The Vulvodynia Experience Questionnaire: Qualitative Development of a New Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Vulvodynia.

INTRODUCTION: Vulvodynia is defined as vulvar pain of at least 3 months duration without a clear identifiable cause. There are currently no validated questionnaires that assess the experience of women with localized vulvodynia of the vestibule (vestibulodynia, previously known as vulvar vestibulitis) that meet the requirements of the Food and Drug Administration's Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Guidance. AIM: To develop a new content-valid PRO assessment in accordance with the Food and Drug Administration's PRO guidance to assess the symptoms and impacts of localized vulvodynia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Participants were recruited for concept elicitation interviews (ie, interviews with open-ended questions with the goal of eliciting volunteered data about the symptoms and impacts of vulvodynia). Participants were identified as having localized vulvodynia by clinicians who were experts in treating vulvar disorders. Eligibility was confirmed by the recruiting clinician, and informed consent was obtained; participants were then scheduled for in-person interviews. 25 participants were interviewed from United States (US). After concept elicitation interviews, the draft Vulvodynia Experience Questionnaire (VEQ) was developed based on the results. Cognitive interviews were conducted with 20 participants from US sites to assess the content validity of the VEQ (eg, interpretation and clarity of the items, relevance of concepts). The VEQ was further revised after cognitive interviews. All interviews were conducted face-to-face, audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, anonymized, and analyzed using a qualitative data analysis software program. RESULTS: 17 unique symptoms and 32 unique impacts were reported during concept elicitation interviews. Pain (n = 25, 100%) and burning (n = 24, 96%) were the most frequently reported symptoms of localized vulvodynia, and negative impact on emotional well-being (n = 25, 100%) was the most frequently reported impact. After analysis, item generation, and cognitive interviews, the resulting VEQ v2.0 contains 3 parts (part 1, pain; part 2, associated symptoms; part 3, impacts) with a total of 25 items that measure the most frequently reported symptoms and impacts of localized vulvodynia. STRENGTH AND LIMITATIONS: The VEQ is a multidimensional assessment of the core symptoms and impacts of localized vulvodynia that, after additional psychometric testing including the ability to detect change, may be used in clinical trials to characterize the benefits of novel treatments. The VEQ requires additional testing to establish its cultural relevance and linguistic validity in other countries. CONCLUSION: The VEQ is a novel method of collecting information on localized vulvodynia symptoms and impacts that may be suitable for use in clinical trials after psychometric testing. Goldstein AT, Diez PMQ, Kapanadze S, et al. The Vulvodynia Experience Questionnaire: Qualitative Development of a New Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Vulvodynia. J Sex Med 2020;17:2055-2066.

Cebranopadol, a Novel First-in-Class Analgesic Drug Candidate: First Experience With Cancer-Related Pain for up to 26 Weeks.

CONTEXT: Pain is one of the most prevalent symptoms associated with cancer. Strong opioids are commonly used in the analgesic management of the disease, but carry the risk of severe side effects. Cebranopadol is a first-in-class drug candidate, combining nociceptin/orphanin FQ peptide and opioid peptide receptor agonism. For cancer patients, frequently experiencing multimorbidities and often exposed to polypharmacy, cebranopadol is easy to handle given its once-daily dosing, the small tablet size that enables swallowing, and the option to flexibly titrate to an effective dose. OBJECTIVES: We assessed the safety and tolerability of prolonged treatment with oral cebranopadol for up to 26 weeks in patients suffering from chronic moderate-to-severe cancer-related pain. METHODS: This was a non-randomized, multi-site, open-label, single-arm clinical trial with patients who had completed a double-blind trial comparing morphine prolonged release with cebranopadol. In this extension trial, patients were treated with oral cebranopadol for up to 26 weeks. RESULTS: Cebranopadol was safe and well tolerated in patients with chronic moderate-to-severe pain related to cancer in the dose range tested (200-1000 µg once daily). The median and mean pain levels remained in the range of mild pain during the treatment period. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that cebranopadol was safe and well tolerated when administered for up to 26 weeks in patients with chronic cancer-related pain who were previously treated with cebranopadol or morphine prolonged release.

Cancer-related chronic pain: Investigation of the novel analgesic drug candidate cebranopadol in a randomized, double-blind, noninferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: Cancer-related pain is a growing health problem given the increasing life expectancy of cancer patients. Opioids are commonly used to treat cancer-related pain, but carry the risk of severe side effects, limiting their use. Cebranopadol is a first-in-class drug candidate, combining nociceptin/orphanin FQ peptide and opioid peptide receptor agonism. This trial examined the analgesic efficacy of cebranopadol compared with morphine prolonged release (PR) in patients with moderate-to-severe cancer-related pain. METHODS: This double-blind, parallel-group, multiple-dose trial was designed as noninferiority trial for efficacy of cebranopadol versus morphine PR. Planned with 524 patients, finally 126 patients were treated for up to 7 weeks (low accrual). The primary efficacy endpoint was the average amount of daily rescue medication intake (morphine immediate release) over the last 2 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: For the primary endpoint, noninferiority of cebranopadol with and superiority over morphine PR were demonstrated (Full Analysis Set: ∆[95%CI] = -7.48 mg [-12.05, -2.92]; Per Protocol Set: ∆[95%CI] = -4.67 mg [-9.25, -0.10]). The vast majority of patients (≥75%, either treatment) had clinically relevant pain reduction, and noninferiority on this secondary endpoint was not shown. Mostly used doses were ≤800 µg cebranopadol or ≤120 mg morphine PR daily. A total of 83.1% of patients on cebranopadol and 82.0% on morphine PR experienced treatment-emergent adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Cebranopadol was effective, safe and well tolerated in the dose range tested (200-1,000 µg) in patients suffering from chronic moderate-to-severe cancer-related pain and was superior to morphine PR on the primary endpoint. SIGNIFICANCE: Cebranopadol presents a new approach to treat cancer pain. The drug candidate was easy to titrate, safe and well tolerated, and as effective as morphine PR in patients suffering from chronic moderate-to-severe cancer-related pain.

Safety and efficacy outcomes of long-term treatment up to 4 years with 5% lidocaine medicated plaster in patients with post-herpetic neuralgia.

OBJECTIVE: Prospective evaluation of the long-term efficacy and safety of the 5% lidocaine medicated plaster in patients with post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients with persisting pain for ≥3 months after acute herpes zoster and a baseline pain intensity of at least 4 on an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS 0-10) were treated with 5% lidocaine medicated plasters for up to 5 years and monitored in regular intervals. Efficacy parameters are presented for the first 4 years and include patients' recall of pain relief (6-point verbal rating scale (VRS), clinical global impression of change (CGIC), patients' global impression of change PGIC), and the global evaluations of study medication. Safety parameters (clinical examination, skin evaluation, laboratory) and adverse events (AEs) were assessed at regular visits. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: KF10004/02. RESULTS: A total of 102 patients continuing from a 1 year main study period were included in an extension phase of up to 3 years. Ten patients (9.8%) dropped out due to lack of efficacy and 9 patients (8.8%) due to treatment-related AEs; 56 patients (54.9%) left the study for non-treatment-related reasons. Twenty-seven patients (26.4%) were still under treatment after a total treatment period of 4 years. On average, a pain relief of at least 4.3 (between moderate and a lot) was achieved throughout the study. At all visits the CGIC and the PGIC were much or very much improved in about 80% of patients. At the final visit, study medication was rated at least to be good by 91% of physicians and 89% of patients. Drug-related adverse events (DRAEs) were reported in 19 of 102 patients, mainly mild to moderate localized skin reactions. There were no hints for a reduced analgesic effect or an increase of DRAEs with long-term treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that long-term treatment of ≥12 months with the 5% lidocaine medicated plaster is effective and well tolerated in PHN patients. These findings support the recommendations to use the 5% lidocaine medicated plaster as baseline therapy for localized neuropathic pain after herpes zoster infection (PHN).