Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Patient Prefer Adherence ; 8: 1699-704, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25525346

RESUMO

Persons with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are known to have poor sleep quality. Acceptance of and adherence to therapies for sleep problems may depend on how the person with COPD regards the source of his sleep problem, yet little is known about their attribution as to the cause of these sleep symptoms. The objective of this study was to describe the subjective sleep complaints of individuals with COPD along with their attributions as to the cause of these symptoms, and their treatment preferences for insomnia. Three focus groups were conducted (N=18) with participants who have moderate to severe COPD. Focus group data were transcribed, compared and contrasted to identify themes of attribution. Participants reported difficulty falling asleep, staying asleep, and daytime sleepiness. They attributed their sleep problems primarily to their pulmonary symptoms, but also poor air quality (thick humid air) and death anxiety when awake during the night. There was no clear preference for type of treatment to remedy this problem (medication, cognitive therapy), although they indicated that traveling to the clinic was difficult and should be avoided as much as possible. These data suggest that environmental manipulation to improve air quality (eg, air conditioning) and modifications to reduce death anxiety could be beneficial to persons with COPD. In-person multi-session therapy may not be acceptable to persons with moderate to severe COPD, however internet-based therapy might make treatment more accessible.

2.
J Comp Eff Res ; 2(3): 313-24, 2013 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24236630

RESUMO

AIMS: This study aimed to identify methods to engage hard-to-reach patients in the research process. MATERIALS & METHODS: With funding from the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (Washington, DC, USA), the University of Maryland (MD, USA) conducted 20 focus groups and one individual interview. The sample consisted of six groups of hard-to-reach patients, two groups of healthcare providers who work with hard-to-reach patients and two groups of surrogates of hard-to-reach patients. RESULTS & CONCLUSION: In order to make patient-centered outcomes research more meaningful to patients and their caregivers, patient-centered outcomes research should be conducted with a focus on building and maintaining trust, which is achieved via pre-engagement with communities and continuous engagement of study participants and their communities.


Assuntos
Atenção à Saúde/organização & administração , Avaliação de Resultados da Assistência ao Paciente , Assistência Centrada no Paciente/organização & administração , Baltimore , Cuidadores , Barreiras de Comunicação , Meios de Comunicação/estatística & dados numéricos , Compreensão , Coleta de Dados , Revelação , Feminino , Grupos Focais , Pessoal de Saúde , Humanos , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido , Acontecimentos que Mudam a Vida , Masculino , Prontuários Médicos , Saúde das Minorias , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Satisfação do Paciente , Relações Profissional-Paciente , Apoio Social , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Confiança , Populações Vulneráveis
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA