RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Approximately 8.1 million outpatient surgical procedures were performed in Germany in 2021. Little is known about the quality of postoperative pain treatment in the outpatient sector. METHODS: The AQS1 project comprises a combined survey of patients and staff in the framework of quality control for ambulatory surgery. The primary endpoint of this study was the prevalence of relevant incisional pain (≥ 4/10 on the numerical rating scale) up to postoperative day 3. Secondary endpoints included prognostic variables for pain and pain-associated outcomes, based on the AQS1 patient questionnaire. Moreover, mixed regression models were used to analyze potential prognostic variables and associations of pain with other outcomes (study registration number DRKS00028052). RESULTS: Data from 330 008 patients were evaluated (from 1 July 2001 to 31 December 2021). The overall prevalence of relevant incisional pain up to postoperative day 3 was 22.5%, with major differences between different types of procedure (3.2%-51.2%). Pain was most common after hemorrhoid surgery (51.2%) and the laparoscopic lysis of large and small bowel adhesions (45.4%). The main associations of relevant pain were with younger age (odds ratio [OR] 1.87, 95% confidence interval [1.82; 1.91]), early postoperative pain (1.34, [1.30; 1.39]), inadequate provision of analgesics (2.90, [2.71; 3.09]), and surgical wound infections (2.60, [2.43; 2.78]). Patients with pain reported lower overall satisfaction with the procedure and a longer inability to work. CONCLUSION: These data have not been tested for representativeness. They can serve as a point of departure for the optimization of individualized perioperative pain therapy and for the planning of prospective studies.
Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Dor Pós-Operatória , AnalgésicosRESUMO
Although regional anesthesia for ambulatory patients is feasible, effective and recommended, general anesthesia, analgosedation and monitored anesthesia care traditionally play a major role in the ambulatory setting. This discrepancy is at least partially caused by a more standardized and predictable process when using general anesthesia. High patient comfort, a low rate of complications and a rapid postoperative recovery are expected by all patients, irrespective of the type of anesthesia chosen and lie in the common interest of the anesthesiologist and the surgeon. A careful selection of suitable regional anesthesia procedures for equally suitable patients achieves these goals without loss of efficiency.