Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab ; 108(9): 2203-2210, 2023 08 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36916985

RESUMO

CONTEXT: Although adding spironolactone to renin-angiotensin system blockers reduces albuminuria in adults with chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes, it increases the risk of hyperkalemia. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether a lower dose of spironolactone (12.5 mg/d) reduces the risk of hyperkalemia while maintaining its effect on reducing albuminemia. DESIGN: Multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial. SETTING: This study was conducted from July 2016 to November 2020 in ambulatory care at 3 diabetes medical institutions in Japan. PATIENTS: We enrolled 130 Japanese adults with type 2 diabetes and albuminuria (≥30 mg/gCre), estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥30 mL/min/1.73 m2, and serum potassium level <5.0 mEq/L. INTERVENTIONS: The participants were randomly assigned to the spironolactone-administered and control groups. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) from baseline over the 24-week interventional period. RESULTS: The spironolactone group showed a significant reduction in UACR from baseline (mean decrease, 103.47 ± 340.80 mg/gCre) compared with the control group, which showed an increased UACR (mean increase, 63.93 ± 310.14 mg/gCre; P = .0007, Wilcoxon rank-sum test and t test). Although the spironolactone group had a statistically significant increase in serum potassium levels, none of the participants had a potassium level ≥5.5 mEq/L at 24 weeks. Further, participants with a higher initial serum potassium level tended to have a smaller increase (estimate, -0.37, analysis of covariance). CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose spironolactone administration reduced albuminuria without causing hyperkalemia. Spironolactone administration, the oldest known and most cost-effective mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, at lower doses should be reconsidered.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Hiperpotassemia , Insuficiência Renal Crônica , Adulto , Humanos , Espironolactona/efeitos adversos , Hiperpotassemia/induzido quimicamente , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/urina , Albuminúria/tratamento farmacológico , Albuminúria/etiologia , Antagonistas de Receptores de Mineralocorticoides/efeitos adversos , Potássio , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/complicações , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/tratamento farmacológico
2.
Acta Diabetol ; 56(5): 525-529, 2019 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30707298

RESUMO

AIMS: To clarify if prediabetes defined by the International Expert Committee (PrediabetesIEC) and/or the American Diabetes Society (PrediabetesADA) is a risk for incident glomerular hyperfiltration (GH). METHODS: 24,524 health examinees without diabetes, chronic kidney disease (CKD), GH and antihypertensive treatment at baseline, and repeated examinations at least twice during a mean of 5.3 years were retrospectively analysed. Diabetes was defined as fasting plasma glucose (FPG) ≥ 7.0 mmol/L and/or HbA1c ≥ 47 mmol/mol, CKD by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 and/or dipstick-positive proteinuria, and GH by upper 95th eGFR in the Japanese adults. PrediabetesIEC was diagnosed by "HbA1c 42-46 mmol/mol and/or FPG 6.1-6.9 mmol/L", PrediabetesADA by "HbA1c 39-46 mmol/mol and/or FPG 5.6-6.9 mmol/L", PrediabetesADA-IEC for the condition met the ADA but not the IEC prediabetes definition, and the ADA-normal glucose regulation (NGRADA) by both HbA1c and FPG lower than PrediabetesADA. Risk of PrediabetesIEC and PrediabetesADA for incident GH was examined by multivariate Cox proportional hazards model with seven covariates and probability of incident GH was calculated on the basis of it. RESULTS: PrediabetesIEC was a significant risk for incident GH [adjusted HR 1.91, 95% CI 1.32-2.71] but PrediabetesADA was not [adjusted HR 1.22, 95% CI 0.93-1.61]. The mean (SD) probability of incident GH was 2.3 (4.5)%, 1.0 (2.3)% and 1.0 (2.4)% for PrediabetesIEC, PrediabetesADA-IEC and NGRADA, respectively: the former was significantly larger than the latter two which were not significantly different from each other. CONCLUSIONS: PrediabetesIEC was an independent risk for incident GH.


Assuntos
Taxa de Filtração Glomerular , Nefropatias/etiologia , Estado Pré-Diabético/complicações , Estado Pré-Diabético/diagnóstico , Adulto , Glicemia/análise , Diabetes Mellitus/sangue , Jejum , Feminino , Hemoglobinas Glicadas/análise , Humanos , Nefropatias/diagnóstico , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estado Pré-Diabético/sangue , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Proteinúria , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/diagnóstico , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/fisiopatologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA