Randomized controlled trial of pre-transplant zoledronate versus observation for prevention of bone loss in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Background: Approximately half of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) recipients experience significant bone loss in the early post-HCT period. Only recently have international guidelines started recommending early screening. However, the guidance for intervention remains conservative. In this study, we sought to evaluate the efficacy of pre-transplant prophylactic zoledronate in preventing early bone loss in allogeneic HCT recipients. Methods: This was an open-label, investigator-initiated, phase 2 randomized controlled trial (RCT) of prophylactic zoledronate versus observation to prevent bone loss in allogeneic HCT recipients. Recipients aged ≥ 18 years of age were included after informed consent and randomized to prophylactic zoledronate 4 mg pre-HCT or observation in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome of the study was bone mineral density (BMD) loss at the femoral neck (FN), total hip (TH), and lumbar spine (LS), as assessed using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) on day+100 post-HCT. The secondary outcomes included BMD loss on day+365 and Z scores on day+100 and day+365 at the FN, TH, and LS sites. Results: The trial was terminated because the interim analysis showed a significant benefit in the intervention arm, with 50% planned recruitment. A total of 40 patients were randomized to the zoledronate and control arms. Both arms were matched for age, sex, diagnosis, pre-HCT steroid exposure, body mass index, human leukocyte antigen (HLA) match, and conditioning intensity. The grade 2-4 acute graft versus host disease (GVHD) incidences were comparable. The primary endpoint of BMD loss at FN and TH at day+100 was significant (5.62% vs. -6.78%, p = 0.009, -1.59 vs. -3.98, p = 0.016, respectively). There was no difference in the secondary endpoint of BMD loss on day+365 compared to that on day+100 or baseline at any BMD site. There was no difference in the Z-scores at any site on day+100 or day+365. Conclusions: Prophylactic zoledronate prevented early bone loss on day+100. The indicated preemptive zoledronate beyond day+100 in recipients prevented further bone loss. Patients receiving prophylactic zoledronate may benefit from a supplementary dose of the indicated preemptive zoledronate.

GVHD relapse-free survival after peripheral blood hematopoietic cell transplantation for hematologic malignancies.

The preferred choice for hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) donors in India is a matched related donor (MRD) followed by a haploidentical (haplo) donor for patients with hematological malignancies. International data in the haplo-HCT setting is mainly using bone marrow as a source. Almost all HCTs in India use peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC), which increases the risk of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). In this single-center prospective study from 2017 to 2021, we sought to compare these outcomes prospectively in adult patients with hematological malignancies. Patient, disease, donor, and HCT details were prospectively recorded. GVHD prophylaxis included cyclosporine + methotrexate in MRD-HCT and post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) based in haplo-HCT. The primary endpoint GVHD relapse-free survival (GRFS) was defined as the time post-HCT without any of the following events: grade III-IV acute GVHD, chronic GVHD requiring systemic immunosuppressive treatment, disease relapse, or death from any cause. A total of 41 MRD and 33 haplo-HCT recipients were included in the study. Both cohorts were matched for age, sex, diagnosis, disease risk index, donor age, sex and CMV mismatches, and CD34 counts. A lower proportion of MRD-HCT recipients than haplo-HCT received myeloablative conditioning (39% vs. 76%, p = 0.002). There was no difference in the cumulative incidence of grade III-IV acute GVHD (16% vs. 27%, p = 0.2) or moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD (58% vs. 71%, p = 0.5). The one-year GRFS was not significantly different (53% vs. 38%, p = 0.2), with median GRFS of 420 and 274 days. The relapse incidence (22% vs. 19%, p = 0.6) and non-relapse mortality (25% vs. 35%, p = 0.4) did not differ. There was no difference in overall survival at one year (60% vs. 52%, p = 0.3). Despite a higher proportion of myeloablative conditioning in the haplo-HCT cohort, all outcomes, including GRFS, were comparable to those of the MRD-HCT cohort. This should encourage patients without an MRD to undergo haplo-HCT.

Factors Impacting Return to Work/School among Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Survivors in India.

Introduction: While there are data about return to work after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in survivors from resource-rich regions, similar data from resource-challenged settings are scarce. This study assessed the incidence of and factors affecting return to work/school (RTW) among HCT survivors in India. Methods: This single-center cross-sectional study was conducted at the long-term follow-up (LTFU) clinic of a large-volume HCT center during 2022-2023. HCT survivors surviving beyond four months were included after obtaining informed consent. Patients' sociodemographic, disease, HCT, and work details were recorded. The factors affecting RTW were evaluated using univariate (ANOVA) and logistic regression analyses. Results: A total of 126 HCT survivors participated in the study. Of these, 34 (27%) did not RTW, 47 (37%) returned to part-time work, and 45 (36%) returned to full-time work at a median of more than three years post-HCT. The three groups did not significantly differ in age, sex, or marital status. The univariate analysis revealed that education, pre-HCT job status, income, and conditioning intensity were significantly associated with RTW. Logistic regression analysis revealed that survivors with a higher (taxable) income were more likely to RTW than those with a lower (non-taxable) income (OR 3.5; CI 1.2-10.2, p=0.01). Survivors with a desk job were more likely to RTW than those who were unemployed/retired or students (OR 4.5; CI 1.1-18.0, p=0.03). Conclusion: Socioeconomic factors, like pre-HCT job status and income, were significantly associated with post-HCT RTW. Therefore, there is a need to integrate multidisciplinary RTW programs for HCT survivors in India.

Generic ibrutinib a potential cost-effective strategy for the first-line treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.

Though the chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) management options in India are still limited compared to the novel drug options in resource-rich settings, the availability of less costly generics and the government health insurance scheme has enabled many patients to access the newer drugs in India. The current study compared the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of existing initial management options for the progression-free survival (PFS) time horizon from the patient's perspective. A two-health-state, PFS and progressive disease, Markov model was assumed for three regimens (generics): ibrutinib monotherapy, bendamustine-rituximab (B-R), and rituximab-chlorambucil (RClb) used as the frontline treatment of CLL patients in India. All costs, utilization of services, and consequences data during the PFS period were collected from interviewing patients during follow-up visits. The transition probability (TP) and average PFS information were obtained from landmark published studies. EQ-5D-5L questionnaires were utilized to assess the quality of life (QoL). Quality-adjusted life years (QALY) were measured during the PFS period. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) were studied. Upon analysis, the entire monetary expense during the PFS time was ₹1581964 with ibrutinib, ₹171434 with B-R, and ₹91997 with RClb treatment arm. Pooled PFS and QALY gain was 10.33 and 8.28 years for ibrutinib, 4.08 and 3.53 years for the B-R regimen, and 1.33 and 1.23 years in RClb arms, respectively. Ibrutinib's ICER and ICUR were ₹214587.32 per PFS year gain and ₹282384.86 per QALY gain when assessed against the B-R regimen. Ibrutinib also performed better in ICER and ICUR against the RClb arm with ₹157014.29 per PFS year gain and ₹200413.6 per QALY gain. In conclusion, generic ibrutinib is a cost-effective initial line of management compared to other commonly used treatment regimes in resource-limited settings.

Utility of eGVHD App for bedside GVHD assessment in a high-volume BMT center.

Assessing acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is challenging because there are several classification systems. The European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation and the Center for International Bone Marrow Transplantation Registry task force recommends using the eGVHD application (App) to score acute GVHD according to the Mount Sinai Acute GvHD International Consortium (MAGIC) criteria and chronic GVHD according to the National Institutes of Health 2014 criteria. We prospectively used the eGVHD App at each follow-up visit in a large-volume bone-marrow transplant center in India from 2017 to 2021. We retrospectively evaluated the discrepancy in scoring GVHD severity by physicians not using the App from the same patient charts. The App user satisfaction and experience were recorded using the technology acceptance model (TAM) and the Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire (PSSUQ). In 100 consecutive allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation recipients, there was more discrepancy in scoring the severity of chronic GVHD (38%) than acute GVHD (9%) without using the App. The median TAM and PSSUQ scores were six (IQR:1) and two (IQR:1), respectively, indicating high perceived usefulness and user satisfaction. The eGVHD App is an excellent learning tool for hematology/BMT fellows and helps manage GVHD in high-volume BMT centers.

Role of fluoroquinolone prophylaxis in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in regions with a high prevalence of fluoroquinolone resistance.

Introduction: The role of fluoroquinolone (FQ) prophylaxis in preventing gram-negative bacilli (GNB) bacteremia, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and overall survival (OS) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is debatable and may differ in settings with low and high prevalences of FQ resistance. In this study, we aimed to answer this question in regions with high FQ resistance. Methods: This single-center retrospective study included all consecutive allo-HCT recipients aged ≥12 years from 2012 to 2021. Allo-HCT recipients until 2016 were administered FQ prophylaxis (levofloxacin). After 2016, the institutional protocol was modified to no antibiotic prophylaxis. Data were retrieved from patient records for disease and transplant characteristics, the incidence of GNB bacteremia, duration of parenteral antibiotics, hospitalization duration, acute GVHD, and OS. Results: A total of 135 allo-HCT recipients (43 in the FQ-prophylaxis cohort and 92 in the no-antibiotic prophylaxis cohort) were analyzed in this study. The two cohorts were matched for age (median, 26 vs. 24.5 years; p = 0.8). The no-antibiotic prophylaxis cohort had a higher proportion of malignant diagnoses (80% vs. 58%, p = 0.01), haploidentical transplants (46% vs. 14%, p = 0.004), and posttransplant cyclophosphamide exposure (46% vs. 14%, p = 0.003) than did the FQ cohort. Despite this, the incidence of GNB bacteremia was not significantly different between the two cohorts (37% vs. 34%, p = 0.6). There were no differences in parenteral antibiotic use or hospitalization duration, as well as the incidence of acute GVHD (53% vs. 53%, p = 0.3). The 1-year OS was similar between the two cohorts (66% vs. 67%, p = 0.6). Conclusion: This study shows that FQ prophylaxis did not affect the incidence of GNB bacteremia, parenteral antibiotic use, hospitalization duration, acute GVHD, and OS post-allo-HCT.

The Effects of Statins on Bone Formation Around Implants Placed in Animal Bones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Implants are preferred for replacement of missing teeth by the clinicians as well as the patients. Lesser alveolar bone density doesn't preclude any individual for choosing this option but warrants for extra caution. Preclinical studies have explored the osteoinductive potential of statins, but results should be analyzed vigorously before implementing them in humans. There is no meta-analysis to document effect of statins on bone formation around implants in osteoporotic animals. Methods and material: PubMed, Embase and Cochrane were searched for studies investigating the effect of statins on bone implant contact (BIC %), bone mineral density (BMD %) and bone volume (BV %) around implants at 2, 4 and 12 weeks. Meta-analysis was performed on subgroups with osteoporotic animals which were administered statins through different routes. Results: Quantitative data from 12 studies showed favorable effect of statins on bone around implants. Positive difference was observed at 4 weeks in BIC (parenteral [SMD = 4.33 (2.89, 5.77); I 2 = 3%)], BMD (local [SMD = 1.33 (0.51, 2.15); I 2 = 0%] and BV (local [SMD = 1.58 (0.76, 2.40); I 2 = 0%]. BIC [SMD = 1.40 (0.89, 1.90); I 2 = 0%] and BV [SMD = 3.91 (2.33, 5.50); I 2 = 43%] were higher in experimental group after 12 weeks of oral administration. Conclusions: Statins can be investigated as potential bone graft materials to increase the predictability of osseointegration especially in osteoporotic individuals. Future research should focus to reproduce homogeneous data and conclusive recommendations which can be applied in clinical trials. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12663-023-01873-z.

Short Research Communication Anti-Spike Antibody Response to COVISHIELD™ (SII-ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) Vaccine in Patients with B-Cell and Plasma Cell Malignancies and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Recipients.

Introduction: There is limited data on the serologic antibody responses after the ChAdOx1 vaccine in patients with hematological malignancies and hematopoietic cell transplantation recipients. There is no data on the safety and efficacy of the Indian COVISHIELD™ vaccine in this population. Methods: This study reports the anti-S antibody response to the COVISHIELD™ vaccine in a prospective cohort of patients with B-cell and plasma cell malignancies and HCT recipients at a single center. The quantitative antibodies to the SARS-CoV-2 S protein receptor-binding domain in human plasma were determined by the validated Roche Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S kit. Results: A total of 118 patients were included over the study period from April 2021 to August 2021. The seropositivity rate at baseline and after the first and second dose of the vaccine was 39%, 66%, and 79%, respectively (p < 0.0001). The seronegative cohort had a higher median age (65 vs. 60 years, p = 0.03), were more likely to be males (81% vs. 42%, p = 0.009), had a diagnosis of B-CLPD (100% vs. 42%, p < 0.001) and were more likely to be on ibrutinib therapy (56% vs. 15%, p = 0.001). Conclusions: This study confirms the safety and efficacy of the COVISHIELD™ vaccine in patients with hematological malignancies.

Adherence to long-term follow-up preventive practices in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation survivors from North India.

Introduction: There are existing international guidelines for long-term follow-up (LTFU) care of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) survivors. However, implementing these guidelines represents a unique challenge in resource-challenged settings. Methods: This study aimed to evaluate adherence to recommended surveillance in allo-HCT survivors at an academic center in North India and study the incidence of late effects. This single-center, retrospective study analyzed records of allo-HCT recipients from 2016 to 2020. Survivors were screened in our LTFU clinic at day +100 and +365 using cardiometabolic parameters (screening for hypertension, dyslipidemia, hyperglycemia, 24-hour urine protein, thyroid function), pulmonary function test (PFT), bone mineral density (BMD), and initiation of revaccination. Results: A total of 40/80 (50%) allo-HCT survivors were alive at a median of 888 days (IQR 515-1,306). The adherence to home-based screening parameters such as blood pressure and blood glucose was highest (>75%), followed by lab-based parameters (45-70%), and lowest for specialized tests such as PFT (<50%) at both day +100 and +365 time points. Adherence to the initiation of revaccination was only 67%. At least one cardiometabolic parameter was out of range in 55% and 63% of survivors at day +100 and +365, respectively. Conclusion: The adherence to recommended surveillance measures for allo-HCT survivors in an academic LTFU clinic at one year was only 75% overall. Cardiometabolic abnormalities were noted in more than half of the survivors. This study emphasizes the need for a structured LTFU clinic in all centers performing HCT.

Impact of broad-spectrum antibiotic exposures and multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteremia on hematopoietic cell transplantation outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: There is a close association between the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics, gut microbiome alteration, multidrug resistant (MDR) gram-negative bacilli (GNB) bacteremia, graft versus host disease (GVHD), and mortality post-allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). This study reports the impact of the high use of carbapenems and colistin and MDR bacteremia pre- and post-HCT on HCT outcomes. METHODS: This was a single-center, partial retrospective, and prospective study from 2016 to 2020. Both pre- and post-HCT antibiotic exposures and blood culture/sensitivity were recorded. MDR GNB was defined as either non-susceptibility to third-generation cephalosporin or carbapenems. In the absence of positive cultures, the treating physician escalated antibiotics from third-generation cephalosporins to carbapenem and/or colistin as per clinical discretion. De-escalation policy was not strictly enforced. RESULTS: MDR GNB bacteremia was seen in 29 of 76 (38%) of patients peri-HCT. The utilization rates for carbapenems and colistin was significantly higher in the cohort with MDR GNB bacteremia pre-HCT (70% vs. 32%, p = 0.002 and 31% vs. 6.4%, p = 0.007, respectively) and post-HCT (100% vs. 74.5%, p = 0.002, and 55.2% vs. 8.5%, p < 0.0001, respectively). The cohort with MDR GNB bacteremia had significantly more severe acute GVHD at day+100 (45% vs. 17.5%, p = 0.009). The median survival was 204 days compared to not reached in the cohort without any MDR GNB bacteremia (p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: This study shows pre- and post-HCT MDR GNB bacteremia is associated with an increased risk of severe acute GVHD and mortality. Patients with MDR GNB bacteremia had higher exposure to pre- and post-HCT carbapenems and colistin.