Midterm Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Revision Lateral Meniscal Allograft Transplantation.

Background: It is unknown whether the outcomes achieved in the early period after revision lateral meniscal allograft transplantation (RLMAT) are maintained through the midterm period. Purpose: To evaluate the midterm clinical and radiological results of patients who underwent RLMAT. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: We reviewed the outcomes of 19 RLMATs in 18 patients with at least 5 years of follow-up data. The mean follow-up period was 6 ± 1.1 years (range, 5-8.5 years). Clinical outcomes were assessed using the modified Lysholm score, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score, and the Tegner activity level. Radiographic progression of arthritis was measured by the absolute and relative joint space widths on 45° of knee flexion posteroanterior radiographs preoperatively, 1 year postoperatively, and at the latest follow-up.Failure was defined as meniscocapsular separation, removal, or tear of more than half of the meniscal allograft on postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or conversion to total knee arthroplasty. Of the 18 patients, 3 underwent ≥2 RLMATs. The survival rate was evaluated according to the number of revision surgeries. Results: For knees with an intact meniscus transplant at the final follow-up, the modified Lysholm and IKDC scores were significantly improved compared with preoperatively, but the Tegner activity level was unchanged. No significant differences were found in the absolute and relative joint space widths postoperatively. There were 6 failures within 3 years after RLMAT; the overall 5-year survival rate was 68.4% (13/19 knees). All failed knees showed bucket-handle tear patterns on MRI due to meniscocapsular healing failure. The survival rate decreased as the number of RLMATs increased-73.3% for a first RLMAT (n = 15 knees), 66.7% for a second RLMAT (n = 3 knees), and 0% for a third RLMAT (n = 1 knee). Midterm MRIs of 8 well-healed RLMATs showed evidence of meniscal degeneration; nonetheless, this did not affect clinical outcomes. Conclusion: The midterm results of RLMATs demonstrated a 5-year survival rate of 68.4% and positive clinical and radiological outcomes for failed MATs despite unimproved activity levels. Inadequate meniscocapsular healing was the leading cause of failure, and it needs to be carefully considered when performing RLMATs.

Association of Medial Meniscal Volume With Decreased Joint Space Width After Medial Opening-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy.

Background: Medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO) reduces contact stress by altering the weightbearing axis from the medial to the lateral compartment, relieves knee pain, and slows the progression of osteoarthritis. Purpose/Hypothesis: To evaluate whether the volume of the medial meniscus affects outcomes after MOWHTO. It was hypothesized that reduced medial meniscal volume would be associated with worse midterm clinical and radiographic outcomes. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Included were 59 patients who underwent MOWHTO and had ≥4 years of follow-up data. The mean follow-up period was 66.5 ± 15.1 months (range, 48-110 months). The cohort was classified into 3 groups according to the status of the medial meniscus on arthroscopic examination before osteotomy: no meniscal tear, degenerative tear leading to partial meniscectomy, and degenerative tear leading to subtotal meniscectomy. The Hospital for Special Surgery score and Knee Society objective and functional scores were compared among the groups at 2 time points (preoperative and latest follow-up), and the medial joint space width (JSW) was compared among the groups at 3 time points (preoperative, 1 year postoperative, and latest follow-up). Results: Overall, 9 patients had no meniscal tear, 20 patients underwent partial meniscectomy, and 30 patients underwent subtotal meniscectomy. The clinical scores improved significantly from preoperatively to the latest follow-up (P ≤ .001 for all), with no significant difference among the groups. Post hoc analysis indicated that at the latest follow-up, JSW was significantly lower in the subtotal meniscectomy group compared with the no-tear group on both 45° of flexion posterior-anterior (2.5 ± 1.3 vs 3.9 ± 1.8 mm; P = .004) and anterior-posterior (3.4 ± 1.1 vs 4.5 ± 0.9 mm; P = .011) radiographs. Conclusion: Subtotal meniscectomy of the medial meniscus performed during arthroscopic examination with MOWHTO was associated with decreased JSW at midterm follow-up. Efforts should be made to preserve the medial meniscus as much as possible during MOWHTO.

A comparison of barbed continuous suture versus conventional interrupted suture for fascial closure in total hip arthroplasty.

A barbed suture is a self-anchoring knotless suture hypothesized to shorten suture time and reduce the tension point of the wound. The purpose of this study was to compare the barbed suture and the interrupted suture for fascial closure in total hip arthroplasty. We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty from March 2014 to June 2020. We evaluated 324 cases among 274 patients consisting of 188 males and 86 females. We collected the following data: demographics, time for wound closure, the number of threads used, hemoglobin level, surgical site pain, and wound complications. Variables were analyzed for their association with closure time using multiple regression analyses between the barbed suture (the SFX group) and the interrupted suture (the Vicryl group). Mean closure time was 5.8 min lower and the mean number of sutures used was 2.2 lower in the SFX group versus the Vicryl group (P < 0.01 and < 0.01, respectively). There were no statistical intergroup differences in the mean largest hemoglobin drop, the incidence of transfusion, surgical site pain, and the incidence of wound complications. The use of barbed sutures for fascial closure in total hip arthroplasty effectively reduces the surgical time without increasing wound complications.

Distal chevron metatarsal osteotomy is a viable treatment option for hallux valgus with metatarsus adductus-multicentre retrospective study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the radiographic and clinical outcomes of patients with hallux valgus (HV) with concomitant metatarsus adductus (MA) treated with distal chevron metatarsal osteotomy (DCMO), without any procedure for the second or third metatarsal. METHODS: A multicentre retrospective study involving four hospitals was conducted. A total of 45 feet from 38 patients who had received DCMO for HV with MA with at least one year post-operative follow-up were analysed. HV angle (HVâ), inter-metatarsal angle (IMâ), MA angle (MAâ), and the lateral sesamoid grade were measured. Foot function index (FFI) and visual analogue scale (VAS) were recorded. Patients were divided into mild (18° ≤ MAâ < 20°) and moderate (20° ≤ MAâ) MA groups, and results were compared. RESULTS: The mean HVâ and IMâ improved significantly from 35.1° and 14.4° pre-operatively to 10.6° and 7.1° one year post-operatively (p < 0.001). There were no differences in pre-operative HVâ, IMâ, or the sesamoid grade, and also no difference in post-operative HVâ or the sesamoid grade between mild and moderate MA groups. Only the mean post-operative IMâ showed a difference between the two groups (8.3° vs. 6.3°; p = 0.019). All clauses of FFI and VAS improved significantly (p < 0.001). When the extent of improvement was compared between the two groups, there were no significant differences in any category (p > 0.05). The total rate of recurrence (HVâ ≥ 20°) was 11.1% (5/45), and although the moderate group (4/29, 13.8%) had a higher proportion than the mild group (1/16, 6.3%), this was not statistically significant (p = 0.641). CONCLUSION: DCMO for patients with HV with MA had satisfactory radiographic and clinical outcomes with minimal recurrence. Except in cases of severe combined deformity, we recommend performing DCMO alone without any additional procedure or manipulation of the other metatarsals as a viable treatment option.