The lower limb-loss rehabilitation continuum (LLRC) - a framework for program design and implementation.

Purpose: The multistep journey to prosthetic device-enabled functioning following amputation requires a structured approach for optimal care delivery, but such program structures and outcomes are inadequately characterized. The study is responsive by describing an implementation framework for lower limb loss rehabilitation and evaluating its utility.Materials and methods: The lower limb loss rehabilitation continuum framework (LLRC) was developed using literature-based continuum of care and amputation phase concepts as well as input from limb loss rehabilitation stakeholders. LLRC structure includes five sequential steps (Postsurgical Stabilization (PS), Preprosthetic Rehabilitation (PPR), Limb Healing and Maturation (LHM), Prosthetic Fitting (PF), Prosthetic Rehabilitation (PR)) between six touchpoints of patient-healthcare interaction (Surgery, Preprosthetic Rehabilitation Admission and Discharge, Functioning Evaluation and Prescription, Prosthetic Rehabilitation Admission and Discharge). The utility of this framework was evaluated through LLRC program implementation in a semiurban US setting and program functioning and process outcomes assessment from an IRB-approved, retrospective observational study about patients with unilateral lower-limb amputations completing this program.Results: Program functional (FIM gain; efficiency) scores were greater for PPR(32.6(8);3.1) compared with PR(24.3(8.5);3.8). Program completion duration was 149.7(63.4) days. LHM(75.8(58.5) days) and PF(51.4(24.3) days) were the longest steps. PR duration was significantly longer(p = 0.033) for the transfemoral level.Conclusion: The LLRC framework is useful for the design and implementation of structured limb loss rehabilitation programs.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONThe lower limb-loss rehabilitation continuum (LLRC) is a novel implementation framework with a five-step structure from limb loss to completion of prosthetic rehabilitation between six touchpoints of patient-healthcare interaction, with standardized terminology and baseline and outcome metrics. The utility of the program was demonstrated by successful program development in a suburban health setting and actionable process outcomes and superior functioning outcomes compared with literature.The LLRC can be adapted by health systems, institutions, and care providers for program development. Programs can expect high FIM gains and efficiency for Preprosthetic rehabilitation and Prosthetic rehabilitation steps. With an LLRC completion time of 5 months, long Limb healing and maturation and Prosthetic fitting steps present areas of opportunity for improvement.

ED Triage Process Improvement: Timely Vital Signs for Less Acute Patients.

PROBLEM: Vital signs can result in an upgrade of patients' Emergency Severity Index (ESI) levels. It is therefore preferable to obtain vital signs early in the triage process, particularly for ESI level 3 patients. Emergency departments have an opportunity to redesign triage processes to meet required protocols while enhancing the quality and experience of care. METHODS: We performed process analyses to redesign the door-to-vital signs process. We also developed spaghetti diagrams to reconfigure the patient arrival area. RESULTS: The door-to-vital signs time was reduced from 43.1 minutes to 6.44 minutes. Both patients and triage staff seemed more satisfied with the new process. The patient arrival area was less congested and more welcoming. DISCUSSION: Performing activities in parallel reduces flow time with no additional resources. Staff involvement in process planning, redesign, and control ensures engagement and early buy-in. One should anticipate how changes to one process might affect other processes.

Who are the medical travelers and what do they want?: a qualitative study.

The ongoing debate on U.S. healthcare reform fueled by increasing cost and poor access to quality healthcare is spurring interest in medical travel. The topic of medical travel-going abroad to seek medical care-has been widely reported in various news outlets. This issue even resulted in a Senate Hearing before the Special Committee on Aging. Despite this popularity, very little empirical research has been conducted to describe and understand medical travelers. To fill this gap, the present study involves in-depth interviews of medical travel facilitators with extensive exposure to and communication with medical travelers. This article has multiple objectives. It aims to develop a demographic and psychographic profile of medical travelers and identify their underlying motives to seek medical care overseas. Based on these insights, it presents a list of propositions to be tested in further research. Finally, it offers practical implications for the healthcare industry.

Changing trends in health care tourism.

Despite much coverage in the popular press, only anecdotal evidence is available on medical tourists. At first sight, they seemed confined to small and narrowly defined consumer segments: individuals seeking bargains in cosmetic surgery or uninsured and financially distressed individuals in desperate need of medical care. The study reported in this article is the first empirical investigation of the medical tourism consumer market. It provides the demographic profile, motivations, and value perceptions of health care consumers who traveled abroad specifically to receive medical care. The findings suggest a much broader market of educated and savvy health care consumers than previously thought. In the backdrop of the health care reform, the article concludes with implications for health care providers.

Point-of-care technologies: a case for resource integration.

Point-of-care technologies have been heralded as enablers of quality care and efficiency. Fueling this reputation is the assumption that these technologies are seamlessly integrated with electronic medical records. In turn, this assumption leads to caregivers' heightened expectations of the capabilities of point-of-care technologies and, when not met, to their frustration with information systems personnel. The case study presented in this article documents an actual hospital's journey to integration. In doing so, it enumerates the technical challenges faced by the organization in layperson's terms and attempts to educate clinical personnel in the intricacies of integrating new health care technologies with existing systems. The drivers to integration were a primary focus on error reduction and an active collaboration among stakeholders. Individuals became learners outside the boundaries of their professional expertise. This cross-functional approach eventually led to simultaneous quality and efficiency gains.