Understanding Factors in Burn Patient Follow-up.

Follow-up rates are concerningly low among burn-injured patients. This study investigates the factors associated with low follow-up rates and missed appointments. We hypothesize that patients who are homeless, use illicit substances, and have psychiatric comorbidities will have lower rates of follow-up and more missed appointments. Data from a discharge-planning survey of 281 burn-injured patients discharged from September 2019 to July 2020 were analyzed and matched with patients' electronic medical records for a retrospective chart review. Data collected included general demographics, burn characteristics, hospitalization details, follow-up visits, missed appointments, homeless status, substance use, major psychiatric illness, and survey responses. Data analysis used chi-square, Fisher's exact test, Student's t-test, Wilcoxon rank sum test, and multivariate regression analysis. Overall, 37% of patients had no follow-up in clinic and 46% had one or more missed appointment. On multivariate regression analysis, homeless patients were more likely to never follow-up, odds ratio (OR) = 0.23 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.11-0.49), as were patients who anticipated experiencing transportation difficulties, OR = 0.28 (95% CI = 0.15-0.50). Homeless patients were more likely to have missed appointments, OR = 0.23 (95% CI = 0.1-0.54). On univariate analysis, patients with one or more documented major psychiatric illness had lower follow-up rates, with 50.62% having no follow-up (P < .01). Among patients who responded to the survey that they were current drug users, 52% had no follow-up as compared to 28% of patients who responded that they did not use drugs (P < .01).

Follow-up After Burn Injury Is Disturbingly Low and Linked With Social Factors.

For medical and social reasons, it is important that burn patients attend follow-up appointments (FUAs). Our goal was to examine the factors leading to missed FUAs in burn patients. A retrospective chart review was conducted of adult patients admitted to the burn center from 2016 to 2018. Data collected included burn characteristics, social history, and zip code. Data analysis was conducted using chi-square, Wilcoxon Rank-Sum tests, and multivariate regression models. A total of 878 patients were analyzed, with 224 (25.5%) failing to attend any FUAs and 492 (56.0%) missing at least one appointment (MA). Patients who did not attend any FUAs had smaller burns (4.5 [8]% vs 6.5 [11]% median [inter quartile range]), traveled farther (70.2 [111.8] vs 52.5 [76.7] miles), and were more likely to be homeless (22.8% vs 6.9%) and have drug dependence (47.3% vs 27.2%). Patients who had at least one MA were younger (42 [26] vs 46 [28] years) and more likely to be homeless (17.5% vs 2.6%) and have drug dependence (42.5% vs 19.4%). On multivariate analysis, factors associated with never attending an FUA were distance from hospital (odds ratio [OR] 1.004), burn size (OR 0.96), and homelessness (OR 0.33). Factors associated with missing at least one FUA: age (OR 0.99), drug dependence (OR 0.46), homelessness (OR 0.22), and Emergency Department visits (OR 0.56). A high percentage of patients fail to make any appointment following their injury and/or have at least one MA. Both FUAs and MAs are influenced by social determinants of health.