Effects of prior osteoporosis treatment on the treatment response of romosozumab followed by denosumab in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis.

In patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis, prior osteoporosis treatment affected the bone mineral density increase of following treatment with 12 months of romosozumab, although it did not affect that of following treatment with 12 months of denosumab after romosozumab. PURPOSE: To investigate the effects of prior osteoporosis treatment on the response to treatment with romosozumab (ROMO) followed by denosumab (DMAb) in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis. METHODS: In this prospective, observational, multicenter study, treatment-naïve patients (Naïve; n = 55) or patients previously treated with bisphosphonates (BP; n = 37), DMAb (DMAb; n = 45) or teriparatide (TPTD; n = 17) (mean age, 74.6 years; T-scores of the lumbar spine [LS] - 3.2 and total hip [TH] - 2.6) were switched to ROMO for 12 months, followed by DMAb for 12 months. Bone mineral density (BMD) and serum bone turnover markers were evaluated for 24 months. RESULTS: A BMD increase was observed at 12 and 24 months in the following patients: Naïve (18.2% and 22.0%), BP (10.2% and 12.1%), DMAb (6.6% and 9.7%), and TPTD (10.8% and 15.0%) (P < 0.001 between the groups at both 12 and 24 months) in LS and Naïve (5.5% and 8.3%), BP (2.9% and 4.1%), DMAb (0.6% and 2.2%), and TPTD (4.3% and 5.4%) (P < 0.01 between the groups at 12 months and P < 0.001 at 24 months) in TH, respectively. The BMD increase in LS from 12 to 24 months was negatively associated with the levels of bone resorption marker at 24 months. Incidences of major fragility fractures for the respective groups were as follows: Naïve (5.5%), BP (16.2%), DMAb (11.1%), and TPTD (5.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Previous treatment affected the BMD increase of following treatment with ROMO, although it did not affect that of following treatment with DMAb after ROMO.

Asymmetrical ossification in the epiphyseal ring of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a retrospective review.

AIMS: To clarify the asymmetrical ossification of the epiphyseal ring between the convex and concave sides in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 29 female patients (mean age, 14.4 years; 11 to 18) who underwent corrective surgery for AIS (Lenke type 1 or 2) were included in our study. In all, 349 vertebrae including 68 apical vertebrae and 87 end vertebrae in the main thoracic (MT) curve and thoracolumbar/lumbar (TL/L) curve were analysed. Coronal sections (anterior, middle and posterior) of the vertebral bodies were reconstructed from pre-operative CT scans (320-row detector; slice thickness, 0.5 mm) and the appearances of the ossification centre in the epiphyseal ring at four corners were evaluated in three groups; all vertebrae excluding end vertebrae, apical vertebrae and end vertebrae. The appearance rates of the ossification centre at the concave and convex sides were calculated and compared. RESULTS: The appearance rates of the ossification centres in all vertebrae excluding end vertebrae and apical vertebrae were significantly lower on the concave side than on the convex side in both MT and TL/L curves irrespective of curve flexibility. There was no significant difference in the rate of appearance of the ossification centres on the concave or convex sides in end vertebrae. CONCLUSION: The asymmetric bony growth of vertebral body came into existence at both structural and non-structural curves, and was more apparent around the apical vertebrae. Evaluation of the ossification centre in the epiphyseal ring could be a measure of the effectiveness of brace treatment. TAKE HOME MESSAGE: The ossification of the epiphyseal ring in patients with AIS was delayed or absent on the concave side particularly around the apical vertebrae. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:666-71.

Comparison of the effect of 18-month daily teriparatide administration on patients with rheumatoid arthritis and postmenopausal osteoporosis patients.

UNLABELLED: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis showed greater response to 18-month administration of daily teriparatide especially in the increase of bone formation markers at 1 month and femoral neck bone mineral density at 18 months compared to postmenopausal osteoporosis patients. INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of 18-month administration of daily teriparatide (TPTD) in osteoporosis patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) by comparing that of postmenopausal osteoporosis patients (Porosis). METHODS: The effects of TPTD were examined between RA (n = 70; age 68.4 years; disease activity score assessing 28 joints with CRP [DAS28-CRP] 2.8; rheumatoid factor [RF] positivity 75.5 %) with 77.1 % of prior bisphosphonate (BP), 84.3 % of oral prednisolone (PSL) (4.4 mg/day at baseline), 25.7 % of biologics, and Porosis (n = 62; age 71.3 years) with 77.4 % of prior BP. RESULTS: Femoral neck (FN) bone mineral density (BMD) increase at 18 months was significantly greater in RA compared to Porosis (4.7 vs. 0.7 %, P = 0.038), whereas it was 9.7 versus 7.9 % (P = 0.736) in the lumbar spine (LS). The increase of bone formation markers (bone alkaline phosphatase [bone ALP] and N-terminal type I procollagen propeptide [PINP]) at 1 month were all significantly greater in RA compared to Porosis. A multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the significant indicator of 18-month BMD increase in RA was a 3-month increase of under-carboxylated osteocalcin (ucOC) for LS (ß = 0.446, P = 0.005) and baseline ucOC for FN (ß = 0.554, P = 0.001), in which both showed significant negative correlation with baseline PSL dose. CONCLUSIONS: RA showed greater response to daily TPTD administration, especially in the increase of bone formation markers at 1 month and FN BMD increase at 18 months compared to Porosis.