Barriers to the use of dental services by children in Lebanon and association with parental perception of oral health care.

BACKGROUND: Oral health is important to general health but use of dental services varies considerably, particularly for children. AIMS: We aimed to determine factors associated with parents' use of dental services for their children in Lebanon, and their perception of dental care relative to medical care. METHODS: A convenience sample of public and private schools in Beirut was selected between January and May 2013. Parents of children in grades 2-6 (aged 7-12 years) were invited to complete a questionnaire covering socioeconomic characteristics and use of dental services. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the relationship between use of dental services, and parents' socioeconomic characteristics and awareness and perceptions of dental services. RESULTS: The parents of 316 children returned the questionnaire. Most children (72.8%) had been taken to the dentist in the past year, mainly for emergency care. Most parents (78.2%) considered dental care as important as or more important than medical care, and 89.9% were willing to contribute to dental insurance. Use of dental services was significantly associated with: older age of the parent (odds ratio, OR = 1.04; 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.02-1.06); awareness of dental care centres offering affordable treatment (OR = 3.18; 95% CI: 1.52-6.68); and children being in private schools (OR = 2.00, 95% CI: 1.08-3.95). It was negatively associated with > 4 children in the family compared with 1 child (OR = 0.18; 95% CI: 0.04-0.81). CONCLUSION: Barriers to dental care for children were mostly related to economic factors.

Association Between Facial Length and Width and Fundamental Frequency.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the association between facial width and length and fundamental frequency (F0) and habitual frequency. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cross-sectional study. SUBJECTS: A total of 50 subjects (35 females;15 males) were included in this study. METHODS: Lateral and posteroanterior cephalometric measurements included: facial height (N-Me); widths of the maxilla (J-J), mandible (AG-AG), and face (Zyg-Zyg); ratios J-J to AG-AG, N-Me to Zyg-Zyg, and lower face to total face heights. All subjects underwent acoustic analysis using Visi-Pitch IV. Sample was stratified according to age and gender. RESULTS: In the total group (mean age: 14.19±6.49 years; range 6-35 years), a significantly moderate negative correlation existed between Zyg-Zyg, J-J, and AG-AG, and F0 and habitual pitch. Similarly, N-Me moderately correlated with habitual pitch. In males, there was a significant moderate negative correlation between Zyg-Zyg and J-J, and habitual pitch, and between J-J and F0 (-0.571;p=0.026). In females, a significant moderate correlation existed between Zyg-Zyg and AG-AG, and habitual pitch, and between AG-AG and F0 (-0.347;p=0.041). In the prepubertal group (n=25), a negative moderate correlation occurred between J-J and AG-AG, N-Me and habitual frequency, and between J-J and F0 (-0.407;p=0.043). In the postpubertal group, there was a significant moderate correlation only between AG-AG and F0 (-0.403;p=0.046). CONCLUSION: Facial length correlates significantly with habitual frequency, and facial width correlates significantly with both F0 and habitual pitch. A larger sample of adult subjects is needed to substantiate this conclusion.

Formants frequency and dispersion in relation to the length and projection of the upper and lower jaws.

OBJECTIVE: Investigate the association between formants frequencies and length and sagittal projection of the maxilla and mandible. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHOD: A total of 47 consecutive patients were recruited. Craniofacial measures included; maxillary length (ANS-PNS), mandibular length (Co-Gn), relationship between maxilla and mandible in the sagittal plane (ANB), the sagittal projection of the maxilla (SNA), and mandible (SNB). Subjects were asked to phonate vowels /a/, /i/, /o/, and /u/. Measurements were made in real-time and formant frequencies across F1, F2, F3, and F4 were determined. RESULTS: There was a significant negative association between the length of the maxilla and F4 for all the vowels, and a significant negative association between the length of the mandible and F4 for vowels /o/ and /u/. The length of maxilla and mandible also negatively associated with F3 for vowels /a/, /i/, /o/, and vowels /i/, /o/, and /u/ respectively. For the first two formants, the negative association was less pronounced. CONCLUSION: There was a significant negative association between the formant frequencies F3, F4, and the length of the mandible and maxilla for vowels /a/, /i/, /o/, and /u/.

Correlation between the length and sagittal projection of the upper and lower jaw and the fundamental frequency.

OBJECTIVE: To report on the correlation between the length and projection of the upper and lower jaw and the fundamental frequency (F0). STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 45 healthy subjects were included in this study. The facial skeletal measurements included: SNA, SNB, ANB, angles that reflect the position of the maxilla and mandible in relation to the base of skull and to each others, length of mandible Co-Gn, and length of maxilla PNS-ANS. All subjects underwent acoustic analysis using VISI-PITCH IV. RESULTS: The means for F0 and habitual frequency were 220.75 + 40.01 Hz and 216.99 + 43.9 Hz, respectively. The means for SNA, SNB, and ANB were 80.753 ± 3.20, 77.409 ± 3.64, and 3.336 ± 2.57, respectively. The mean length of the mandible and maxilla were 104.28 + 7.94 and 50.29 + 3.94, respectively. In the total group, there was a moderate negative correlation between F0 and habitual frequency and the length of the mandible (r = -0.528 and -0.577, respectively). There was also a moderate negative correlation between F0 and habitual frequency and the length of the maxilla (r = -0.473 and -0.519, respectively). Similar findings were present after excluding the pubertal subjects. With respect to the other cephalometric measurements, the correlation was poor (r value < 0.3). CONCLUSIONS: There is a moderate negative correlation between the length of the upper and lower jaw and the average F0 and habitual frequency. The remaining facial sagittal projection parameters do not correlate with the average F0 and habitual frequency.