Measuring Signs of Atopic Dermatitis in Clinical Practice: A HOME-CP Consensus Statement.

Importance: Outcome measurement is an essential component of value-based health care and can aid patient care, quality improvement, and clinical effectiveness evidence generation. The Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema Clinical Practice initiative aims to identify a list of validated, feasible, outcome measurement instruments recommended to measure atopic dermatitis (AD) in the clinical practice setting. The clinical practice set is a list of instruments that clinicians can pick and choose from to suit their needs in the context of clinical care. Objective: To recommend instruments to measure clinical signs of AD in clinical practice. Evidence Review: Following the predefined roadmap, a mixed methods design was implemented and incorporated systematic reviews and qualitative consensus methods. Previous systematic reviews identified few clinical signs instruments with sufficient validation for recommendation. An updated systematic review evaluating the validity of clinical signs instruments informed an international meeting to reach consensus on recommended instruments to measure AD clinical signs in clinical practice. Consensus was defined as less than 30% disagreement. An in-person consensus exercise was held in Montreal, Canada, on October 16, 2022. The 34 attendees included patient and patient advocate research partners, health care professionals, researchers, methodologists, and industry representatives. Findings: The updated systematic review found that the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), Scoring Atopic Dermatitis, and objective Scoring Atopic Dermatitis were the only instruments that demonstrated sufficient performance in all assessed measurement properties. The modified EASI and Signs Global Assessment × Body Surface Area instruments were also recommended. The EASI, Validated Investigator Global Assessment, and Investigator's Global Assessment multiplied by or measured concurrently with a body surface area measure achieved consensus in criteria and were adopted. Conclusions and Relevance: This consensus statement by the Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema initiative suggests that when assessing and documenting clinical signs of AD, there are several valid and feasible instruments that can best fit a clinician's specific practice needs. These instruments should improve and standardize the documentation of signs severity, help determine the effect of treatment, facilitate the generation of clinical effectiveness evidence, and enhance the implementation of value-based health care.

Correlation Analysis of Clinician- and Patient-Reported Outcomes Among Japanese Adults with Atopic Dermatitis.

INTRODUCTION: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic relapsing condition with high disease burden and impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Correlations between clinician- and patient-reported outcomes tend to be poor, and limited data in Asian patients are available. METHODS: ADDRESS-J was a prospective, non-interventional, longitudinal study that evaluated the real-world effectiveness and safety of AD treatment in Japanese adults (aged 20-59 years) with moderate-to-severe AD. Three clinician-reported AD severity outcomes (Investigator's Global Assessment, Eczema Area and Severity Index, and body surface area affected), three dermatological patient-reported outcomes (Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure, Dermatology Life Quality Index, and Worst Itch Numerical Rating Scale), and two general HRQoL patient-reported outcomes (5-dimension EuroQoL questionnaire and EuroQol Visual Analog Scale) were collected at baseline and every 3 months throughout the 24-month observation period. Four biomarkers were also analyzed when available (thymus and activation-regulated chemokine [TARC], lactate dehydrogenase [LDH], total immunoglobulin E [IgE], and peripheral blood eosinophil counts [PB EOS]). Spearman's correlation coefficients were calculated using all available pooled data from baseline through 24 months. RESULTS: Correlations between the three clinician-reported outcomes were high/very high (Spearman's correlation coefficients 0.76-0.92); those between the three dermatological patient-reported outcomes were moderate (0.53-0.64), and those between the clinician-reported and dermatological patient-reported outcomes were low/moderate (0.37-0.51). Correlations between the general HRQoL patient-reported outcomes and the clinician-reported and dermatological patient-reported outcomes were negligible-moderate (0.26-0.60). Biomarker correlations with the clinician-reported and dermatological patient-reported outcomes were low/moderate for TARC and LDH (0.44-0.63), but negligible/low for PB EOS and total IgE (0.01-0.41). CONCLUSIONS: These results show that clinician- and patient-reported outcomes do not necessarily correlate well in Japanese adults with AD. This highlights the importance of including patient-reported outcomes when assessing disease severity/impact, planning treatment, and assessing response to treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR) Identifier UMIN000022623.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a long-term recurring skin disease that needs monitoring over time. Various measures (outcomes) are used to assess the severity of AD and its effect on patients. Some outcomes are based on examinations used by clinicians (doctors). Others are based on questionnaires used by patients themselves to report how severe they feel their AD is, and how it affects their lives. It is not known how well these different measures correlate with one another (how a severity score given by one outcome agrees with that given by another outcome), especially in Asian patients. This analysis used information from ADDRESS-J, a study that followed Japanese adults with moderate-to-severe AD who were treated for AD in the real world for a period of 2 years. It used a statistical method to compare three clinician-reported severity outcomes, three dermatological (skin-related) patient-reported outcomes, and two general health-related quality of life patient-reported outcomes. Agreement between the three clinician-reported outcomes was high or very high. Agreement between the three dermatological patient-reported outcomes was moderate. However, importantly, agreement between the clinician-reported outcomes and the dermatological patient-reported outcomes was low or moderate. Agreement between the general health-related quality of life outcomes and all other dermatological outcomes (whether clinician- or patient-reported) was low or moderate. The study showed that clinician-reported and patient-reported AD outcomes do not necessarily agree well in Japanese adults with AD. This highlights the importance of including patient-reported outcomes when evaluating AD, planning treatment, or judging how well patients are responding to treatment.

Tralokinumab Provides Clinically Meaningful Responses at Week 16 in Adults with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis Who Do Not Achieve IGA 0/1.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Investigator's Global Assessment of clear/almost clear skin (IGA 0/1) is a difficult endpoint to achieve after short-term treatment of chronic moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis, and does not fully reflect clinically meaningful changes in other parameters. We assessed the impact of tralokinumab versus placebo on other clinically meaningful parameters in patients not achieving IGA 0/1 at week 16 using pooled data from two monotherapy phase III trials, ECZTRA 1 and 2. METHODS: This post hoc analysis included patients (n = 1328) from ECZTRA 1 and 2 who did not achieve the co-primary endpoint, IGA 0/1 at week 16 without rescue medication. Endpoints evaluating atopic dermatitis extent and severity included proportions of patients achieving IGA 0/1, 50%, 75%, and 90% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-50/75/90); endpoints evaluating patient-reported outcomes included a ≥ 3-point improvement in worst daily pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), a ≥ 3-point improvement in eczema-related sleep interference (sleep) NRS, a ≥ 4-point improvement in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and DLQI ≤ 5. Specifically, clinically meaningful responses were defined as EASI-50, a ≥ 3-point improvement in itch NRS, or a ≥ 4-point improvement in DLQI at week 16. RESULTS: Among ECZTRA 1 and 2 patients who did not achieve IGA 0/1 at week 16 without rescue medication, a significantly greater proportion of patients receiving tralokinumab versus placebo achieved EASI-50 (33.0% vs 13.0%), a ≥ 3-point improvement in itch NRS (22.6% vs 9.4%), or a ≥ 4-point improvement in DLQI (41.2% vs 24.5%) at week 16. In addition, compared with placebo, a numerically greater proportion of tralokinumab-treated patients achieved all three measures of clinically meaningful response (30% vs 18%) or a clinically meaningful change in at least one outcome (48.8% vs 28.5%). Significantly greater proportions of patients receiving tralokinumab versus placebo achieved additional clinician-reported and patient-reported outcomes, such as EASI-75 (13.5% vs 4.1%), EASI-90 (3.5% vs 1.1%), DLQI ≤ 5 (22.5% vs 12.5%), and a ≥ 3-point improvement in sleep NRS (24.5% vs 11.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Tralokinumab provided clinically meaningful responses in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis who did not achieve IGA 0/1 at week 16 and/or used rescue medication. Using multiple validated outcome measures of both efficacy and quality of life, alongside IGA scores, can better characterize tralokinumab treatment responses in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. [Video abstract available] CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03131648 (ECZTRA 1); study start date: 30 May, 2017; primary completion date: 7 August, 2018; study completion date: 10 October, 2019. NCT03160885 (ECZTRA 2); study start date: 12 June, 2017; primary completion date: 4 September, 2019; study completion date: 14 August, 2019. Video abstract: Tralokinumab provides clinically meaningful responses at week 16 in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis who do not achieve IGA 0/1 (MP4 362818 KB).

Safety and Efficacy of Upadacitinib for Atopic Dermatitis in Japan: Analysis of the 3-Year Phase 3 Rising Up Study.

INTRODUCTION: Upadacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor approved in multiple countries for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). Here we present long-term data for up to 3 years of continuous upadacitinib treatment in Japanese patients with AD. METHODS: Rising Up was a phase 3, randomized, multicenter study in Japan investigating the safety and efficacy of upadacitinib in patients with moderate-to-severe AD. Patients aged 12-75 years (weight ≥ 40 kg if < 18 years) were randomized 1:1:1 to receive upadacitinib 15 mg, upadacitinib 30 mg, or placebo through week 16 (all in combination with topical corticosteroids). At week 16, patients who received placebo were rerandomized 1:1 to upadacitinib 15 mg or 30 mg; topical corticosteroids were optional per investigator discretion from weeks 16-160. Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events (AEs). Efficacy assessments included patients who achieved ≥ 75%/≥ 90% improvement from baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI 75/90), clear/almost clear on the validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD 0/1), or a ≥ 4-point improvement from baseline in Worst Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (WP-NRS). RESULTS: Of 272 patients enrolled, 230 completed the study. Through week 160, the long-term incidence rate of overall AEs was numerically higher with upadacitinib 30 mg than 15 mg; rates of serious AEs, AEs considered possibly related to study drug, AEs leading to discontinuation, and AEs of special interest were generally low and similar between dose groups. EASI 75, EASI 90, vIGA-AD 0/1, and WP-NRS response rates were generally greater with upadacitinib 30 mg than 15 mg and maintained through week 160 with either dose. CONCLUSION: For up to 3 years of continuous treatment, upadacitinib was well tolerated in Japanese patients, with a similar safety profile to that of short-term studies and durable long-term response rates for skin clearance and itch improvement. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03661138.

How to use the Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema Core Outcome Set for atopic dermatitis trials: a users' guide.

BACKGROUND: The Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema (HOME) initiative has agreed upon the Core Outcome Set (COS) for use in atopic dermatitis (AD) clinical trials, but additional guidance is needed to maximize its uptake. OBJECTIVES: To provide answers to some of the commonly asked questions about using the HOME COS; to provide data to help with the interpretation of trial results; and to support sample size calculations for future trials. METHODS AND RESULTS: We provide practical guidance on the use of the HOME COS for investigators planning clinical trials in patients with AD. It answers some of the common questions about using the HOME COS, how to access the outcome measurement instruments, what training/resources are needed to use them appropriately and clarifies when the COS is applicable. We also provide exemplar data to inform sample size calculations for eczema trials and encourage standardized data collection and reporting of the COS. CONCLUSIONS: By encouraging adoption of the COS and facilitating consistent reporting of outcome data, it is hoped that the results of eczema trials will be more comprehensive and readily combined in meta-analyses and that patient care will subsequently be improved.

[JAPANESE TRANSLATION AND LINGUISTIC VALIDATION OF THE RECAP OF ATOPIC ECZEMA (RECAP)].

BACKGROUND: The Recap of atopic eczema (RECAP), a new core outcome of the atopic dermatitis trial, was translated into Japanese and linguistically validated. METHODS: Translation into Japanese was accomplished according to the ISPOR (International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcome Research) guidelines and the basic guidelines for scale translation. The translation process included two forward translations, reconciliation with native English speakers, third-party back translation, cognitive debriefing, review and harmonization by the original authors. Twenty-seven atopic dermatitis and pediatric specialists from 21 centers in Japan participated in the translation process. Cognitive debriefing was conducted through face-to-face interviews using a think-aloud method with the interview guide including questions about comprehensibility, relevance, comprehensiveness, recall period and suggested improvements, based on the COSMIN methodology. RESULTS: No linguistic or cultural problems were encountered in the translation into Japanese. Cognitive debriefings were conducted with 10 adult patients and 10 parents of pediatric patients. Some minor modifications were made following discussion and approval by the research team and the original authors. The Japanese version of RECAP was considered to be understandable, comprehensive and relevant for adult patients and families of pediatric patients. CONCLUSION: The Japanese version of the RECAP, which has been validated as linguistically equivalent to the original version, is now available. Further evaluation of the measurement properties is needed in the future.

Tralokinumab Efficacy Over 1 Year in Adults with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: Pooled Data from Two Phase III Trials.

BACKGROUND: Two phase III trials, ECZTRA 1 and 2, confirmed the efficacy and safety of tralokinumab versus placebo in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). To further explore the long-term efficacy of tralokinumab for AD, a pooled analysis of these trials was conducted. METHODS: ECZTRA 1 and 2 patients (n = 1596 total) were randomized to tralokinumab 300 mg or placebo every 2 weeks (q2w) over 16 weeks. Patients achieving Investigator's Global Assessment of clear/almost clear skin (IGA 0/1) and/or 75% improvement in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-75) at Week 16, were re-randomized to tralokinumab q2w, every 4 weeks (q4w), or placebo (tralokinumab withdrawal) for another 36 weeks. Patients not achieving the response criteria at Week 16 received open-label tralokinumab q2w plus optional topical corticosteroids (TCS). A pooled, prespecified analysis assessed the proportions of Week 16 responders that maintained IGA 0/1 and/or EASI-75 at Week 52. Pooled data from all patients initiated with tralokinumab, regardless of the response at Week 16 or dosing regimen received thereafter, were analyzed post hoc. RESULTS: In patients who achieved the primary endpoints at Week 16, IGA 0/1 responses were maintained at Week 52 without rescue treatment (including TCS) by 55.9%, 42.4%, and 34.0% of patients re-randomized to tralokinumab q2w, q4w, or placebo (tralokinumab withdrawal), respectively, while EASI-75 responses were maintained by 57.3%, 50.4%, and 26.4%, respectively (prespecified analysis). In a post hoc analysis of all patients initiated with tralokinumab, response rates improved over time with continued tralokinumab treatment beyond Week 16 to Week 52 for EASI-50 (63.1-82.7%), EASI-75 (37.6-61.8%), EASI-90 (20.4-37.3%), and IGA 0/1 (23.0-36.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Tralokinumab treatment provides progressive and sustained improvement over 1 year in the extent and severity of AD in patients with moderate-to-severe AD. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03131648 (ECZTRA 1); study start date: 30 May 2017; primary completion date: 7 August 2018; study completion date: 10 October 2019. NCT03160885 (ECZTRA 2); study start date: 12 June 2017; primary completion date: 4 September 2019; study completion date: 14 August 2019. INFOGRAPHIC.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by excessively dry and itchy skin, resulting in a considerable burden of disease. Patients with AD often require long-term treatment. Tralokinumab is an injectable antibody treatment that targets a protein called interleukin-13, which substantially contributes to the signs and symptoms of AD. In the ECZTRA 1 and 2 phase III clinical trials, funded by LEO Pharma A/S, adults with moderate-to-severe AD treated with tralokinumab every other week for 16 weeks showed significant improvement in disease extent and severity compared with patients receiving placebo. To further explore the long-term efficacy of tralokinumab for AD, we performed a new analysis combining the almost 1600 patients of ECZTRA 1 and 2. A large proportion of patients treated with tralokinumab who achieved clear or almost clear skin at Week 16 were able to maintain clear or almost clear skin at Week 52 with less frequent dosing (every 4 weeks). Additionally, combining all patients treated with tralokinumab, regardless of Week 16 response or dose frequency thereafter, showed that most patients achieved a significant reduction in disease extent and severity at Week 52. These results demonstrate that many tralokinumab-treated patients continue to improve beyond Week 16, and highlight that efficacy results at Week 16 may not be representative of the outcome of longer-term tralokinumab treatment. These findings may help health care providers better advise patients regarding when to modify treatment with tralokinumab.

The Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema (HOME) implementation roadmap.

BACKGROUND: Core outcome sets (COS) are consensus-driven sets of minimum outcomes that should be measured and reported in all clinical trials. COS aim to reduce heterogeneity in outcome measurement and reporting, and selective outcome reporting. Implementing COS into clinical trials is challenging. Guidance to improve COS uptake in dermatology is lacking. OBJECTIVES: To develop a structured practical guide to COS implementation. METHODS: Members of the Harmonising Outcome Measurement for Eczema (HOME) executive committee developed an expert opinion-based roadmap founded on a combination of a review of the COS implementation literature, the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative resources, input from HOME members and experience in COS development and clinical trials. RESULTS: The data review and input from HOME members was synthesized into themes, which guided roadmap development: (a) barriers and facilitators to COS uptake based on stakeholder awareness/engagement and COS features; and (b) key implementation science principles (assessment-driven, data-centred, priority-based and context-sensitive). The HOME implementation roadmap follows three stages. Firstly, the COS uptake scope and goals need to be defined. Secondly, during COS development, preparation for future implementation is supported by establishing the COS as a credible evidence-informed consensus by applying robust COS development methodology, engaging multiple stakeholders, fostering sustained and global engagement, emphasizing COS ease of use and universal applicability, and providing recommendations on COS use. Thirdly, incorporating completed COS into primary (trials) and secondary (reviews) research is an iterative process starting with mapping COS uptake and stakeholders' attitudes, followed by designing and carrying out targeted implementation projects. Main themes for implementation projects identified at HOME are stakeholder awareness/engagement; universal applicability for different populations; and improving ease-of-use by reducing administrative and study burden. Formal implementation frameworks can be used to identify implementation barriers/facilitators and to design implementation strategies. The effect of these strategies on uptake should be evaluated and implementation plans adjusted accordingly. CONCLUSIONS: COS can improve the quality and applicability of research and, so, clinical practice but can only succeed if used and reported consistently. The HOME implementation roadmap is an extension of the original HOME roadmap for COS development and provides a pragmatic framework to develop COS implementation strategies.

English version of Japanese guidance for biologics in treating atopic dermatitis.

This is the English version of the Japanese guidance for biologics in treating atopic dermatitis (AD). The signaling pathway mediated by interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13 contributes to type 2 inflammatory responses and plays an important role in the pathogenesis of AD. IL-31 is a cytokine mainly produced by activated T cells and is known to be involved in the pruritus of AD. Biologics for AD have been approved, including dupilumab, an anti-IL-4 receptor α antibody that was approved for expanded use in AD in 2018. In 2022, nemolizumab, an anti-IL-31 receptor α antibody, was approved for pruritus of AD, and tralokinumab, an anti-IL-13 antibody, was approved for AD. Physicians who intend to use these drugs should sufficiently understand and comply with the contents of the guidelines prepared by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare to promote the optimal use of the drugs. In treatment with biologics, it is important to consider disease factors (activity and severity), treatment factors (dosage and administration as well as the efficacy and safety), and patients' background characteristics (age and comorbidities) and share this information with patients when choosing treatment options. This guidance was developed for board-certified dermatologists who specialize in treating AD, and for promoting the proper use of biologics, taking into account the variety of factors in individual patients.

Dupilumab Provides Clinically Meaningful Responses in Children Aged 6-11 Years with Severe Atopic Dermatitis: Post Hoc Analysis Results from a Phase III Trial.

BACKGROUND: Children with severe atopic dermatitis (AD) have a multidimensional disease burden. OBJECTIVE: Here we assess the clinically meaningful improvements in AD signs, symptoms, and quality of life (QoL) in children aged 6-11 years with severe AD treated with dupilumab compared with placebo. METHODS: R668-AD-1652 LIBERTY AD PEDS was a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, phase III clinical trial of dupilumab with concomitant topical corticosteroids (TCS) in children aged 6-11 years with severe AD. This post hoc analysis focuses on 304 patients receiving either dupilumab or placebo with TCS and assessed the percentage of patients considered responsive to dupilumab treatment at week 16. RESULTS: At week 16, almost all patients receiving dupilumab + TCS (95%) demonstrated clinically meaningful improvements in AD signs, symptoms, or QoL compared with placebo + TCS (61%, p < 0.0001). Significant improvements were seen as early as week 2 and sustained through the end of the study in the full analysis set (FAS) and the subgroup of patients with an Investigator's Global Assessment score greater than 1 at week 16. LIMITATIONS: Limitations include the post hoc nature of the analysis and that some outcomes were not prespecified; the small number of patients in some subgroups potentially limits generalizability of findings. CONCLUSION: Treatment with dupilumab provides significant and sustained improvements within 2 weeks in AD signs, symptoms, and QoL in almost all children with severe AD, including those who did not achieve clear or almost clear skin by week 16. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03345914. Video Abstract: Does dupilumab provide clinically meaningful responses in children 6 to 11 years old with severe atopic dermatitis? (MP4 99484 kb).

Abrocitinib efficacy and safety in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: Results from phase 3 studies, including the long-term extension JADE EXTEND study.

BACKGROUND: Abrocitinib improved signs and symptoms of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) at 12 or 16 weeks in phase 3 studies with a manageable safety profile. Further understanding of the abrocitinib long-term efficacy and safety profile is important for its appropriate use in treating chronic AD. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the abrocitinib efficacy up to 48 weeks and long-term safety in patients with moderate-to-severe AD. METHODS: JADE EXTEND (NCT03422822) is an ongoing, phase 3, long-term extension study that enrolled patients from previous abrocitinib AD trials. This analysis focusses on patients from the phase 3 JADE MONO-1 (NCT03349060), JADE MONO-2 (NCT03575871) and JADE COMPARE (NCT03720470) studies who completed the full treatment period of placebo or abrocitinib (200 mg or 100 mg once daily) and subsequently entered JADE EXTEND. Efficacy endpoints included the proportion of patients achieving skin clearance (Investigator's Global Assessment [IGA] 0/1 [clear/almost clear]; ≥75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index [EASI-75]) and itch response (Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale [PP-NRS] severity ≥4-point improvement). Safety endpoints included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), serious TEAEs and TEAEs leading to discontinuation. Data cut-off: April 22, 2020. RESULTS: As of the data cut-off, ~70% and ~45% of patients received abrocitinib for ≥36 and ≥48 weeks, respectively. Nasopharyngitis, atopic dermatitis, nausea and upper respiratory tract infections were the most frequent TEAEs. Serious TEAEs occurred in 7% and 5% and TEAEs leading to study discontinuation occurred in 9% and 7% of patients receiving abrocitinib 200 mg and 100 mg, respectively. Week 48 efficacy responses with abrocitinib 200 mg and 100 mg were as follows: IGA 0/1 52% and 39%; EASI-75 82% and 67%, and PP-NRS severity ≥4-point improvement 68% and 51%. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with moderate-to-severe AD, long-term abrocitinib treatment resulted in clinically meaningful skin and pruritus improvement. The long-term safety profile was manageable and consistent with previous reports.

Topical Betamethasone Treatment of Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis with Ocular Involvement in the Acute Phase.

PURPOSE: To clarify the importance of administering topical steroids for the treatment of Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) / toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) with ocular involvement in the acute phase. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. METHODS: Using the medical records of acute SJS/TEN patients treated at the Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine Hospital, Kyoto, Japan, between July 2006 and July 2017, the ocular findings, topical steroid dosage, systemic steroid dosage, and ocular sequelae were retrospectively examined. The level of cytokines in tear fluid and serum samples was also analyzed. RESULTS: This study involved 13 cases. In 10 cases in whom the clinical courses were recorded before the start of steroid therapy, the mean acute ocular severity score (AOSS: 3 = very severe; 2 = severe; 1 = mild; 0 = none) was 2.8 ± 0.4 points in the severest phase. The mean systemic steroid dose after steroid pulse therapy was 694 ± 386 mg and the mean topical steroid (0.1% betamethasone eye drop and ointment) dose was 13.4 ± 3.3 times daily in the severest phase. Analysis of cytokine levels of 4 cases showed that a cytokine storm occurred in the tear fluid after the steroid pulse therapy. At final follow-up, 16 eyes of 8 patients had a logMAR visual acuity of ≤0, and no serious ocular sequelae were observed. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with SJS/TEN, ocular surface inflammation remains strong even after systemic inflammation has improved post steroid pulse therapy, thus suggesting that both systemic and topical steroid therapy should be administered appropriately.

Comparing how well abrocitinib and dupilumab treat atopic dermatitis signs and symptoms: a plain language summary.

WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?: Atopic dermatitis (AD, also called atopic eczema) is a skin disease that that can affect a person for a long time and causes red or flaky skin that can be itchy and uncomfortable. Healthcare providers can prescribe medicated creams and ointments to reduce the visible signs and symptoms of AD, but these treatments are not always enough to keep it under control. A new medicine called abrocitinib is taken every day as a tablet. Abrocitinib works by slowing a part of the body's defense mechanism, called immune response, that is not functioning properly in AD. The clinical study described in this plain language summary, called JADE DARE, investigated how well and how safely 26 weeks of treatment with abrocitinib worked in adults with AD compared to an injected medicine, called dupilumab, that is also approved for AD. WHAT WERE THE RESULTS?: The study showed that abrocitinib was more effective than dupilumab in providing itch relief after 2 weeks. In addition, people who were taking abrocitinib for 4 and 16 weeks experienced greater improvement in the visible skin signs of AD than people who were taking dupilumab. The number of people who had health complaints while taking abrocitinib was similar to the number of people who had health complaints while taking dupilumab. Most of these complaints were minor. WHAT DO THE RESULTS MEAN?: Abrocitinib was more effective than dupilumab in quickly improving the signs and symptoms of moderate or severe AD in people who did not show improvement with prescribed medications like creams or ointments. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04345367 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

The Treat-to-Target Project in Atopic Dermatitis: One Year On.

Atopic dermatitis is a chronic skin condition for which a range of systemic treatments have recently been approved. A treat-to-target strategy has been developed previously alongside an algorithm to guide the management of patients with atopic dermatitis. Here, we review the strategy and algorithm in the context of the evolving therapeutic landscape, and identify areas for further refinement and development.

Developing integrated care pathways for atopic dermatitis-Challenges and unmet needs.

BACKGROUND: GA2 LEN-ADCARE is a branch of the largest multidisciplinary network of research centres and clinical care in allergy and asthma, GA2 LEN, focussing on the field of atopic dermatitis (AD). AD is a chronic inflammatory skin disease with high burden and many comorbidities requiring different levels of treatment. The need for aligned information from all involved healthcare providers led to the discussion of an integrated care pathway (ICP) plan for AD patient care involving all stakeholders and considering the complexity and variability of the disease, with a particular focus placed on the large number of patients with milder forms of AD. METHODS: The GA2 LEN ADCARE network and all stakeholders, abbreviated the AD-ICPs working group, were involved in the discussion and preparation of the AD-ICPs during a series of subgroup workshops and meetings in years 2020 and 2021. RESULTS: Here we discuss the unmet needs in AD, the methodology for devising an AD-ICP and the ICP action plan. CONCLUSION: The GA2 LEN ADCARE network has outlined the unmet needs in AD and provided an action plan for devising AD-ICPs, considering the complexity and variability of the disease.