Biomechanical Characteristics of Kissing Spine During Extension Using a Human Cadaveric Lumbar Spinal Model.

Introduction: Although kissing spine syndrome in the lumbar spinal region is a relatively common condition in older adults, no study examining its biomechanical characteristics has been reported. We hypothesized that kissing of the spinous processes during extension causes an increase in the flexural rigidity of the spine and significantly limits the deformation behavior of extension, which in turn might cause lower back pain. Methods: Three test models (human cadavers A, B, and C) were prepared by removing supraspinal/interspinous ligaments between L4 and L5. The dental resin was attached to the cephalocaudal spinous process so that the spinous processes between L4 and L5 were almost in contact with each other to simulate the condition of a kissing spine. The flexion-extension direction's torque-range-of-motion (torque-ROM) curve was generated with a six-axis material tester for biomechanical measurements. Results: In all three models, the maximum ROMs at the time of extension were smaller than those at the time of flexion, and no sudden increase in torque was observed during extension. Conclusion: The results indicated no apparent biomechanical effects of kissing between the spinous processes, suggesting that the contact between the spinous processes has little involvement in the onset of lower back pain.

Experimental Study of Failures of the Rigid Spinal Posterior Fixation System Under Compressive Load Conditions: A Cadaver Study.

Background Many studies have been conducted on the biomechanics of the spine to elucidate the fixation properties of spinal fusion surgery and the causes of instrumentation failure. Among these studies, there are some studies on load sharing in the spine and measurement using strain gauges and pressure gauges, but there is a lack of research on axial compressive loads. Methods Axial compressive load tests were performed on human cadaveric injured lumbar vertebrae fixed with pedicle screws (PS). Both the strain generated in the PS rod and the intradiscal pressure were measured. Subsequently, the stress generated in the PS rod and the load sharing of the spine and instrumentation were calculated. Results Even when only compressive load is applied, bending stress of more than 10 times the compression stress was generated in the rod, and the stress tended to concentrate on one rod. Rod deformation becomes kyphotic, in contrast to the lordotic deformation behavior of the lumbar spine. The stress shielding rate was approximately 40%, less than half. Conclusions This study obtained basic data useful for constructing and verifying numerical simulations that are effective for predicting and elucidating the causes of dislodgement and failure of spinal implants.

Pedicle Screw System May Not Control Severe Spinal Rotational Instability.

STUDY DESIGN: An in vitro biomechanical study. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to discuss whether pedicle screw systems can control spinal rotational instability in a functional spinal unit of lumbar spine on human cadaver. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Rotational experiments using deer lumbar cadaveric models showed that rotational range of motion (ROM) of the model fixed by a pedicle screw system with crosslinking after total facetectomy for both the sides was larger than that in the intact model, and stated that spinal rotational instability could not be controlled using a pedicle screw system. METHODS: A rotation experiment using 10 functional spinal units (L3-4) of lumbar spine on human cadavers was performed by preparing the four models (intact model, damaged model, pedicle screw model, and crosslink (CL) model) in stages, then calculating and comparing rotational ROM among the four models. RESULTS: Rotational ROM in the CL model was still larger than that of the intact model in all the samples. And, rotational ROM decreased in the order of damaged model >> pedicle screw model > CL model > intact model. Statistical analysis revealed significant differences between all models (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Pedicle screw systems may not control severe spinal rotational instability in human lumbar cadaveric models with total facetectomy on both the sides. This may represent a major biomechanical drawback to the pedicle screw system. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.

Biomechanical Problems Related to the Pedicle Screw System.

AIM: To assess biomechanical problems related to pedicle screw (PS) systems. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Functional spinal units (L3-4) of deer were evaluated using a 6-axis material testing machine. For the specimen models, we prepared an intact model, a damaged model, a PS model, and a crosslink model. We checked the range of motion (ROM) during bending and rotation tests. Eight directions were measured in the bending test: anterior, right-anterior, right, right-posterior, posterior, left-posterior, left, and left-anterior, and 2 directions were measured in the rotation test (right and left). RESULTS: ROMs of the PS model were smaller than those of the intact model in all directions. However, ROMs of the PS model in the rotation test were smaller than those of the damaged model and larger than those of the intact model. The stability of the crosslink model was better than that of the PS model during the bending test, but ROMs of the crosslink model were larger than those of the intact model during the rotation test. CONCLUSION: Excessive bending rigidity and rotational instability are the biomechanical problems related to PS systems. Based on these results, we speculate that one of the most significant causes of adjacent segment disease is excessive bending rigidity and one of the most important causes of instrumentation failure is rotational instability.

Biomechanical Stability of a Cross-Rod Connection with a Pedicle Screw System.

BACKGROUND Surgery with pedicle screw instrumentation does not provide sufficient torsional stability. This leads to pseudoarthrosis, loosening of the pedicle screws, and, ultimately, implant failure. MATERIAL AND METHODS Functional spinal units from 18 deer were evaluated using a 6-axis material testing machine. As specimen models, we prepared an intact model, a damaged model, a cross-rod model, and a cross-link model. We measured the range of motion (ROM) during bending and rotation tests. RESULTS The range of motions of cross-rod model were almost equal to those of cross-link model during the bending test. In the rotation test, the average ranges of motion of the intact, cross-rod, and cross-link models were 2.9°, 3.1°, and 3.9° during right rotation and 2.9°, 3.1°, and 4.1° during left rotation, respectively. The range of motions of the cross-rod model were significantly smaller than those of the cross-link model during the rotation test. The range of motions of the intact model were significantly smaller than those of the cross-link model during the rotation test, but there were no statistically significant differences between the range of motions of intact model and cross-rod model during the rotation test. CONCLUSIONS The stability of spinal fixation such as cross-rod model is equal to the fixation using the pedicle screw system during bending tests and equal to that of the intact spine during rotation tests.

Trajectory of instantaneous axis of rotation in fixed lumbar spine with instrumentation.

BACKGROUND: Several studies showed instantaneous axis of rotation (IAR) in the intact spine. However, there has been no report on the trajectory of the IAR of a damaged spine or that of a fixed spine with instrumentation. It is the aim of this study to investigate the trajectory of the IAR of the lumbar spine using the vertebra of deer. METHODS: Functional spinal units (L5-6) from five deer were evaluated with six-axis material testing machine. As specimen models, we prepared a normal model, a damaged model, and a pedicle screw (PS) model. We measured the IAR during bending in the coronal and sagittal planes and axial rotation. In the bending test, four directions were measured: anterior, posterior, right, and left. In the rotation test, two directions were measured: right and left. RESULTS: The IAR of the normal model during bending moved in the bending direction. The IAR of the damaged model during bending moved in the bending direction, but the magnitude of displacement was bigger compared to that of the normal model. In the PS model, the IAR during bending test hardly moved. During rotation test, the IAR of the normal model and PS model located in the spinal canal, but the IAR of the damaged model located in the posterior part of the vertebral body. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the IAR of damaged model was scattering and that of PS model was concentrating. This suggests that higher mechanical load applied to the dura tube and nerve roots in the damaged model and less mechanical load applied to that in the PS model.

A biomechanical comparison between cortical bone trajectory fixation and pedicle screw fixation.

PURPOSE: There have been several reports on the pullout strength of cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screws, but only one study has reviewed the stability of functional spine units using the CBT method. The purpose of this study was to compare vertebral stability after CBT fixation with that after pedicle screw (PS) fixation. METHODS: In this study, 20 lumbar spine (L5-6) specimens were assigned to two groups: the CBT model group that underwent CBT screw fixation (n = 10) and the PS model group that underwent pedicle screw fixation (n = 10). Using a six-axis material testing machine, bend and rotation tests were conducted on each model. The angular displacement from the time of no load to the time of maximum torque was defined as range of motion (ROM), and then, the mean ROM in the bend and rotation tests and the mean rate of relative change of ROM in both the bend and rotation tests were compared between the CBT and PS groups. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the CBT and PS groups with regard to the mean ROMs and the mean rate of relative change of ROMs in both the bend and rotation tests. CONCLUSION: Intervertebral stability after CBT fixation was similar to that after PS fixation.

Basic research on a cylindrical implant made of shape-memory alloy for the treatment of long bone fracture.

The internal fixing materials made from shape-memory alloys (SMAs) have recently been reported for long bone fracture. We present a new internal fixation technique using a cylindrical SMAs implant in a rat femoral fracture healing. The implant was designed in a shape to circumferentially fix the fractured bone using resilient SMA claws. To evaluate the fixing ability of the implant, three-point bending and rotation tests were performed. Fifteen female Wister rats were treated surgically as an experimental model. All rats were killed at 16 weeks postoperatively, and the radiological and histological evaluations were performed. In biomechanical test, the good fixation ability of the implant was demonstrated. In animal model, no cases of postoperative infection or death were encountered and postoperative gait was stable in all cases. Radiological examination at 16 weeks postoperatively demonstrated the implant firmly fixed to the fractured part, endosteal healing, and no callus formation in all cases. In Histological evaluation, bone union in all cases was characterized by endochondral ossification from within the medullary cavity. In conclusion, our cylindrical SMA implant provided good fixation in biomechanical tests, and achieved bone union in all 15 rats. If a larger size is designed in the future, our implant will be a clinically applicable, useful fixing material for fracture of the human long bones.

Biomechanical study of the lumbar spine using a unilateral pedicle screw fixation system.

Lumbar fusion combined with unilateral pedicle screw fixation has received favourable clinical reports. However, there are very few reports about the biomechanical properties of this system. The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanics of a unilateral pedicle screw system with a bilateral system. Two fresh lumbar vertebral columns from human cadavers were used. Seven models were prepared by the sequential damage and spinal instrumentation of each specimen. Bending and rotation tests were performed to clarify the range of motion for each model using a 6-axis material tester that we have developed. We showed that the unilateral pedicle screw system offers only uneven fixation. This results in dispersion of rigidity depending on the direction of bending and rotation. The bilateral pedicle screw system, however, allows excellent fixation in all directions.

Clinical application of a handy intraoperative measurement device for lumbar segmental instability.

We describe the development of a new device that permits handy intraoperative measurement of lumbar segmental instability. The subjects comprised 80 patients with lumbar degenerative disease. Relationships between preoperative radiological assessments and extended distance as measured using our new device were investigated. Mean extended distance measured using the device was 3.7 +/- 1.9 mm. Correlation coefficients between angular motion and extended distance, and translational motion and extended distance were 0.76 and 0.66, respectively, revealing significant positive relationships between these values (p < 0.01 each). The correlation coefficient between the intervertebral endplate angle on the flexion film and extended distance was -0.78, showing a significant negative relationship (p < 0.01). In conclusion, the device for intraoperative measurement of lumbar segmental instability that we have developed appears to permit simple measurement of intervertebral instability and provides operators with valuable information for selecting operative methods of spinal fusion or instrumentation.

An amplitude-bandwidth expansion method for hearing-aid adjustment.

The basic concept for a technique that facilitates the adjustment of a hearing aid by a person of normal hearing is proposed. The technique involves processing using an amplitude-bandwidth expansion method to expand the hearing-aid output to fit to the user's hearing requirements and loudness recruitment. The expansion is a reversal of the cochlear compression model. As the expansion method introduces distortion of the waveform and a reduction of the expansion rate, the support technique presented here includes solutions to these problems. The difference between the original speech signal and the expanded output generated from the compressed output of the original signal is virtually inaudible. This technique, which effectively simulates a patient's hearing characteristics in order to allow an audiologist to set up a patient's hearing aid, is worth further investigation.