Topographic detection of photorefractive keratectomy.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of subjective review of corneal topography to detect patients who have undergone photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). METHODS: Topographic maps from 3 different devices were obtained from 19 patients with postoperative PRK and 9 control subjects with emmetropia and 10 control subjects with myopia. Each image was printed in an absolute and relative scale (total of 228 maps) and graded for overall shape and pattern. Fifteen masked reviewers independently rated each map as either postoperative PRK or not. RESULTS: The overall sensitivity (ability to detect PRK) and specificity rates (ability to exclude control subjects) by reviewers were 65% and 93%, respectively. Sensitivity was influenced independently by the scale (relative, 68%; absolute, 62%; P < 0.01), experience of reviewer (experienced, 77%; inexperienced, 53%; P < 0.001), and device (Alcon, 67 +/- 29.9; Eyesys, 75 +/- 29.4%; and Tomey, 54 +/- 31.7%; P < 0.001). Low levels of preoperative myopia were consistently more difficult to detect than higher levels (low myopia -1.50 to -2.99 diopters [D] sensitivity: 53 +/- 34.5%; medium level -3.00 to -4.49 D: 67 +/- 28.9%; and high level -4.50 to -6.00 D: 77 +/- 21.1%; P < 0.0001). Differences in specificity between experienced and inexperienced reviewers were obtained when maps had a homogeneous topographic pattern (97 +/- 5.6% and 85 +/- 13.7%, respectively; P < 0.05). Several control topography patterns (e.g., homogeneous, focal, and keyhole) were disproportionately more difficult to correctly identify on the Eyesys device. CONCLUSIONS: Topographic experience is a significant factor influencing the correct identification of PRK. Techniques also can be used to enhance detection, such as the use of different devices and scales. However, if subjective review of topography is used as the only method of detection, many patients with PRK will not be identified properly. In addition, the most prevalent preoperative myopic category in the general population (myopia < -3.00 D) also is the most difficult to detect after treatment. This reduces the usefulness of topography as a screening tool. Other techniques are needed to improve the detection of patients with postoperative PRK.

Preliminary results of photorefractive keratectomy in active-duty United States Navy personnel.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety, efficacy, and quality of vision after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in active-duty military personnel. METHODS: Photorefractive keratectomy (6.0-mm ablation zone) was performed on 30 navy/marine personnel(-2.00 to -5.50 diopters [D]; mean, -3.35 D). Glare disability was assessed with a patient questionnaire and measurements of intraocular light scatter and near contrast acuity with glare. RESULTS: At 1 year, all 30 patients had 20/20 or better uncorrected visual acuity with no loss of best-corrected vision. By cycloplegic refraction, 53% (16/30) of patients were within +/- 0.50 D of emmetropia and 87% (26/30) were within +/- 1.00 D. The refraction (mean +/- standard deviation) was +0.45 +/- 0.56 D (range, -1.00 to 1.63 D). Four patients (13%) had an overcorrection of more than 1 D. Glare testing in the early (1 month) postoperative period demonstrated increased intraocular light scatter (P<0.01) and reduced contrast acuity (with and without glare, (P<0.01). These glare measurements statistically returned to preoperative levels by 3 months (undilated) and 12 months (dilated) postoperatively. Two patients reported moderate to severe visual symptoms (glare, halo, night vision) worsened by PRK. One patient had a decrease in the quality of night vision severe enough to decline treatment in the fellow eye. Intraocular light scatter was increased significantly (>2S D) in this patient after the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Photorefractive keratectomy reduced myopia and improved the uncorrected vision acuity of all patients in this study. Refinement of the ablation algorithm is needed to decrease the incidence of hyperopia. Glare disability appears to be a transient event after PRK. However, a prolonged reduction in the quality of vision at night was observed in one patient and requires further study.