GPRC5C drives branched-chain amino acid metabolism in leukemogenesis.

Leukemia stem cells (LSCs) share numerous features with healthy hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs). G-protein coupled receptor family C group 5 member C (GPRC5C) is a regulator of HSC dormancy. However, GPRC5C functionality in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is yet to be determined. Within patient AML cohorts, high GPRC5C levels correlated with poorer survival. Ectopic Gprc5c expression increased AML aggression through the activation of NF-κB, which resulted in an altered metabolic state with increased levels of intracellular branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs). This onco-metabolic profile was reversed upon loss of Gprc5c, which also abrogated the leukemia-initiating potential. Targeting the BCAA transporter SLC7A5 with JPH203 inhibited oxidative phosphorylation and elicited strong antileukemia effects, specifically in mouse and patient AML samples while sparing healthy bone marrow cells. This antileukemia effect was strengthened in the presence of venetoclax and azacitidine. Our results indicate that the GPRC5C-NF-κB-SLC7A5-BCAAs axis is a therapeutic target that can compromise leukemia stem cell function in AML.

Chronic activation of GPR40 does not negatively impact upon BRIN-BD11 pancreatic ß-cell physiology and function.

BACKGROUND: Free fatty acids (FFAs) are known for their dual effects on insulin secretion and pancreatic ß-cell survival. Short-term exposure to FFAs, such as palmitate, increases insulin secretion. On the contrary, long-term exposure to saturated FFAs results in decreased insulin secretion, as well as triggering oxidative stress and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, culminating in cell death. The effects of FFAs can be mediated either via their intracellular oxidation and consequent effects on cellular metabolism or via activation of the membrane receptor GPR40. Both pathways are likely to be activated upon both short- and long-term exposure to FFAs. However, the precise role of GPR40 in ß-cell physiology, especially upon chronic exposure to FFAs, remains unclear. METHODS: We used the GPR40 agonist (GW9508) and antagonist (GW1100) to investigate the impact of chronically modulating GPR40 activity on BRIN-BD11 pancreatic ß-cells physiology and function. RESULTS: We observed that chronic activation of GPR40 did not lead to increased apoptosis, and both proliferation and glucose-induced calcium entry were unchanged compared to control conditions. We also observed no increase in H2O2 or superoxide levels and no increase in the ER stress markers p-eIF2α, CHOP and BIP. As expected, palmitate led to increased H2O2 levels, decreased cell viability and proliferation, as well as decreased metabolism and calcium entry. These changes were not counteracted by the co-treatment of palmitate-exposed cells with the GPR40 antagonist GW1100. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic activation of GPR40 using GW9508 does not negatively impact upon BRIN-BD11 pancreatic ß-cells physiology and function. The GPR40 antagonist GW1100 does not protect against the deleterious effects of chronic palmitate exposure. We conclude that GPR40 is probably not involved in mediating the toxicity associated with chronic palmitate exposure.