YouTube as a source of education in perioperative anesthesia for patients and trainees: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Online video sharing platforms like YouTube (Google LLC, San Bruno, CA, USA) have become a substantial source of health information. We sought to conduct a systematic review of studies assessing the overall quality of perioperative anesthesia videos on YouTube. METHODS: We searched Embase, MEDLINE, and Ovid for articles published from database inception to 1 May 2023. We included primary studies evaluating YouTube videos as a source of information regarding perioperative anesthesia. We excluded studies not published in English and studies assessing acute or chronic pain. Studies were screened and data were extracted in duplicate by two reviewers. We appraised the quality of studies according to the social media framework published in the literature. We used descriptive statistics to report the results using mean, standard deviation, range, and n/total N (%). RESULTS: Among 8,908 citations, we identified 14 studies that examined 796 videos with 59.7 hr of content and 47.5 million views. Among the 14 studies that evaluated the video content quality, 17 different quality assessment tools were used, only three of which were externally validated (Global Quality Score, modified DISCERN score, and JAMA score). Per global assessment rating of video quality, 11/13 (85%) studies concluded the overall video quality as poor. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the educational content quality of YouTube videos evaluated in the literature accessible as an educational resource regarding perioperative anesthesia was poor. While these videos are in demand, their impact on patient and trainee education remains unclear. A standardized methodology for evaluating online videos is merited to improve future reporting. A peer-reviewed approach to online open-access videos is needed to support patient and trainee education in anesthesia. STUDY REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework ( https://osf.io/ajse9 ); first posted, 1 May 2023.

RéSUMé: CONTEXTE: Les plateformes de partage de vidéos en ligne comme YouTube (Google LLC, San Bruno, CA, États-Unis) sont devenues une source importante d'informations sur la santé. Nous avons cherché à réaliser une revue systématique des études évaluant la qualité globale des vidéos d'anesthésie périopératoire sur YouTube. MéTHODE: Nous avons recherché des articles dans Embase, MEDLINE et Ovid publiés depuis la création de ces bases de données jusqu'au 1er mai 2023. Nous avons inclus des études primaires évaluant les vidéos YouTube comme source d'information sur l'anesthésie périopératoire. Nous avons exclu les études publiées dans une langue autre que l'anglais et les études évaluant la douleur aiguë ou chronique. Les études ont été examinées et les données ont été extraites en double par deux personnes. Nous avons évalué la qualité des études selon le cadre des médias sociaux publié dans la littérature. Nous avons utilisé des statistiques descriptives pour rapporter les résultats en utilisant la moyenne, l'écart type, la plage et n/total N (%). RéSULTATS: Parmi 8908 citations, nous avons identifié 14 études qui ont examiné 796 vidéos avec 59,7 heures de contenu et 47,5 millions de vues. Parmi les 14 études qui ont évalué la qualité du contenu vidéo, 17 outils d'évaluation de la qualité différents ont été utilisés, dont seulement trois ont été validés en externe (Score Global Quality, score DISCERN modifié et score JAMA). Selon l'évaluation globale de la qualité des vidéos, 11 études sur 13 (85 %) ont conclu que la qualité globale des vidéos était médiocre. CONCLUSION: Dans l'ensemble, la qualité du contenu éducatif des vidéos YouTube évaluées dans la littérature accessible en tant que ressource éducative concernant l'anesthésie périopératoire était médiocre. Bien que ces vidéos soient très demandées, leur impact sur la formation de la patientèle et des stagiaires reste incertain. Une méthodologie normalisée d'évaluation des vidéos en ligne est nécessaire pour améliorer les évaluations futures. Une approche évaluée par les pairs pour les vidéos en libre accès en ligne est nécessaire pour soutenir la formation de la patientèle et des stagiaires en anesthésie. ENREGISTREMENT DE L'éTUDE: Open Science Framework ( https://osf.io/ajse9 ); première publication le 1er mai 2023.

The role of sealants for achieving anastomotic hemostasis in vascular surgery.

BACKGROUND: During vascular interventions, connections that link arteries, veins, or synthetic grafts, which are known as an 'anastomosis', may be necessary. Vascular anastomoses can bleed from the needle holes that result from the creation of the anastomoses. Various surgical options are available for achieving hemostasis, or the stopping of bleeding, including the application of sealants directly onto the bleeding vessels or tissues. Sealants are designed for use in vascular surgery as adjuncts when conventional interventions are ineffective and are applied directly by the surgeon to seal bleeding anastomoses. Despite the availability of several different types of sealants, the evidence for the clinical efficacy of these hemostatic adjuncts has not been definitively established in vascular surgery patients. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the benefits and harms of sealants as adjuncts for achieving anastomotic site hemostasis in patients undergoing vascular surgery. SEARCH METHODS: The Cochrane Vascular Information Specialist conducted systematic searches of the following databases: the Cochrane Vascular Specialised Register via the Cochrane Register of Studies; the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); MEDLINE via Ovid; Embase via Ovid ; and CINAHL via EBSCO. We also searched ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform for clinical trials. Reference lists of included trials and relevant reviews were also searched. The latest search date was 6 March 2023. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized controlled trials that compared fibrin or synthetic sealant use with alternative interventions (e.g. manual compression, reversal of anticoagulation) for achieving anastomotic-site hemostasis in vascular surgery procedures. We included participants who underwent the creation of an anastomosis during vascular surgery. We excluded non-vascular surgery patients. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We have used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were time to hemostasis, failure of hemostatic intervention, and intraoperative blood loss. Our secondary outcomes were operating time, death from bleeding complications up to 30 days, postoperative bleeding up to 30 days, unplanned return to the operating room for bleeding complications management up to 30 days, quality of life, and adverse events. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for each outcome. MAIN RESULTS: We found 24 randomized controlled trials that included a total of 2376 participants who met the inclusion criteria. All trials compared sealant use with standard care controls, including oxidized cellulose, gelatin sponge, and manual compression. All trials were at high risk of performance bias, detection bias, and other sources of bias. We downgraded the certainty of evidence for risk of bias concerns, inconsistency, imprecision and possible publication bias. Combining data on time to hemostasis showed that sealant use may reduce the mean time to hemostasis compared to control (mean difference (MD) -230.09 seconds, 95% confidence interval (CI) -329.24 to -130.94; P < 0.00001; 7 studies, 498 participants; low-certainty evidence). Combining data on failure of hemostatic intervention showed that sealant use may reduce the rate of failure compared to control, but the evidence is very uncertain (risk ratio (RR) 0.46, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.61; P < 0.00001; 17 studies, 2120 participants; very low-certainty evidence). We did not detect any clear differences between the sealant and control groups for intraoperative blood loss (MD -32.69 mL, 95% CI -96.21 to 30.83; P = 0.31; 3 studies, 266 participants; low-certainty evidence); operating time (MD -18.72 minutes, 95% CI -40.18 to 2.73; P = 0.09; 4 studies, 436 participants; low-certainty evidence); postoperative bleeding (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.04; P = 0.09; 9 studies, 1216 participants; low-certainty evidence), or unplanned return to the operating room (RR 0.27, 95% CI 0.04 to 1.69; P = 0.16; 8 studies, 721 participants; low-certainty evidence). No studies reported death from bleeding or quality of life outcomes. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Based on meta-analysis of 24 trials with 2376 participants, our review demonstrated that sealant use for achieving anastomotic hemostasis in vascular surgery patients may result in reduced time to hemostasis, and may reduce rates of hemostatic intervention failure, although the evidence is very uncertain, when compared to standard controls. Our analysis showed there may be no differences in intraoperative blood loss, operating time, postoperative bleeding up to 30 days, and unplanned return to the operating room for bleeding complications up to 30 days. Deaths and quality of life could not be analyzed. Limitations include the risk of bias in all studies. Our review has demonstrated that using sealants may reduce the time required to achieve hemostasis and the rate of hemostatic failure. However, a significant risk of bias was identified in the included studies, and future trials are needed to provide unbiased data and address other considerations such as cost-effectiveness and adverse events with sealant use.

Distal Adjuncts for High-Risk Lower Extremity Bypasses.

BACKGROUND: This review will discuss the use of distal adjuncts for improving graft patency in high-risk lower extremity bypasses. METHODS: Factors that contribute to the increased risk of failure in high-risk lower extremity bypasses, such as the use of nonautogenous conduits, the creation of bypasses to very distal arterial targets, and bypasses in patients with significant tibial arterial disease, will be discussed. RESULTS: The use of surgical techniques such as creating venous cuffs, venous patches, and arteriovenous fistulas have been shown to improve the patency of high-risk bypasses. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the increased risk of failure, the use of surgical adjuncts such as cuffs, patches, and arteriovenous fistulas can improve the patency rates of high-risk lower extremity bypasses.

Quality of Life in Patients With Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia Treated With Revascularization.

BACKGROUND: In the BEST-CLI trial (Best Endovascular Versus Best Surgical Therapy for Patients With Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia), a prespecified secondary objective was to assess the effects of revascularization strategy on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). METHODS: Patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia were randomized to surgical bypass (Bypass) or endovascular intervention (Endo) in 2 parallel trials. Cohort 1 included patients with single-segment great saphenous vein; cohort 2 included those lacking suitable single-segment great saphenous vein. HRQoL was assessed over the trial duration using Vascular Quality-of-Life (VascuQoL), European Quality-of-Life-5D (EQ-5D), the Short Form-12 (SF-12) Physical Component Summary (SF-12 PCS), SF-12 Mental Component Summary (SF-12 MCS), Utility Index Score (SF-6D R2), and numeric rating scales of pain. HRQoL was summarized by cohort and compared within and between groups using mixed-model linear regression. RESULTS: A total of 1193 and 335 patients in cohorts 1 and 2 with a mean follow-up of 2.9 and 2.0 years, respectively, were analyzed. In cohort 1, HRQoL significantly improved from baseline to follow-up for both groups across all measures. For example, mean (SD) VascuQoL scores were 3.0 (1.3) and 3.0 (1.2) for Bypass and Endo at baseline and 4.7 (1.4) and 4.8 (1.5) over follow-up. There were significant group differences favoring Endo when assessed with VascuQoL (difference, -0.14 [95% CI, -0.25 to -0.02]; P=0.02), SF-12 MCS (difference, -1.03 [95% CI, -1.89 to -0.18]; P=0.02), SF-6D R2 (difference, -0.01 [95% CI, -0.02 to -0.001]; P=0.03), numeric rating scale pain at present (difference, 0.26 [95% CI, 0.03 to 0.49]; P=0.03), usual level during previous week (difference, 0.26 [95% CI, 0.04 to 0.48]; P=0.02), and worst level during previous week (difference, 0.29 [95% CI, 0.02 to 0.56]; P=0.04). There was no difference between treatment arms on the basis of EQ-5D (difference, -0.01 [95% CI, -0.03 to 0.004]; P=0.12) or SF-12 PCS (difference, -0.41 [95% CI, -1.2 to 0.37]; P=0.31). In cohort 2, HRQoL also significantly improved from baseline to the end of follow-up for both groups based on all measures, but there were no differences between Bypass and Endo on any measure. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia deemed eligible for either Bypass or Endo, revascularization resulted in significant and clinically meaningful improvements in HRQoL. In patients with an available single-segment great saphenous vein for bypass, but not among those without one, Endo was statistically superior on some HRQoL measures; however, these differences were below the threshold of clinically meaningful difference.

YouTube as a Source of Patient and Trainee Education in Vascular Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Objective: Due to its video based approach, YouTube has become a widely accessed educational resource for patients and trainees. This systematic review characterised and evaluated the peer reviewed literature investigating YouTube as a source of patient or trainee education in vascular surgery. Data sources: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Ovid HealthStar from inception until 19 January 2023. All primary studies and conference abstracts evaluating YouTube as a source of vascular surgery education were included. Review methods: Video educational quality was analysed across several factors, including pathology, video audience, and length. Results: Overall, 24 studies were identified examining 3 221 videos with 123.1 hours of content and 37.1 million views. Studies primarily examined YouTube videos on diabetic foot care (7/24, 29%), peripheral arterial disease (3/24, 13%), carotid artery stenosis (3/24, 13%), varicose veins (3/24, 13%), and abdominal aortic aneurysm (2/24, 8%). Video educational quality was analysed using standardised assessment tools, author generated scoring systems, or global author reported assessment of quality. Six studies assessed videos for trainee education, while 18 studies evaluated videos for patient education. Among the 20 studies which reported on the overall quality of educational content, 10/20 studies deemed it poor, and 10/20 studies considered it fair, with 53% of studies noting poor educational quality for videos intended for patients and 40% of studies noting poor educational quality in videos intended for trainees. Poor quality videos had more views than fair quality videos (mean 27 348, 95% CI 15 154-39 543 views vs. 11 372, 95% CI 3 115-19 629 views, p = .030). Conclusion: The overall educational quality of YouTube videos for vascular surgery patient and trainee education is suboptimal. There is significant heterogeneity in the quality assessment tools used in their evaluation. A standardised approach to online education with a consistent quality assessment tool is required to better support online patient and trainee education in vascular surgery.

The CathCam: A Novel Angioscopic Solution for Endovascular Interventions.

Peripheral arterial diseases are commonly managed with endovascular procedures, which often face limitations in device control and visualization under X-ray fluoroscopy guidance. In response, we developed the CathCam, an angioscope integrated into an expandable cable-driven parallel mechanism to enhance real-time visualization, precise device positioning and catheter support for successful plaque crossing. The primary objective of this study was to assess and compare the performance of the novel CathCam with respect to conventional catheters and the CathPilot (i.e., CathCam without the angioscope), for applications in crossing chronic total occlusions (CTO). We first assessed the system in 3D-printed phantom models, followed by an ex vivo evaluation with CTO samples from a patient's superficial femoral artery. We measured and compared success rates, crossing times, and fluoroscopy times in both experiments. The CathCam demonstrated a 100% success rate in phantom experiments and a 75% success rate in ex vivo experiments with CTO samples, compared to conventional catheters, with 35% and 25% success rates, respectively. The average crossing times for the CathCam and the conventional catheter were 31 s and 502 s for the phantom experiments and 210 s and 511 s for the actual CTO lesions. The Cathcam also showed to be a reliable endovascular imaging approach in an in vivo experiment. Compared to conventional catheters, the CathCam significantly increased the success rate and reduced crossing and fluoroscopy times in both phantom and ex vivo setups. CathCam can potentially improve clinical outcomes for minimally invasive endovascular interventions by offering high-resolution real-time imaging alongside accurate device control.

Evaluation of the Efficacy of an Online Learning Module to Increase Wound Care Theoretical Knowledge Amongst Medical Students.

OBJECTIVE: We developed and evaluated an online learning module for teaching wound care basics to junior medical learners, which was assessed for its ability to increase theoretical knowledge of wound care, and medical learners' perceptions on the use of an online module to teach wound care practices. DESIGN: Between February 2022 to November 2022, participants were enrolled into our unblinded, matched-pair single-arm study. Participants completed a pre- and postquiz prior to and after completing the online module, respectively. Scores on the pre- and postquiz were matched by participant and evaluated for improvement. The online module was composed of free text, animated videos with voiceovers, pictorial examples, and tables, as well as unscored knowledge checks, covering the categories of i) normal wound healing physiology, ii) describing wounds/assessment of wounds, iii) choosing dressings for wounds, and iv) addressing and understanding wound aetiologies, including diabetic, arterial, and venous ulcers. SETTING: Participants were enrolled at the University of Toronto in Toronto, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were recruited from the undergraduate medicine and physician assistant programs at the University of Toronto. Students were provided with information on how to participate in the study through email and in-person recruitment. Thirty-three participants entered the study, and 23 participants completed the study. RESULTS: Across all participants, the prequiz to postquiz score increase averaged 13.29%, representing a statistically significant increase (p = 0.0000013). Ten of the 20 questions and all question categories had a statistically significant increase in the postquiz scores. All respondents found the module very useful (67%) or extremely useful (33%) for learning wound care, and 67% were very satisfied overall with the quality of the module, with the remainder (33%) of respondents somewhat satisfied. CONCLUSIONS: Online learning modules are effective at increasing wound care knowledge in junior medical learners, with high satisfaction amongst learners.

Evaluating YouTube as a Source of Education for Patients Undergoing Surgery: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this systematic review is to characterize the peer-reviewed literature investigating YouTube as a source of patient education for patients undergoing surgery. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: YouTube is the largest online video sharing platform and has become a substantial source of health information that patients are likely to access before surgery, yet there has been no systematic assessment of peer-reviewed studies. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Ovid HealthStar from inception through to December of 2021. METHODS: All primary studies evaluating YouTube as a source of patient education relating to surgical procedures (general, cardiac, urology, otolaryngology, plastic, vascular) were included. Study screening and data extraction occurred in duplicate with two reviewers. Characteristics extracted included video length, view count, upload source, overall video educational quality, and quality of individual studies. RESULTS: Among 6,453 citations, 56 studies were identified that examined 6,797 videos with 547 hours of content and 1.39 billion views. There were 49 studies that evaluated the educational quality of the videos. A total of 43 quality assessment tools were used, with each study using a mean of 1.90 assessment tools. Per the global rating for assessments, 34/49 studies (69%) concluded that the overall quality of educational content was poor. CONCLUSIONS: While the impact of non-peer-reviewed YouTube videos on patient knowledge for surgery is unclear, the large amount of online content suggests that they are in demand. The overall educational content of these videos is poor, however, and there is substantial heterogeneity in the quality assessment tools used in their evaluation. A peer-reviewed and standardized approach to online education with video content is needed to better support patients.

The CathPilot: Performance Validation and Preclinical Safety and Feasibility Assessment.

OBJECTIVES: Peripheral endovascular revascularization procedures often fail due to technical limitations of guidewire support, steering, and visualization. The novel CathPilot catheter aims to address these challenges. This study assesses the safety and feasibility of the CathPilot and compares its performance to conventional catheters for peripheral vascular interventions. METHODS: The study compared the CathPilot to non-steerable and steerable catheters. The success rates and access times for a relevant target inside a tortuous vessel phantom model were assessed. The reachable workspace within the vessel and the guidewire's force delivery capabilities were also evaluated. To validate the technology, chronic total occlusion tissue samples were used ex vivo to compare crossing success rates with conventional catheters. Finally, in vivo experiments in a porcine aorta were conducted to evaluate safety and feasibility. RESULTS: The success rates for reaching the set targets were 31%, 69%, and 100% with the non-steerable catheter, the steerable catheter, and the CathPilot, respectively. CathPilot had a significantly larger reachable workspace, and allowed for up to four times higher force delivery and pushability. In crossing of chronic total occlusion samples, the CathPilot achieved a success rate of 83% and 100%, for fresh and fixed lesions respectively, which was also significantly higher than conventional catheters. The device was fully functional in the in vivo study, and there were no signs of coagulation or damage to the vessel wall. CONCLUSION: This study shows the safety and feasibility of the CathPilot system and its potential to reduce failure and complication rates in peripheral vascular interventions. The novel catheter outperformed conventional catheters in all defined metrics. This technology can potentially improve the success rate and outcome of peripheral endovascular revascularization procedures.

General versus loco-regional anesthesia for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.

BACKGROUND: Aortic aneurysms occur when the aorta, the body's largest artery, grows in size, and can occur in the thoracic or abdominal aorta. The approaches to repair aortic aneurysms include directly exposing the aorta and replacing the diseased segment via open repair, or endovascular repair. Endovascular repair uses fluoroscopic-guidance to access the aorta and deliver a device to exclude the aneurysmal aortic segment without requiring a large surgical incision. Endovascular repair can be performed under a general anesthetic, during which the unconscious patient is paralyzed and reliant on an anesthetic machine to maintain the airway and provide oxygen to the lungs, or a loco-regional anesethetic, for which medications are administered to provide the person with sufficient sedation and pain control without requiring a general anesthetic. While people undergoing general anesthesia are more likely to remain still during surgery and have a well-controlled airway in the event of unanticipated complications, loco-regional anesthesia is associated with fewer postoperative complications in some studies. It remains unclear which anesthetic technique is associated with better outcomes following the endovascular repair of aortic aneurysms. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the benefits and harms of general anesthesia compared to loco-regional anesthesia for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. SEARCH METHODS: We used standard, extensive Cochrane search methods. The latest search was 11 March 2022. SELECTION CRITERIA: We searched for all randomized controlled trials that assessed the effects of general anesthesia compared to loco-regional anesthesia for endovascular aortic aneurysm repairs. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were: all-cause mortality, length of hospital stay, length of intensive care unit stay. Our secondary outcomes were: incidence of endoleaks, requirement for re-intervention, incidence of myocardial infarction, quality of life, incidence of respiratory complications, incidence of pulmonary embolism, incidence of deep vein thrombosis, and length of procedure. We planned to use GRADE methodology to assess the certainty of evidence for each outcome. MAIN RESULTS: We found no studies, published or ongoing, that met our inclusion criteria. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We did not identify any randomized controlled trials that compared general versus loco-regional anesthesia for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. There is currently insufficient high-quality evidence to determine the benefits or harms of either anesthetic approach during endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. Well-designed prospective randomized trials with relevant clinical outcomes are needed to adequately address this.

Association Between Hospital Postoperative Troponin Use and Patient Outcomes After Vascular Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Acute myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery, which is most often symptomatically silent, is associated with increased mortality and morbidity. However, it is not known if routine postoperative troponin testing will affect patient outcomes. METHODS: We assembled a cohort of patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy or abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in Ontario, Canada, from 2010 to 2017. Hospitals were categorized into high, medium, and low troponin testing intensity based on the proportion of patients who received postoperative troponin testing. Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to assess the association between hospital-specific testing intensity and 30-day and 1-year major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) while adjusting for patient-, surgery-, and hospital-level factors. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 18,467 patients from 17 hospitals. Mean age was 72 years, and 74.0% were men. Rates of postoperative troponin testing were 77.5%, 35.8%, and 21.6% in the high-, medium-, and low-testing intensity hospitals, respectively. At 30 days, 5.3%, 5.3%, and 6.5% of patients in high-, medium-, and low-testing intensity hospitals experienced MACE, respectively. Higher troponin testing rate was associated with lower adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for MACE at 30 days (0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89-0.98) and at 1 year (0.97; 95% CI, 0.94-0.99) for each 10% increase in hospital troponin rate. Hospitals with high-testing intensity had higher rates of postoperative cardiology referrals, cardiovascular testing, and rates of new cardiovascular prescriptions. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing vascular surgery at hospitals with higher postoperative troponin testing intensity experienced fewer adverse outcomes than patients who had surgery at hospitals with lower testing intensity.

Experimental Protocol and Phantom Design and Development for Performance Characterization of Conventional Devices for Peripheral Vascular Interventions.

Conventional catheter-based interventions for treating peripheral artery disease suffer high failure and complication rates. The mechanical interactions with the anatomy constrain catheter controllability, while their length and flexibility limit their pushability. Also, the 2D X-ray fluoroscopy guiding these procedures fails to provide sufficient feedback about the device location relative to the anatomy. Our study aims to quantify the performance of conventional non-steerable (NS) and steerable (S) catheters in phantom and ex vivo experiments. In a 10 mm diameter, 30 cm long artery phantom model, with four operators, we evaluated the success rate and crossing time in accessing 1.25 mm target channels, the accessible workspace, and the force delivered through each catheter. For clinical relevance, we evaluated the success rate and crossing time in crossing ex vivo chronic total occlusions. For the S and NS catheters, respectively, users successfully accessed 69 and 31% of the targets, 68 and 45% of the cross-sectional area, and could deliver 14.2 and 10.2 g of mean force. Using a NS catheter, users crossed 0.0 and 9.5% of the fixed and fresh lesions, respectively. Overall, we quantified the limitations of conventional catheters (navigation, reachable workspace, and pushability) for peripheral interventions; this can serve as a basis for comparison with other devices.

Health utility in community-dwelling adults with dysvascular lower limb loss.

PURPOSE: Adults with dysvascular lower extremity amputation (LEA) experience a large number of secondary health conditions yet there is a gap in the literature on health utility scores for this population. A health utility score relates to a person's state of well-being, and is a single metric anchored at 0 (death) and 1 (perfect health). This study aimed to provide a descriptive account of health utility scores in community-dwelling adults with dysvascular LEA. METHODS: Participants were adults with dysvascular LEA who were 3 months post-amputation. Data collected included socio-demographic characteristics, the Special Interest Group in Amputee Medicine (SIGAM) grades, the dysvascular conditions scale (DCS), which is a scale developed for this study, and the Short Form-36 (SF-36). SF-6D health utility scores were derived from the SF-36 using a software algorithm. Participants were grouped into low-impact and high-impact groups based on self-reported severity of symptoms using the DCS. Health utility scores were compared between the low-impact and high-impact groups using independent t-tests. RESULTS: A total of 231 participants were enrolled in the study. The mean SF-6D health utility score was 0.689 (0.127). A significant association was found between health utility score and SIGAM grade (p < 0.001, η2 = .09). Health utility was positively associated with age (r = 0.137, p = 0.037) and months post-amputation (r = 0.141, p = 0.032), and negatively associated with DCS severity (r = -0.526, p < 0.001). Health utility scores were lower for participants in the DCS high-impact groups for conditions such as diabetes mellitus, phantom limb pain, musculoskeletal pain, back pain, psychological distress, depression, vision problems, and other pain. CONCLUSION: Cost-utility analyses rely on health utility estimates and our findings provide data for future economic evaluations that may assist policy makers in evidence informed allocation of healthcare resources for this population.

Exploring the psychosocial needs of persons with lower extremity amputation and feasibility of internet cognitive behavioural therapy: a qualitative study.

PURPOSE: Following major lower extremity amputation (LEA), patients experience significant emotional distress and are at risk for anxiety and depression. There is a lack of mental health supports for this population, and internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy (iCBT) may be a useful resource to meet this need. The purpose of this study was to use a qualitative approach to explore the mental health needs of LEA patients and to gauge their attitudes of the use of iCBT to help them cope with their amputation. METHODS: Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with inpatients and outpatients with LEA recruited from a major urban rehabilitation hospital. Data were analysed using inductive codebook thematic analysis (TA). RESULTS: Ten interviews were completed with individuals with LEA. The main themes identified were: (1) Fixating on the past; (2) Worry about the future; (3) Unmet mental health needs; (4) Barriers to Mental Health Support; (5) Importance of peer support; and (6) Tailoring iCBT. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight that patients with LEA are open to learning more about iCBT to meet their mental health needs. Key iCBT implementation considerations include taking into account issues of stigma associated with mental health, timing of delivery, levels of digital literacy, online security, and interactive content.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONFollowing lower extremity amputation (LEA), people experience significant emotional distress and are at risk for the development of anxiety and/or depression.Patients with LEA are receptive to an online mental health resource (i.e., internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy [iCBT]) but it needs to be tailored to meet the various mental health needs and digital literacy of the LEA population.The use of an implementation science approach can help identify factors related to the development and potential uptake of an iCBT for patients with LEA.

Qualitative research in vascular surgery.

Qualitative research aims to understand and describe subjective experiences and perceptions. Qualitative and mixed-methods research, in which quantitative and qualitative research methods are combined, is playing an increasingly bigger role in vascular surgery research. The aim of this review was to describe the fundamentals of qualitative research methods and its application in vascular surgery.

Canadian Cardiovascular Society 2022 Guidelines for Peripheral Arterial Disease.

Patients with widespread atherosclerosis such as peripheral artery disease (PAD) have a high risk of cardiovascular and limb symptoms and complications, which affects their quality of life and longevity. Over the past 2 decades there have been substantial advances in diagnostics, pharmacotherapy, and interventions including endovascular and open surgical to aid in the management of PAD patients. To summarize the evidence regarding approaches to diagnosis, risk stratification, medical and intervention treatments for patients with PAD, guided by the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework, evidence was synthesized, and assessed for quality, and recommendations provided-categorized as weak or strong for each prespecified research question. Fifty-six recommendations were made, with 27% (15/56) graded as strong recommendations with high-quality evidence, 14% (8/56) were designated as strong recommendations with moderate-quality evidence, and 20% (11/56) were strong recommendations with low quality of evidence. Conversely 39% (22/56) were classified as weak recommendations. For PAD patients, strong recommendations on the basis of high-quality evidence, include smoking cessation interventions, structured exercise programs for claudication, lipid-modifying therapy, antithrombotic therapy with a single antiplatelet agent or dual pathway inhibition with low-dose rivaroxaban and aspirin; treatment of hypertension with an angiotensin converting enzyme or angiotensin receptor blocker; and for those with diabetes, a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor should be considered. Furthermore, autogenous grafts are more effective than prosthetic grafts for surgical bypasses for claudication or chronic limb-threatening ischemia involving the popliteal or distal arteries. Other recommendations indicated that new endovascular techniques and hybrid procedures be considered in patients with favourable anatomy and patient factors, and finally, the evidence for perioperative risk stratification for PAD patients who undergo surgery remains weak.

The timing of amputation of mangled lower extremities does not predict post-injury outcomes and mortality: A retrospective analysis from the ACS TQIP database.

BACKGROUND: While limb salvage does not result in improved functional outcomes among patients with a mangled lower extremity, the impact of attempted limb salvage on mortality and complications is poorly understood. The objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship between attempted limb salvage and in-hospital outcomes among patients with a mangled lower extremity. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of adults, 16 years or older, with a mangled lower extremity. Data were derived from the American College of Surgeons' Trauma Quality Improvement Program (2012-2017). We compared mortality, complications (severe sepsis, acute kidney injury [AKI], decubitus ulcers) and length of stay between patients managed with the intention of limb salvage (amputation beyond 24 hours or no amputation) and those who underwent early amputation (within 24 hours of presentation). Instrumental variable analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between management strategy and outcomes. RESULTS: We identified 5,527 patients with a mangled lower extremity, of which 901 (16.3%) underwent early amputation. Among those managed with attempted limb salvage, 42.5% underwent amputation prior to discharge. After adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics, there was no association between initial management strategy and mortality (odds ratio, 1.20; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83-1.74 early amputation vs. attempted limb salvage). Early amputation was associated with lower odds of AKI (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.39-0.88) and a trend toward shorter length of stay (relative risk, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.52-1.14). CONCLUSION: Over half of patients who sustain a mangled lower extremity undergo amputation during their initial hospital course. While a limb salvage strategy is associated with an elevated risk of AKI, there is no association between attempted limb preservation and mortality. These findings suggest that in patients in which there is no clear indication for early amputation, attempts at limb salvage do not come at the cost of increased mortality. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, level IV.