,535 visits, 39,910,849 conditions, 259,594,727 drug exposures, and 30,176,929 procedures were recorded. The K-CDM, which comprises three layers, is compatible with existing models and is potentially adaptable to extended clinical research. Local codes for electronic medical records (EMRs), including diagnosis, drug prescriptions, and procedures, were mapped using standard vocabulary. Distributed queries based on clinical scenarios were developed and applied to K-CDM through decentralized or distributed networks. RESULTS: Meta-analysis of drug relative risk ratios from ten institutions revealed that non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) increased the risk of gastrointestinal hemorrhage by twofold compared with aspirin, and non-vitamin K anticoagulants decreased cerebrovascular bleeding risk by 0.18-fold compared with warfarin. CONCLUSION: These results are similar to those from previous studies and are conducive for new research, thereby demonstrating the feasibility of K-CDM for pharmacovigilance. However, the low quality of original EMR data, incomplete mapping, and heterogeneity between institutions reduced the validity of the analysis, thus necessitating continuous calibration among researchers, clinicians, and the government.

Adverse events of a third dose of BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine among Korean healthcare workers.

Due to the urgency of controlling the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, coronavirus disease 2019 messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) vaccines have been expeditiously approved and introduced in several countries without sufficient evaluation for adverse events. We analyzed adverse events among Korean healthcare workers who received all 3 doses of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine. This survey was conducted among hospital workers of Inha University Hospital who had received the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine for their first, second, third rounds, and using a diary card. The surveyed adverse events included local (redness, edema, and injection site pain) and systemic (fever, fatigue, headache, chill, myalgia, arthralgia, vomiting, diarrhea, pruritis, and urticaria) side effects and were divided into 5 grades (Grade 0 = none - Grade 4 = critical). Based on adverse events reported at least once after any of the 3 doses, the most common systemic adverse reactions were chills and headache (respectively, 62.6%, 62.4%), followed by myalgia (55.3%), arthralgia (53.4%), fatigue (51.6%), pruritus (38.1%), and fever (36.5%). The frequency and duration of adverse events were significantly greater in women (P < .05) than men. Except for redness, pruritus, urticaria, and most adverse reactions had a higher rate of occurrence after the third dose in subjects who also had reactions with the second dose. However, grade 4 adverse events did occur with the third dose in some patients, even if there were no side effects with the first and second doses. Adverse events experienced with the first and second doses of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine in Korean healthcare workers increased the incidence of adverse events at the time of the third dose. On the other hand, grade 4 adverse events could still occur with the third dose even though there were no side effects with the first and second doses.

Clinical aspects of severe cutaneous adverse reactions caused by beta-lactam antibiotics: A study from the Korea SCAR registry.

Background: Although beta-lactams are 1 of the major causative agents of severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCAR), their epidemiology and clinical aspects have been poorly studied. This study aimed to investigate the characteristics of SCAR caused by beta-lactams in the Korean SCAR registry. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed beta-lactam-induced SCAR cases collected from 28 tertiary university hospitals in Korea between 2010 and 2015. The SCAR phenotypes included Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), SJS-TEN overlap, and drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS). Beta-lactams were classified according to their chemical structures: penicillins, cephalosporins, and carbapenems. The causative beta-lactams, clinical and laboratory features, treatments, and outcomes were evaluated. Results: Among the 275 antibiotic-induced SCAR cases, 170 patients developed SCAR induced by beta-lactams. Beta-lactam antibiotic-induced SCAR showed more frequent SJS/TEN compared to SCAR induced by non-beta-lactam antibiotics (SJS/TEN/SJS-TEN overlap/DRESS: 36.5/11.2/5.9/46.5% vs. 23.8/10.5/2.9/62.9%, P = 0.049). Cephalosporin was the most common culprit drug. Particularly, 91 and 79 patients presented with SJS/TEN and DRESS, respectively. The odds ratio (OR) for poor prognosis, such as sequelae and death, was significantly increased in subjects with SJS-TEN overlap and TEN and carbapenem as culprit drug in the multivariate analysis (OR, 35.61; P = 0.016, OR, 28.07; P = 0.006, OR 30.46; P = 0.027). Conclusion: Among antibiotic-induced SCAR, clinical features were different depending on whether the culprit drug was a beta-lactam antibiotic or SCAR type. The poor prognosis was related to SJS-TEN overlap, TEN type, and carbapenem as the culprit drug.

Effect of weekend catch-up sleep on high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels according to bedtime inconsistency: a population-based cross-sectional study.

To investigate the associations of weekend catch-up sleep (WCS) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels according to bedtime inconsistency in the Korean population. In this cross-sectional study using the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2016-2018) with 17,665 participants, four groups were defined: no-WCS (WCS within ± 1 h of weekday sleep time), moderate WCS (1 ≤ , < 3 h), severe WCS (≥ 3 h), and inverse WCS (≤ - 1 h). An inconsistent bedtime was defined as a > 2 h difference between weekend and weekday bedtimes. Outcomes were divided into quartiles based on the hs-CRP level: Lowest (< 0.34), Middle-low (≥ 0.34, < 0.55), Middle-high (≥ 0.55, < 1.10), Highest (≥ 1.10). Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using multinomial logistic regression, controlling for relevant covariates. Moderate WCS was associated with a lower risk for the highest hs-CRP levels than no WCS (aOR = 0.87, 95% CI 0.78-0.97), and a similar association was observed only in participants with consistent bedtimes (aOR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.78-0.99). Significant interactions of those associations of WCS and hs-CRP levels with bedtime inconsistency were found. These findings provide evidence that people with inconsistent bedtimes would have limited protective effect of WCS on hs-CRP.

HLA-A*24:02 increase the risk of allopurinol-induced drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms in HLA-B*58:01 carriers in a Korean population; a multicenter cross-sectional case-control study.

Background: HLA-B*58:01 is a well-known risk factor for allopurinol-induced severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs). However, only a minority of HLA-B*58:01 carriers suffer SCARs after taking allopurinol. The aim of this study was to investigate subsidiary genetic markers that could identify those at further increased risk of developing allopurinol-induced drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) in subjects with HLA-B*58:01. Methods: Subjects with B*58:01 were enrolled (21 allopurinol-induced DRESS and 52 allopurinol-tolerant control). HLA-A, -B, -C and -DRB1 alleles were compared. Comparison of risk between HLAs and allopurinol-induced SCAR in separate populations was performed to support the results. Kruskal-Wallis test, Pearson's chi-square test, Fisher's exact test and binary logistic regression were used to analyze the risk of SCAR development. Results: Frequencies of A*24:02 (71.4 vs. 17.3%, p < 0.001, odds ratio [OR] = 12.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.6-39.2) were significantly higher in B*58:01 (+) DRESS than B*58:01 (+) tolerant controls. In addition, DRB1*13:02 further increased the risk of DRESS. The phenotype frequency of A*24:02/DRB1*13:02 was significantly higher in the B*58:01 (+) DRESS group than in the B*58:01 (+) tolerant controls (52.4% vs. 5.8%, p < 0.001, OR, 66.0; 95% CI, 6.1-716.2). In 2782 allopurinol user cohort, the overall prevalence of DRESS was 0.22%, which increased to 1.62% and 2.86% in the presence of B*58:01 and B*58:01/A*24:02, respectively. Conclusion: The additional secondary screening with A*24:02 and DRB1*13:02 alleles may identify those at further increased risk of allopurinol-induced DRESS in B*58:01 carriers.

Increase in eosinophil-derived neurotoxin level in school children with allergic disease.

Background: Eosinophils are major effector cells of allergic disease and excellent markers of eosinophilic inflammation. Accurate and reliable biomarkers are helpful in the diagnosis, treatment, and control of allergic disease. Objective: This study aimed to investigate an alternate marker of eosinophilic inflammation, eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN), in a number of allergic diseases. Methods: Three hundred ninety-six elementary school-age children with various allergic conditions were recruited for this study. Subgroups included food allergies (FAs), atopic dermatitis (AD), bronchial asthma (BA), and allergic rhinitis (AR). EDN levels in these groups were compared to those in 93 healthy controls (HC). Results: All subjects with allergic disease had elevated levels of serum EDN (median [interquartile range]: FA, 124.2 ng/mL [59.13-160.5 ng/mL]; AD, 110.8 ng/mL [57.52-167.9 ng/mL]; BA, 131.5 ng/mL [60.60-171.0 ng/mL]; AR, 91.32 ng/mL [46.16-145.0 ng/mL]) compared to HC (38.38 ng/mL [32.40-55.62 ng/mL]) (p < 0.0001). These elevated levels were consistent throughout the age range (6-12 years) of the healthy study subjects (p = 0.0679). EDN levels also correlated well with total immunoglobulin E (Rs = 0.5599, p < 0.0001). Looking at all individuals with an allergic disease, the area under the curve was 0.790. Conclusions: Direct measures of eosinophilic inflammation are needed for accurate diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of allergic diseases. EDN may be a worthy biomarker of eosinophil activity and a useful screening tool for allergic diseases including FA, AD, BA, and AR.

Prescription Patterns of Asthma Preventers Among Children and Adolescents Between Australia and South Korea.

Purpose: Inhaled Corticosteroids (ICSs) and oral Leukotriene Receptor Antagonists (LTRAs) are commonly prescribed asthma preventers, however, concerns have been raised as to whether montelukast (LTRA) is associated with an increase in occurrences of neuropsychiatric side effects in children. Our study was conducted to observe prescribing patterns of asthma preventers among paediatric patients specifically focusing on ICSs and LTRAs between Australia and South Korea to see intercountry differences in the use of these medicines. Materials and Methods: The Health Insurance Review and Assessment Paediatric Patients Sample dataset for South Korea and data provided by Services Australia were used in the study. Paediatric patients aged between 3 and 19 with more than one dispensing of an asthma preventer and at least one reliever between 1 Jan 2018 and 31 December 2018 were selected. Prevalence per 1,00,000 persons and standardised prevalence were estimated. Results: A total of 3,58,470 patients (2,04,270 from South Korea and 1,54,200 from Australia) were included in the study. A higher prevalence of ICS-based inhalers was seen in Australia with 80.1% compared to 13.5% in South Korea. In addition, Australia showed a stronger tendency of prescribing high dose ICS-based inhalers compared to South Korea with 22.9% vs. 4.9%. In contrast, use of LTRAs was more prevalent in South Korea with 57.6% while in Australia, montelukast was the only LTRA dispensed at a proportion of 18.9%. Moreover, 29.9% of xanthines which are orally available preventers, were prescribed more frequently in South Korea compared to Australia (0.1%). Conclusion: Australia showed a tendency of prescribing ICS-based preventers whereas South Korea exhibited a preference towards the oral LTRAs. Given the potential risk of neuropsychiatric side effects among paediatric patients with montelukast, reasons for the high use of montelukast in South Korea should be investigated further.

Validation of Practical Pathway in Patients With Anaphylaxis to Low Osmolar Contrast Media: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: An optimal strategy for choosing safe alternative low osmolar contrast media (LOCM) has not yet been established in patients with a history of LOCM-induced anaphylaxis. OBJECTIVES: To validate the practical pathway in patients with anaphylaxis to LOCMs and to compare 2 different doses of challenge testing with skin test-negative LOCM. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed in patients with LOCM-induced anaphylaxis. Patients were challenged with intravenous LOCMs showing negativity in the skin test according to 2 different protocols: low-dose and high-dose (maximum dose 10 and 30 mL, respectively). Challenge-negative LOCMs were selected for use during computed tomography scans, and patients received intravenous pretreatment with 4 mg chlorpheniramine and 40 mg methylprednisolone. RESULTS: Of the 110 challenge tests, there were 4 (3.6%) positive challenges. Among 106 enhanced computed tomography scans performed using challenge-negative LOCMs, breakthrough reactions occurred in 8 (7.6%). Breakthrough reaction rates were not statistically different between the 2 protocols (8.9% and 6.0% in the low-dose challenge and the high-dose challenge, respectively). Compared with the low-dose protocol, the number needed to test of the high-dose challenge test decreased 2.5-fold. Moreover, none of the patients in the high-dose challenge group incurred severe reactions during computed tomography scans with challenge-negative LOCM, whereas 80% of reactions were severe in the low-dose challenge group. CONCLUSIONS: We validated a pathway consisting of a battery of skin testing to LOCMs and challenge with skin test-negative LOCM in patients with LOCM-induced anaphylaxis.

Analysis of Breakthrough Reactions in 1,143 Desensitization Procedures in a Single Tertiary Hospital Using a One-Bag Desensitization Protocol.

Background: Drug desensitization is helpful for patients who have experienced significant hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) to antineoplastic agents. One-bag desensitization protocols, attracting attention in recent years, need to be validated on their safety and efficacy in a large number. Methods: One-bag desensitization procedures conducted from 2018 to 2020 were analyzed; their outcomes and the risk factors for breakthrough reactions (BTRs) were assessed in desensitization procedures to major drug types (platins, taxanes, and monoclonal antibodies). Results: A total of 1,143 procedures of one-bag desensitization were performed in 228 patients with 99% completion rate. BTRs occurred in 26% of the total desensitization procedures-34% in platins, 12% in taxanes, and 18% in mAbs. BTR occurrence rate decreased along the desensitization process with 80% of BTRs occurring within the 6th desensitization attempts. Severe BTR occurred more frequently with severe initial HSRs (1% in mild to moderate initial HSRs vs. 16% in severe). Severe initial HSR was also a significant risk factor for moderate to severe BTR in platins (odds ratio 1.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-2.29, p = 0.025). The use of steroid was also associated with lower occurrence of moderate to severe BTR (odds ratio 0.50, 95% CI 0.35-0.72, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Most patients with HSRs to antineoplastic agents can safely receive chemotherapy through a one-bag desensitization protocol. Further studies on each drug with larger sample size can help verify the risk factors of BTRs and evaluate the efficacy of steroid premedication in improving the safety of desensitization in high-risk patients.

Epidemiology and evaluation of adverse drug reactions in a Korean hospital database for spontaneous reports in the period 2009 to 2018.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the epidemiology of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in the Korean population and to identify their characteristics and factors affecting their severity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The analysis was based on the ADRs reported to the Seoul National University Hospital between 2009 and 2018. Statistical assessment (SPSS Statistics 25) included frequency analysis and the χ2-test. Risk factors were assessed using logistic regression analysis. Results were considered significant at p < 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 44,122 cases were analyzed of which 24,801 (56.2%) cases concerned females and 19,321 (43.8%) males. A total of 47% of cases involved persons aged between 50 and 79 years. Antineoplastic agents, immunomodulating agents, and systemically administered anti-infective agents accounted for 57.6% of all drugs reported. Gastro-intestinal system disorders accounted for the largest proportion (25.8%) of adverse drug reactions reported. A total of 3,429 (7.8%) ADRs were reported as being in the category severe. Multivariate analysis showed that the risk of an ADR being reported as severe is higher in males than in females (OR = 1.25, 95% CI: 1.16 - 1.35), and higher in those aged 0 - 4 years (OR = 1.74, 95% CI: 1.46 - 2.08), in those aged 5 - 19 years (OR = 1.19, 95% CI: 1.07 - 1.31), and in those aged 65 years and over (OR = 1.26, 95% CI: 1.16 - 1.37), compared to those aged 20 - 64 years. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: From a public health perspective, ADRs are important because they are preventable. Important determinants, such as differences in specific age groups and drug classes, for the occurrence of ADRs and the occurrence of severe ADRs in particular, were identified. These determinants need to be carefully monitored in both private medical practices, clinics and hospitals. This monitoring of specific groups will involve close attention factors associated with gender, age group, and drug classes.

Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitor-Related Diabetic Ketoacidosis: Accuracy Verification of Operational Definition.

BACKGROUND: The most important aspect of a retrospective cohort study is the operational definition (OP) of the disease. We developed a detailed OP for the detection of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) related to diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). The OP was systemically verified and analyzed. METHODS: All patients prescribed SGLT2i at four university hospitals were enrolled in this experiment. A DKA diagnostic algorithm was created and distributed to each hospital; subsequently, the number of SGLT2i-related DKAs was confirmed. Then, the algorithm functionality was verified through manual chart reviews by an endocrinologist using the same OP. RESULTS: A total of 8,958 patients were initially prescribed SGLT2i. According to the algorithm, 0.18% (16/8,958) were confirmed to have SGLT2i-related DKA. However, based on manual chart reviews of these 16 cases, there was only one case of SGLT2i-related DKA (positive predictive value = 6.3%). Even after repeatedly narrowing the diagnosis range of the algorithm, the effect of a positive predictive value was insignificant (6.3-10.0%, P > 0.999). CONCLUSION: Owing to the nature of electronic medical record data, we could not create an algorithm that clearly differentiates SGLT2i-related DKA despite repeated attempts. In all retrospective studies, a portion of the samples should be randomly selected to confirm the accuracy of the OP through chart review. In retrospective cohort studies in which chart review is not possible, it will be difficult to guarantee the reliability of the results.

Allergic-like Hypersensitivity Reactions to Gadolinium-based Contrast Agents: An 8-year Cohort Study of 154 539 Patients.

Background With the widespread use of gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs), the incidence of allergic-like hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) to GBCAs is increasing. Research on the incidence and risk factors for HSRs to GBCAs is needed for their safe use. Purpose To determine the incidence of acute and delayed reactions to GBCAs and to discuss the risk factors and strategies for the prevention of HSRs to GBCAs. Materials and Methods All cases of HSRs to contrast media that occurred at the Seoul National University Hospital from July 1, 2012, to June 30, 2020, were assessed. Information including age, sex, GBCA type, onset, and severity of HSRs was retrospectively analyzed. Results Among the 331070 cases of GBCA exposure in 154539 patients, 1304 cases of HSRs (0.4%) were reported. Acute HSRs accounted for 1178 cases (0.4%), while 126 cases (0.04%) were delayed HSRs. While both premedication (odds ratio [OR] = 0.7, P = .041) and changing the type of GBCA (OR = 0.2, P < .001) showed preventative effects in patients with a history of acute HSRs, only premedication (OR = 0.2, P = .016) significantly reduced the incidence of HSRs in patients with a history of delayed reactions. The risk of an HSR to GBCA was higher in those with a history of an HSR to iodinated contrast media (OR = 4.6, P < .001). Conclusion The rate of hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) to gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) was 0.4%. The absence of premedication, repeated exposures to the culprit GBCA, and a history of HSRs to iodinated contrast media and GBCAs were risk factors for HSRs to GBCAs. © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Kallmes and McDonald in this issue.

Reducing severe cutaneous adverse and type B adverse drug reactions using pre-stored human leukocyte antigen genotypes.

BACKGROUND: Several type B adverse drug reactions (ADRs), especially severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs), are associated with particular human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genotypes. However, pre-stored HLA information obtained from other clinical workups has not been used to prevent ADRs. We aimed to simulate the preemptive use of pre-stored HLA information in electronic medical records to evaluate whether this information can prevent ADRs. METHODS: We analyzed the incidence and the risk of ADRs for selected HLA alleles (HLA-B*57:01, HLA-B*58:01, HLA-A*31:01, HLA-B*15:02, HLA-B*15:11, HLA-B*13:01, HLA-B*59:01, and HLA-A*32:01) and seven drugs (abacavir, allopurinol, carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, dapsone, methazolamide, and vancomycin) using pre-stored HLA information of transplant patients based on the Pharmacogenomics Knowledge Base guidelines and experts' consensus. RESULTS: Among 11,988 HLA-tested transplant patients, 4092 (34.1%) had high-risk HLA alleles, 4583 (38.2%) were prescribed risk drugs, and 580 (4.8%) experienced type B ADRs. Patients with HLA-B*58:01 had a significantly higher incidence of type B ADR and SCARs associated with allopurinol use than that of patients without HLA-B*58:01 (17.2% vs. 11.9%, odds ratio [OR] 1.53 [95% confidence interval {CI} 1.09-2.13], p = 0.001, 2.3% versus 0.3%, OR 7.13 [95% CI 2.19-22.69], p < 0.001). Higher risks of type B ADR and SCARs were observed in patients taking carbamazepine or oxcarbazepine if they had one of HLA-A*31:01, HLA-B*15:02, or HLA-B*15:11 alleles. Vancomycin and dapsone use in HLA-A*32:01 and HLA-B*13:01 carriers, respectively, showed trends toward increased risk of type B ADRs. CONCLUSION: Utilization of pre-stored HLA data can prevent type B ADRs including SCARs by screening high-risk patients.

Incidence and risk factors of late adverse reactions to low-osmolar contrast media: A prospective observational study of 10,540 exposures.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the incidence and risk factors of late adverse reactions (ARs) to non-ionic low-osmolar contrast media (LOCM). METHODS: The occurrence of late AR was monitored on day 1 and from day 7 to day 28 in all patients who received enhanced computed tomography using LOCM during a 5-week study period in a single tertiary hospital. Patients who experienced late AR were followed up for three years. RESULTS: Among the total 10,540 LOCM exposures, 315 ARs (3.0%) were reported; acute ARs occurred in 108 LOCM exposures (1.0%) and late ARs occurred in 207 LOCM exposures (2.0%) (90.9% within one week, 9.1% developed afterwards by day 20). Previous history of drug allergy (odds ratio [OR] = 4.59; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.17-9.71) and allergic diseases (OR = 2.54; 95% CI 1.32-4.91) were risk factors of late ARs to LOCM. Although the recurrence rate was lowered with premedication from 8.5% to 1.7% (8/94 vs. 3/178; p = 0.016), LOCM change did not make difference compared to reuse of the culprit LOCM (2/38 vs. 9/234; p = 0.655). In patients with a history of late AR to LOCM, the risk of recurrent reactions decreased with longer time intervals between exposures (OR = 0.86; 95% CI: 0.77-0.97; p = 0.025) and with the use of antihistamine premedication (OR = 0.27; 95% CI: 0.06-0.99; p = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS: Late ARs to LOCM occurred mostly within one week. The use of premedication may be helpful in reducing the recurrence of late ARs.