Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Assunto principal
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur J Ophthalmol ; : 11206721221143160, 2022 Dec 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36475915

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To evaluate the agreement between two biometry devices, the Heidelberg Anterion and the Galilei G6 Lens Professional. METHODS: Eyes were scanned with both biometry devices. Analysis of inter-device agreement was conducted for the following metrics: flat (K1), steep (K2) and mean K (Km) for anterior, posterior and total cornea, lens thickness (LT), central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), white to white (WTW) and axial length (AL). Generalised Estimating Equations were used to account for inter-eye correlation. Bland-Altman analysis was conducted to derive the mean difference (MD) and limits of agreement (LoA) between devices. Differences were deemed clinically significant if they would result in a change in post-operative refraction of 0.25D or more. RESULTS: 159 eyes of 91 patients were included. For the anterior cornea, no significant MD was found for K1 (-0.11D) and K2 (-0.10D), although a significant MD was found for Km (-0.10D). For posterior cornea, while there were no significant MDs between devices, the LoAs were wide for both posterior K1(-0.70, 0.68) and posterior K2 (-1.01, 1.29). For total corneal power, significant MDs were found in K1 (0.36D), and Km (0.26D) but not for K2 (0.17D). Significant MDs were found for LT (0.179mm), CCT (-0.005mm), ACD (-0.111mm) and WTW (-0.158mm), but not for AL (-0.021mm, p > 0.05).Conclusion: There are statistically but not clinically significant differences between Anterion and Galilei G6 Lens Professional in anterior Km, LT, CCT, ACD and WTW. Measurements of the posterior and total cornea are not interchangeable between devices.

2.
Mar Pollut Bull ; 184: 114174, 2022 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36194961

RESUMO

For the first time, this study explored the dominant features of Marine HeatWaves (MHWs) in the Persian Gulf and Oman Sea (1982-2020). The spatial extent of MHWs has nearly doubled in the last 24 years. Since 1997, the average number of MHW days in the central parts of the Persian Gulf has increased about 19 times compared to the period 1982-1997. The average number of the detected MHW events has increased by about three times. Simultaneously with the increase in MHWs frequency trend, the trend in the average number of MHW days has also increased. Since 1997, the average number of MHW days in the study area has almost increased by 10 times. The mean duration of the detected MHWs ranged from 5 to10 days. On average, in a major part of the Persian Gulf, about 1-2 MHW events occur annually.


Assuntos
Mudança Climática , Oceano Índico , Omã
3.
J Med Signals Sens ; 12(2): 114-121, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35755981

RESUMO

Background: One of the most prevalent methods in noninvasive blood pressure (BP) measurement with cuff is oscillometric, which has two different types of deflation, including linear and step deflation. With this approach, in addition to designing a novel algorithm by the step deflation method, a sample of its module was constructed and validated during clinical tests in different hospitals. Method: In this study, by controlling the valve, the pressure would be deflated through optimized steps. By real-time processing on the obtained signal from the pressure sensor, pulses in each step would be extracted. After that, in offline mode, mean arterial pressure is estimated based on curve fitting. Result: A BP simulator, various modules, and an auditory method were used to validate the algorithm and its results. During clinical tests, 80 people (men and women), 11 dialysis patients, and 69 non-dialysis (healthy or with other diseases) in the age range of 17-85 years participated. Conclusion: The obtained results compared with the BP simulator are in the standard range according to the international medical standards of the British Hypertension Society (BHS) and the US Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI), which are the global standard of comparison in this field.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA