Secondary prevention in diabetic and nondiabetic coronary heart disease patients: Insights from the German subset of the hospital arm of the EUROASPIRE IV and V surveys.

BACKGROUND: Patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) with and without diabetes mellitus have an increased risk of recurrent events requiring multifactorial secondary prevention of cardiovascular risk factors. We compared prevalences of cardiovascular risk factors and its determinants including lifestyle, pharmacotherapy and diabetes mellitus among patients with chronic CHD examined within the fourth and fifth EUROASPIRE surveys (EA-IV, 2012-13; and EA-V, 2016-17) in Germany. METHODS: The EA initiative iteratively conducts European-wide multicenter surveys investigating the quality of secondary prevention in chronic CHD patients aged 18 to 79 years. The data collection in Germany was performed during a comprehensive baseline visit at study centers in Würzburg (EA-IV, EA-V), Halle (EA-V), and Tübingen (EA-V). RESULTS: 384 EA-V participants (median age 69.0 years, 81.3% male) and 536 EA-IV participants (median age 68.7 years, 82.3% male) were examined. Comparing EA-IV and EA-V, no relevant differences in risk factor prevalence and lifestyle changes were observed with the exception of lower LDL cholesterol levels in EA-V. Prevalence of unrecognized diabetes was significantly lower in EA-V as compared to EA-IV (11.8% vs. 19.6%) while the proportion of prediabetes was similarly high in the remaining population (62.1% vs. 61.0%). CONCLUSION: Between 2012 and 2017, a modest decrease in LDL cholesterol levels was observed, while no differences in blood pressure control and body weight were apparent in chronic CHD patients in Germany. Although the prevalence of unrecognized diabetes decreased in the later study period, the proportion of normoglycemic patients was low. As pharmacotherapy appeared fairly well implemented, stronger efforts towards lifestyle interventions, mental health programs and cardiac rehabilitation might help to improve risk factor profiles in chronic CHD patients.

Factors associated with smoking cessation in patients with coronary heart disease: a cohort analysis of the German subset of EuroAspire IV survey.

BACKGROUND: Tobacco smoking is one of the most important risk factors of coronary heart disease (CHD). Hence, smoking cessation is considered pivotal in the prevention of CHD. The current study aimed to evaluate smoking cessation patterns and determine factors associated with smoking cessation in patients with established CHD. METHODS: The fourth European Survey of Cardiovascular Disease Prevention and Diabetes investigated quality of CHD care in 24 countries across Europe in 2012/13. In the German subset, smoking cessation patterns and clinical characteristics were repetitively assessed a) during index event due to CHD by medical record abstraction, b) as part of a face-to-face interview 6 to 36 months after the index event (i.e. baseline visit), and c) by telephone-based follow-up interview two years after the baseline visit. Logistic regression analysis was performed to search for factors determining smoking status at the time of the telephone interview. RESULTS: Out of 469 participants available for follow-up, 104 (22.2%) had been classified as current smokers at the index event. Of those, 65 patients (62.5%) had quit smoking at the time of the telephone interview, i.e., after a median observation period of 3.5 years (quartiles 3.0, 4.1). Depressed mood at baseline visit and higher education level were less prevalent amongst quitters vs non-quitters (17.2% vs 35.9%, p = 0.03 and 15.4% vs 33.3%, p = 0.03), cardiac rehabilitation programs were more frequently attended by quitters (83.1% vs 48.7%, p < 0.001), and there was a trend for a higher prevalence of diabetes at baseline visit in quitters (37.5% vs 20.5%, p = 0.07). In the final multivariable model, cardiac rehabilitation was associated with smoking cessation (OR 5.19; 95%CI 1.87 to 14.46; p = 0.002). DISCUSSION: Attending a cardiac rehabilitation program after a cardiovascular event was associated with smoking cessation supporting its use as a platform for smoking cessation counseling and relapse prevention.

[The intraoperative measured stimulation impedance of pacemaker electrodes is not a predictor for their longevity]. / Die intraoperativ gemessene Stimulationsimpedanz von Schrittmacherelektroden ist kein Prädiktor für ihren Langzeitverlauf.

UNLABELLED: As pacing impedance is inversely related to pacing current, the increase of pacing impedance additionally decreases pacing current. Whether the impedance measurement at implantation predicts the outcome during follow-up, was studied in 87 patients who received the VDD-single lead UniPass 425 connected to the pacemaker Unity (Sulzer Intermedics). The impedance changes between implantation and 6 months follow-up were assessed for each patient. Similar impedance values were defined, if the two measurements were within a range < or = -100 to +100 omega. Six-months impedance was lower or higher compared to implantation, if the difference exceeded > -100 or > +100 omega. At implantation, impedance was 535 +/- 98 omega (range: 333-811 omega) and significantly increased to 604 +/- 160 omega (range: 361-1150 omega) after 6 months. Mean difference between the two measurements was 69 +/- 162 omega (range: -336 bis + 560 omega). Similar impedance had 43 (implantation: 527 +/- 75 omega, 6 months: 531 +/- 87 omega), lower values 11 (implantation: 660 +/- 83 omega, 6 months: 494 +/- 73 omega) and higher values 33 patients (implantation: 503 +/- 99 omega, 6 months: 735 +/- 168 omega). Compared to the patients with similar impedance patients with lower impedance had a significantly higher impedance values at implantation. CONCLUSIONS: Pacing impedance increased significantly within 6 months after implantation. Pacing impedance changed > 100 omega in 51% of the patients. The long-term follow-up of pacing impedance can be predicted generally, but not for the individual patient.

[The effect of a lower stimulation frequency on the AV synchronicity of VDD pacemakers]. / Einfluss der unteren Stimulationsfrequenz auf die AV-Synchronität von VDD-Schrittmachern.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Implantation of a VDD pacemaker (ventricular pacing; dual sensing [atrial and ventricular]; dual response [triggered + inhibited]) together with a single VDD electrode catheter restores synchronous AV ventricular stimulation in patients with higher-grade AV block and intact sinus function. If higher-frequency stimulation occurs it may be a sign of pacemaker malfunction or of inadequate pacemaker programming. This study was undertaken to determine, at first follow-up examination, in how many patients with a VDD pacemaker VVI stimulation occurred more than 5% of the time; how such patients differed from those with 5% or fewer VVI stimulations; and whether a changed program reduced the proportion of VVI stimulations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 67 consecutive patients were tested 1 to 3 months after implantation of the Unity VDD pacemaker (Sulzer Intermedics). The frequency of VVI stimulations was determined via a diagnostic pacemaker memory store. After intermediate analysis, programming was optimized and the patients then re-tested 12 months after the initial implantation. RESULTS: At the first follow-up examination 54 patients had VVI stimulations of < or = 5% (0.5 +/- 0.9%) and 13 had > 5% of the time (19.8 +/- 10.7%). The two groups differed significantly from one another in their lower intervention frequency (< or = 5% VVI stimulations: 47 +/- 6/min; > 5% VVI stimulations: 58 +/- 5/min). In particular, the pacemakers in patients with > 5% VVI stimulations had been significantly more often programmed to values of > 50/min. As a result, the pacemakers of these patients were reprogrammed to a lower frequency. A year after implantation there was no longer any difference in the lower intervention frequency, 44 +/- 4/min, between patients with initially > 5% VVI stimulations and those with initially < or = 5% stimulations. At the same time, the proportion of VVI stimulations fell to 4 +/- 6%, with 67% of patients having AV synchronicity of > 95%. INTERPRETATION: At first follow-up, patients with > 5% VVI stimulations differed from those with < or = 5% stimulations with regard to an increased lower intervention frequency. In most of these patients the proportion of AV stimulations was increased to > 95% by reducing the lower intervention frequency to < or = 50/min.