Tropical Infections in the Indian Intensive Care Units: The Tip of the Iceberg!

How to cite this article: Karnad DR, Patil VP, Kulkarni AP. Tropical Infections in the Indian Intensive Care Units: The Tip of the Iceberg! Indian J Crit Care Med 2021; 25(Suppl 2):S115-S117.

An Approach to a Patient with Tropical Infection in the Intensive Care Unit.

How to cite this article: Karnad DR, Amin P. An Approach to a Patient with Tropical Infection in the Intensive Care Unit. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021;25(Suppl 2):S118-S121.

Intensive Care Management of Severe Tetanus.

Tetanus is caused by an exotoxin, tetanospasmin, produced by Clostridium tetani, an anaerobic gram-positive bacillus.Tetanospasmin prevents the release of inhibitory neurotransmitter gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) in the spinal cord, brainstem motor nuclei, and the brain, producing muscle rigidity and tonic spasms.Trismus (lockjaw), dysphagia, laryngeal spasms, rigidity of limbs and paraspinal muscles, and opisthotonic posture are common.Frequent severe spasms triggered by touch, pain, bright light, or sounds may produce apnea and rhabdomyolysis.Autonomic overactivity occurs in severe tetanus causing labile hypertension, tachycardia, increased secretions, sweating, and urinary retention. Dysautonomia is difficult to manage and is a common cause of mortality; magnesium sulfate infusion is often used.Antibiotics (penicillin or metronidazole) and wound care reduce toxin production and human tetanus immune globulin neutralizes the circulating toxin.Nasogastric tube placement for feeding and medications is needed.Early elective tracheostomy is performed in moderate or severe tetanus to prevent aspiration and laryngeal stridor.Benzodiazepines help reduce rigidity, spasms, and autonomic dysfunction. Large doses of diazepam (0.2-1 mg/kg/h) are administered via nasogastric tube.Neuromuscular blocking agents and mechanical ventilation are used for refractory spasms.Mortality ranges from 5% to 50%. How to cite this article: Karnad DR, Gupta V. Intensive Care Management of Severe Tetanus. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021; 25(Suppl 2):S155-S160.

Preeclampsia and Related Problems.

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy can be classified as chronic hypertension (present before pregnancy), gestational hypertension (onset after 20 weeks of pregnancy), and preeclampsia (onset after 20 weeks of pregnancy, along with proteinuria and other organ dysfunction). Preeclampsia and related disorders are a major cause of maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality. Preeclampsia is believed to result from an angiogenic imbalance in the placenta circulation. Antenatal screening and early diagnosis may help improve outcomes. Severe preeclampsia is characterized by SBP ≥160 mm Hg, or DBP ≥110 mm Hg, thrombocytopenia (platelet count <100 × 109/L), abnormal liver function, serum creatinine >1.1 mg/dL, or a doubling of the serum creatinine concentration in the absence of other renal diseases, disseminated intravascular coagulation, pulmonary edema, new-onset headache, or visual disturbances. Severe preeclampsia or eclampsia (preeclampsia with seizures) needs ICU management and is the main cause of morbidity and mortality. Severe hypertension can also result in life-threatening intracranial hemorrhage. Blood pressure control, seizure prevention, and appropriate timing of delivery are the cornerstones of the management of preeclampsia. Besides intravenous antihypertensive drugs, intravenous magnesium sulfate is the drug of choice to prevent or treat seizures, when preparing for urgent delivery. At present, delivery remains the most effective treatment for preeclampsia, and organ dysfunction rapidly recovers after delivery. Novel therapeutic interventions are under development to reduce complications. How to cite this article: Narkhede AM, Karnad DR. Preeclampsia and Related Problems. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021;25(Suppl 3):S261-S266.

Validation of electrocardiographic criteria for identifying left ventricular dysfunction in patients with previous myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Eleven criteria correlating electrocardiogram (ECG) findings with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) have been previously published. These have not been compared head-to-head in a single study. We studied their value as a screening test to identify patients with reduced LVEF estimated by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging. METHODS: ECGs and CMR from 548 patients (age 61 + 11 years, 79% male) with previous myocardial infarction (MI), from the DETERMINE and PRE-DETERMINE studies, were analyzed. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of each criterion for identifying patients with LVEF ≤ 30% and ≤ 40% were studied. A useful screening test should have high sensitivity and NPV. RESULTS: Mean LVEF was 40% (SD = 11%); 264 patients (48.2%) had LVEF ≤ 40%, and 96 patients (17.5%) had LVEF ≤ 30%. Six of 11 criteria were associated with a significant lower LVEF, but had poor sensitivity to identify LVEF ≤ 30% (range 2.1%-55.2%) or LVEF ≤ 40% (1.1%-51.1%); NPVs were good for LVEF ≤ 30% (range 82.8%-85.9%) but not for LVEF ≤ 40% (range 52.1%-60.6%). Goldberger's third criterion (RV4/SV4 < 1) and combinations of maximal QRS duration > 124 ms + either Goldberger's third criterion or Goldberger's first criterion (SV1 or SV2 + RV5 or RV6 ≥ 3.5 mV) had high specificity (95.4%-100%) for LVEF ≤ 40%, although seen in only 48 (8.8%) patients; predictive values were similar on subgroup analysis. CONCLUSIONS: None of the ECG criteria qualified as a good screening test. Three criteria had high specificity for LVEF ≤ 40%, although seen in < 9% of patients. Whether other ECG criteria can better identify LV dysfunction remains to be determined.

Goal-directed Therapy: Does It Work in Postcardiac Surgery Patients, Unlike in Sepsis?

How to cite this article: Saraf S, Karnad DR. Goal-directed Therapy: Does It Work in Postcardiac Surgery Patients, Unlike in Sepsis? Indian J Crit Care Med 2020;24(5):287-288.

Reference values of ECG parameters derived from 906 echocardiographically confirmed healthy Indian children: A population-based study from Gujarat.

INTRODUCTION: There are few published studies on reference ranges of ECG parameters in children; some ethnic differences have been described. METHODS: We studied digital 12­lead ECGs (1000 samples/s) from 906 healthy rural Indian children (467 boys: 439 girls) aged 5-15 years. PR, QRS, and QT were measured using superimposed median beat. Age-wise normal limits (median, 2nd and 98th percentile) were defined. RESULTS: Heart rate decreased while PR interval and QRS duration increased with age. QTcB interval remained unchanged from 5 to 12 years and decreased thereafter due to QTcB shortening in boys but not in girls. "Juvenile T wave pattern" was seen in 95% of children aged 5-8 years in lead V1 and 55-60% in V2, V3; it decreased with age. RV dominance (R/S > 1) in lead V1 was seen in 13% at 5 years, 1% at 10 years and none at 14 years. CONCLUSION: Reference ranges in Indian children are similar to those in other ethnic groups.

For neonatal ECG screening there is no reason to relinquish old Bazett's correction.

Aims: There is an almost endless controversy regarding the choice of the QT correction formula to be used in electrocardiograms (ECG) in neonates for screening for long QT syndrome (LQTS). We compared the performance of four commonly used formulae and a new formula derived from neonates. Methods and results: From a cohort of 44 596 healthy neonates prospectively studied in Italy between 2001 and 2006, 5000 ECGs including 17 with LQTS-causing mutation identified by genotyping were studied using four QT correction formulae [Bazett's (QTcB), Fridericia's (QTcF), Framingham (QTcL), and Hodges (QTcH)]. A neonate-specific exponential correction (QTcNeo) was derived using 2500 randomly selected ECGs and validated for accuracy in the remaining 2500 ECGs. Digital ECGs were recorded between the 15th and 25th day of life; QT interval was measured manually in leads II, V5, and V6. To assess the ability to provide heart rate (HR) independent QT correction, regression analysis of the QTc-HR plots for all 5000 ECGs with each correction formula was done. QTcB provided the most HR independent correction with a slope closest to zero (slope +0.086 ms/b.p.m.) followed by QTcF (slope -0.308 ms/b.p.m.), QTcL (slope -0.364 ms/b.p.m.), and QTcH (slope +0.962 ms/b.p.m.). The QTc-HR slope of QTcNeo (QT/RR0.467) was similar to QTcB. The ability to correctly identify neonates with LQTS was best with QTcB, QTcF, and QTcNeo (comparable areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves) with positive predictive value of 39-40% and sensitivity of 100%. Cut-off values were 460 ms for QTcB, 394 ms for QTcF, and 446 ms for QTcNeo. Conclusions: The Bazett's correction provides an effective HR independent QT correction and also accurately identifies the neonates affected by LQTS. It can be used with confidence in neonates, although other methods could also be used with appropriate cut-offs.

Individual-Specific QT Interval Correction for Drugs With Substantial Heart Rate Effect Using Holter ECGs Extracted Over a Wide Range of Heart Rates.

Although fixed QT correction methods are typically used to adjust for the effect of heart rate on the QT interval in thorough QT/QTc studies, individual-specific QT correction (QTcI = QT/RRI ) is advisable for drugs that increase the heart rate by >5 to 10 beats/minute (bpm). QTcI is traditionally derived using resting drug-free electrocardiograms (ECGs) collected at prespecified times. However, the resting heart rate range in healthy individuals is narrow, and extrapolation of inferences from these data to higher heart rates could be inappropriate. Accordingly, the QTcI derived from triplicate ECGs extracted at prespecified times (the traditional [T] method, yielding QTcIT) was compared with QTcIs obtained using ECGs with a wider heart rate range (alternative Holter [H] method, yielding QTcIH) from 24-hour Holter recordings from 40 healthy individuals selected from a central ECG laboratory database. For QTcIH, 10-second ECGs were extracted at stable heart rates in the ranges of 51-60, 61-70, 71-80, and 81-90 bpm (9 ECGs in each bin = 36 ECGs). An independent set of 40 ECGs with heart rates from 51 to 90 bpm was extracted from each individual to validate the accuracy of QTcI by the 2 methods. For the validation set, the QTcIH was a better QT correction method (slope of QTc vs heart rate closer to zero) than QTcIT. The mean difference between QTcIT and QTcIH increased from 3.1 milliseconds at 65 bpm to 10.0 milliseconds at 90 bpm (P < 0.01). The QTcIT exceeded QTcIH at heart rates > 60 bpm. Employment of the QTcIH may be more appropriate for studies involving drugs that increase heart rate.

Chikungunya: Report from the task force on tropical diseases by the World Federation of Societies of intensive and critical care medicine.

Chikungunya is an arbovirus that is transmitted by the Aedes mosquito causing a febrile illness with periodic outbreaks in large parts of the world. In the last decade it has become a public health concern in a host of countries and has affected international tourists. In the vast majority of cases Chikungunya presents as an acute febrile illness, associated with rash, headache, myalgia and debilitating arthralgia or even polyarthritis. A small proportion of patients present atypically with nervous, ocular, renal, myocardial, respiratory and renal system involvement and may require ICU management. Over the years the epidemic potential of the virus has become apparent with spread related to an increase in global travel and the successful adaptation of the Aedes mosquito to the urban and sylvan environments in numerous countries. These epidemics have affected millions of people across the globe. Treatment is usually symptomatic and supportive.

Tropical diseases in the ICU: A syndromic approach to diagnosis and treatment.

Tropical infections form 20-30% of ICU admissions in tropical countries. Diarrheal diseases, malaria, dengue, typhoid, rickettsial diseases and leptospirosis are common causes of critical illness. Overlapping clinical features makes initial diagnosis challenging. A systematic approach involving (1) history of specific continent or country of travel, (2) exposure to specific environments (forests or farms, water sports, consumption of exotic foods), (3) incubation period, and (4) pattern of organ involvement and subtle differences in manifestations help in differential diagnosis and choice of initial empiric therapy. Fever, rash, hypotension, thrombocytopenia and mild derangement of liver function tests is seen in a majority of patients. Organ failure may lead to shock, respiratory distress, renal failure, hepatitis, coma, seizures, cardiac arrhythmias or hemorrhage. Diagnosis in some conditions is made by peripheral blood smear examination, antigen detection or detection of microbial nucleic acid by PCR. Tests that detect specific IgM antibody become positive only in the second week of illness. Initial therapy is often empiric; a combination of intravenous artesunate, ceftriaxone and either doxycycline or azithromycin would cover a majority of the treatable syndromes. Additional antiviral or antiprotozoal medications are required for some specific syndromes. Involving a physician specializing in tropical or travel medicine is helpful.

Intensive care in severe malaria: Report from the task force on tropical diseases by the World Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine.

Severe malaria is common in tropical countries in Africa, Asia, Oceania and South and Central America. It may also occur in travelers returning from endemic areas. Plasmodium falciparum accounts for most cases, although P vivax is increasingly found to cause severe malaria in Asia. Cerebral malaria is common in children in Africa, manifests as coma and seizures, and has a high morbidity and mortality. In other regions, adults may also develop cerebral malaria but neurological sequelae in survivors are rare. Acute kidney injury, liver dysfunction, thrombocytopenia, disseminated intravascular coagulopathy (DIC) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are also common in severe malaria. Metabolic abnormalities include hypoglycemia, hyponatremia and lactic acidosis. Bacterial infection may coexist in patients presenting with shock or ARDS and this along with a high parasite load has a high mortality. Intravenous artesunate has replaced quinine as the antimalarial agent of choice. Critical care management as per severe sepsis is also applicable to severe malaria. Aggressive fluid boluses may not be appropriate in children. Blood transfusions may be required and treatment of seizures and raised intracranial pressure is important in cerebral malaria in children. Mortality in severe disease ranges from 8 to 30% despite treatment.

Recent developments in the science of proarrhythmic cardiac safety of new drugs.

Following marketing withdrawals of several drugs due to proarrhythmic safety concerns, the ICH Guidelines S7B and E14 were released in 2005 and have guided pre-approval cardiac safety assessments in multiple regulatory jurisdictions. While this S7B-E14 paradigm has successfully prevented drugs with unanticipated potential for inducing Torsades de Pointes entering the market, it has unintentionally resulted in the termination of development programs for potentially important compounds that could have exhibited a favourable benefit-risk balance. The Comprehensive In vitro Proarrhythmia Assay paradigm is currently attracting considerable attention as a solution to this problem. While much evaluative work in this new paradigm will be conducted in the non-clinical domain, human electrocardiographic assessments will remain an important component of the overall investigational strategy, possibly being conducted in Phase I trials employing exposure-response modelling. This article reviews recent developments in proarrhythmic cardiac safety assessments of new drugs, their rationales, and current limitations.

Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016.

OBJECTIVE: To provide an update to "Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2012." DESIGN: A consensus committee of 55 international experts representing 25 international organizations was convened. Nominal groups were assembled at key international meetings (for those committee members attending the conference). A formal conflict-of-interest (COI) policy was developed at the onset of the process and enforced throughout. A stand-alone meeting was held for all panel members in December 2015. Teleconferences and electronic-based discussion among subgroups and among the entire committee served as an integral part of the development. METHODS: The panel consisted of five sections: hemodynamics, infection, adjunctive therapies, metabolic, and ventilation. Population, intervention, comparison, and outcomes (PICO) questions were reviewed and updated as needed, and evidence profiles were generated. Each subgroup generated a list of questions, searched for best available evidence, and then followed the principles of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system to assess the quality of evidence from high to very low, and to formulate recommendations as strong or weak, or best practice statement when applicable. RESULTS: The Surviving Sepsis Guideline panel provided 93 statements on early management and resuscitation of patients with sepsis or septic shock. Overall, 32 were strong recommendations, 39 were weak recommendations, and 18 were best-practice statements. No recommendation was provided for four questions. CONCLUSIONS: Substantial agreement exists among a large cohort of international experts regarding many strong recommendations for the best care of patients with sepsis. Although a significant number of aspects of care have relatively weak support, evidence-based recommendations regarding the acute management of sepsis and septic shock are the foundation of improved outcomes for these critically ill patients with high mortality.

Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016.

OBJECTIVE: To provide an update to "Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2012". DESIGN: A consensus committee of 55 international experts representing 25 international organizations was convened. Nominal groups were assembled at key international meetings (for those committee members attending the conference). A formal conflict-of-interest (COI) policy was developed at the onset of the process and enforced throughout. A stand-alone meeting was held for all panel members in December 2015. Teleconferences and electronic-based discussion among subgroups and among the entire committee served as an integral part of the development. METHODS: The panel consisted of five sections: hemodynamics, infection, adjunctive therapies, metabolic, and ventilation. Population, intervention, comparison, and outcomes (PICO) questions were reviewed and updated as needed, and evidence profiles were generated. Each subgroup generated a list of questions, searched for best available evidence, and then followed the principles of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system to assess the quality of evidence from high to very low, and to formulate recommendations as strong or weak, or best practice statement when applicable. RESULTS: The Surviving Sepsis Guideline panel provided 93 statements on early management and resuscitation of patients with sepsis or septic shock. Overall, 32 were strong recommendations, 39 were weak recommendations, and 18 were best-practice statements. No recommendation was provided for four questions. CONCLUSIONS: Substantial agreement exists among a large cohort of international experts regarding many strong recommendations for the best care of patients with sepsis. Although a significant number of aspects of care have relatively weak support, evidence-based recommendations regarding the acute management of sepsis and septic shock are the foundation of improved outcomes for these critically ill patients with high mortality.

Comparison of the spatial QRS-T angle derived from digital ECGs recorded using conventional electrode placement with that derived from Mason-Likar electrode position.

BACKGROUND: The spatial QRS-T angle is ideally derived from orthogonal leads. We compared the spatial QRS-T angle derived from orthogonal leads reconstructed from digital 12-lead ECGs and from digital Holter ECGs recorded with the Mason-Likar (M-L) electrode positions. METHODS AND RESULTS: Orthogonal leads were constructed by the inverse Dower method and used to calculate spatial QRS-T angle by (1) a vector method and (2) a net amplitude method, in 100 volunteers. Spatial QRS-T angles from standard and M-L ECGs differed significantly (57°±18° vs 48°±20° respectively using net amplitude method and 53°±28° vs 48°±23° respectively by vector method; p<0.001). Difference in amplitudes in leads V4-V6 was also observed between Holter and standard ECGs, probably due to a difference in electrical potential at the central terminal. CONCLUSION: Mean spatial QRS-T angles derived from standard and M-L lead systems differed by 5°-9°. Though statistically significant, these differences may not be clinically significant.