Association of Preserved Ratio Impaired Spirometry (PRISm) with Arterial Stiffness.

RATIONALE: Preserved ratio impaired spirometry (PRISm) is a recently recognized spirometric pattern defined by forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) / Forced vital capacity ratio ≥0.70 and FEV1 <80% of reference. For unclear reasons, PRISm is associated with increased cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality. Arterial stiffness is a major mechanism of CV disease, which can be measured by carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV). OBJECTIVES: We explored the hypothesis that cfPWV would be increased in individuals with PRISm and airflow limitation (AL). METHODS: We measured forced spirometry, lung volumes by body plethysmography, and cfPWV in 9,466 subjects recruited from the general population in the Austrian cross-sectional LEAD study, and tested the association of arterial stiffness with PRISm and AL by multivariable linear regression analysis. Individuals aged 18 years and under as well as those with missing cfPWV or co-variates were excluded from further analysis. RESULTS: Individuals with PRISm (n = 431, 4.6%) were of similar age to those with normal spirometry (n = 8136, 85.9%) and significantly younger than those with AL (n = 899, 9.5%). Arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, heart failure and peripheral arterial occlusive disease were significantly more common in individuals with PRISm compared to normal lung function and similar to those with AL. There was a significant association between PRISm and arterial stiffness on bivariate linear regression analysis (crude model; ß = 0.038; 95% CI, 0.016 - 0.058), which persisted after robust adjustment for clinical confounders upon multivariable analysis (final model; ß = 0.017; 95% CI, 0.001 - 0.032). CfPWV was significantly higher in individuals with PRISm irrespective of the presence of established CV disease or pulmonary restriction. AL also showed a significant association with arterial stiffness on multivariable linear regression analysis (final model; 95% CI, ß = 0.025, 0.009 - 0.042). CONCLUSIONS: Arterial stiffness measured by cfPWV is increased in individuals with PRISm independent from CV disease and risk factors. The pathobiological mechanisms underlying this association deserve further research.

Antiplatelet Therapy and Anticoagulation before, during, and after Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remains a major challenge in clinical practice, requiring rapid and effective antithrombotic treatment to mitigate adverse ischemic events while minimizing the risk of bleeding. In recent years, results from several clinical trials addressing this issue through various approaches have substantially improved the treatment landscape for patients presenting with ACS. The emergence of new, potent P2Y12 inhibitors has significantly enhanced thrombotic risk reduction and different strategies for de-escalating and shortening dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) have demonstrated promising outcomes in reducing bleeding rates. Furthermore, data from ongoing trials focusing on novel therapeutic agents and investigating alternative treatment strategies to optimize outcomes for ACS patients are expected in the next few years. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge and emphasize the critical role of individualized treatment approaches tailored to patient-specific risk factors and individual clinical scenarios.

The LIPL study: Postprandial lipid profile, inflammation, and platelet activity in patients with chronic coronary syndrome.

Background and aims: It is suggested that the changes in atherosclerosis happen mainly under the influence of non-fasting lipids. To date, the studies in the postprandial state were primarily performed on healthy subjects. This exploratory, cross-sectional study investigates the change in lipid profile, inflammation, and platelet activation in patients with different cardiovascular risk profiles in the postprandial state. Methods: The studied population consists of 66 patients with different cardiovascular risks: patients with a history of the chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) and diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM2) (n = 20), CCS without DM2 (n = 25), and a healthy control group (n = 21). Lipid variables and markers of platelet function and inflammation were assessed during the fasting state and three and 5 h after a standardized fat meal using a standardized oral fat tolerance test (OFTT), a milkshake with 90 g of fat. Results: Patients with CCS and DM2 were significantly older and had the highest BMI. All patients with CCS were on acetylsalicylic acid, and 95% of CCS patients were on high-dose statins. The absolute leukocyte and neutrophile count increased significantly in the control group during the OFTT in comparison to CCS subjects. There was a significant decrease of HDL and increase of triglycerides during the OFTT, however with no difference between groups. There was no difference in the change of platelet activity between all groups. Conclusion: This study showed that OFTT leads to an increased postprandial inflammation response in healthy group compared to CCS ± DM2 while there was no change in lipid profile and platelet activity.

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reduction with immediate combination therapy of statin and ezetimibe compared to statin monotherapy after percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend a stepwise initiation of lipid-lowering therapy after percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) in treatment-naïve individuals. Patients might benefit from an earlier and stronger low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction through upfront combination therapies. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients without previous lipid-lowering therapy undergoing acute or elective PCI with stent implantation between January 2016 and December 2019. Patients initiated on statin monotherapy vs. a combination of statin and ezetimibe were compared. The primary endpoint was an LDL­C reduction into the target range of < 55 mg/dL at 3 months. The secondary endpoint was the occurrence of major cardiovascular events (MACE). RESULTS: A total of 204 lipid-lowering therapy naive patients were included, of whom 157 (77.0%) received statin monotherapy and 47 (23.0%) combination therapy. Median LDL­C levels were higher in patients initiated on combination therapy vs. monotherapy (140 mg/dL, interquartile range, IQR, 123-167 mg/dL vs. 102 mg/dL, IQR 80-136 mg/dL, p < 0.001). The LDL­C reduction was greater in patients treated with combination therapy vs. statin monotherapy (-73 mg/dL, -52.1% vs. -43 mg/dL, -42.2%, p < 0.001). While the primary endpoint was similar between groups (44.7% vs. 36.1%, p = 0.275), combination therapy significantly increased the proportion of patients achieving the treatment target in the presence of an admission LDL-C > 120 mg/dL (46.2% vs. 26.2%, p = 0.031). The rates of MACE were similar between the two groups (10.6% vs. 17.8%, p = 0.237) at a median follow-up of 2.2 years, IQR 1.46-3.10 years. CONCLUSION: Immediate initiation of high-intensity statin and ezetimibe treatment might be considered as the default strategy in treatment-naïve patients with high admission LDL­C undergoing PCI.

Cardiac inflammation associated with COVID-19 mRNA vaccination in patients with and without previous myocarditis.

BACKGROUND: mRNA COVID-19 vaccines have been associated with myocarditis in the general population. However, application of gold standard techniques is often missing, and data about patients with history of myocarditis have not been reported yet. METHODS: We evaluated 21 patients (median age 27, 86% males) for suspected myocarditis after receiving mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. We divided cases with previous diagnosis of myocarditis (PM, N.=7), from naïve controls (NM, N.=14). All patients were investigated thoroughly by cardiac magnetic resonance (100%) with or without endomyocardial biopsy (14%). RESULTS: Overall, 57% of patients met updated Lake Louise criteria and none fulfilled Dallas criteria, with no remarkable differences between groups. Acute coronary syndrome-like presentation was more frequent in NM with earlier normalization of troponin than PM. NM and PM already healed from myocarditis were clinically comparable, whereas PM with active inflammation had subtle presentation and were evaluated for immunosuppressive therapy modulation. None had fulminant myocarditis and/or malignant ventricular arrhythmia at presentation. No major cardiac events occurred by 3 months. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the suspicion of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine-associated myocarditis was inconstantly confirmed by gold standard diagnostics. Myocarditis was uncomplicated in both PM and NM patients. Larger studies with longer follow-up are needed to validate COVID-19 vaccination in this population.

Association of Interleukin-32 and Interleukin-34 with Cardiovascular Disease and Short-Term Mortality in COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: Excess cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality has been observed in patients with COVID-19. Both interleukin-32 (IL-32) and interleukin-34 (IL-34) have been hypothesized to contribute to CV involvement in COVID-19. METHODS: This prospective, observational study of patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 infection was conducted from 6 June to 22 December 2020 in a tertiary care hospital in Vienna, Austria. IL-32 and IL-34 levels on admission were collected and tested for their association with CV disease and short-term mortality in patients with COVID-19. CV disease was defined by the presence of coronary artery disease, heart failure, stroke or atrial fibrillation and patients were stratified by CV disease burden. RESULTS: A total of 245 eligible patients with COVID-19 were included, of whom 37 (15.1%) reached the primary endpoint of 28-day mortality. Of the total sample, 161 had no CV disease (65.7%), 69 had one or two CV diseases (28.2%) and 15 patients had ≥three CV diseases (6.1%). Median levels of IL-32 and IL-34 at admission were comparable across the three groups of CV disease burden. IL-32 and IL-34 failed to predict mortality upon both univariable and multivariable Cox regression analysis. The two CV disease groups, however, had a significantly higher risk of mortality within 28 days (one or two CV diseases: crude HR 4.085 (95% CI, 1.913-8.725), p < 0.001 and ≥three CV diseases: crude HR 13.173 (95% CI, 5.425-31.985), p < 0.001). This association persisted for those with ≥three CV diseases after adjustment for age, gender and CV risk factors (adjusted HR 3.942 (95% CI, 1.288-12.068), p = 0.016). CONCLUSION: In our study population of hospitalized patients with COVID-19, IL-32 and IL-34 did not show any associations with CV disease or 28-day mortality in the context of COVID-19. Patients with multiple CV diseases, however, had a significantly increased risk of short-term mortality.

Short dual antiplatelet therapy and dual antiplatelet therapy de-escalation after primary percutaneous intervention: For whom and how.

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 6-12 months, followed by lifelong aspirin monotherapy is considered an effective standard therapy for the prevention of thrombo-ischemic events in patients with acute and chronic coronary syndrome (ACS, CCS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or after a primarily conservative treatment decision. In ACS patients, the stronger P2Y12-inhibitors ticagrelor or prasugrel are recommended in combination with aspirin unless the individual bleeding risk is high and shortening of DAPT is warranted or clopidogrel is preferred. However, also in patients at low individual bleeding risk, DAPT is associated with a higher risk of bleeding. In recent years, new antithrombotic treatment strategies, such as shortening DAPT followed by early P2Y12-inhibitor monotherapy and de-escalating DAPT from potent P2Y12-inhibitors to clopidogrel by maintaining DAPT duration time, have been investigated in clinical trials and shown to reduce bleeding complications in cardiovascular high-risk patients without negative effects on ischemic events. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge and discuss its implication on future antithrombotic strategies in terms of a personalized medicine.

Neutrophile-Lymphocyte Ratio and Outcome in Takotsubo Syndrome.

Background: Takotsubo syndrome (TTS) is an important type of acute heart failure with significant risk of acute complications and death. In this analysis we sought to identify predictors for in-hospital clinical outcome in TTS patients and present long-term outcomes. Methods: In this analysis from the Austrian national TTS registry, univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to identify significant predictors for severe in-hospital complications requiring immediate invasive treatment or leading to irreversible damage, such as cardiogenic shock, intubation, stroke, arrhythmias and death. Furthermore, the influence of independent predictors on long-term survival was evaluated. Results: A total of 338 patients (median age 72 years, 86.9% female) from six centers were included. Severe in-hospital complications occurred in 14.5% of patients. In multivariable analysis, high neutrophile-lymphocyte-ratio (NLR; OR 1.04 [95% CI 1.02−1.07], p = 0.009) and low LVEF (OR 0.92 [0.90−0.95] per %, p < 0.001) were significant predictors of severe in-hospital complications. Both the highest NLR tercile and the lowest LVEF tercile were significantly associated with reduced 5-year survival. Conclusions: Low LVEF and high NLR at admission were independently associated with increased in-hospital complications and reduced long-term survival in TTS patients. NLR is a new easy-to-measure tool to predict worse short- and long-term outcome after TTS.

Biomarkers Associated with Cardiovascular Disease in COVID-19.

Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) emerged late December 2019 in the city of Wuhan, China and has since spread rapidly all over the world causing a global pandemic. While the respiratory system is the primary target of disease manifestation, COVID-19 has been shown to also affect several other organs, making it a rather complex, multi-system disease. As such, cardiovascular involvement has been a topic of discussion since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, primarily due to early reports of excessive myocardial injury in these patients. Treating physicians are faced with multiple challenges in the management and early triage of patients with COVID-19, as disease severity is highly variable ranging from an asymptomatic infection to critical cases rapidly deteriorating to intensive care treatment or even fatality. Laboratory biomarkers provide important prognostic information which can guide decision making in the emergency department, especially in patients with atypical presentations. Several cardiac biomarkers, most notably high-sensitive cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), have emerged as valuable predictors of prognosis in patients with COVID-19. The purpose of this review was to offer a concise summary on prognostic cardiac biomarkers in COVID-19 and discuss whether routine measurements of these biomarkers are warranted upon hospital admission.

Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in adults in a young male following severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 infection: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in adults (MIS-A) is a rare but potentially life-threatening condition that may occur during or in the weeks following severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 infection. To date, only case reports and small case series have described typical findings and management of patients with MIS-A. The prevalence of MIS-A is largely unknown due to the lack of data. CASE SUMMARY: A 30-year-old male patient presented to the emergency department with new-onset of fever, chest discomfort, macular exanthema, abdominal pain, mild dyspnoea, and coughing. The patient reported a mildly symptomatic recent coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19). Significantly increased markers of inflammation and a modest increase of cardiac troponin were found upon laboratory work-up at admission. Despite broad-spectrum antibiotics, the patient's clinical status deteriorated continuously. Cardiac work-up, including echocardiography, coronary angiography, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, was done and signs of acute myocarditis with mildly reduced left ventricular systolic function were found. The complex multi-organ symptom constellation facilitated the diagnosis of MIS-A following COVID-19 infection. Besides aspirin, intravenous, continuous hydrocortisone treatment was initiated, resulting in a prompt improvement of symptoms and clinical findings. DISCUSSION: We report a case of successfully treated MIS-A in the context of COVID-19, which further adds to the existing literature on this rare but clinically significant condition. Our case highlights the necessity of an interdisciplinary approach to correctly diagnose this complex, multi-organ disease and enable fast and appropriate management of these high-risk patients.

Prothrombotic Milieu, Thrombotic Events and Prophylactic Anticoagulation in Hospitalized COVID-19 Positive Patients: A Review.

The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. Although initial reports concentrated on severe respiratory illness, emerging literature has indicated a substantially elevated risk of thromboembolic events in patients with COVID-19 disease. Pro-inflammatory cytokine release has been linked to endothelial dysfunction and activation of coagulation pathways, as evident by elevated D-dimer levels and deranged coagulation parameters. Both macrovascular and microvascular thromboses have been described in observational cohort and post-mortem studies. Concurrently, preliminary data have suggested the role of therapeutic anticoagulation in preventing major thromboembolic complications in moderately but not critically ill patients. However, pending results from randomized controlled trials, clear guidance is lacking regarding the intensity and duration of anticoagulation in such patients. Herein, we review the existing evidence on incidence and pathophysiology of COVID-19 related thromboembolic complications and guide anticoagulation therapy based on current literature and societal consensus statements.

Improvement of outcome prediction of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 by a dual marker strategy using high-sensitive cardiac troponin I and copeptin.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 has been associated with a high prevalence of myocardial injury and increased cardiovascular morbidity. Copeptin, a marker of vasopressin release, has been previously established as a risk marker in both infectious and cardiovascular disease. METHODS: This prospective, observational study of patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 infection was conducted from June 6th to November 26th, 2020 in a tertiary care hospital. Copeptin and high-sensitive cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) levels on admission were collected and tested for their association with the primary composite endpoint of ICU admission or 28-day mortality. RESULTS: A total of 213 eligible patients with COVID-19 were included of whom 55 (25.8%) reached the primary endpoint. Median levels of copeptin and hs-cTnI at admission were significantly higher in patients with an adverse outcome (Copeptin 29.6 pmol/L, [IQR, 16.2-77.8] vs 17.2 pmol/L [IQR, 7.4-41.0] and hs-cTnI 22.8 ng/L [IQR, 11.5-97.5] vs 10.2 ng/L [5.5-23.1], P < 0.001 respectively). ROC analysis demonstrated an optimal cut-off of 19.3 pmol/L for copeptin and 16.8 ng/L for hs-cTnI and an increase of either biomarker was significantly associated with the primary endpoint. The combination of raised hs-cTnI and copeptin yielded a superior prognostic value to individual measurement of biomarkers and was a strong prognostic marker upon multivariable logistic regression analysis (OR 4.274 [95% CI, 1.995-9.154], P < 0.001). Addition of copeptin and hs-cTnI to established risk models improved C-statistics and net reclassification indices. CONCLUSION: The combination of raised copeptin and hs-cTnI upon admission is an independent predictor of ICU admission or 28-day mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.

Direct cardiovascular complications and indirect collateral damage during the COVID-19 pandemic : A review.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), puts a heavy strain on healthcare systems around the globe with high numbers of infected patients. Pre-existing cardiovascular disease is a major risk factor for a severe clinical course of COVID-19 and is associated with adverse outcome. COVID-19 may directly exacerbate underlying heart disease and is frequently aggravated by cardiovascular complications, including arterial and venous thromboembolic events, malignant arrhythmia and myocardial injury. In addition to these direct cardiac manifestations of COVID-19, patients with cardiovascular disease face further indirect consequences of the pandemic, as the respective resources in the healthcare systems need to be redirected to cope with the high numbers of infected patients. Consecutively, a substantial decrease in cardiac procedures was reported during the pandemic with lower numbers of coronary angiographies and device implantations worldwide. As a consequence an increased number of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests, late-comers with subacute myocardial infarction and of patients presenting in cardiogenic shock or preshock were observed. Maintenance of high-quality cardiac care by avoiding a reduction of cardiac services is of utmost importance, especially in times of a pandemic.

Red Cell Distribution Width Upon Hospital Admission Predicts Short-Term Mortality in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19: A Single-Center Experience.

Background: Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) was first described at the end of 2019 in China and has since spread across the globe. Red cell distribution width (RDW) is a potent prognostic marker in several medical conditions and has recently been suggested to be of prognostic value in COVID-19. Methods: This retrospective, observational study of consecutive patients with COVID-19 was conducted from March 12, 2020 to December 4, 2020 in the Wilhelminenhospital, Vienna, Austria. RDWlevels on admission were collected and tested for their predictive value of 28-day mortality. Results: A total of 423 eligible patients with COVID-19 were included in the final analyses and 15.4% died within 28 days (n = 65). Median levels of RDWwere significantly higher in non-survivors compared to survivors [14.6% (IQR, 13.7-16.3) vs. 13.4% (IQR, 12.7- 14.4), P < 0.001]. Increased RDW was a significant predictor of 28-day mortality [crude odds ratio (OR) 1.717, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.462-2.017; P = < 0.001], independent of clinical confounders, comorbidities and established prognostic markers of COVID-19 (adjusted OR of the final model 1.368, 95% CI 1.126-1.662; P = 0.002). This association remained consistent upon sub-group analysis. Our study data also demonstrate that RDW levels upon admission for COVID-19 were similar to previously recorded, non-COVID-19 associated RDW levels [14.2% (IQR, 13.3-15.7) vs. 14.0% [IQR, 13.2-15.1]; P = 0.187]. Conclusions: In this population, RDWwas a significant, independent prognostic marker of short-term mortality in patients with COVID-19.

Mid-regional pro-atrial natriuretic peptide independently predicts short-term mortality in COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: Mid-regional pro-atrial natriuretic peptide (MR-proANP) is a strong prognostic marker in several inflammatory, respiratory and cardiovascular conditions, but has not been studied in COVID-19 yet. METHODS: This prospective, observational study of patients with COVID-19 infection was conducted from 6 June to 26 November 2020 in different wards of a tertiary hospital. MR-proANP, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and high-sensitive cardiac troponin I levels on admission were collected and tested for their association with disease severity and 28-day mortality. RESULTS: A total of 213 eligible patients with COVID-19 were included in the final analyses of whom 13.2% (n = 28) died within 28 days. Median levels of MR-proANP at admission were significantly higher in nonsurvivors (307 pmol/L IQR, [161 - 532] vs 75 pmol/L [IQR, 43 - 153], P < .001) compared to survivors and increased with disease severity and level of hypoxaemia. The area under the ROC curve for MR-proANP predicting 28-day mortality was 0.832 (95% CI 0.753 - 0.912, P < .001). An optimal cut-off point of 160 pmol/L yielded a sensitivity of 82.1% and a specificity of 76.2%. MR-proANP was a significant predictor of 28-day mortality independent of clinical confounders, comorbidities and established prognostic markers of COVID-19 (HR 2.77, 95% CI 1.21 - 6.37; P = .016), while NT-proBNP failed to independently predict 28-day mortality and had a numerically lower AUC compared to MR-proANP. CONCLUSION: Higher levels of MR-proANP at admission are associated with disease severity of COVID-19 and act as a powerful and independent prognostic marker of 28-day mortality.

Immature cell fractions after cessation of chronic P2Y12-inhibition in patients with coronary artery diseases.

Changes in circulating cell populations may promote ischemic events that occur soon after discontinuation of P2Y12-inhibition. The aim of the study was to track the course of thrombopoietic and erythropoietic cells in patients with coronary artery diseases (CAD) after planned and physician-driven cessation of chronic P2Y12-inhibition (clopidogrel 75 mg OD, or prasugrel 10 mg OD, or ticagrelor 90 mg BID). Cell fractions were determined in 62 patients at baseline (the last day of P2Y12-inhibitor intake), on day-10, day-30, and day-180 thereafter. Immature platelet fraction (IPF), immature reticulocyte fraction (IRF), reticulocyte hemoglobin content (Ret-Hb) and red blood cell count (RBC) significantly increased from baseline to day-180 (IPF: p = .003; IRF: p = .013; Ret-Hb: p < .001; RBC: p = .044). Platelet count, leucocyte count and immature granulocyte fraction did not change over time (p = .561, p = .869, and p = .161, respectively). Fibrinogen levels significantly declined over time (p = .011), thrombopoietin levels increased in a non-significant manner (p = .379). We did not observe any significant interaction with choice of P2Y12-inhibitor, therefore suggesting a drug class-effect. Our data shows, that discontinuation of dual antiplatelet therapy is associated with raised thrombopoietic and erythropoietic activity in the bone marrow, without significant upregulation of thrombopoietin. This provides further evidence for a direct stimulation of precursor cells by P2Y12-inhibitors.

Effect of marathon and ultra-marathon on inflammation and iron homeostasis.

The physiological response to high-level endurance exercise, such as running a marathon, poses several beneficial but also potentially harmful metabolic changes. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of marathon (M) and ultra-marathon (UM) on inflammation and iron homeostasis in paired samples. Fifteen well-trained, non-professional endurance athletes (14 males, 1 female) performed both a 130 km ultra-marathon and a traditional 42.195 km marathon. We determined markers of inflammation and iron homeostasis before, immediately after, and within 5 days after finishing each run, respectively. Biomarkers of inflammation (leucocytes, neutrophil granulocytes, monocytes, and c-reactive protein [CRP]) increased significantly after both marathon and ultra-marathon with higher levels of CRP after ultra-marathon compared with marathon both immediately after the race (18.15 ± 12.41 vs 5.58 ± 9.65 mg/L, P < .001) and at follow-up (15.67 ± 16.97 vs 7.19 ± 7.75 mg/L, P = .045) Concentrations of ferritin also increased significantly after both races and remained high at follow-up. Higher levels of ferritin immediately after the race (111.5 ± 103.2 vs 84.8 ± 86.3, P = .001) and at follow-up (102.7 ± 79.5 vs 74.6 ± 65.6, P = .001) were found in ultra-marathon finishers. The observed increase of serum iron and transferrin saturation (TSAT) after marathon and the decrease of serum iron and TSAT after ultra-marathon resulted in a significant absolute difference between the two races. The present data suggest a higher degree of inflammation after ultra-marathon compared with marathon. Markers of iron homeostasis also showed different response patterns with regard to running distance.

Impella in cardiogenic shock following acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Cardiogenic shock (CS) conveys a high mortality risk. A cardiac assist device may serve as bridge to patient recovery. We aimed to provide a pooled estimate on mortality and complications from studies evaluating the use of the left ventricular assist device Impella in CS following acute myocardial infarction. In addition, we evaluated whether mortality risk differed with device placement before or after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: We searched Medline, Embase and Web of Science from 2005 until July 2019 for observational studies or clinical trials on this specific patient group. Studies were required to report on 30-day all-cause mortality and device-related complications. We calculated pooled proportions with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using random effects models and the inverse variance method. RESULTS: Overall, 671 patients from 11 studies (2 randomized and 9 observational) were included. Pooled proportions showed a 30-day mortality of 54.6% (95% CI 47.3-61.8; P = 0.22; I2 = 65.8%). Among complications, major bleeding was found in 19.9% (95% CI 14.2-27.3; P < 0.05; I2 = 69.1%), hemolysis in 10.5% (95% CI 7.2-15.0; P < 0.05; I2 = 52.1%), limb ischemia in 5.0% (95% CI 2.6-9.5; P < 0.05; I2 = 48.3%) and stroke in 3.8% of patients (95% CI 2.4-5.9; P < 0.05; I2 = 0%). Sensitivity analysis demonstrated a statistically significant risk reduction in 30-day mortality when Impella was implanted prior to PCI as compared to after PCI, risk ratio (RR): 0.71, CI 0.58-0.86, P = 0.001, I2 = 0%. CONCLUSION: Pooled estimates of Impella use in myocardial infarction with CS revealed a high 30-day mortality; however, as compared to post-PCI, Impella initiation prior to PCI was associated with a survival benefit.

Non-bacterial thrombotic endocarditis in the context of pulmonary adenocarcinoma: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Non-bacterial thrombotic endocarditis (NBTE) is a rare condition, usually observed in association with malignancy, lupus erythematosus, or antiphospholipid syndrome. Diagnosis of NBTE remains a challenge as patients are often asymptomatic up to their first thromboembolic event. While there is no randomized data available for the guidance of treatment in NBTE, effective anticoagulation remains the main focus in the management of affected patients. CASE SUMMARY: A 44-year-old female patient without a significant medical history presented to the emergency department with a new numbness of her right hand. Magnetic resonance imaging scans facilitated the diagnosis of supratentorial stroke. Within the next 3 months, the patient had multiple thromboembolic events, including multiple strokes, pulmonary embolism, and renal/splenic infarction. Echocardiographic examination revealed large, transient vegetations of the aortic valve with concomitant aortic regurgitation. In addition, an incidental, pulmonary non-small-cell adenocarcinoma was found during the diagnostic work-up. Infective endocarditis was excluded by several negative blood cultures and missing signs of infection. Hence, the diagnosis of NBTE secondary to malignancy was made. DISCUSSION: We present a rare case of NBTE in the context of pulmonary adenocarcinoma. The adequate treatment of malignancy and effective anticoagulation are the main treatment options.