[Critical events in the operating room among 1,440,776 patients with ASA PS 1 for elective surgery].

BACKGROUND: The Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists (JSA) survey of critical incidents in the operating room has shown that preoperative complications are the leading causes of critical incidents, and affect the occurrence, severity and outcome of critical incidents which are due to causes other than preoperative complications. Causes of critical events in the operating room were examind in patients for elective surgery with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA PS) 1. METHODS: JSA has conducted annual surveys of critical incidents in the operating room by sending and collecting confidential questionnaires to all JSA Certified Training Hospitals. From 1999 to 2002, 3,855,384 anesthesia patients were registered. Among these, 1,440,776 patients with ASA PS 1 for elective surgery were analyzed. The causes of critical incidents were classified as follows: totally attributable to anesthetic management (AM), mainly to intraoperative pathological events (IP), to preoperative complications (PC), and to surgical management (SM). IP consists of coronary ischemia mainly due to coronary vasospasm, arrhythmias, pulmonary embolism, and other conditions. RESULTS: The incidences of cardiac arrest, critical incidents other than cardiac arrest and subsequent death were 9.86, 59.41 and 3.12 per 100,000 anesthesia cases, respectively. IP and SM were responsible for 36.6% and 34.5% of cardiac arrest, respectively. AM and SM were responsible for 46.7% and 26.8% of critical incidents other than cardiac arrest, respectively. SM, IP and AM were responsible for 66.7%, 22.2% and 4.4% of subsequent deaths (within 7 postoperative days), respectively. Coronary ischemia and pulmonary embolism were the main causes of death due to IP. The incidences of cardiac arrest and death totally attributable to AM were 1.87 and 0.14 per 100,000 anesthesia cases, respectively. Medication problems were responsible for 48.1% of arrests, while airway/ventilation problems were for 57.2% of critical incidents other than arrest. Human factors (SM combined with AM) were responsible for 53.5%, 73.5%, and 71.1% of cardiac arrest, critical incidents other than arrest and death, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Even in elective patients with good physical status, non-lethal incidents were not rare, and lethal incidents were also reported. We should pay significant attention to the following findings, and take some measures to overcome these problems especially related to human factors. Firstly, SM badly harmed some operative patients. Secondly, coronary vasospasm and pulmonary embolism were the main causes of death due to IP. Thirdly, drug administration and airway/ventilation management were the major causes of critical incidents totally attributable to AM. Human factors were responsible for 70.6% of critical incidents and 71.1% of deaths.

[Critical incidents during regional anesthesia in Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists-Certified Training Hospitals: an analysis of responses to the annual survey conducted between 1999 and 2002 by the Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists].

BACKGROUND: Recently, a national survey in France including 35,439 patients who had received spinal anesthesia showed that the incidences of cardiac arrest and mortality associated with spinal anesthesia were 2.5 and 0.8 per 10,000 anesthetics, respectively. In this study, we investigated these values using data obtained from annual surveys conducted by the Japanese Society of Anesthesiologist (JSA). METHODS: Since 1994, JSA has conducted annual surveys concerning critical incidents in the operating theater by sending confidential questionnaires to JSA-certified training hospitals, then collecting and analyzing the responses. We investigated critical incidents associated with regional anesthesia using data from annual surveys between 1999 and 2002. The questionnaire was identical in each survey conducted during these years. The total number of anesthetics available for this analysis was 3,855,384, of which spinal anesthesia, combined spinal-epidural anesthesia and epidural anesthesia were performed in 409,338, 146,282, and 69,001 patients, respectively. In patients receiving regional anesthesia, 628 critical incidents including 108 cardiac arrests, and 45 subsequent deaths were reported. The causes of critical incidents were classified as follows: totally attributable to anesthetic management, due mainly to intraoperative pathological events, preoperative complications, and surgical management. IP consists of coronary ischemia including coronary vasospasm not suspected preoperatively, arrhythmias including severe bradycardia, pulmonary thromboembolism, and other conditions. Mortality was determined by postoperative day 7. Statistical analysis was performed by chi-square test and Mann-Whitney test. A p value less than 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: The incidences of cardiac arrest and mortality due to all etiologies were 1.69 and 0.76 with spinal anesthesia, 1.78 and 0.68 with combined spinal-epidural anesthesia, and 1.88 and 0.58/10,000 anesthetics with epidural anesthesia, respectively. The incidences of cardiac arrest and mortality due to anesthetic management were 0.54 and 0.02 with spinal anesthesia, 0.55 and 0.00 with combined spinal-epidural anesthesia, and 0.72 and 0.14/10,000 anesthetics with epidural anesthesia, respectively. These values did not significantly differ among regional anesthesia. Death attributable to anesthetic management was reported in 2 patients: both patients were classified as ASA-PS 3 E, and developed cardiac arrest; one due to inadvertent high spinal anesthesia with spinal anesthesia, and the other due to local anesthetic intoxication with epidural anesthesia. Anesthetic management and intraoperative pathological events comprised 33 and 43% of cardiac arrests, respectively. The distribution of causes of death was as follows: anesthetic management, 5%; intraoperative pathological events, 34%; preoperative complications, 35%; surgical management, 26%. Among the causes of anesthetic management-induced critical incidents, inadvertent high spinal anesthesia was the leading cause of cardiac arrest in spinal and combined spinalepidural anesthesia: 90% of arrests occurred in patients with ASA-PS 1+2; 88% in patients below 65 years of age; 45 and 25% in patients undergoing hip or lower extremities surgery, and cesarean section, respectively. Among the causes of intraoperative pathological event-induced critical incidents, pulmonary thromboembolism was the leading cause of cardiac arrest in spinal and combined spinal-epidural anesthesia: 59% of arrests occurred in patients with ASA-PS 1+2; 81% in patients above 66 years of age; 91% in patients undergoing hip or lower extremity surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of cardiac arrest and mortality associated with spinal anesthesia in Japan was shown to be in the same order as in France by analyzing a larger population. In patients with good ASA-PS, critical incidents occurred more often under regional anesthesia than under general anesthesia. Inadvertent high spinal anesthesia should be carefully avoided. We should also pay much attention to subclinical deep vein thrombosis in patients who were scheduled for hip or lower extremity surgery, and tourniquet- or bone cement-associated pulmonary embolism in these patients.

[Supplemental survey in 2003 concerning life-threatening hemorrhagic events in the operating room].

BACKGROUND: We previously showed that pre-operative hemorrhagic shock and surgical hemorrhage were the major causes of life-threatening events in the operating room and subsequent fatality. We investigated the background of these events. METHODS: The Subcommittee on Surveillance of Anesthesia-Related Critical Incidents, Japanese Society of Anesthesiologist (JSA) sent confidential questionnaires to all JSA-certified training hospitals (n=862). The questionnaires were composed of two parts: one for examining all life-threatening events in the operating room and the other for examining the background of massive hemorrhage in the operating room. The number of patients registered between January 1, 2003 and December 31, 2003 was 1,367,790 from 782 hospitals. Life-threatening hemorrhagic events were reported in 1,011 patients, of whom 876 patients were available for further analysis of the background of the events. Fatality within 7 postoperative days following these events was 45.4%. RESULTS: In patients who developed life-threatening events due to hemorrhage, 35.2% had blood loss of more than 12 l x 60 kg(-1) of body weight, 44.9% had a maximal hemorrhagic speed of more than 240 ml x min(-1) x 60 kg(-1) of body weight, and 39.1% had a minimal hemoglobin concentration of less than 5 g x dl(-1). The main sources of hemorrhage were as follows: the abdominal aorta, 15.4%; the thoracic aorta, 14.0%; the liver, 12.6%; intra-cranium, 8.2%; the pelvic organs, 8.0%; celiac or mesenteric artery, 7.8%; the lung, 7.1%. Of patients who developed life-threatening events due to preoperative hemorrhagic shock, 18.3% underwent cardiac massage preoperatively, 50.0% lost consciousness, 58.5% were intubated, and 16.4% were retrospectively judged to have had no operative indications. Human factors also affected the life-threatening events due to preoperative hemorrhagic shock: delayed decision making concerning indications for surgical treatment, 15.6%; delayed admission to the operating room, 16.6%; delayed supply of blood products, 25.5%; problems in surgical management, 16.3%; problems in anesthetic management, 28.1%. These problems in anesthetic management included shortage of supportive anesthesiologists. This was partly explained by the time of their admission to the operating room: 67.0% of the patients admitted during the week end or at night. Of the patients who developed life-threatening events due to surgical hemorrhage, 58.0% were predicted preoperatively to develop massive hemorrhage by anesthesiologists, and 66.7% were informed of the risks of massive hemorrhage and associated complications. The main causes of surgical hemorrhage were as follows: adhesion or invasion, 44.7%; and problems in surgical judgments or techniques, 43.7%. Anesthetic management affected the development of life-threatening events in these patients: lack of infusion prior to hemorrhage, shortage of supportive anesthesiologists, delay in ordering additional blood products, delayed judgment to start blood transfusion, and shortage of rapid infusion/transfusion apparatus. Delay for hospitals in obtaining blood supply from blood banks was reported in 13.0% of cases, and delayed supply from inhospital blood transfusion service to the operating room in 16.0%. Despite massive hemorrhage, ABO cross-matching was omitted only in 13.4% of patients, and transfusion of ABO-compatible, instead of ABO-identical red blood cells, was performed only in 1.3%. CONCLUSIONS: To reduce life-threatening hemorrhagic events in the operating theater, reorganization of emergency medical service and blood supply, improvement of surgical techniques, improved triage of patients with hemorrhagic shock, flexible application of compatible blood products in emergency situations, and improvement of the quality and number of anesthesiologists should be considered.

[Critical incidents due to drug administration error in the operating room: an analysis of 4,291,925 anesthetics over a 4 year period].

BACKGROUND: Wrong drugs, overdose of drugs, and incorrect administration route remain unsolved problems in anesthetic practice. We determined the incidence and outcome of drug administration error in the operating room of Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists Certified Training Hospitals. METHODS: Data were obtained from annual surveys conducted by Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists between 1999 and 2002. There were 4,291,925 cases of anesthetic delivery for this analysis. RESULTS: Incidence of critical incidents due to drug administration error was 18.27/100,000 anesthetics. Cardiac arrest occurred in 2.21 patients per 100,000 anesthetics. Causes of these critical incidents were as follows: overdose or selection error involving non-anesthetic drugs, 42.1%; overdose of anesthetics, 28.7%; inadvertent high spinal anesthesia, 17.9%; local anesthetic intoxication, 6.4%; ampule or syringe swap, 4.3%; blood mismatch, 0.6%. Incidence of death following these incidents was 0.44/100,000. Causes of death were as follows: overdose or selection error involving non-anesthetic drugs, 47.4%; overdose of anesthetics, 26.3%; inadvertent high spinal anesthesia, 15.8%; local anesthetic intoxication, 5.3%. Ampule or syringe swap did not lead to any fatalities. Death following inadvertent high spinal anesthesia and local anesthetic intoxication was reported only in patients who had developed cardiac arrest. It should be noted that 88 percent of ampule or syringe swap occurred in patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists-Physical Status 1 or 2, who did not seem to require complex anesthetic management. CONCLUSIONS: We should increase awareness that drug administration is generally performed with limited objective monitoring, although "To error is human". Increased vigilance is required to avoid drug administration error in the operating room. Additional anesthesia resident education, adequate supervision, and improved organization are necessary. Bar-coding technology might be useful in preventing drug administration error.

[Annual mortality and morbidity in operating rooms during 2002 and summary of morbidity and mortality between 1999 and 2002 in Japan: a brief review].

The Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists (JSA) conducts an annual survey of life-threatening events in operating rooms (OR) in JSA Certified Training Hospitals (JSACTH) by sending and collecting confidential questionnaires. Etiologies of the incidents were divided into four categories: those totally attributable to anesthetic management (AM), those resulting from preoperative complications (PC), those resulting from intraoperative pathological events (IP) and those related to surgical procedures (SP). IP resulted from coronary ischemia not suspected preoperatively, arrhythmias, pulmonary embolism, and other conditions. Outcomes were judged on the 7th post-operative day. In the year 2002, questionnaires were sent to 844 JSACTHs, and a total of 1,461,020 cases of anesthesia were documented from 773 JSACTHs. Of these, 1,277,045 cases of anesthesia from 712 JSACTHs were available for analysis. Seven hundred thirty nine cardiac arrests (5.79 per 10,000 anesthetics) and 806 deaths (6.31 per 10,000 anesthetics) due to life-threatening events in the OR were reported. The incidence of cardiac arrest and mortality totally attributable to AM was 0.38 and 0.11 per 10,000 anesthetics. These values tended to decrease after 1994, except the mortality totally attributable to AM, which were almost at constant level during recent years. The summary of the study between 1999 and 2002 was as follows. Among 3,855,384 anesthetics, 2,443 cardiac arrests (6.34 per 10,000 anesthetics) and 2,638 deaths (6.85 per 10,000 anesthetics) due to life-threatening events in the OR were reported. PC, SP, IP and AM were responsible for 64.7, 23.9, 9.4, and 1.5% of deaths, respectively. The major cause of PC related deaths was preoperative hemorrhagic shock, followed by cardiovascular diseases such as myocardial ischemia and congestive heart failure. Excessive surgical bleeding comprised 70.2% of SP-related deaths. The major causes of IP-related death were myocardial ischemia, pulmonary embolism, and severe arrhythmias. The incidence of cardiac arrest and death totally attributable to AM was 0.47 and 0.10/10,000 anesthetics, respectively. Among patients with ASA-PS 1(E) and 2(E), AM-related deaths occurred at a rate of 0.04/10,000 anesthetics. Half of AM-induced deaths were caused by airway or ventilatory problems. Other causes of AM-related death were medication accidents and infusion/transfusion accidents. Considerable effort is required to reduce intraoperative life-threatening events caused by human error, hemorrhage, and cardiovascular diseases.

[Surgical volume and mortality due to intraoperative critical incidents at Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists certified training hospitals: an analysis of the annual survey in 2002].

BACKGROUND: We have previously showed that surgical volume affects mortality due to intraoperative critical incidents among patients undergoing cardiac surgery, the surgery with the highest risk, using data obtained by the annual survey in 2001 conducted by the Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists (JSA). In this study, we investigated whether surgical volume affects mortality due to intraoperative critical incidents independent of the surgical site. METHODS: We investigated this relationship using data obtained from the 2002 annual survey conducted by the Subcommittee on Surveillance of Anesthesia-related Critical Incidents, JSA. Between January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2002, 1,987,988 patients were registered from 704 training hospitals certified by the JSA. Intraoperative critical incidents occurred in 2,844 patients. Of these, 804 patients died within 7 postoperative days. The overall mortality was 4.61 per 10,000 anesthetics. Hospitals were divided into 5 groups according to their annual surgical cases: Group A, fewer than 1,000 (62 hospitals); Group B, 1,000-1,999 (204 hospitals); Group C, 2,000-3,999 (288 hospitals); Group D, 4,000-5,999 (110 hospitals); Group E, more than 6,000 (40 hospitals). Hospitals were also divided into 2 groups according to mortality: Group 1, under 20.00 per 10,000 anesthetics (672 hospitals); Group 2, equal to or higher than 20.00 per 10,000 anesthetics (32 hospitals). Total number of deaths in Group 2 was 158. Mortality was expressed as the mean (95% confidence interval). Statistical analysis was performed using chi-square test and Fisher test. A p value of <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: The mortality rates in Groups A-E were 14.89 (8.48-21.3), 3.86 (3.05-4.67), 3.88 (3.19-4.57), 4.04 (3.20-4.88), and 3.12 (2.19-4.05) per 10,000 anesthetics, respectively. Average surgical cases and mortality in Group 1 were 2,789 (2,775-3,002) and 3.24 (2.90-3.58), respectively, while those in Group 2 were 1,672 (1,243-2,101) and 22.18 (30.58-45.94), respectively. If all patients in Group 2 (n=53,509) had been treated in the hospitals of Group 1, 139-143 deaths might have been avoided. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical volume was shown to affect mortality independent of the surgical site. Hospitals with low surgical volume should pay significant attention to improving surgical outcomes. These results also suggest that centralization or regionalization should be discussed from the perspective of socio-economical problems as well as patient safety.

[The relationship between the yearly number of operations and mortality due to intraoperative critical incidents in patients for cardiac surgery: an analysis of annual survey 2001 conducted by the Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists].

BACKGROUND: The number of surgical operations performed has been reported to have a relation with surgical morbidity and mortality. In Japan, however, the relationship between surgical load and outcome has not been elucidated. METHODS: We investigated this relationship in patients for cardiac surgery using data from the 2001 annual survey concerning anesthesia-related critical incidents, conducted by the Committee on Operating Room Safety, Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists. Between January 1, 2001 and December 31, 2001, 43,411 patients for cardiac surgery patients were registered from 486 training hospitals certified by the Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists. Intraoperative critical incidents occurred in 632 of the patients. Of these, 289 patients died within 7 postoperative days. The overall mortality was 66.57 per 10,000 anesthetics. Hospitals were divided into 4 groups according to their annual numbers of cardiac operations: Group A, fewer than 50; Group B, 50-99; Group C, 100-199; Group D, more than 200. Mortality rate was expressed as a mean +/- SD (95% confidence interval). RESULTS: The mortality rates in Group A-D were 107.64 +/- 327.33 (63.47-151.81), 114.42 +/- 168.76 (83.02-145.87), 63.53 +/- 84.35 (48.04-79.01), and 36.97 +/- 52.83 (22.32-51.61) per 10,000 anesthetics, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The yearly number of operations has been shown to affect mortality rate due to intraoperative critical incidents among patients for cardiac surgery in Japan. Hospitals with a small number operations should pay significant attention to improving surgical outcome. These results also suggest that centralization or regionalization of cardiac surgery should be discussed from the socio-economical points as well as patient safety.

[Annual study of anesthesia-related mortality and morbidity in the year 2001 in Japan: the outlines--report of Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists Committee on Operating Room Safety].

We reported anesthesia-related mortality and morbidity in Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists Certified Training Hospitals (JSACTH) in the year 2001, as a part of the second series of annual studies in the identical questionnaires form started in 1999. JSA Committee on Operating Room Safety sent confidential questionnaires to 813 JSACTH and received effective answers from 87.9% of the hospitals. A total number of 1,284,957 anesthetics were documented. The respondents were asked to report all cases of cardiac arrests and other critical incidents (serious hypotension, serious hypoxemia and others) during anesthesia and surgery, and their outcomes (death in operating room, death within 7 days, transfer to vegetative state and rescue without sequelae) as well as one principal cause for each incident from the list of 52 items. Definition of serious hypotension, serious hypoxemia and others was those events suggesting the possibility of impending cardiac arrest or permanent disability of the central nervous system or myocardium. The respondents were also requested to submit the tabulation of patients by ASA physical status, age distribution, surgery sites and anesthetic methods. Analysis was made by total incidents under anesthesia/surgery, and also by incidents totally attributable to anesthetic management (AM), due to preoperative complications (PC), due to intraoperative pathological events (IP) and due to surgery (SG). This paper focused on analysis of entire patients, as other later papers will report analyses with special reference to ASA physical status, age distribution, surgery sites and anesthetic methods. Total incidence of cardiac arrest under anesthesia/surgery was 6.12 per 10,000 anesthetics. PC, IP and SG occupied 47.2%, 21.1% and 24.2% of principal causes of total cardiac arrest, respectively. AM occupied only 6.4% of the principal causes and the incidence was 0.39 per 10,000. The most frequent cause of cardiac arrest in 52 more detailed classifications of principal causes was preoperative hemorrhagic shock that occupied 19.2% of all cardiac arrests. The second was massive hemorrhage due to surgical procedures (12.3%), and the third was surgery itself (9.7%). Prognosis of the cardiac arrest was worst in that due to PC, i.e. 86.1% of cardiac arrests died in the operating room or within 7 days after surgery and only 5.3% survived without sequelae. Very low survival rate of preoperative hemorrhagic shock (5.3%) and preoperative multiple organ failure/sepsis (7.1%) aggravated the prognosis. Pulmonary embolism was the worst single cause in prognosis of cardiac arrest due to IP. The best prognosis was found in cardiac arrest due to AM, 82.0% survived without sequelae and 10.0% died. The mortality rate after cardiac arrest was 3.04 per 10,000 anesthetics, of them 0.04 was due to AM, 0.43 due to IP, 1.89 due to PC and 0.67 due to SG. The mortality rate after critical incidents other than cardiac arrest such as severe hypotension and severe hypoxemia was 3.37, and of them 0.06 was due to AM, 0.23 due to IP, 2.25 due to PC and 0.82 due to SG. The final mortality rate attributable to anesthesia/surgery including deaths after cardiac arrest and after other critical incidents was 6.41 per 10,000 anesthetics. The final mortality rate totally attributable to AM was 0.10 per 10,000 anesthetics, which was significantly improved from 0.21 [0.15, 0.27], that of mean [95%C.I.] in 1994-1998. IP, PC and SG showed the final mortality rate of 0.65, 4.14 and 1.49, respectively. Three major causes of all critical incidents in 52 detailed classification of principal causes were preoperative hemorrhagic shock (31.4%), massive hemorrhage due to surgical procedures (16.9%), and preoperative multiple organ failure/sepsis (9.0%). In conclusion, the obtained incidences as to cardiac arrest and death, either in total number during anesthesia/surgery or in that due to anesthetic management, kept decreasing lineally through 8 years study in 1994-2001. We expect that this second series of annual studies for five-years should reveal precise and definite direction for us to reduce anesthesia-related mortality and morbidity by analyzing further detail with special reference to ASA physical status, age distribution, surgery sites and anesthetic methods.

[Life-threatening coronary ischemia in the operating room: analysis of annual survey from 1999 to 2001 conducted by Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists].

In Japan, the incidence of cardiac morbidity among patients with ischemic heart diseases has been reported to be 13.2-16.4%, and that of perioperative myocardial infarction in these patients about 1%. We investigated the perioperative morbidity and mortality due to coronary ischemia by using data from an annual survey concerning anesthesia-related critical incidents, conducted by the Committee on Operating Room Safety, Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists. In this survey, coronary ischemia was divided into intraoperative pathological events (coronary ischemia as intraoperative event) and preoperative complication (coronary ischemia as preoperative complication). The former consists of coronary ischemia which developed in patients without preoperative diagnosis of ischemic heart diseases or which was induced by surgical and/or anesthetic procedures. The latter was coronary ischemia developed in patients with preoperative diagnosis of ischemic heart diseases. From January 1, 1999, to December 31, 2001, 3,020,021 patients were registered from certified training hospitals of Japanese Society of the Anesthesiologists in the survey. Among them 1,918 episodes of intraoperative cardiac arrest and 2,054 deaths (within 7th postoperative days) were reported. Of these 7.5% and 6.3% of cardiac arrests were due to coronary ischemia as intraoperative event and as preoperative complication, respectively. Death was due to coronary ischemia as intraoperative event in 4.0% and as preoperative complication in 5.1%. The occurrence of critical incidents (cardiac arrest and the other life-threatening events) due to both types of coronary ischemia depended on ASA-PS. The percentage of coronary ischemia as preoperative complication was higher in emergency patients than in elective patients. The percentage of coronary ischemia as intraoperative event was almost the same between emergency and elective patients. Both types of coronary ischemia developed most frequently in cardiac/aortic surgeries, followed by thoracotomy with or without laparotomy. The number of critical incidents due to coronary ischemia as preoperative complication was the largest in emergency cardiac/aortic surgeries, followed by elective non-cardiac surgeries. The number of critical incidents due to coronary ischemia as intraoperative event was the largest in elective non-cardiac, especially open abdominal, surgeries in patients with ASA-PS 1(E) + 2(E). Among the patients with ASA-PS 1(E) + 2(E) who underwent non-cardiac surgeries 13.9% of deaths were due to coronary ischemia as preoperative complication and 12.5% as intraoperative event. It should be noted that many critical incidents due to coronary ischemia as intraoperative event during laparotomy developed in patients anesthetized by inhalation anesthesia combined with epidural, spinal or conduction block. Prognosis of cardiac arrest due to coronary ischemia as preoperative complication was the worst: 47.1% of these patients died. The best prognosis was found in critical incidents other than cardiac arrest due to coronary ischemia as intraoperative event with mortality of 12.3%. The results show that quality improvement from the standpoint of intraoperative coronary ischemia is required.

[Perioperative mortality and morbidity in the year 2000 in 520 certified training hospitals of Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists: with a special reference to age--report of Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists Committee on Operating Room Safety].

Perioperative mortality and morbidity in Japan for the year 2000 were studied retrospectively. Committee on Operating Room Safety of Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists (JSA) sent confidential questionnaires to 794 Certified Training Hospitals of JSA and received answers from 67.6% of the hospitals. We analyzed their answers with a special reference to the age group. The total number of anesthetics available for this analysis was 910,757. All cases were divided into 7 age groups; group A (< 1 months), group B (< 12 months), group C (< 5 years), group D (< 18 years), group E (< 65 years), group F (< 85 years), and group G (> 85 years). The incidences of all critical events including cardiac arrest, severe hypotension, and severe hypoxemia were 70.04, 42.06, 17.79, 15.57, 21.14, 39.66, and 44.65 per 10,000 in patients with group A, B, C, D, E, F, and G, respectively. The overall mortality rates (death during anesthesia and within 7th postoperative day) were 26.94, 5.91, 1.88, 2.57, 5.23, 11.98, and 17.50 per 10,000 anesthetics in patients with group A, B, C, D, E, F, and G, respectively. The incidences of cardiac arrest were 28.29, 8.54, 3.56, 2.57, 5.08, 10.27, and 11.47 per 10,000 in patients with group A, B, C, D, E, F, and G, respectively. The mortality rates after cardiac arrest were 18.86, 4.60, 1.26, 1.57, 2.77, 5.50, and 6.64 in patients with group A, B, C, D, E, F, and G, respectively. The incidence of all critical events, the incidence of cardiac arrest, and the overall mortality rate were much higher in group A than in other groups, but much lower than those in 1999. The incidences of all critical events and the mortality rate after cardiac arrest were lowest in group C. Mortality and morbidity due to all kinds of causes including anesthetic management, intraoperative events, co-existing diseases, and operation were as follows. The incidences of all critical events attributable to co-existing disease were the highest in these four groups, and 32.33, 13.80, 5.86, 4.43, 7.50, 15.34, and 21.72 per 10,000 in patients with group A, B, C, D, E, F, and G, respectively. The incidences of all critical events attributable to anesthetic management were 13.47, 16.43, 6.28, 3.86, 4.08, 6.87, and 6.64 per 10,000 in patients with group A, B, C, D, E, F, and G, respectively. The incidence of cardiac arrest in group A was much more attributable to co-existing disease and operation than other causes. The incidences of cardiac arrest attributable to anesthetic management were 0.00, 1.97, 0.63, 0.29, 0.38, 0.74, and 1.81 per 10,000 in patients with group A, B, C, D, E, F, and G, respectively. Its mortality rate in each group was 0.00, 0.00, 0.21, 0.14, 0.06, 0.04, or 0.00. There were eleven cases of death or vegetative state due to anesthetic management, like improper management of airway and overdose of anesthetics. Some of them were preventable with the anesthesiologists' effort in protocol development and skilled assistance.

[Annual study of anesthesia-related mortality and morbidity in the year 2000 in Japan: the outlines--report of Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists Committee on Operating Room Safety].

This report contains anesthesia-related mortality and morbidity in Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists Certified Training Hospitals (JSACTH) in the year 2000, as a part of the second series of annual studies started in 1999. JSA Committee on Operating Room Safety (CORS) sent confidential questionnaires to 794 JSACTH and received effective answers from 65.5% of hospitals. A total number of 941,217 anesthetics were documented. The respondents were asked to report all cases of cardiac arrests and other critical incidents (serious hypotension, serious hypoxemia and others), and their outcomes (death in operating room, death within 7 days, transfer to vegetative state and rescue without sequelae) as well as one principal cause for each incident from the list of 52 items. They were also requested to submit the tabulation of patients by ASA physical status, age distribution, surgery sites and anesthetic methods. Analysis was made by total incidents under anesthesia/surgery, and also by incidents totally attributable to anesthetic management (AM), due to preoperative complications (PC), due to intraoperative pathological events (IP) and due to surgery (SG). This paper focused analysis on entire patients, since analyses with special reference to ASA physical status, age distribution, surgery sites and anesthetic methods were reported previously. Total incidence of cardiac arrest under anesthesia/surgery was 6.52 per 10,000 anesthetics. PC, IP and SG occupied 46.4%, 19.1% and 23.0% of principal causes of total cardiac arrest, respectively. AM occupied only 8.1% of the principal causes and the incidence was 0.53 per 10,000. The most frequent cause of cardiac arrest in 52 more detailed classification of principal causes was preoperative hemorrhagic shock that occupied 23.3% of all cardiac arrests. The second was massive hemorrhage and/or hypovolemia due to surgical procedures (10.6%), and the third was surgery itself (9.5%). Prognosis of the cardiac arrest was worst in that due to PC, 73.7% of cardiac arrests died in the operating room or within 7 days after surgery and only 20.4% survived without sequelae. The best prognosis was found in cardiac arrest due to AM, 76.0% survived without sequelae and 12.0% died. The mortality rate after cardiac arrest was 3.52 per 10,000 anesthetics, of them 0.06 was due to AM, 0.39 due to IP, 2.23 due to PC and 0.76 due to SG. The mortality rate after critical incidents other than cardiac arrest such as severe hypotension and severe hypoxemia was 3.48, and of them 0.03 was due to AM, 0.18 due to IP, 2.45 due to PC and 0.81 due to SG. The final mortality rate attributable to anesthesia/surgery including deaths after cardiac arrest and after other critical incidents was 7.00 per 10,000 anesthetics and very close to 7.18 [6.22, 8.13], that of mean [95%C.I.] in 1994-1998, and 7.19 in 1999. The final mortality rate totally attributable to AM was 0.10 per 10,000 anesthetics, which was significantly improved from 0.21 [0.15, 0.27], that of mean [95%C.I.] in 1994-1998, but not different from 0.13 in 1999. IP, PC and SG showed the final mortality rate of 0.56, 4.69 and 1.57, respectively. Five major causes of all critical incidents were massive hemorrhage due to surgical procedures (13.8%), preoperative hemorrhagic shock (13.1%), surgical technique (8.6%), inappropriate airway management (6.2%) and preoperative respiratory complication (5.7%). Drug overdose or wrong choice (2.7%) as a human error occupied the 10th. In conclusion, the obtained incidences as to death, other critical incidents and their outcomes as well as the occurrence of principal causes in 2000 study were remarkably close to those in 1999 study. We expect that this second series of annual studies for five-years should reveal precise and definite direction for us to reduce anesthesia-related mortality and morbidity.

[Perioperative mortality and morbidity for the year 2000 in 532 Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists certified training hospitals: with a special reference to surgical sites--report of the Japan Society of Anesthesiologists Committee on Operating Room Safety].

Perioperative mortality and morbidity in Japan for the year 2000 were analyzed with special reference to operative regions. The total number of analyzed cases was 903,086. The percentages for each operative region were as follows, CRANIOTOMY 4.5%, THORACOTOMY 3.5%, HEART and GREAT-VESSELS 3.7%, THORACOTOMY with LAPAROTOMY 0.7%, LAPAROTOMY 30.4%, CESARIAN SECTION 3.3%, HEAD-NECK-ENT 14.7%, CHEST-ABDOMEN-PERINEUM 14.0%, SUPINE 3.6%, EXTREMITY including PERIPHERAL-VESSEL 17.2%, OTHERS 4.4%. The incidence of serious events, including cardiac arrest and severe hypotension and hypoxemia developing to cardiac arrest, was 26.74 per 10,000 anesthetics in all operative regions. The events were observed more frequently in HEART and GREAT-VESSELS 170.39, THORACOTOMY with LAPAROTOMY 85.84 and THORACOTOMY 63.63, and less frequently in CHEST-ABDOMEN-PERINEUM 10.49, CESARIAN SECTION 10.95 and EXTREMITY including PERIPHERAL-VESSEL 13.42. Regarding the prognosis of events, the cases with no sequelae were 63.4% in all operative regions. While there were fewer cases with no sequelae in CRANIOTOMY 49.0%, THORACOTOMY with LAPAROTOMY 43.4% and HEART and GREAT-VESSELS 44.4%, there were more cases in HEAD-NECK-ENT 86.9% and CHEST-ABDOMEN-PERINEUM 89.5%. The incidence of serious events totally attributable to anesthetic management was 5.24 per 10,000 anesthetics in all operative regions. The events were observed more frequently in THORACOTOMY 12.91 and SPINE 8.02, and less frequently in LAPAROTOMY except CESARIAN SECTION 4.11 and EXTREMITY including PERIPHERAL-VESSEL 4.65. The main cause of events in THORACOTOMY was inadequate airway management and in SPINE was inadequate airway management and the overdose or miss selection for drugs. Regarding the prognosis of events totally attributable to anesthetic management, the cases with no sequelae were 91.8% in all operative regions. There were fewer cases with no sequelae in HEART and GREAT-VESSELS 82.6%. The incidence of serious events totally attributable to anesthetic management was one fifth of all serious events in all operative regions. While the total deaths from 903,086 cases, including deaths in the operating room or within 7 postoperative days, were 641 cases (7.10 per 10,000 cases), the deaths totally attributable to anesthesia were 9 cases (0.10 per 10,000 cases).

[A comment on five reports concerning perioperative mortality and morbidity of the year 1999 in Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists certified training hospitals].

Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists (JSA) has conducted an annual survey concerning anesthesia-related morbidity and mortality in JSA certified training hospitals. This survey was conducted through confidential questionnaires sent by mail to the hospitals. In 'Survey 1999', 60.3% of the hospitals responded to the questionnaire. The results were published in five separate reports: with special reference to ASA-physical status, age, anesthetic methods, operative regions, and 'outline'. However, overall morbidity and mortality differed among the reports. For example, overall anesthesia-related morbidity in the report with special reference to ASA-PS was 0.08 (5/655,644) per 10,000 cases, although it was 0.13 (11/793,847) in a report 'outline'. This difference was caused by imperfect answers from some hospitals. Some hospitals only reported the total number of patients in 1999 and total cases with cardiac arrest or other critical events, without details of distribution as to ASA-physical status, age, anesthetic methods, and/or operative regions. As a result, a part of critical incidents was reflected in the calculation of overall mortality and morbidity in the 'outlines', but not in that of ASA-physical status, age, anesthetic methods, and/or operative regions. In 'Survey 2000', however this type of confusion was reduced, because increasing number of hospitals had answered the questionnaire completely.

[Annual report of perioperative mortality and morbidity for the year 2000 at certified training hospitals of Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists: with a special reference to anesthetic methods--report of the Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists Committee on Operating Room Safety].

The Committee on Operating Room Safety of Japan Society of Anesthesiologists (JSA) sends annually confidential questionnaires of perioperative mortality and morbidity (cardiac arrest, severe hypotension, severe hypoxia) to Certified Training Hospitals of JSA. This report is a special reference to anesthetic methods in perioperative mortality and morbidity in 2000. Five hundreds and twenty hospitals reported perioperative mortality and morbidity referred to anesthetic methods and total numbers of reported cases were 910,007. The percentage of cases reported by each anesthetic method was as follows; inhalation anesthesia 45.47%, total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) 6.15%, inhalation anesthesia + epidural or spinal or conduction block 24.48%, TIVA + epidural or spinal or conduction block 6.33%, spinal with continuous epidural block (CSEA) 3.67%, epidural anesthesia 1.92%, spinal anesthesia 10%, conduction block 0.47% and others 1.49%. The incidence of cardiac arrest per 10,000 cases due to all etiology (anesthetic management, preoperative complications, intraoperative complications, surgery, others) is estimated to be 6.55 cases in average; 5.36 cases in inhalation anesthesia, 30.72 cases in total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA), 4.62 cases in inhalation anesthesia + epidural or spinal or conduction block, 2.6 cases in TIVA + epidural or spinal or conduction block, 1.2 cases in spinal with continuous epidural block (CSEA), 0.57 cases in epidural anesthesia, 1.65 cases in spinal anesthesia, 2.36 cases in conduction block and 46.38 cases in other methods. However, the incidence of cardiac arrest per 10,000 cases totally attributable to anesthetic management is estimated to be 0.54 cases in average; 0.34 cases in inhalation anesthesia, 1.07 cases in TIVA, 0.58 cases in inhalation anesthesia + epidural or spinal or conduction block, 0.17 cases in TIVA + epidural or spinal or conduction block, 0.9 cases in CSEA, 0.57 cases in epidural anesthesia, 0.99 cases in spinal anesthesia, zero case in conduction block and 1.47 cases in other methods. The incidence of severe hypotension per 10,000 cases due to all etiology is estimated to be 11.14 cases in average; 11.31 cases in inhalation anesthesia, 36.61 cases in TIVA, 9.29 cases in inhalation anesthesia + epidural or spinal or conduction block, 6.59 cases in TIVA + epidural or spinal or conduction block, 3.59 cases in CSEA, 6.3 cases in epidural anesthesia, 4.39 cases in spinal anesthesia, 2.36 cases in conduction block and 23.56 cases in other methods. On the other hand, the incidence of severe hypotension per 10,000 cases totally attributable to anesthetic management is estimated to be 1.25 cases in average; 0.97 cases in inhalation anesthesia, 0.89 cases in TIVA, 1.39 cases in inhalation anesthesia + epidural or spinal or conduction block, 1.39 cases in TIVA + epidural or spinal or conduction block, 2.09 cases in CSEA, 3.44 cases in epidural anesthesia, 1.87 cases in spinal anesthesia, zero case in conduction block and zero case in other methods. The incidence of severe hypoxia per 10,000 cases due to all etiology is estimated to be 4.8 cases in average; 6.35 cases in inhalation anesthesia, 9.64 cases in TIVA, 3.82 cases in inhalation anesthesia + epidural or spinal or conduction block, 2.26 cases in TIVA + epidural or spinal or conduction block, 0.3 cases in CSEA, 1.15 case in epidural anesthesia, 1.21 cases in spinal anesthesia, zero case in conduction block and 5.89 cases in other methods. On the other hands, the incidence of severe hypoxia per 10,000 cases totally attributable to anesthetic management is estimated to be 1.98 cases in average; 3.09 cases in inhalation anesthesia, 2.32 cases in TIVA, 1.3 cases in inhalation anesthesia + epidural or spinal or conduction block, 0.87 cases in TIVA + epidural or spinal or conduction block, zero case in CSEA, zero case in epidural anesthesia, 0.55 cases in spinal anesthesia, zero case in conduction block and zero case in other methods. The mortality rate of cardiac arrest within 7 postoperative days per 10,000 cases due to all etiology is estimated to be 3.55 (54.2%) cases in average; 3.12 (58.1%) cases in inhalation anesthesia, 19.29 (62.8%) cases in TIVA, 1.17 (25.2%) cases in inhalation anesthesia + epidural or spinal or conduction block, 0.52 (20%) cases in TIVA + epidural or spinal or conduction block, zero cases in CSEA, zero case in epidural anesthesia, 0.33 (20%) cases in spinal anesthesia, zero case in conduction block and 39.76 (85.7%) cases in other methods. On the other hands, the mortality rate of cardiac arrest per 10,000 cases totally attributable to anesthesia is estimated to be 0.07 (12.2%) case in average, 0.07 (21.4%) case in inhalation anesthesia, 0.18 (16.8%) case in TIVA, zero case in inhalation anesthesia + epidural or spinal or conduction block, zero case in TIVA + epidural or spinal or conduction block, zero case in CSEA, zero case in epidural anesthesia, 0.11 (11.1%) case in spinal anesthesia, zero case in conduction block and 0.74 (50%) case in other methods. Five major combinations of listed critical incidents, causes and anesthetic methods were as follows: 18.93 cases in TIVA, preoperative complications and severe hypotension; 18.75 cases in TIVA, preoperative complications and cardiac arrest; 11.07 cases in TIVA, surgery and severe hypotension; 6.79 cases in TIVA, surgery and cardiac arrest; 5.24 cases in inhalation anesthesia, preoperative complications and severe hypotension. In summary: 1. There was no significant difference with regard to perioperative mortality and morbidity due to anesthetic management among anesthetic methods. 2. The percentage of each anesthetic method in 2000 was not different significantly from that in 1999 in spite of increased cases reported. 3. Incidence of severe hypotension due to all etiology of TIVA in 2000 decreased significantly compared with that in 1999 (P < 0.05). This may be attributed to the decreased incidence in preoperative complication (shock) and massive bleeding due to surgery.

[Perioperative mortality and morbidity in the year 2000 in 502 Japanese certified anesthesia-training hospitals: with a special reference to ASA-physical status--report of the Japan Society of Anesthesiologists Committee on Operating Room Safety].

Perioperative mortality and morbidity in Japan from Jan. 1 to Dec. 31, 2000 were studied retrospectively. Committee on Operating Room Safety in Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists (JSA) sent confidential questionnaires to 794 certified training hospitals of JSA and received answers from 67.6% of the hospitals. We analyzed their answers with a special reference to ASA physical status (ASA-PS). The total number of anesthesia available for this analysis was 897,733. The percentages of patients with ASA-PS of I, II, III, IV, I E, II E, III E, and IV E are 38.0, 40.3, 8.5, 0.4, 4.3, 5.3, 2.5, and 0.7%, respectively. Mortality and morbidity from all kinds of causes including anesthetic management, intraoperative events, co-existing diseases, and surgical problems were as follows. The incidences of cardiac arrest (per 10,000 cases of anesthesia) were 1.11, 3.26, 12.25, 54.60, 0.77, 4.46, 21.08 and 217.75 in patients with ASA-PS of I, II, III, IV, I E, II E, III E, and IV E, respectively. The incidences of critical events including cardiac arrest, severe hypotension, and severe hypoxemia were 6.89, 20.22, 62.18, 148.21, 6.71, 20.38, 106.72 and 592.21 in patients with ASA-PS of I, II, III, IV, I E, II E, III E, and IV E, respectively. The mortality rates (death during anesthesia and within 7 postoperative days) after cardiac arrest were 0.26, 0.77, 3.69, 41.60, 0.00, 1.06, 9.42 and 163.31 per 10,000 cases of anesthesia in patients with ASA-PS of I, II, III, IV, I E, II E, III E, and IV E, respectively. The overall mortality rates were 0.32, 1.38, 9.75, 70.20, 0.26, 2.12, 29.15 and 353.02 in patients with ASA-PS of I, II, III, IV, I E, II E, III E, and IV E, respectively. Overall mortality and morbidity were higher in emergency anesthesia than in elective anesthesia. ASA-PS correlated well with overall mortality and morbidity, regardless of etiology. The incidences of cardiac arrest totally attributable to anesthesia were 0.23, 0.50, 1.32, 0.00, 0.00, 0.85, 2.69 and 4.95 in patients with ASA-PS of I, II, III, IV, I E, II E, III E, and IV E, respectively. The incidences of all critical events totally attributable to anesthesia were 3.13, 5.56, 11.46, 5.20, 3.87, 5.94, 13.90 and 14.85 in patients with ASA-PS of I, II, III, IV, I E, II E, III E, and IV E, respectively. The mortality rates after cardiac arrest totally attributable to anesthesia were 0.03, 0.03, 0.00, 0.00, 0.00, 0.21, 0.45 and 3.30 in patients with ASA-PS of I, II, III, IV, I E, II E, III E, and IV E, respectively. The overall mortality rates totally attributable to anesthesia were 0.03, 0.06, 0.00, 0.00, 0.00, 0.21, 0.45 and 6.60 in patients with ASA-PS of I, II, III, IV, I E, II E, III E, and IV E, respectively. The overall mortality rate totally attributable to anesthesia among patients with good physical status (ASA-PS of I, II, I E, II E) was 0.05. Anesthetic management was mainly responsible for critical events in patients with good physical status, while coexisting diseases were in those with poor physical status. Surgical problems including procedures and massive hemorrhage were the leading causes of mortality in patients with good physical status. We reconfirmed that ASA-PS is useful to predict perioperative mortality and morbidity. It also seems likely that we should make much more efforts to reduce anesthetic morbidity in patients with good physical status, and to improve preanesthetic assessment and preparation in those with poor physical status. Reducing mortality and morbidity from surgical problems is also required for improving perioperative mortality.